What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2022 FBG Subscriber Contest is ON - Update - 1st place is $10k + $5k to food bank of their choice (3 Viewers)

My bye week management attempts to spread 'player' bye weeks out in proportion to the percentage of NFL "team byes" for the corresponding weeks, while also bearing in mind the progressive nature of the cut week percentages this year. But I measure my bye week risks based on projected points for my players, rather than cap dollars, which I see as irrelevent in this context. (what matters here is what a player is likely to produce; not what he cost in cap dollars, and how many points you are likely to produce at each position, in order to survive). Starting with week 6, the percentage of NFL teams on bye are 12.5%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 18.75%, 12.5%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 18.75%. My projected fantasy points sitting on the bench those same weeks are 21% 18.3%, 8.9%, 12.1%, 10.5%, 11.9%, 2.3%, and 15%. With the cut line increasing throughout the season, it made sense to me to try to front load my byes in the lowest cut percentage weeks as much as possible. So I'm overloaded in weeks 6 and 7, simply because I see those two weeks as the lowest risk, with only a 20% cut percentage. When it shifts to 30% and 40% cut percentage weeks, it's going to be far more critical to not have many players on the bench.

My team is a high risk in weeks 6 and 7, but I felt those two weeks were the most logical place to roll the dice. If I manage to survive past week 7, I feel my chances to surive improve until I get to week 14, where I have 4 players on bye, although all at different positions.

Sometimes you can set things up as logically as you think possible, yet still get clobbered by other factors. Injuries are probably the main one. Another one is a surprise showing by an underdog team in the early part of a game that results in the other team abandoning their game plan and going all out passing, for example. We will forever debate the merits of small roster vs large roster, as well as how many players we should roster at the given positions, but the truth is there are as many unknowns in this contest as there things we can try to calculate.

I feel fortunate to still be alive in the costest at this point, but I'm rowing against the current for at least the next two weeks.

Good luck to everyone for week 6!
 
With the bye weeks coming up, I'm curious how people incorporated that into their strategy. My thought was to front-load my bye weeks, since it gets harder and harder to make the cut the further we get into the competition. That way, my roster should be a relatively fuller strength towards the end of the bye weeks. For example, I took Goff (week 6 bye) and Cousins (week 7 bye) as my 2 QBs, so I ensure (barring injury) that I've got both scores available throughout most of the harder weeks. How did everyone else approach that?
Bye Weeks play a major role in my decision making. I had to make choices between players because of bye weeks. I just try to make sure that every position is covered during the bye weeks. I also extend the projected points per player out to every week to see what my projected score would be for every week.
 
For bye weeks, I go through the exhaustive, meticulous and detailed process of hitting submit a thousand times with a slightly tweaked roster each time to try not to have too many guys out on the same weeks. This process is completed when the submission deadline prevents me from tweaking my roster any more. ;)
 
On to week 6…

No Goff, Pierce, Zamir, Chark, Hooper, or Tenn D

Rocking ?? for this week

Hurts
Pickett

Breece Hall
Dillon
R. White

Jefferson
D.J.
Dotson ?
Sky Moore
Pickens
Wandale?
Zay Jones
Doubs

Pitts

Gano

Arizona
Minn

Obvioidly my flex will come from WR. Hopefully Pitts comes back and Hurts continues to perform.
 
Posting this for my own benefit because I tend to organize my documents the same way a squirrel organizes acorns.

Hopefully it works in my favor that Davis Mills is coming off a buy for week 7 while Josh Allen is on hiatus.

Attention Kadarius Toney, Elijah Moore, and Kyle Pitts: Feel free to show up this week.


  • Week 6 ($30) QB Davis Mills, RB Dameon Price, WR Nico Collins
  • Week 7 ($53) QB Josh Allen, RB James Cook, WR DeVonta Smith
  • Week 8 ($33) WR Jaylen Guyton, TE Travis Kelce
  • Week 9 ($18) WR Kadarius Toney, Def Dallas Cowboys
  • Week 10 ($50) RB Ramondre Stevenson, WR Rashod Bateman, WR Elijah Moore, PK Evan McPherson
  • Week 11 ($8) RB Raheem Mostert
  • Week 14 ($58) RB Brian Robinson, WR Michael Pittman, TE Kyle Pitts, PK Rodrigo Blakenship
 
So it'll be the Sloman shield if Gould can't go this week. Parkey and Santoso also tried out - not sure of any others.
-QG

I’ll take “References I Don’t Understand” for $500, Alex.

