I don't dispute that Kerr was able to instantly push some buttons that Jackson had completely missed, and as a result transformed this team. He deserves a ton of credit. But, I am not positive a replacement level coach doesn't do almost as well with this squad over most of the last two years (and especially post-Durant). I'm not sold that Walton is the next Red Auerbach, and Brown is clearly not a great coach, and they both got phenomenal results. For comparison's sake, if Phil Jackson missed a lot of time and his Bulls teams don't miss a beat, do we think about his legacy differently? I don't know that we do, but I think it's an interesting question.