What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2022 FBG Subscriber Contest is ON - Update - 1st place is $10k + $5k to food bank of their choice (8 Viewers)

MORE

Subscriber Contest Roster​

Full contest rules
Week 5 standings

hagmania​

These results are: extremely unofficial
This entry is still alive (as of the beginning of week 5)

Week 5​

QB Trevor Lawrence - $110.00
QB Baker Mayfield - $80.00
QB Davis Mills - $70.00
RB Nick Chubb - $240.00
RB Clyde Edwards-Helaire - $170.00
RB Rhamondre Stevenson - $150.00
RB Dameon Pierce - $100.00
RB Brian Robinson - $70.00
WR Justin Jefferson - $350.00
WR D.J. Moore - $230.00
WR Allen Lazard - $120.00
WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling - $100.00
WR K.J. Hamler - $82.00
WR Van Jefferson - $70.00
WR WanDale Robinson - $50.00
TE T.J. Hockenson - $170.00
TE Gerald Everett - $80.00
TE Hayden Hurst - $80.00
PK Cairo Santos - $30.00
PK Graham Gano - $30.00
PK Zane Gonzalez - $30.00
TD Arizona Cardinals - $30.00
TD Minnesota Vikings - $30.00
TD Tennessee Titans - $30.00

I am not much of an active FBG these days so I didn't post any before the contest locked, but I like the bigger rosters and accept that the way to win the contest is to pick the guys that score points. IE, the above I view as a lottery ticket and not much more. (Especially considering the Gonzalez oversight lol)
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.
You are pretty much describing what we are all feeling right now. You want to kick yourself for some of the decisions you ultimately made and are thinking about how much better off your team would be now if you had instead done some of the things you had contemplated before submitting your final lineup. I had a similar kicker dilemma. I learned from past mistakes NOT to even consider a kicker without job security. I had settled on 2 of my 3 PK and did not include Blankenship. I felt comfortable with Gano and Zeurlein, although a week earlier I had tagged Gano to watch closely after he apparently had a concussion or something similar with a week left in preseason. When a few days passed and he got the all-clear, I decided it would probably be ok to keep him. I never wavered on Zeurlein. My third kicker with a few days to go before live date was Cairo Santos. The problem with Santos is I could not get any information on him to determine if his job was safe. He didn't even show up with any detail in any of the team reports and wasn't even mentioned in most of them. I had considered Blankenship and he was rated much higher in terms of projected points, but in the back of my mind I had fears related to his injury last year and falling out of favor for a while, only to apparently secure his job again in the last few days of preseason this year. I looked at his projected stat total and compared it to Santos and my inability to get any reliable info on his job security. When they cut the kicker that was competing with Blankenship in the preseason a few days before the season start, I took a chance and swapped Santos for Blankenship. We all know the rest of the story. I am fortunate so far that I still have 2 kickers that are active, and Gano has been a pleasant surprise so far in his scoring. People often ask if it's a deal breaker if all 3 of your kickers do not have different bye weeks, and this year reinforces the answer as a definite yes.

My other woes relate to suddenly dealing with injuries to several players after largely avoiding the injury bug the first 3 weeks. Week 4 saw me without Zay Jones, who I've been patting myself on the back for selecting with his $5 cap, while he is either the leading receiver (or very close to it) in Jacksonville. This week he was limited at practice and early yesterday it was said that he was going to play, only to have an update around 5pm saying his playing this week is again in doubt.

LIke many others here, I was also without Amon-Ra St. Brown, who has been my top scoring WR through 3 weeks. It looks like he's likely out again this week, and next week is a bye. What scares me is I have front loaded byes in week 6 and 7, being without one of my two QB each week. The Carr-Cousins duo has not exactly set the world of fire through 4 weeks, with each of them having one week that sucked. I can't afford for the only one active to have a suck week in week 6 or 7.