Sam Sloman is a kicker on the 49ers practice squad. Robbie Gould got hurt against the Panthers this past weekend. Sloman must have beaten out Cody Parkey and some guy named Santoso.
 
So it'll be the Sloman shield if Gould can't go this week. Parkey and Santoso also tried out - not sure of any others.
-QG

I’ll take “References I Don’t Understand” for $500, Alex.

Sam Sloman is a kicker on the 49ers practice squad. Robbie Gould got hurt against the Panthers this past weekend. Sloman must have beaten out Cody Parkey and some guy named Santoso.
I guess I don’t know what a Sloman Shield is. Must be a product that’s not familiar with me.
 
+66 on MNF. Passed with flying colors. Best week so far, but lose Carr/Adams/St. Brown and the insane points from Zamir next week. No backup past Burrow. Nailbiter week.
 
With my 19-player roster, I am rolling with (likely starters in bold):
QB - Kirk Cousins
RB - Saquon Barkley, Chase Edmonds, Zack Moss, Jeff Wilson
WR - Courtland Sutton, Christian Kirk, Juju Smith-Schuster
TE - Travis Kelce, Mark Andrews, Kyle Pitts (still questionable)
K - None
D - ARI, MIN
 
I missed the cut by 0.10 points. The first 4 weeks I was doing really well. My WR corps was the weakness. Such a great contest. Good luck the rest of the way!

Sorry to see you depart. Any normal week from LJax or something at TE and you roll on

Is there anything you would do different strategy wise in hingsight like dropping from 4 QB
If I would have better anticipated Steelers offensive inept, I might have tried to find another affordable 3rd QB rather than the low cost Trubisky & Pickett platoon. Another reply to my post let me know that I foolishly had unrostered Zane Gonzalez as my 3rd $3 kicker which most certainly did me in since I missed advancing by a tenth of a point.
 
I missed the cut by 0.10 points. The first 4 weeks I was doing really well. My WR corps was the weakness. Such a great contest. Good luck the rest of the way!

It may not have mattered, but if you noticed Zane Gonzalez was on IR before the contest closed, who would you have replaced him with?
That was a major blunder that definitely contributed to my not making the cut. I did not even know I did that until I read your reply. Any other kicker actually on a roster on my team likely would have gotten me that one point. I haven't checked to see if there were any shut outs in week 5, but I deserved my cut for that gaffe. Live and learn.
 
I missed the cut by 0.10 points. The first 4 weeks I was doing really well. My WR corps was the weakness. Such a great contest. Good luck the rest of the way!

Sorry to see you depart. Any normal week from LJax or something at TE and you roll on

Is there anything you would do different strategy wise in hingsight like dropping from 4 QB
If I would have better anticipated Steelers offensive inept, I might have tried to find another affordable 3rd QB rather than the low cost Trubisky & Pickett platoon. Another reply to my post let me know that I foolishly had unrostered Zane Gonzalez as my 3rd $3 kicker which most certainly did me in since I missed advancing by a tenth of a point.
0.1 really sucks. I probably put to much emphasis trying to learn in hindsight when it's 90% luck anyway.
 
With the bye weeks coming up, I'm curious how people incorporated that into their strategy. My thought was to front-load my bye weeks, since it gets harder and harder to make the cut the further we get into the competition. That way, my roster should be a relatively fuller strength towards the end of the bye weeks. For example, I took Goff (week 6 bye) and Cousins (week 7 bye) as my 2 QBs, so I ensure (barring injury) that I've got both scores available throughout most of the harder weeks. How did everyone else approach that?
I back loaded more salary than most for the late bye weeks because I liked those players and thought it would provide a slight edge to advance past the earlier weeks.
 

