msudaisy26
Footballguy
Jamo will be allowed back in the facility in one week
Will he be bringing his late night meals?
Jamo will be allowed back in the facility in one week
I don't understand not trying to score a TD at the end of the 4th quarter. We played scared instead of being aggressive.
6 Plays,30 Total Yards,1:44 Duration
Started from Midfield at 1:44 4th Quarter
Result FG
Play-By-Play
- 1st & 10, Midfield 1:44 4th J. Goff passed to J. Reynolds down the middle for 12 yard gain, tackled by J. Love
- 1st & 10, SEA 38 1:05 4th K. Raymond rushed to the right for 11 yard gain, tackled by J. Love
- 1st & 10, SEA 27 0:32 4th J. Goff passed to J. Gibbs down the middle for 4 yard gain, tackled by J. Brooks
0:26 4th Detroit timeout #1- 2nd & 7, SEA 24 0:264th J. Goff incomplete pass down the middle intended for A. St. Brown
- 3rd & 7, SEA 23 0:23 4th J. Goff passed to J. Gibbs to the right for 3 yard gain, tackled by J. Love
0:03 4th Detroit timeout #2- 4th & 3, SEA 20 0:03 4th R. Patterson kicked a 38-yard field goal
I am not sure he cut the wrong way, but a step or two before Goff expected.rewatching the condensed game - first play was a trend setter, didn't set the edge, CJGJ missed tackle, KW3 goes for 14
***************
pick 6
blew this up on the big screen, left ED might have redirected the ball - comes out a wobbler and way behind Gibbs
we'll see if MCDC comments on it after he reviews the tape but I don't think the rookie cut the wrong way, was just poor execution by RT Matt Nelson
Goff had a pretty solid game, this L wasn't on him - but man that play & Monty fumbling (Laporta got blown tf up) right out the gate in the second half....killers
need to see the all-22 later in the week but no idea what the coverage was on Parkinson''s 20 yarder right after the fumble - no one accounted for him
Mel Tucker fired from Michigan State. Thought it was such a bad contract. Length of it was ridiculous based on his accomplishments. Mentioned at the time he rode Kenneth Walkers legs into a 10 year extension.
Michigan State cant seem to do too much right anymore.
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/s...nson-potentially-lost-for-season/70896689007/
Lions' C.J. Gardner-Johnson potentially lost for season: 'It's not looking good for him'
![]()
Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
With Gardner-Johnson being out for the season he might be a one and done here. Will be interesting to see if Lions will resign him on another "Prove it" type of deal.
Sad thing is he was injured after he took that stupid penalty, in fact two players got hurt after the roughing call. Things may have been different if that does not happen.
Anyway he will be sorely missed.
He might not have a choiceI don't think he'd be happy taking another "prove it" deal.
This is nothing short of amazing.Pass Blocking Efficiency ([Sacks+Hits+Hurries]=Pressure/Pass Pro Opp)
- Ragnow 100%
- Vaitai 100%
- Sewell 98.6% (2 hurries)
- Nelson 97.3% (1 hit, 1 hurry)
- Decker 97.1% (1 hit, 1 hurry)
- Jackson 95.1% (1 sack, 1 hit, 4 hurries)
- Glasgow 90.0% (1 hit, 2 hurries
If Glenn does not start making in-game adjustments and changing things when they aren't working, he might be the next assistant coach that gets fired.It's now-or-never time for Aaron Glenn and the Lions defense
It sure set up beautifully for Lions defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn. A home game with an amazing sell-out crowd and a Seahawks team coming to Ford Field with both starting offensive tackles out — it’s an optimal situation for his defense to attack Seattle.
It didn’t play out as hoped for Glenn and his Detroit defense. Not even remotely close. And that’s the kind of suboptimal performance from Glenn’s unit that is no longer acceptable
After playing pretty well in the opening win over the Kansas City Chiefs, the Lions’ defense collapsed against the Seahawks.
Okay, okay. The Seahawks have a potent offense. D.K. Metcalf, Tyler Lockett, Kenneth Walker and company are great weapons for steady veteran QB Geno Smith. Heck, they hung 48 on Detroit last year, never punting once in the process. They’re going to get theirs against a lot of teams, not just Detroit.
That doesn’t excuse how easy Detroit’s defense, no–Glenn’s defense–made it for them. Again, it’s no longer acceptable, not for Glenn, not for the players, not for Dan Campbell as the man in charge of the on-field product.
The Lions didn’t register a single QB hit in the game until Alex Anzalone sacked Geno Smith late in the fourth quarter on a play where Smith eschewed several chances to throw the ball away. They didn’t have a single sack in the opener in Kansas City, either.