Dotson has been worth his cap money in the first 4 weeks, adding to my score in 3 of the 4. But he got injured during the week 4 game and is out for probably both week 5 and 6 at least. This is not looking good.

I'm weak at TE and this is the fact that has bugged me since the start. I normally spend more at TE and get one or two studs, and a couple flyers, counting on at least one flex score from a TE each week... simply because statistically TEs produce more points per cap dollar, and it's sound strategy to spend more there. This week Hurst is questionable again but appears to be on the doubtful side of questoinable.

I feel like I've skated by on luck so far and I'm losing confidence that this will continue with injuries mounting. Balance that with the fact that there are some highly rostered stud RBs who are out either for the season or for the longer term, which may hold some other teams scores down enough for me to stay alive. There are also several under-performing (normally stud) TEs, who I avoided, that hopefully will play favorably into my chances.

What I miss from previous years are the weeks when I virtually knew I was safe after the 1pm games concluded, simply because of amassing a lot of points early with lots of players left to go. My average this year so far is only about 168, whereas last year it was 183 through 4 weeks, with a high week of 231.

Perhaps the only good thing about this weeks Thursday night game is it did not establish a cut line.

Hopefully we can all survive the fog and preserve our slim chances to make it to the finals.
 
Last edited:
Continue to survive my fellow Turk dodgers.......Seems kind of a slow contest so far - which is good when you need to be built for comfort and not speed.

I personally hope to get the Sun God back soon....
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.

hot rod was the single best non-pierce play in the entire contest. a kicker whos been in the top 5 fantasy pts/game in both of his 2 years in the league on a dome team that by all accounts looked like one of the best teams in the nfl. he was $2-$3 underpriced and the easiest click in the entire contest. right process, wrong results. dont be results oriented,

if dameon pierce tears his acl tomorrow youre not going to be all like 'oh man, i should have known not to take a rookie rb'.
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.

hot rod was the single best non-pierce play in the entire contest. a kicker whos been in the top 5 fantasy pts/game in both of his 2 years in the league on a dome team that by all accounts looked like one of the best teams in the nfl. he was $2-$3 underpriced and the easiest click in the entire contest. right process, wrong results. dont be results oriented,

if dameon pierce tears his acl tomorrow youre not going to be all like 'oh man, i should have known not to take a rookie rb'.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the bolded. Here is what I posted back on Aug 17th...
For those rostering Rodrigo, I think he is listed at $3 because his job security is in doubt. He's tempting because of the team he is on, but something tells me he won't last the season.
IMO, the right process for choosing cheapie kickers is not to find the highest rated guy, but the guy with the most job security, and Hot Rod was not that guy.
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.

hot rod was the single best non-pierce play in the entire contest. a kicker whos been in the top 5 fantasy pts/game in both of his 2 years in the league on a dome team that by all accounts looked like one of the best teams in the nfl. he was $2-$3 underpriced and the easiest click in the entire contest. right process, wrong results. dont be results oriented,

if dameon pierce tears his acl tomorrow youre not going to be all like 'oh man, i should have known not to take a rookie rb'.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the bolded. Here is what I posted back on Aug 17th...
For those rostering Rodrigo, I think he is listed at $3 because his job security is in doubt. He's tempting because of the team he is on, but something tells me he won't last the season.
IMO, the right process for choosing cheapie kickers is not to find the highest rated guy, but the guy with the most job security, and Hot Rod was not that guy.

lol ok, well for those of us that dont have the ability to magically predict which kickers have the most job security (personally i feel like all of these guys are basically a few misses away from never kicking in the nfl again, but what do i know??) heres how i think it works:

theres a bunch of kickers listed at $3 which are roughly the same bet. that is if we simulated the season a million times theyd end up with about the same number of points as each other long term. you really have no idea who to pick since theyre so grouped together, so you go by things like projected points, offense/team quality, stadium environment, stuff like that. then you just do the best you can to choose the ones you think will outperform the $3 price tag.