Week 5​

QB Kirk Cousins - $1426.20
QB Derek Carr - $130.00
RB Saquon Barkley - $2618.10
RB A.J. Dillon - $203.40
RB Kareem Hunt - $1913.20
RB Rhamondre Stevenson - $1518.50
RB Dameon Pierce - $1018.80
RB Dontrell Hilliard - $510.30
WR Mike Williams - $2123.40
WR Gabe Davis - $1932.10
WR Courtland Sutton - $1912.40
WR Rashod Bateman - $160.00
WR Nico Collins - $1010.50
WR Josh Palmer - $65.40
TE Dawson Knox - $140.00
TE David Njoku - $917.80
PK Rodrigo Blankenship - $30.00
PK Kaimi Fairbairn - $311.10
TD Miami Dolphins - $42.00
TD San Francisco 49ers - $40.00
TOTAL181.20
CUT LINE99.65



I like my chances this week

holy crap this is a high variance rooster! love your rb strat too. (though i think one of those guys could have been swapped out for another TE)
I’ve thought about that as well, but looking back the last 5 weeks, it’s been a different group of RBs carrying me every week.

I believe I would have been eliminated had I changed anything but Hilliard. And I like having him - he’s been a contributor even with a healthy Henry.

Really liking how this team is performing. I actually didn’t think it was very high variance - I know my QB combo is pretty common.
 
Last edited:
So it'll be the Sloman shield if Gould can't go this week. Parkey and Santoso also tried out - not sure of any others.
-QG

I’ll take “References I Don’t Understand” for $500, Alex.

Sam Sloman is a kicker on the 49ers practice squad. Robbie Gould got hurt against the Panthers this past weekend. Sloman must have beaten out Cody Parkey and some guy named Santoso.

That's Ryan Santoso - he is on 11 roosters

-QG
 
Oh where, oh where is Rodrigo Blankenship?? :laugh:
Too bad Mr Potatohead can’t sign an executive order to put him back on someone’s roster…
 

I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
 

I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
With Schultz, TJ Hock, and Goedert, I fully expected to have at least one flex score from my TEs every week. Instead, I've had 4 of my RBs (Henry, Chubb, Pierce and Stevenson) provide both flex scores twice. It's better to be lucky than good.
 
This bye week I feel the pain at WR with St. Brown and Renfrow both out and Watkins injured.

That leaves me needing 2 of 4 from guys who all seem about 50/50 likely of putting up double-digit weeks: A-Rob, Pickens, J Palmer, Z Jones.

At least my other positions are looking in better shape. Over 20% of my $$ on bye this week ($55) and another $7 not playing as well.
 
Last edited:

P U P P I E S​

These results are: not quite official

This entry survived week 5


Week 5​

QB Kirk Cousins - $1426.20
QB Derek Carr - $1324.35
RB Leonard Fournette - $2730.90
RB A.J. Dillon - $203.40
RB Clyde Edwards-Helaire - $175.00
RB Rhamondre Stevenson - $1518.50
RB Dameon Pierce - $1018.80
WR Courtland Sutton - $1912.40
WR Amon-Ra St. Brown - $175.80
WR JuJu Smith-Schuster - $156.30
WR Jahan Dotson - $90.00
WR K.J. Osborn - $89.10
WR George Pickens - $614.30
WR Zay Jones - $54.20
TE Dallas Goedert - $1521.50
TE Evan Engram - $915.90
TE Robert Tonyan - $88.30
TE Hayden Hurst - $820.30
PK Rodrigo Blankenship - $30.00
PK Greg Zuerlein - $38.40
PK Graham Gano - $311.50
TD Arizona Cardinals - $32.00
TD Tennessee Titans - $35.00
TOTAL179.40
CUT LINE139.80

Feeling lucky that my crop of mid-range TEs kept me alive this week, contributing a good score plus a flex.
It's going to be tough this week without Carr, Pierce, Amon-Ra, Dotson, and Tenn defense... and of course, Rodrigo.
I'm hoping that Stevenson contributes again this week with the injury to Damien Harris, but you can never count on anything with Belichick's game plans.
Fingers are crossed that Zay is back to full strength and once again gets his normal number of targets. My WR's mostly didn't show up in week 5 with two scores barely in the teens and nothing toward flex. I'm probalby going to need a good score from Pickens and Zay Jones this week to stay alive, unless there are some surprises elsewhere, like Fournette was in week 5.
 
Last edited:
Can we get a prayer circle that my Niners sign Blankenship this week?


I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
I kind of like the Knox/Njoku pairing. It's unique and TE has been a free for all outside of the top 2 players. I had Taysom Hill in all of my earlier iterations but wanted Pitts and both have the same bye week. Hill is basically a cheat code at this point.
 