Aidan Hutchinson has been Detroit’s only source of real pressure in the first two games. He’s been blanked on the sack sheet, but Hutchinson has definitely been impactful. Nobody else has sniffed what Patrick Mahomes or Geno Smith smells like in the pocket, not without Hutchinson’s help in attracting attention away from them.
Some of that is on the players themselves. Charles Harris had a couple of effort wins and pressures against the Chiefs, and James Houston nearly bagged a sack on Mahomes. John Cominsky played well in Kansas City but was invisible against the Seahawks. Alim McNeill almost got home once against Smith right after Seattle had to insert rookie Olu Oluwatimi at center for an injured (ex-Lion) Evan Brown, but that was it on Sunday. The players are not getting the job done. They’re also not being helped by their coordinator.
Glenn hasn’t been aggressive or creative in attacking the quarterback. There have been a few blitzes, mostly from Brian Branch out of the slot, that have had some success even without finishing the sack. Most of the time, it’s Glenn asking his players to win their battles one-on-one, or two-on-one if it’s Hutchinson.
It jumps off the game film when watching the frequently chaotic blocking scheme the Detroit offense deploys. There’s almost always some movement, or a trap block, or a pulling lineman, or a backside pickoff help built into the blocking scheme. Glenn’s defense doesn’t do anything like that. No stunts, no twists, no asynchronous rushes, no overloads. The limited ones they do try don’t seem well-coordinated or rehearsed. They’re certainly not effective.
There is too much individual talent on the defensive front to have just one sack in eight-plus quarters of football. The players are not producing. The scheme and defensive play-calling aren’t helping. It’s making life too hard on the linebackers and defensive backs in coverage, and that’s a very easy way to keep losing football games.
(Those coverages look better than last year’s early-season abomination but could also use some simplification, too.)
Glenn has to mix things up. He’s from the Bill Parcells coaching tree. He was a Pro Bowl cornerback in multiple Parcells defenses. Parcells would not stand pat and keep failing by trying the same ineffective methods and schemes over and over again. It’s time for Glenn to either channel his Hall-of-Fame coaching mentor or find a different place to coach.
Campbell has been down this road once before, unfortunately. His initial choice of offensive coordinator, Anthony Lynn, was disastrous back in 2021. Campbell had no choice but to pull the plug on Lynn after an 0-8-1 start. It’s getting perilously close to time for Campbell to make another tough but necessary decision, this time on his defensive coordinator and longtime colleague, Glenn.
Next week’s game against Atlanta is a direct challenge for Glenn, or rather it should be. The Falcons are a run-based team with an inconsistent young quarterback in Desmond Ridder who doesn’t attack downfield well. Detroit’s run defense has been a bright spot; the Lions are allowing under 2.8 yards per carry on non-QB runs through the first two weeks. The linebackers and safeties are doing great at snuffing out the opposing running backs.
Now it’s time for them to do that to the opposing passing game. If not, Glenn’s seat should be on fire.
Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
With Gardner-Johnson being out for the season he might be a one and done here. Will be interesting to see if Lions will resign him on another "Prove it" type of deal.
Sad thing is he was injured after he took that stupid penalty, in fact two players got hurt after the roughing call. Things may have been different if that does not happen.
Anyway he will be sorely missed.
I don't think he'd be happy taking another "prove it" deal.
Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
With Gardner-Johnson being out for the season he might be a one and done here. Will be interesting to see if Lions will resign him on another "Prove it" type of deal.
Sad thing is he was injured after he took that stupid penalty, in fact two players got hurt after the roughing call. Things may have been different if that does not happen.
Anyway he will be sorely missed.
I don't think he'd be happy taking another "prove it" deal.
No player is happy on a "prove it" deal. But he only played a game and a half.
I liked him but it is difficult to judge his value in such little time.
This is a crazy busy week for the assistants bc they’re putting together two game plans; Sunday v Falcons and 9 days fm now. They’ll send out Wk 4 to the players after the next game & do the installs/ walk through on Monday.
I don’t see them 86ing AG but I could see them making some philosophical changes. This is two years in a row of believing your guys are good enough to play an aggressive coverage scheme and get pressure from the front 4. Took us 8 weeks/7 games to admit it last year.
Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
With Gardner-Johnson being out for the season he might be a one and done here. Will be interesting to see if Lions will resign him on another "Prove it" type of deal.
Sad thing is he was injured after he took that stupid penalty, in fact two players got hurt after the roughing call. Things may have been different if that does not happen.
Anyway he will be sorely missed.
I don't think he'd be happy taking another "prove it" deal.
No player is happy on a "prove it" deal. But he only played a game and a half.
