Frostillicus
Footballguy
Any GM who wouldn't trade Simmons for Gobert + Mitchell shouldn't have a job.
And even when he does he will tell us how he knew Mitchell was going to be a stud in 6th grade and was screaming at the television for the Bulls to take him.Has @DJackson10 weighed in on Simmons vs. Mitchell?
Upset is putting it lightly. It goes from a few people preferring Mitchell over Simmons, to Simmons is so bad he will be cut.at Philly fans getting so upset about this
I actually thought it was funny all of the non-Sixers caring so much and being upset with it. Like, why even care about a rookie on another team?at Philly fans getting so upset about this
I had a room mate in college; when we were playing pickup games out on the quad, he would trash talk and say that you can't leave him open at half court, he'll take that shot all day. He would and he'd always miss. The misses never stopped him from saying it though.Come on. That can’t be real.
Michael Bauer?I had a room mate in college; when we were playing pickup games out on the quad, he would trash talk and say that you can't leave him open at half court, he'll take that shot all day. He would and he'd always miss. The misses never stopped him from saying it though.
Not sure what basketball reference's "heave" criteria is, but it has Simmons down for 8 heaves out of 11 3P attempts this year.Come on. That can’t be real.
The reason I'm engaging you is because the comparison is saying something bad about Magic or ridiculously great about Ben. Magic took down Dr J, Chocolate Thunder, Bobby Jones, Maurice Cheeks and Lionell Hollins without Jabbar. He had Wilkes, Nixon and Cooper. He played spectacularly, willed his team to a championship as a rookie. That's a stat. Magic 1 (100% rookie championships). Ben 0 (0%). Ben played like a deer in the headlights on both ends of the court over and over again. He looked bewildered for entire quarters at a time. He did this to the point that the 6ers got big lifts from McConnell with Ben's rump on the pine, ffs. Drop the Magic comparisons and I'll disengage. Try Fat Lever. He averaged 19, 9, 8 one year Denver bowed out early like Philly (as opposed to winning a title like Magic). Actually Fat was way better than Ben, if you know, stats are how you judge players. He actually hit some threes too.I compared to Simmons rookie stats to one of the best players who ever lace them up. And Simmons stats are every bit as good. If you're trying to get me to say something bad about magic, it will never happen. One of my favorite players ever. Just loving what the future holds for Simmons and the Sixers.
Nobody has said or even implied this. I even went as far to say he’s great. Your problem is you aren’t willing to listen to any objective criticism of your favorite players without making up some ridiculous hyperbolic comments that nobody said., to Simmons is so bad he will be cut.
I had to google him. Apparently I've avoided following them since I graduated. Looks like Michael made a few. My room mate made not a single one I ever saw him attempt. Also had one of our buddies offer to spot him 10 points to get to 11, 1 on 1 for $100. Room mate always weaseled out of it.Michael Bauer?
I bet the Sixers cut him. ROFL. Dude, we get your point. You prefer Mitchell. You're kind of going a little overboard now acting like the guy sucks. If you want any basketball credibility at all, you might want to tone down the shtick.
Nobody has said or even implied this. I even went as far to say he’s great. Your problem is you aren’t willing to listen to any objective criticism of your favorite players without making up some ridiculous hyperbolic comments that nobody said.
Why would I want you to disengage? I could have this conversation all day everyday. I know you're more intelligent than you're letting on but I'm going to say this in a simpler way so that I'm sure you understand this time. Ben Simmons is not as good as Magic Johnson. Are we clear on that? Can you understand that I agree with you on that? And can you now move past it? What I said was, and we'll stand by, is that Ben Simmons has a similar skill set. He's a big man who is a good ball-handler, great penetrator, has awesome court vision, and can rebound like a power forward. Where they are dissimilar, is that Magic Johnson was a better shooter then Simmons is. And now I will repeat something else I've said multiple times. I hope that Simmons develops a jump shot. That will take him from a very good player, to a great player in this league. Is there anything in that that you disagree with?The reason I'm engaging you is because the comparison is saying something bad about Magic or ridiculously great about Ben. Magic took down Dr J, Chocolate Thunder, Bobby Jones, Maurice Cheeks and Lionell Hollins without Jabbar. He had Wilkes, Nixon and Cooper. He played spectacularly, willed his team to a championship as a rookie. That's a stat. Magic 1 (100% rookie championships). Ben 0 (0%). Ben played like a deer in the headlights on both ends of the court over and over again. He looked bewildered for entire quarters at a time. He did this to the point that the 6ers got big lifts from McConnell with Ben's rump on the pine, ffs. Drop the Magic comparisons and I'll disengage. Try Fat Lever. He averaged 19, 9, 8 one year Denver bowed out early like Philly (as opposed to winning a title like Magic). Actually Fat was way better than Ben, if you know, stats are how you judge players. He actually hit some threes too.
Huh? He is doing exactly what she pointed out.He’s a Sixers fan...doing the same thing she was doing. The ROFL and the rest of his post wasn’t a hint? ?
Um... dammit... no.Why would I want you to disengage? I could have this conversation all day everyday. I know you're more intelligent than you're letting on but I'm going to say this in a simpler way so that I'm sure you understand this time. Ben Simmons is not as good as Magic Johnson. Are we clear on that? Can you understand that I agree with you on that? And can you now move past it? What I said was, and we'll stand by, is that Ben Simmons has a similar skill set. He's a big man who is a good ball-handler, great penetrator, has awesome court vision, and can rebound like a power forward. Where they are dissimilar, is that Magic Johnson was a better shooter then Simmons is. And now I will repeat something else I've said multiple times. I hope that Simmons develops a jump shot. That will take him from a very good player, to a great player in this league. Is there anything in that that you disagree with?