since im not clairvoyant enough to know who has this mythical "job security" and who doesnt, i chose blankenship since, like i said, he was on a good team (lol fail), in a good offense (lol fail), in a good kicking environment in a dome and he had been a top 5 ppg kicker for 2 straight years. this seemed reasonable to me.

i wasnt on seibert. dont really remember why. but if you looked at him and thought 'hmm...lions have a good offense in a dome...ill take him.' i wouldnt blame you, i get it. its certainly a reasonable enough decision.

i get that we all think we're super smart and good at fantasy football and everything, but the truth is that not only do we not know better than everyone else, but so much of fantasy football results are just randomness. so to look at that randomness and be like 'aww man i should have known that hot rod would get cut and not taken him even though he projected much much better than all the other $3 kickers' is kinda strange in my mind.
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.

hot rod was the single best non-pierce play in the entire contest. a kicker whos been in the top 5 fantasy pts/game in both of his 2 years in the league on a dome team that by all accounts looked like one of the best teams in the nfl. he was $2-$3 underpriced and the easiest click in the entire contest. right process, wrong results. dont be results oriented,

if dameon pierce tears his acl tomorrow youre not going to be all like 'oh man, i should have known not to take a rookie rb'.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the bolded. Here is what I posted back on Aug 17th...
For those rostering Rodrigo, I think he is listed at $3 because his job security is in doubt. He's tempting because of the team he is on, but something tells me he won't last the season.
IMO, the right process for choosing cheapie kickers is not to find the highest rated guy, but the guy with the most job security, and Hot Rod was not that guy.

lol ok, well for those of us that dont have the ability to magically predict which kickers have the most job security (personally i feel like all of these guys are basically a few misses away from never kicking in the nfl again, but what do i know??) heres how i think it works:

theres a bunch of kickers listed at $3 which are roughly the same bet. that is if we simulated the season a million times theyd end up with about the same number of points as each other long term. you really have no idea who to pick since theyre so grouped together, so you go by things like projected points, offense/team quality, stadium environment, stuff like that. then you just do the best you can to choose the ones you think will outperform the $3 price tag.

since im not clairvoyant enough to know who has this mythical "job security" and who doesnt, i chose blankenship since, like i said, he was on a good team (lol fail), in a good offense (lol fail), in a good kicking environment in a dome and he had been a top 5 ppg kicker for 2 straight years. this seemed reasonable to me.

i wasnt on seibert. dont really remember why. but if you looked at him and thought 'hmm...lions have a good offense in a dome...ill take him.' i wouldnt blame you, i get it. its certainly a reasonable enough decision.

i get that we all think we're super smart and good at fantasy football and everything, but the truth is that not only do we not know better than everyone else, but so much of fantasy football results are just randomness. so to look at that randomness and be like 'aww man i should have known that hot rod would get cut and not taken him even though he projected much much better than all the other $3 kickers' is kinda strange in my mind.
Once again, totally disagree. You don't think you have the ability to predict which kickers have the most job security, and you think it's mythical? Maybe you don't, but I guarantee the staffers at FBG who priced Rodrigo had the ability, and that's why he was $3 instead of $5.

I chose to turn a blind eye because he was the highest rated $3 kicker, but I knew what I was getting myself into.
 
Once again, totally disagree. You don't think you have the ability to predict which kickers have the most job security, and you think it's mythical? Maybe you don't, but I guarantee the staffers at FBG who priced Rodrigo had the ability, and that's why he was $3 instead of $5.

