What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2022-23 NBA Thread: “you’ll never let me down like the Heat did”, Miami fan says to giant pile of cocaine (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
This was true, but there have been some additional recent studies that suggest otherwise. The data that the prior studies was based on was relatively simple and more recent studies have tried to account for more variables and reach some different conclusions
Cool. Would love to read the latest studies as a guy who loves stats and actual basketball.
I think this was the main development after the earlier studies: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.3982/ECTA14943

I think it is still a matter of some debate though
 
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
Not sure I get this. Steph Curry goes 11-13 from three in a game. Pretty sure that's "hot".
No, it’s a small sample size
13 three point attempts in a single game is about as large a sample size as you can reasonably hope for.
 
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
Not sure I get this. Steph Curry goes 11-13 from three in a game. Pretty sure that's "hot".
No, it’s a small sample size
13 three point attempts in a single game is about as large a sample size as you can reasonably hope for.
:mellow:
 
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
Not sure I get this. Steph Curry goes 11-13 from three in a game. Pretty sure that's "hot".
No, it’s a small sample size
13 three point attempts in a single game is about as large a sample size as you can reasonably hope for.
:mellow:
:mellow: :mellow:
 
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
Not sure I get this. Steph Curry goes 11-13 from three in a game. Pretty sure that's "hot".
No, it’s a small sample size
13 three point attempts in a single game is about as large a sample size as you can reasonably hope for.
That’s why you look at a larger sample size, across multiple seasons, players, etc. Look, as a basketball guy I’d love to think streak shooting is a real thing. My gut tells me it’s real, that it happens in front of my eyes, that it’s happened to me. But I’m also a stats guy, and like to have gut validated with statistical analysis.

Looks like someone posted new stat / research stuff in here, so I’ll enjoy reading it tonight.
 
The whole point of "hot" is that it is a short term phenomenon.

It is simply a term for performing at an extremely high rate of efficiency for a period of time...usually limited to a single game.

Of course when you expand the sample size it goes away. It's inherent in the definition.
 
The whole point of "hot" is that it is a short term phenomenon.

It is simply a term for performing at an extremely high rate of efficiency for a period of time...usually limited to a single game.
Yeah, I get it. I’ve played basketball a long time. Really not worth getting into a stats debate. Like I wrote a few minutes ago, my heart tells me it’s a real thing.
 
a whole video game was built around guys bursting into a ball of flame and making baskets from full court, or dunking from the opposite free throw line.

what am i missing
Best game EVER. "HE'S ON FIRE!"




"BOOM SHAKA LAKA!"
Dan Majerle just leapt from the baseline, scraped the arena roof and hammered a thunderous dunk down so hard that it shook the cartridge loose
 
a whole video game was built around guys bursting into a ball of flame and making baskets from full court, or dunking from the opposite free throw line.

what am i missing
Best game EVER. "HE'S ON FIRE!"




"BOOM SHAKA LAKA!"
Dan Majerle just leapt from the baseline, scraped the arena roof and hammered a thunderous dunk down so hard that it shook the cartridge loose
Dennis Scott was so good.
 
Also also my son (12) who didn't care about watching basketball a year ago has since developed a complete obsession with NBA and it's the best ever and the reason not to try to force your kids to like something. Tongith he went upstairs at 9 (usually it's at 10) and my wife said "are you tired?" and he said "No, I want to watch the Wolves and Lakers game" and my dad heart exploded.
 
Me: "Heat check!"

You: :nerd: "Across a large sample-size, and so on and so forth, and what is a female breast and excetera?"
 
Also also my son (12) who didn't care about watching basketball a year ago has since developed a complete obsession with NBA and it's the best ever and the reason not to try to force your kids to like something. Tongith he went upstairs at 9 (usually it's at 10) and my wife said "are you tired?" and he said "No, I want to watch the Wolves and Lakers game" and my dad heart exploded.
Until you find out he is a Laker fan to spite his old man and just wanted to watch Austin Reaves cook. He’ll be asking for a Westbrook jersey for Christmas/Hanukkah/Kwanza.
 
Smart literally cannot tell when he's hot and when he isn't. In addition to the entire concept of being "hot" as a shooter has been debunked.
Maybe over multiple games, but in a single game it is a very real phenomenon.
Not according to statistical analysis
Not sure I get this. Steph Curry goes 11-13 from three in a game. Pretty sure that's "hot".
No, it’s a small sample size
Wouldn’t “hot” have to happen within a small sample size?
 
The whole point of "hot" is that it is a short term phenomenon.

It is simply a term for performing at an extremely high rate of efficiency for a period of time...usually limited to a single game.

Of course when you expand the sample size it goes away. It's inherent in the definition.
I think the study basically looked at a large collection of players, and assessed whether a shooter was more likely to make their next shot if they had made their previous one (or two or three), and found that the likelihood of making the next shot was independent of making previous shots.

This article talks about the flaws and concludes that there is actually a better chance of making the next shot: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/momentum-isnt-magic-vindicating-the-hot-hand-with-the-mathematics-of-streaks/#:~:text=Research%20made%20it%20the%20'hot%20hand%20fallacy'&text=GVT%20concluded%20that%20the%20hot,in%20an%20illusory%20hot%20hand.
 
