Lets see if they can something with it.Packers now control their own density. Fire 'em all
Always the optimist, aren't you?Lets see if they can something with it.
I'd agree. The defense will be their downfall, either during the regular season or the playoffs. Wouldn't mind seeing Capers go but I think they need a lot more talent on that side of the ball. I don't see Shields coming back. Could use some DBs. Could also use another player (or 2 or 3) to put pressure on the QB.As long as Rodgers is on the field....
They need to beat Sam Glassford & Pad Statford sticking out his middle finger.
My money is on Rodgers.
I'm most concerned with the Packer defense.
That toupe' wearing DC needs to go. No more Domfense.
I appreciate the Super Bowl win but that was 6 years ago. Time for a change.
Capers stays or goes, doesn't really matter to me.I'd agree. The defense will be their downfall, either during the regular season or the playoffs. Wouldn't mind seeing Capers go but I think they need a lot more talent on that side of the ball. I don't see Shields coming back. Could use some DBs. Could also use another player (or 2 or 3) to put pressure on the QB.
See this would hurt my feelings if I wasn't spot on in my assessment of him over a year ago.My guess is the "some things" were the deluge of phone calls at halftime from Sabertooth.
Agreed 100%Capers stays or goes, doesn't really matter to me.
They've rebuilt the ILB position to an extent, and I think they can be fine there with Thomas, Ryan, and Martinez.
I'm of the belief that pass rush makes the all the difference for corners. As such, I'd be looking for another OLB to pressure the QB first. Then look CB.
Did you see the pic of Ryan's helmet after?So I gathered that two Packer's o-linemen where hurt immediately preceding the heave to Jordy. Any news there? I also gathered Thomas and Ryan were seen gimpy once or twice during the game, how about info on that.
I like that they Knocked the "C" out of the Bears.Did you see the pic of Ryan's helmet after?
https://mobile.twitter.com/JakeRyan_47/status/810623953257582600
Lane Taylor: http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/packers-lane-taylor-injures-hip-in-week-15/So I gathered that two Packer's o-linemen where hurt immediately preceding the heave to Jordy. Any news there? I also gathered Thomas and Ryan were seen gimpy once or twice during the game, how about info on that.
Thank you Man in the Yellow Hat. I have always admired the way you are patient with us inexperienced chimps, the way you help us find the information we need, the perspective we need. One question. Many times I have seen pictures of you driving your roadster. How do you keep your hat on in the rushing air?Lane Taylor: http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/packers-lane-taylor-injures-hip-in-week-15/
Taylor injured his hip late in Sunday's victory over the Bears, Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com reports.
Taylor was not on the field for the key 60-yard pass from Aaron Rodgers to Jordy Nelson that set up the game-winning field goal late in Sunday's game, but he indicated after the contest that he did not suffer any sort of serious injury, so the setback may not cost him any further action.
TJ Lang: http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/packers-tj-lang-has-strained-muscle-in-neck/
Lang has a strained muscle in his neck and upper back but expects to be fine, Ryan Wood of the Green Bay Press-Gazette reports.
Lang is notorious for toughing out injuries, and he seems as though he is ready to play through this one as well as the Packers make a playoff push. He should play against the Vikings in Week 16.
Nothing on Ryan, other than his ruined helmet.
Martinez was gimpy because he's not far removed from his sprained MCL. I don't think he played a lot, and he's not 100%.
He definitely needed to see the bench in that one.Randall needs a wake up call. Glad the first round free pass is over. He never had to earn anything and it shows.
The hat. Well, that's a secret I share with my monkey.Thank you Man in the Yellow Hat. I have always admired the way you are patient with us inexperienced chimps, the way you help us find the information we need, the perspective we need. One question. many times I have seen pictures of you driving your roadster. how do you keep your hat on in the rushing air?
I think Lane tried to run back on to the field after the bomb, but Rodgers told him to stay off the field. I assume to keep the line in tact since it was a rush to get everyone down/lined up and ball spiked and avoiding any penalties. Which is good we really can't afford to lose O-lineman (Not that any team can) with Aaron being gimpy.Lane Taylor: http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/football/news/packers-lane-taylor-injures-hip-in-week-15/
Taylor injured his hip late in Sunday's victory over the Bears, Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com reports.
Taylor was not on the field for the key 60-yard pass from Aaron Rodgers to Jordy Nelson that set up the game-winning field goal late in Sunday's game, but he indicated after the contest that he did not suffer any sort of serious injury, so the setback may not cost him any further action.
Is that what was going on back there as Rodgers was hobbling slowly down the field?I think Lane tried to run back on to the field after the bomb, but Rodgers told him to stay off the field. I assume to keep the line in tact since it was a rush to get everyone down/lined up and ball spiked and avoiding any penalties. Which is good we really can't afford to lose O-lineman (Not that any team can) with Aaron being gimpy.
Would Rodgers have let them carry him like Leftwich at Marshall?Is that what was going on back there as Rodgers was hobbling slowly down the field?
Yeah, I think it was Lane trying to run back on and Rodgers told him to stay back, very smart by Rodgers, an offensive penalty could have been a run-off.Is that what was going on back there as Rodgers was hobbling slowly down the field?
The man is in full command of his instrument.Yeah, I think it was Lane trying to run back on and Rodgers told him to stay back, very smart by Rodgers, an offensive penalty could have been a run-off.