I chose to turn a blind eye because he was the highest rated $3 kicker, but I knew what I was getting myself into.

lol maybe mythical was a bit dramatic, but my whole point is that if gano, fairnbarn or whoever else had that game they might be getting cut too. youre suggesting that you know better that theyre not getting cut bc youve decided they have "job security". im saying i dont think these things are all that predictable, so i just go based on projections. also if hot rod had 6 great weeks and that game happened week 7 instead, maybe he doesnt get cut bc hes earned enough of the team's confidence by that point.

i also think that youre being extemely results oriented. yes, kickers get cut, but theres tons of $3 kickers that havent been cut and are doing just fine. i think its just unfortunate that you stumbled onto the ones that got cut. its extremely unfortunate bc they were two of the "better" kickers, at least based on what we thought of the teams before the season started. let me restate this again: these $3 kickers are all roughly the same bet and, theoretically speaking, are going to perform roughly the same long-term.

theres plenty of alternate universes where you have 2 of the best kicker values in the contest after 4 weeks. ofc irl we get just one chance at it and it went badly. and thats a bummer. but its not your fault bc you chose kickers without much "job security".
 
Once again, totally disagree. You don't think you have the ability to predict which kickers have the most job security, and you think it's mythical? Maybe you don't, but I guarantee the staffers at FBG who priced Rodrigo had the ability, and that's why he was $3 instead of $5.

I chose to turn a blind eye because he was the highest rated $3 kicker, but I knew what I was getting myself into.

lol maybe mythical was a bit dramatic, but my whole point is that if gano, fairnbarn or whoever else had that game they might be getting cut too. youre suggesting that you know better that theyre not getting cut bc youve decided they have "job security". im saying i dont think these things are all that predictable, so i just go based on projections. also if hot rod had 6 great weeks and that game happened week 7 instead, maybe he doesnt get cut bc hes earned enough of the team's confidence by that point.

i also think that youre being extemely results oriented. yes, kickers get cut, but theres tons of $3 kickers that havent been cut and are doing just fine. i think its just unfortunate that you stumbled onto the ones that got cut. its extremely unfortunate bc they were two of the "better" kickers, at least based on what we thought of the teams before the season started. let me restate this again: these $3 kickers are all roughly the same bet and, theoretically speaking, are going to perform roughly the same long-term.

theres plenty of alternate universes where you have 2 of the best kicker values in the contest after 4 weeks. ofc irl we get just one chance at it and it went badly. and thats a bummer. but its not your fault bc you chose kickers without much "job security".
I still blame myself for selecting Blankenship and Seibert. I had them as the highest rated $3 kickers, which is why I chose them. But I also had them ranked as the riskiest kickers. Sadly, Gano and Fairbairn were the two I was going with, as I considered them safer, but both got dinged up during preseason.

Lemme just ask - since Rodrigo was ranked around K10 by the staff near the contest deadline, why do you think he was $3?
 
I made a fatal mistake in team selection. I decided this year I was gonna go small roster and ended up with only 19 spots. That wasn't my mistake, but who I chose at K was. I figured since I was going small roster and it's a risky practice, may as well take the take the 2 highest ranked $3 kickers with differing byes. I had done my research and considered Gano and Fairbairn the 2 with the best job security, but went with Blankenship and Seibert anyways.

A lesson learned and a mistake I will never make again. I still believe in rostering cheap kickers, but job security is the only factor I will care about.

hot rod was the single best non-pierce play in the entire contest. a kicker whos been in the top 5 fantasy pts/game in both of his 2 years in the league on a dome team that by all accounts looked like one of the best teams in the nfl. he was $2-$3 underpriced and the easiest click in the entire contest. right process, wrong results. dont be results oriented,

if dameon pierce tears his acl tomorrow youre not going to be all like 'oh man, i should have known not to take a rookie rb'.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the bolded. Here is what I posted back on Aug 17th...
For those rostering Rodrigo, I think he is listed at $3 because his job security is in doubt. He's tempting because of the team he is on, but something tells me he won't last the season.
IMO, the right process for choosing cheapie kickers is not to find the highest rated guy, but the guy with the most job security, and Hot Rod was not that guy.