With my 19-player roster, I am rolling with (likely starters in bold):
QB - Kirk Cousins
RB - Saquon Barkley, Chase Edmonds, Zack Moss, Jeff Wilson
WR - Courtland Sutton, Christian Kirk, Juju Smith-Schuster
TE - Travis Kelce, Mark Andrews, Kyle Pitts (still questionable)
K - None
D - ARI, MIN
You have enough horses to cross the finish line in week 6. Pitts should play as well.
 
Can we get a prayer circle that my Niners sign Blankenship this week?


I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
I kind of like the Knox/Njoku pairing. It's unique and TE has been a free for all outside of the top 2 players. I had Taysom Hill in all of my earlier iterations but wanted Pitts and both have the same bye week. Hill is basically a cheat code at this point.
Njoku has been the sleeper I expected.

I just dealt Doubs for him in a 12-team redraft to cover Hock’s BYE, and as an insurance TE2. TEs are big dudes and get banged up a lot.

Also have a ton of good receivers so it made a lot of sense.

I wanted to go outside the box. Knox has not been paying off to date - I need him to get healthy.
 
Can we get a prayer circle that my Niners sign Blankenship this week?


I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
I kind of like the Knox/Njoku pairing. It's unique and TE has been a free for all outside of the top 2 players. I had Taysom Hill in all of my earlier iterations but wanted Pitts and both have the same bye week. Hill is basically a cheat code at this point.
Njoku has been the sleeper I expected.

I just dealt Doubs for him in a 12-team redraft to cover Hock’s BYE, and as an insurance TE2. TEs are big dudes and get banged up a lot.

Also have a ton of good receivers so it made a lot of sense.

I wanted to go outside the box. Knox has not been paying off to date - I need him to get healthy.
Yeah I mean look at the other TE you could have picked for $14, kmet, gesicki, irv smith. Knox is still the best choice.
 
Decisions done right:

Pivoting to Kupp for the final iteration
Selecting Pierce and WIlson for RB depth

Decisions still to be validated:

Moving down from Kelce and away from Taysom Hill
Locking up 25% of salary in 2 players with week 14 byes
 
Last edited:
Can we get a prayer circle that my Niners sign Blankenship this week?


I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
I kind of like the Knox/Njoku pairing. It's unique and TE has been a free for all outside of the top 2 players. I had Taysom Hill in all of my earlier iterations but wanted Pitts and both have the same bye week. Hill is basically a cheat code at this point.
Njoku has been the sleeper I expected.

I just dealt Doubs for him in a 12-team redraft to cover Hock’s BYE, and as an insurance TE2. TEs are big dudes and get banged up a lot.

Also have a ton of good receivers so it made a lot of sense.

I wanted to go outside the box. Knox has not been paying off to date - I need him to get healthy.
Yeah I mean look at the other TE you could have picked for $14, kmet, gesicki, irv smith. Knox is still the best choice.

About 6 weeks ago when most of us were losing sleep making dozens of last minute tweaks to our tentative lineups in hopes of finding the magic formula, I probably spent more time agonizing over TE than any other position. I tried unsuccessfully to find a way to roster at least one upper level TE that I thought would produce a consistent score that would likely count each week. I studied FBGuy's "team reports" over and over from each week of the pre-season, and I looked at Pitts, Waller, Schultz, Kittle, and Hockenson, but just could not make any of them work with the core lineup I had already assembled without screwing up my bye week risk management. Probably my biggest mistake is not seriously considering Kelce, who I have rostered in several prior years. Kelce's 126.30 total for the first 5 weeks is 50.4 points higher than the combined best scores of my weekly highest scoring TE, so he would have been a far better value at $30 than the $40 I spend on my 4 guys combined.. I ended up with 4 middle of the road TEs (Goedert, Ingram, Tonyan, and Hurst) thinking that Goedert was the most promising of my group. One iteration had both Ertz and Goedert but I got scared about Ertz still nursing an calf injury for the entire preseason, and having still not practiced, so I opted out of Ertz.