No, you guys are right. He's the GOAT. Would probably be in his best interest to retire now and preserve his legacy.shtick?
would the start of Jason Kidd's career be a useful comparison? My memory is not what used to be but I seem to remember him being similar to Ben in that he was above average in everything except shooting.. Drop the Magic comparisons and I'll disengage. Try Fat Lever. He averaged 19, 9, 8 one year Denver bowed out early like Philly (as opposed to winning a title like Magic). Actually Fat was way better than Ben, if you know, stats are how you judge players. He actually hit some threes too.
Yup and it took 17 years in a less 3 pt intensive league for him to get a ring in Dallas.would the start of Jason Kidd's career be a useful comparison? My memory is not what used to be but I seem to remember him being similar to Ben in that he was above average in everything except shooting.
I don't think you can make career arc comparisons to past players with the current state of the game. Shooting is essential.would the start of Jason Kidd's career be a useful comparison? My memory is not what used to be but I seem to remember him being similar to Ben in that he was above average in everything except shooting.
Maybe you should probably just do that Homer Simpson backing into the trees thing here.No, you guys are right. He's the GOAT. Would probably be in his best interest to retire now and preserve his legacy.
If we’re comparing the outside shooting and trying to project Simmons going forward, Kidd was still way ahead of Simmons, shooting 27% on 3.3 attempts per game as a rookie. Rondo was mentioned earlier and I think that’s as close as we’re going to get.would the start of Jason Kidd's career be a useful comparison? My memory is not what used to be but I seem to remember him being similar to Ben in that he was above average in everything except shooting.
You mean what you should have done after my initial response?Maybe you should probably just do that Homer Simpson backing into the trees thing here.
You mean what you should have done after my initial response?
you are so lost here. It’s amazing. If you'd like to get back on track I can drop a couple more turd predictions and then double back later to mock my own stupidity.wowzer, this threadfor the past 10 hours.
We should probably stipulate that comparing three pointers is always a waste here with Simmons because of how epic it was. There has to be an incredibly small amount of NBA rookie guards in history that made no 3 pointers, with any where near his minutes.If we’re comparing the outside shooting and trying to project Simmons going forward, Kidd was still way ahead of Simmons, shooting 27% on 3.3 attempts per game as a rookie. Rondo was mentioned earlier and I think that’s as close as we’re going to get.
it's funny looking back at the last 3 pages, I am sure it is much different looking at it from the outside after all the posts, but this was quite a #### show in here today. So yeah, predictions are always funTobiasFunke said:If you'd like to get back on track I can drop a couple more turd predictions and then double back later to mock my own stupidity.
.
.Exactly my thoughts and my predictions have been equally as bad.My new terrible prediction:
I think the Warriors are going to roll the Rockets in 5 or fewer. I think it's a good matchup for them on the court- as their length, athleticism and ability to switch 1-5 will allow them to contest the Rockets at the 3 point line in a way other teams can't. I also kinda suspect they've been on cruise control basically since signing Durant and this Rockets team- really the first team since then that the media and public have treated as their peers- will motivate them to play at a level we've never seen before.
I've given up on trying to figure out anything involving the Celtics.
It's still a zillion times better than rock action's thread in the political subform.modogg said:wowzer, this threadfor the past 10 hours.
it's not like he's Aaron Rodgers for chrissakesCapella said:It’s amazing. HOW DARE YOU NOT UNILATERALY LOVE MY FAVORITE PLAYER AS UNOBJECTIVELY AS I DO. HE SCORED 15 POINTS PER GAME
Aaron Rodgers sucks!it's not like he's Aaron Rodgers for chrissakes
Capella said:Right. You could see the Celtics just drag off him when he was at the top of the key, just begging him to shoot. They were playing 4 on 5 with him on offense at times. They had no chance with that guy out there.
To be fair saying the Sixers had no chance with Simmons playing is a little hyperbolic. I thought all but game 1 could have gone either way.Capella said:Nobody has said or even implied this. I even went as far to say he’s great. Your problem is you aren’t willing to listen to any objective criticism of your favorite players without making up some ridiculous hyperbolic comments that nobody said.
Exactly, he is a historic player.NewlyRetired said:We should probably stipulate that comparing three pointers is always a waste here with Simmons because of how epic it was. There has to be an incredibly small amount of NBA rookie guards in history that made no 3 pointers, with any where near his minutes.
Ya wanna know who did it (not as a rookie). Magic ####### Johnson, that’s who.NewlyRetired said:We should probably stipulate that comparing three pointers is always a waste here with Simmons because of how epic it was. There has to be an incredibly small amount of NBA rookie guards in history that made no 3 pointers, with any where near his minutes.
It ended with Cleveland's point guard hitting a 3-point shot.Can you guys go back to discussing how the Cavs came back from 3-1 down to beat the Warriors?
Exactly. In the very thread where everybody is talking about what a genius Stevens is and how awesome all of their players are, we have guys talking about the Sixers like the process has failed and they need to go back to the drawing board. If two shots fall for the Sixers, they're taking a 3-2 lead into a home game six. The overreactions of people are absolutely hilarious.To be fair saying the Sixers had no chance with Simmons playing is a little hyperbolic. I thought all but game 1 could have gone either way.![]()