lol ok, well for those of us that dont have the ability to magically predict which kickers have the most job security (personally i feel like all of these guys are basically a few misses away from never kicking in the nfl again, but what do i know??) heres how i think it works:

theres a bunch of kickers listed at $3 which are roughly the same bet. that is if we simulated the season a million times theyd end up with about the same number of points as each other long term. you really have no idea who to pick since theyre so grouped together, so you go by things like projected points, offense/team quality, stadium environment, stuff like that. then you just do the best you can to choose the ones you think will outperform the $3 price tag.

since im not clairvoyant enough to know who has this mythical "job security" and who doesnt, i chose blankenship since, like i said, he was on a good team (lol fail), in a good offense (lol fail), in a good kicking environment in a dome and he had been a top 5 ppg kicker for 2 straight years. this seemed reasonable to me.

i wasnt on seibert. dont really remember why. but if you looked at him and thought 'hmm...lions have a good offense in a dome...ill take him.' i wouldnt blame you, i get it. its certainly a reasonable enough decision.

i get that we all think we're super smart and good at fantasy football and everything, but the truth is that not only do we not know better than everyone else, but so much of fantasy football results are just randomness. so to look at that randomness and be like 'aww man i should have known that hot rod would get cut and not taken him even though he projected much much better than all the other $3 kickers' is kinda strange in my mind.
Once again, totally disagree. You don't think you have the ability to predict which kickers have the most job security, and you think it's mythical? Maybe you don't, but I guarantee the staffers at FBG who priced Rodrigo had the ability, and that's why he was $3 instead of $5.

I chose to turn a blind eye because he was the highest rated $3 kicker, but I knew what I was getting myself into.
To be fair, FBG did their pricing in July/early August. As you noted, at that time there was competition for the job. By the time rosters were locked, that competition had ended. That situation seemed a lot like a few years ago after Boswell had a down year and the Steelers brought in some competition in training camp. Bos only stuck around because he won the competition and turned into one of the most "secure" kickers in the league.
 
3003 Blankenship not Seibert
253 Seibert not Blankenship
460 with both

3716 of live roosters with at least one
-QG
🐓 ⬆️
3003 Blankenship not Seibert
253 Seibert not Blankenship
460 with both

3716 of live roosters with at least one
-QG

<---- This guy 3 :cry:
-QG
Um…maybe I wasn’t obvious enough earler

:bag:
Off my rooster emoji recognition game
-QG
 
I didn't take Blankenship, rating him as more risky because he's only had one good season, the Colts opting not to use him when he got healthy last year, and having to compete for his job this year.
 
After 1pm games 144.10 + (Mixon/J Wilson/Z White - 5.40/8.40/17.80/18.10) + (Hollywood/JuJu - 5.40/8.40/12.40/14.30) + (Hurst/Higbee - 5.40/8.40/13.30) + (MoneyMac - 0.00) + (Arizona - 5.00)

Huge game by Josh Allen might bail me out - need some points from the guys left to nail things down though.
-QG

(edited due to error with Quizzomatic)
 
Last edited:
After 1pm games 144.10 + (Mixon/J Wilson/Z White - 5.40/8.40/17.80/18.10) + (Hollywood/JuJu - 5.40/8.40/12.40/14.30) + (Hurst/Higbee - 5.40/8.40/13.30) + (MoneyMac - 0.00) + (Arizona - 5.00)

Huge game by Josh Allen might bail me out - need some points from the guys left to nail things down though.
-QG

(edited due to error with Quizzomatic)
99% lock to advance this week.

Personally sitting at 104 with fewer players left and feel like I have a decent shot.
 