Looking back, I have not really gotten great scores from my TEs (highest was 21.50) but the minimum score that has counted through 5 weeks is 13.40, and I have gotten 2 flex scores from TEs so far of 20.30 and 15.10, so I have to feel fortunate with this group in spite of my regrets. The only one that has NOT contributed yet is Tonyan, who might turn out to be a waste of $8. But with Aaron Rodgers playing from behind a lot this year, I still have hope that perhaps he will contribute a few scores and possibly help me stay alive in the contest.

In one way, I feel lucky that I was not able to roster one of those higher cost TEs that have either been injured, or who have largely disappointed so far. No matter how you slice it, this is still a game of chance to a large degree.
 
Last edited:
Week 5 Statistical Trivia and other fun facts....

27
= Team size with the highest overall survival rate through 5 weeks, at 57.36%
18 = Team size with the lowest overall survival rate through 5 weeks, at 43.36%

27
= Team size with the smallest drop in survival rate between weeks 4 and 5, dropping only 8.63% overall
30 = Team size with the largest drop in survival ratebetween weeks 4 and 5, dropping 17.05% overall

Graphing the survival rate on a bell curve shows the hump ranging from team size 23 to 28, with 27 as the high point. (The top 6 survival rates all fall between team size 23 and 28)

The survival rate trend continues to move upward from low to high roster size, with 27 player teams holding the highest overall survival rate 3 weeks in a row.

The median contest score has varied by a total of only 0.20 points for 3 weeks in a row from week 3 to week 5 at 160.05, 160.20, and 160.25 respectively,

While the overall survival rate for the contest through 5 weeks is 46.75%, the Football Guys Staff overall survival rate is exactly 50.00%

Speaking of FBG staff, sadly the subscriber contest team of the Turk, was eliminated this week, falling 2.80 points short of the cut line.

For the guys in this forum who unfortunately were eliminated in week 5, please consider hanging around and tracking how your team would do, had it not been eliminated.
I do that every year after I get booted, just to see, and to help plan next year's strategy.

Good luck to all in week 6 - I hope I'm still around to make more of these silly observations....
 
Last edited:
Week 5 Statistical Trivia and other fun facts....

27
= Team size with the highest overall survival rate through 5 weeks, at 57.36%
18 = Team size with the lowest overall survival rate through 5 weeks, at 43.36%

27
= Team size with the smallest drop in survival rate between weeks 4 and 5, dropping only 8.63% overall
30 = Team size with the largest drop in survival ratebetween weeks 4 and 5, dropping 17.05% overall

Graphing the survival rate on a bell curve shows the hump ranging from team size
23 to 28, with 27 as the high point. (The top 6 survival rates all fall between team size 23 and 28)

The survival rate trend continues to move upward from low to high roster size, with
27 player teams holding the highest overall survival rate 3 weeks in a row.

The median contest score has varied by a total of only 0.20 points for 3 weeks in a row from week 3 to week 5 at 160.05, 160.20, and 160.25 respectively,

While the overall survival rate for the contest through 5 weeks is 46.75%, the
Football Guys Staff overall survival rate is exactly 50.00%

Speaking of FBG staff, sadly the subscriber contest team of the Turk, was eliminated this week, falling 2.80 points short of the cut line.

For the guys in this forum who unfortunately were eliminated in week 5, please consider
hanging around and tracking how your team would do, had it not been eliminated.
I do that every year after I get booted, just to see, and to help plan next year's strategy.


Good luck to all in week 6 - I hope I'm still around to make more of these silly observations....
These are fun to read. Thanx for doing them.
 
Well week 6 is here and injuries have taken a toll. I am a front bye loading guy and banked on stud rbs of swift and Javonte. Since javonte went down, Pierce has been carrying. Mostert not practicing and I may only be down to one RB. Not good. Lost wandale Robinson and treylon burka at wr and Kirk has disappeared.

Hoping for some week 6 magic!
 
Its at times like this that I have to admit I may not be smart enough to hang around with this group.

Google is your friend. Seriously. Because I like joey and his postings, I took the time to Google it. I'm nowhere near as smart, urbane, or worldly as I appear.

Did I cheat by doing that?

That question just gave me a slight lol right there.
 
I feel the same way about this place, especially this thread. There are people here talking laymen's terms that are still above my head. Come in. Ask questions. Most, if not all of us, are here to help, really, or at least commiserate in the "I don't know" aspect of things. I tend towards the latter of that proposition when it comes to the subscriber contest. Just...whoa.
 