I'm trying to follow the latest chat, but what exactly is the theory?...that confidence has no relation to successful shot making?

I don't care what statistics say....the more confident you are on the court, the more successful you'll be in shots going in. I'm not anything close to NBA level, but was all conf/all state type Bball player in high school (played varsity as a frosh in a D1 high school and 3 pt shooting was my specialty). I most certainly knew when I was feeling it and confident that more balls went in. When I got in my head a bit it was a struggle....rim felt about 6" wide. There's just no doubt about it.
 
Also also my son (12) who didn't care about watching basketball a year ago has since developed a complete obsession with NBA and it's the best ever and the reason not to try to force your kids to like something. Tongith he went upstairs at 9 (usually it's at 10) and my wife said "are you tired?" and he said "No, I want to watch the Wolves and Lakers game" and my dad heart exploded.
Until you find out he is a Laker fan to spite his old man and just wanted to watch Austin Reaves cook. He’ll be asking for a Westbrook jersey for Christmas/Hanukkah/Kwanza.
I actually grew up a Laker fan until we got the Wolves and he already has a Lebron, Magic, and Kareem jersey/shirt. But he's not getting a Westbrook, ever.
 
Poole musta been talking a LOT of ****.
Don’t kid yourself. I’m a Draymond fan and he runs his mouth about as good as anybody. Looked to me like he has no problem talking smack but is thin skinned enough to resort to violence when someone dishes it back to him. Unless Poole crossed a line and said something derogatory about Draymonds family or significant other- that was brutally dumb. Problem with the video being leaked is that the Warriors are not purely in a position to handle it internally anymore. The regular media and social media will chime in like a tidal wave and the bay area is one of the wokest places on the planet
 
the bay area is one of the wokest places on the planet
being against unprovoked violence is a woke thing? God I hate that word.
No- but emotions rising and scuffles occurring amongst some of the most competitive people in the planet in the arena of sports/athletics is not horribly uncommon. Ask anyone that has played pick up ball. Heck, Bobby Portis put a teammate in the hospital. I’m not justifying what Draymond did. It was stupid and deserves a punishment. However-,you can already smell the masses saying “if a coworker did that to me in my office or workplace”..etc—which is the typical woke response imo.
 
a whole video game was built around guys bursting into a ball of flame and making baskets from full court, or dunking from the opposite free throw line.

what am i missing
Best game EVER. "HE'S ON FIRE!"




"BOOM SHAKA LAKA!"
Dan Majerle just leapt from the baseline, scraped the arena roof and hammered a thunderous dunk down so hard that it shook the cartridge loose
Dennis Scott was so good.

Vernon 'Mad Max' Maxwell
 
Ask anyone that has played pick up ball.
Come on - that wasn't a heat of the moment thing. They weren't under the basket scuffling or throwing elbows. Draymond slowly walked over and threw a sucker punch after throwing Poole back after some pushing.
I understand that and I think you and I believe that he deserves a punishment. I think he deserves a moderate to significant punishment relative to the context of the workplace. For me- 10-15 games and anger management and a fine that is to be donated to a charity of Pooles choice would be reasonable. However- one of the attributes of “wokeness” is removing context before evaluating and judging situations. A professional athlete talking smack and getting punched does not warrant the same workplace punishment that a person working in an office getting punched by a coworker would support. Its no different than football coaches and drill sargents being able to yell at their players and troops in a manner that would be considered horribly abusive in virtually any other workplace
 
To update the Ime situation, the Daily Mail came out and identified who the women in question was (basically confirming the rumors that were circulating). The woman apparently went to college with Danny Ainge's daughter and then Ainge hired her. Information has been getting leaked out from the Ainge camp. They are said to be very disappointed by the turn of events, as the Ainge family is good friends with the woman who Ime hooked up with (part of the same family and religious values as Ainge).

They discussed this on the radio last night, and the affair was already over by the time the Celtics found out about it over the summer. Sounds like they were fine with it and were going to ignore it when additional info came to light. The official story is that Ime used disparaging language to other Celtics staff about the woman (who then entered into an affair AFTER being called derogatory names). The C's hired a law firm, launched an investigation, and interviewed a ton of people, and ultimately Udoka got suspended for the year (but still will get half his salary).

Dissecting that a little more, there still has to be more to the story and another shoe to drop. The investigation was focused on the affair with that individual, and apparently, they noted that was all they questioned people about (READ AS: who knows what else Ime was doing and with whom). It's clear the Celtics didn't really care that Udoka had an affair (they didn't do anything about it initially) and then some of this other stuff came out.

As things stand now (ie, without any additional information), Boston effectively suspended Udoka for the season over using inappropriate language (and most likely will release him at some point)? That sounds draconian. Celtics brass insists they were justified in suspending Udoka for the season because what he did was really, really egregious. It mind be nice if they actually provided some additional details, because as of now, they look like they went way overboard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top