I'm actually a Chip Kelly fan
I was surprised he failed in the NFL, he's so innovative and smart I thought he could easily adjust. To me he's much like Barry Switzer, a smart guy with a very particular way of administering that leads to success. Switzer won a Super Bowl, but I could have coached that team to at least the NFCCG.
He's gonna have to adjust at UCLA (the USC jab was shtick, I commented on his arrival at UCLA earlier in the thread), you just have a higher academic standard there and the athletes you can get there is limited like it is at Stanford, Northwestern, Notre Dame, Boston College, etc. That's not disparaging Oregon either, they are like Florida, Ohio State, Oklahoma, or Alabama. There are standards but they are secondary to athletic success and that is the business of college football.
UCLA could lower standards but as successful as they have been in general, over the years, it isn't gonna be like that institution is going to relent to the powers of Chip Kelly. He's gonna have to recruit differently, build differently, execute differently. I think he can do it and UCLA could be a monster if he can keep innovating, develop new concepts to win football games, and play with a flare that he's known for.
Since I don't care about the pac12 and don't really dislike UCLA, I hope he does well. I'd rather he gone to Arizona State where he'd have no restrictions, but I'm glad he didn't land at Texas Tech or Nebraska. I want him no where near my programs.