Ahman Green has a fantastic career in GB. Cook would be nice because he's such a good receiver out of the back field...something this offense has been sorely lacking for quick some time. All this Cook talk was before Montgomery looked like a legit option at RB, when their RB cupboard was completely bare. Now that's he's put together some nice (and a great one yesterday) games at least personally I'm not fully on board the Cook train like I was a few weeks ago. I'd still like him though but I'm guessing and rightfully so they'll look at DB's early and often this upcoming draft.I need a Packers fan to tell me why Dalvin Cook to Greenbay would be a good thing. I just don't see it. It's not like they would feature him. He would likely be splitting carries with Ty Montgomery his entire career. When was the last time Greenbay had a feature running back while McCarthy was head coach. I can't remember. Lacy has always split carries with Starks. Not to mention Rodgers would die without throwing it up 50 times per game. The way I see it, Greenbay is where running backs go to die.
Good point on receiving ability. Montgomery is a RB now, I don't think there is any doubt. If you can pair him 1-2 with Michael next season, that serves this offense very well. No need to draft one in that case.Ahman Green has a fantastic career in GB. Cook would be nice because he's such a good receiver out of the back field...something this offense has been sorely lacking for quick some time. All this Cook talk was before Montgomery looked like a legit option at RB, when their RB cupboard was completely bare. Now that's he's put together some nice (and a great one yesterday) games at least personally I'm not fully on board the Cook train like I was a few weeks ago. I'd still like him though but I'm guessing and rightfully so they'll look at DB's early and often this upcoming draft.
Where are all these uber talented running backs that have wasted away in Green Bay in recent years? When they've had talent, and stayed healthy, they produced.Some of Montgomery's runs yesterday looked highy improvised - almost like a chicken with its head cut off. He still has a lot to learn IMO. But thankfully, the Bears defense couldn't tackle a kikndergarten math problem. I would hate to see Lacy resigned because they will never run him into the ground like I think he needs to be and I would also hate a highly touted rookie to be sent there. Just my two cents. I hate Greenbay for RBs.
Being a running back is all about improvisation. You run the direction of the play call, read what's happening, and react accordingly. Montgomery has shown very good patience to setup blocks, excellent vision to find running lanes, and strength to break tackles (and throw some stiff arms.)georg013 said:Some of Montgomery's runs yesterday looked highy improvised - almost like a chicken with its head cut off. He still has a lot to learn IMO. But thankfully, the Bears defense couldn't tackle a kikndergarten math problem. I would hate to see Lacy resigned because they will never run him into the ground like I think he needs to be and I would also hate a highly touted rookie to be sent there. Just my two cents. I hate Greenbay for RBs.
Id worry about such shots with most RBs. Its not as if Ty is built like a tiny WR or anything.TY also has the advantage of having the best player in (perhaps) the history of the NFL playing Quarterback and keeping defenses honest. So he has that going for him, which is nice.
Ty did take a huge shot last game though when he was almost down, no chance to avoid it. Those are the shots I worry about.
He does look light in the legs.Not tiny but he is high cut for a RB. Most 220 lbs backs are all ### and hips.
Yeah...that was the worst thing about giving up that TD when they were up 17 to start the 4th quarter. Though...with a stop there, will they sit Rodgers.Well it is nice to now be in the 6th slot for the playoffs as opposed to sitting two slots out. Still, that slot is precarious. Need to put a quick and decisive whopping on the Vikes on Saturday and do so with no injuries, and ideally the ability to rest Rodger is the second half. From there they can enjoy knowing that Detroit cannot even be thinking of them for another two days since their game with the Cowboys will not be over. This time of year I will gladly take an extra two days of rest over an opponent, particularly when one has to be the traveling team. It sort of evens things up a bit.
Pretty tough thing to do unless the game is completely out of hand.Yeah...that was the worst thing about giving up that TD when they were up 17 to start the 4th quarter. Though...with a stop there, will they sit Rodgers.
Sure...I think the way things were going, a 17 point lead part way into the 4th quarter would have been a good time for it.Pretty tough thing to do unless the game is completely out of hand.
Why would Montgomery not be a good pass catching back? After all he has caught a few passes in his life...Ahman Green has a fantastic career in GB. Cook would be nice because he's such a good receiver out of the back field...something this offense has been sorely lacking for quick some time. All this Cook talk was before Montgomery looked like a legit option at RB, when their RB cupboard was completely bare. Now that's he's put together some nice (and a great one yesterday) games at least personally I'm not fully on board the Cook train like I was a few weeks ago. I'd still like him though but I'm guessing and rightfully so they'll look at DB's early and often this upcoming draft.
I've never seen him up close, but that is counter to the draft profile on him:Not tiny but he is high cut for a RB. Most 220 lbs backs are all ### and hips.
My issue with McCarthy is he could make it easier on himself with his play calling. Start of the season he relies on deep ball to move the offense, which is helped a lot by Rodgers buying time for the WRs. When it doesn't work he takes a while but goes to a shorter passing game that isn't exciting but team moves the ball. In this latest hot streak we saw more use of a FB and under center Rodger till he got hurt. I would like to know why he doesn't start season with more of these type of formations and play calls. McCarthy is always saying he wants to run the ball and use multiple TE looks. But to start the season those looks and plays are not there.Just thought I'd share this for those that think McCarthy should go.
Mike Freeman's 10-Point Stance: Packers May Be as Good as We Thought They Were
Nice to see the high praise for Rodgers. But also an interesting perspective on McCarthy.