What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2015 NBA Thread: I felt a great disturbance in the trolls, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. (4 Viewers)

i'm as appalled that the refs have called a single foul on Golden State as the GS players are

every single whistle is just astonishing. i can understand why they're complaining... so... #######,,, much

 
I think Barnes has cost himself tens of millions of dollars this series. He has been awful. If they had somebody passable playing small forward they would have won this series by now.
I think he's getting a max deal unless he has a major injury tonight. No matter how he performs. 

 
Barnes has sucked this finals but don't think he's losing any money. Everyone has loads to spend and he's still one of the best free agents available. He's still the #3 SF available this offseason IMO. The guys right behind him at SF have larger warts and a handful years older.....and will be getting paid handsomely as well. (Parsons/knee & Batum/2014 disappearing act)

If we're gonna mention Barnes, let's mention Ezeli (who has played a grand total of about 48 minutes this whole Finals.....with a banged up/out Bogut). Hell it's been widely reported for quite awhile Ezeli's been looking at $15+ mil/yr this offseason on a multi year deal..There's just a glut of similar big men available this offseason.......in an increasing small ball league. JMO If anyone's going to be shunned this offseason as far as paydays, it's not gonna be 24 year old Harrison Barnes thats shot 38% from 3 in his career. It's some of those middle tiered unversatile big men that can get run off the court who've been been reported to be getting just an asinine amt of money. Not gonna ramble off the list (as most can figure some of them out), but a lot of teams will throw near or max money at Barnes.
He can't beat centers off the dribble and he can only make shots when he is wide open. He's athletic enough to guard 3s and big enough to guard 4s at an acceptable level, but his skill set is something that can be found on the scrap heap during free agency. Matt Barnes has never made more than 3.4 million dollars in a season with that skill set. 

 
Him, rodman, artest, Lambier...who else belongs on our team of people you hate but would love to have on your squad?
Nearly exact thought crossed my mind a few minutes ago. He's one of those throwback punkass but great players that are seemingly so hard to find these days.

 
Kevin Love on fire, Cavs playing good ball, then gets banished to the bench and they kinda come unglued

Love has to keep playing well, ball needs to go through Lebron + he needs to take Green out of the game

 
Kevin Love on fire, Cavs playing good ball, then gets banished to the bench and they kinda come unglued

Love has to keep playing well, ball needs to go through Lebron + he needs to take Green out of the game
Other than Green, the Cavs have kept the Warriors in check. I'm not sure why they would be playing Shumpert and Jefferson so much rather than Love and Thompson to wipe up the offensive glass on all these missed jumpers.

 
This #### is fun. 

Cappy, deal right now. You and me at NBA finals in Orlando two* years.

*probably more like one.

 
I'm sure they didn't want TT to get his 3rd foul. He better make up for lost time in the 2nd half. Love has 2 also iirc.
I've never unstood sitting guys for long stretches if they are in light/moderate foul trouble. I get it if the 3rd foul comes with a couple minutes left in the half or they were a minute or two away from checking out anyway, but otherwise you are just preemptively punishing yourself for something that might happen. The player might take it a little easier to avoid fouls if you leave them in, but if the coach wouldn't have such a quick trigger for players in foul trouble I don't think it they would play much different. 

 
I assume Lebron's goal is just to keep it close for most of the game and then at some point in the middle of the 3rd he is going to tell his team "everyone just focus on making a defensive stop, let me handle the offense."

 
I've never unstood sitting guys for long stretches if they are in light/moderate foul trouble. I get it if the 3rd foul comes with a couple minutes left in the half or they were a minute or two away from checking out anyway, but otherwise you are just preemptively punishing yourself for something that might happen. The player might take it a little easier to avoid fouls if you leave them in, but if the coach wouldn't have such a quick trigger for players in foul trouble I don't think it they would play much different. 
I agree. Interesting that Lue said what I posted. I guess he disagrees.

Funny seeing Green heat check to start the 3rd. I guess he's not familiar with that role.

 
The best player to ever lace em up was desperate to pass there before takings less then confident shot. 

The boy is bad but if he doesn't put his head down and take the ball to the hole every time since he literally can't be stopped then y'all can have him. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top