Its at times like this that I have to admit I may not be smart enough to hang around with this group.

Google is your friend. Seriously. Because I like joey and his postings, I took the time to Google it. I'm nowhere near as smart, urbane, or worldly as I appear.

Did I cheat by doing that?

That question just gave me a slight lol right there.
You used the word urbane....my comment stands lol
 
More fun facts...
- The 49ers D was the most common from the start, has the highest survival rate at 58.16%, and is currently D1.
- The overall contest survival rate is 46.75%, but only 10 out of 32 D's are above that.
- The 3 highest scoring $3 D's are SEA, JAC, and CAR. They were only on 1 roster, and that team has been eliminated.
- The 3 highest scoring $3 K's are Gano (K3), Fairbairn (K8), and Zuerlein (K9). The trio has a survival rate of 43.75%.
- Jonathan Taylor ($39), the highest priced player, is being outscored by 10 different kickers.
- The highest priced WR (Cooper Kupp at $36) is outscoring the top 2 priced RB's (JT & CMC) combined.
 
Another fun fact - @rockaction is 1 of only 7 teams alive with the top three $3 kickers
Let's go, fellas! :towelwave:

Man, I wish I had my JuJu Smith-Schuster and Darnell Mooney picks back. That's a tough thirty-two bucks allocated at WR to swallow. My WRs are hurtin'. Gonna need more heroics from Playoff Lenny and Breaktastic Breece to stay in this.

RBs

L. Fournette
B. Hall
E. Mitchell
D. Pierce
B. Robinson
J. Wilson

As of now, I'm happy with that so far. Let's hope for continued health and success for these guys.
 
Can we get a prayer circle that my Niners sign Blankenship this week?


I actually didn’t think it was very high variance
interesting, i think your wr and te groups are among the highest variance ive seen from basically anybody whos posted their team. gabe and knox are basically the biggest boom/bust plays at their positions in the entire nfl. rolling with just knox + njoku (who had tons of questions coming into the season even though i loved him) in a te-premium contest is pretty risky imo.

the rb thing is interesting for sure. i love the strat and i suppose you can play 4 of them. ive never thought about trying to fill the flex with rbs in this contest so it feels weird to me. maybe im wrong about you investing too much salary cap in the position idk.
I kind of like the Knox/Njoku pairing. It's unique and TE has been a free for all outside of the top 2 players. I had Taysom Hill in all of my earlier iterations but wanted Pitts and both have the same bye week. Hill is basically a cheat code at this point.
Njoku has been the sleeper I expected.

I just dealt Doubs for him in a 12-team redraft to cover Hock’s BYE, and as an insurance TE2. TEs are big dudes and get banged up a lot.

Also have a ton of good receivers so it made a lot of sense.

I wanted to go outside the box. Knox has not been paying off to date - I need him to get healthy.
Yeah I mean look at the other TE you could have picked for $14, kmet, gesicki, irv smith. Knox is still the best choice.

About 6 weeks ago when most of us were losing sleep making dozens of last minute tweaks to our tentative lineups in hopes of finding the magic formula, I probably spent more time agonizing over TE than any other position. I tried unsuccessfully to find a way to roster at least one upper level TE that I thought would produce a consistent score that would likely count each week. I studied FBGuy's "team reports" over and over from each week of the pre-season, and I looked at Pitts, Waller, Schultz, Kittle, and Hockenson, but just could not make any of them work with the core lineup I had already assembled without screwing up my bye week risk management. Probably my biggest mistake is not seriously considering Kelce, who I have rostered in several prior years. Kelce's 126.30 total for the first 5 weeks is 50.4 points higher than the combined best scores of my weekly highest scoring TE, so he would have been a far better value at $30 than the $40 I spend on my 4 guys combined.. I ended up with 4 middle of the road TEs (Goedert, Ingram, Tonyan, and Hurst) thinking that Goedert was the most promising of my group. One iteration had both Ertz and Goedert but I got scared about Ertz still nursing an calf injury for the entire preseason, and having still not practiced, so I opted out of Ertz.