Week 5​

QB Kirk Cousins - $1426.20
QB Derek Carr - $130.00
RB Saquon Barkley - $2618.10
RB A.J. Dillon - $203.40
RB Kareem Hunt - $1913.20
RB Rhamondre Stevenson - $1518.50
RB Dameon Pierce - $1018.80
RB Dontrell Hilliard - $510.30
WR Mike Williams - $2123.40
WR Gabe Davis - $1932.10
WR Courtland Sutton - $1912.40
WR Rashod Bateman - $160.00
WR Nico Collins - $1010.50
WR Josh Palmer - $65.40
TE Dawson Knox - $140.00
TE David Njoku - $917.80
PK Rodrigo Blankenship - $30.00
PK Kaimi Fairbairn - $311.10
TD Miami Dolphins - $42.00
TD San Francisco 49ers - $40.00
TOTAL181.20
CUT LINE99.65



I like my chances this week


 
On to week 6. 165.80 after early games with either Waller or Andrews to count. Should start to get interesting next week.
I'm very close to you at 163 with still a few bullets to go in L-Jax, Mixon and currently Kittle/Goedert adding to that. Roll on Week 6!

I"m in the ballpark with you guys at 162.60 with Goedert & Hurst (-8.30), Juju (-12.40), Edwards-Helaire (-13.80), and Arizona Defense (-5.00) and Derek Carr (-26.20) left.
I scored almost nothing in the Thrusday night and Sunday morning games and was feeling pretty vulnerable. I had an obligation to take care of today and could not watch the stats until about 4:30.
WHen I finally checked I was surprised to see that Cousins, Fournette and Stevenson had largely bailed me out. My score probalby won't go much higher than it is unless Juju or Edwards-Helarie go off the rails.

Just checked and saw that Goedert has 7 catches for 79 yards so far and his score has me up to 171.90. It's going to be a lot tougher next week with 4 players on bye week and Dotson out.
Fingers crossed for week 6.
 
174.9 with the cut line at 99.6.

Feeling good, will likely move on to next week!

Love the Fournette/Hall/Pierce/J. Wilson combination of RBs pulling their weight and making me look smart through six weeks. B-Rob next week ready to rumble!

My receivers and now quarterbacks look el stinko right now, though. Jameis was not a wise use of twelve bucks so far.
 
After 4pm:
174.50 + (Mixon/Z White - 13.30/18.10/18.80/19.70) + (JuJu - 13.30/14.30) + (Hurst - 13.30/15.10) + (MoneyMac - 0.00)

On to Week 6 :pickle:
-QG
 
Josh Allen owner checking in. I think I will advance one more time. Sitting on 146 plus I'm waiting on the Dallas defense and Devonta scores to add to my total. Should come out to about 168, and all of Kelce's score goes directly into the gravy boat
 
20+ points above cut, but over 2000 entries between me and there. Could use some help from unlikely sources.

Lamar -19.45
JuJu/McKinnon/Zamir -5.90, -10.70
Ravens -14.

I'd like to see a good day from Lamar so I don't have to sweat tomorrow night's game.
 
174.9 with the cut line at 99.6.

Feeling good, will likely move on to next week!

Love the Fournette/Hall/Pierce/J. Wilson combination of RBs pulling their weight and making me look smart through six weeks. B-Rob next week ready to rumble!

My receivers and now quarterbacks look el stinko right now, though. Jameis was not a wise use of twelve bucks so far.
:ROFLMAO:

Likely is more likely to score 3 TDs tonight than you are not to move out.
 
After 1pm games 144.10 + (Mixon/J Wilson/Z White - 5.40/8.40/17.80/18.10) + (Hollywood/JuJu - 5.40/8.40/12.40/14.30) + (Hurst/Higbee - 5.40/8.40/13.30) + (MoneyMac - 0.00) + (Arizona - 5.00)

Huge game by Josh Allen might bail me out - need some points from the guys left to nail things down though.
-QG

(edited due to error with Quizzomatic)
99% lock to advance this week.

Personally sitting at 104 with fewer players left and feel like I have a decent shot.

Not feeling as good now sitting on the wrong side of the cut and losing ground in tonights game. Tomorrow will be my first real sweat.
 
1079 with Lamar
Tucker 668
Bateman 628
484 Andrews
282 Dobbins
85 Duverney (kicking my self as I took him almost everywhere but here)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top