Looking back, I have not really gotten great scores from my TEs (highest was 21.50) but the minimum score that has counted through 5 weeks is 13.40, and I have gotten 2 flex scores from TEs so far of 20.30 and 15.10, so I have to feel fortunate with this group in spite of my regrets. The only one that has NOT contributed yet is Tonyan, who might turn out to be a waste of $8. But with Aaron Rodgers playing from behind a lot this year, I still have hope that perhaps he will contribute a few scores and possibly help me stay alive in the contest.

In one way, I feel lucky that I was not able to roster one of those higher cost TEs that have either been injured, or who have largely disappointed so far. No matter how you slice it, this is still a game of chance to a large degree.
So far that's the biggest open question for me as well. I faded Kelce given his age and there is no way to argue yet that was a great decision. He just turned 33 this month and averaged a career low yards per target last season. And it's actually even lower this season after the last game, although his TD numbers are better than ever. He doesn't get to play the Raiders D every week, only twice, and the schedule gets tougher from here. But his scoring is off the charts through the first 5 weeks.
 
I feel the same way about this place, especially this thread. There are people here talking laymen's terms that are still above my head. Come in. Ask questions. Most, if not all of us, are here to help, really, or at least commiserate in the "I don't know" aspect of things. I tend towards the latter of that proposition when it comes to the subscriber contest. Just...whoa.

I'm with you. On the “whoa, these dudes take this really seriously” side of things and enjoy the show, data and info shared here.

and I know I can Google things like Sloman Shield (and thanks for replying to my stupid question) but I’ll take asking a stupid question here, with the ensuing comedy, abuse and whatever else comes along with it, over a boring Google search any day :)
 
Still alive I think this is the first week 6 I've seen in a long time :pickle:
I feel like I can go a few more at least.
Need more from my WRs soon. Picking two Panthers probably wasn't the best strategy, hopefully new coach gets them more involved!

QB Lamar,Matt Ryan
RB Henry, Chubb, Elijah, Dameon, Eno
WR Evans, DJ Moore, Lazard, Campbell, Chark, Pickens, Laviska
TE Kittle, HHenry
PK Rodrigo, Gano
DEF LAR, SF, Tenn

 
@TwinTurbo @Hot Sauce Guy

cmon guys. dawson knox scored 9 tds on 71 targets last year. they hardly throw to him except in the red zone. dan arnold averaged more targets per game than he did. im not saying hes a bad play necessarily, but saying hes not high variance is insane. hes basically the biggest boom/bust te in the league.
Oh he is definitely high variance. And Kelce is this year's Knox lol. He's scored 7 tds on 33 receptions while averaging a career low yards per target. Meanwhile the Chiefs WR room has accounted for only 2 rec TDs through 5 games. Their WR1/WR2 have zero TDs. How long can that hold up?
 
Still alive I think this is the first week 6 I've seen in a long time :pickle:
I feel like I can go a few more at least.
Need more from my WRs soon. Picking two Panthers probably wasn't the best strategy, hopefully new coach gets them more involved!

QB Lamar,Matt Ryan
RB Henry, Chubb, Elijah, Dameon, Eno
WR Evans, DJ Moore, Lazard, Campbell, Chark, Pickens, Laviska
TE Kittle, HHenry
PK Rodrigo, Gano
DEF LAR, SF, Tenn

I like this team. And one of those Panthers might get traded.
 
@TwinTurbo @Hot Sauce Guy

cmon guys. dawson knox scored 9 tds on 71 targets last year. they hardly throw to him except in the red zone. dan arnold averaged more targets per game than he did. im not saying hes a bad play necessarily, but saying hes not high variance is insane. hes basically the biggest boom/bust te in the league.
Oh he is definitely high variance. And Kelce is this year's Knox lol. He's scored 7 tds on 33 receptions while averaging a career low yards per target. Meanwhile the Chiefs WR room has accounted for only 2 rec TDs through 5 games. Their WR1/WR2 have zero TDs. How long can that hold up?
Well, since I failed to roster Kelce, I'm hoping for my own sake that when he starts seeing more double coverge, More targets will got to JuJu and Edwards-Helaire, so I can justify spending $32 on the pair. I thought (momentarily) on Monday night that Clyde had partially partially redeemed himself with that sneaky shovel pass reception for the TD from Mahomes. But the replay clearly showed him down by contact prior to breaking the plane. I'll bet I was not the only one who said "Oh s#$&*?" as they showed the replay...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top