I liked him but it is difficult to judge his value in such little time.
MCDC & Glenn had him for three years with the Saints. The whole league knows him as one of the best Swiss Army knife DBs around. Philly would love to have him back. IDK if either the Eagles or Lions will pay up though.
Jack Campbell has earned more snaps IMO.
Doubt they’ll do it, but Alex Anzalone needs to have a reduced role. They love his leadership, he’s a captain and wears the green dot helmet. Wish that would change but realistically I don’t think so.
Jack Campbell has earned more snaps IMO.
Doubt they’ll do it, but Alex Anzalone needs to have a reduced role. They love his leadership, he’s a captain and wears the green dot helmet. Wish that would change but realistically I don’t think so.
Campbell is faster and more fluid than AA. Deserves more snaps.
I really like what AA brings, just wish he were a faster type of LB.
Definitely a low point after such high expectations. If we are feeling like this, you wonder where the players are at.Been avoiding coming in here as have been in a bad mood about it all. Hardly makes for light reading now that I have. Some really depressing injury news.
Yet if you hear some people talk he's a terrible coach.Lions head coach Dan Campbell leads the league in WP added over expected on fourth-down, 2PAT, timeout, etc. decisions through two games.
Last season he ranked 3rd in WP added over expected for the year.
Yet if you hear some people talk he's a terrible coach.Lions head coach Dan Campbell leads the league in WP added over expected on fourth-down, 2PAT, timeout, etc. decisions through two games.
Last season he ranked 3rd in WP added over expected for the year.
Jared Goff has a good thing brewing with rookie Sam LaPorta, who's got more passes coming his way.
"When guys are making plays across the middle and catching balls like he is, it gains a lot of trust from me to want to continue to give it to him."
I jumped on the Josh Reynolds bandwagon last week thanks to the info here, @BobbyLayne , and the history of SEA-DET games. I might jump off for a week, TBD.
Jameson was just dropped in my league. Any predictions about his future use after game 6? Benches aren't that deep in my league and byes start game 5, but I still imagine he'll be picked up in the next week or so.
Look at me!I have Chase/Waddle/Olave/Addison/JSN so not looking to start him right away but I like the idea of having an upside sitting there.
Faulty logic you aggressively play for the TD and take the FG if you can’t. The TD puts you up by 4 and Seattle has to score a TD to win.Yet if you hear some people talk he's a terrible coach.Lions head coach Dan Campbell leads the league in WP added over expected on fourth-down, 2PAT, timeout, etc. decisions through two games.
Last season he ranked 3rd in WP added over expected for the year.
People on Reddit and X losing their minds over what he said on 97.1 yesterday.
Campbell:
Campbell: Lions' final drive was "end of half" scenario, not end of game
Do I agree with Coach here? No, but that’s OK. I’m a CPA who spent 25 years in tech M&A. I can speak as a SME on the things I spent thousands of hours doing. I’ll defer to the guy who is quantitatively, statistically one of the best decision makers in the league when it comes to end game decisions.
Trailing by three with 1:44 remaining in their Week 2 loss to Seattle, the Lions took over at midfield with all three timeouts. From that point on, Dan Campbell said the Lions were in an "end-of-half" scenario, not end of game. They would force the game to overtime with a field goal as time expired, before losing the coin toss and then losing the game.
"To me, you’re down three, in the worst-case scenario you’re going in tied at halftime playing to overtime," Campbell said Tuesday on 97.1 The Ticket. "We agree with that? So we know, at worst, that’s what we need to end up with. At best, we’re going to get a touchdown. That is not end-of-game scenario, in my mind. That is end of half. That’s like, we’re the end of the second quarter, is how we’re playing that scenario."
Campbell said that because the Lions had just "come back from two scores down," they wanted to ensure that "at minimum," they brought the game into overtime: "We are going to get a field goal and we are not going to give them the chance to answer before halftime."
The drive began with a 12-yard completion to Josh Reynolds. The Lions ran their next play at 1:05, a handoff to Kalif Raymond that went for 11 yards. They let the clock run down to 32 seconds before Goff hit Jahmyr Gibbs for a short gain to the Seahawks' 23. At that point, Campbell called his first timeout with 26 seconds to go.
For the Lions, the approach changed after the next play when Goff failed to connect with Amon-Ra St. Brown over the middle for a potential first down. When they wound up facing 4th and 3 after another short pass to Gibbs on third down, Campbell let the clock wind down to 3 seconds before taking his second timeout to set up the game-tying field goal.
Asked if they thought about taking a shot to the end zone at any point in the final series, Campbell said, "No, I wanted to get a first down, call a timeout and then we had three shots to the end zone." He added that St. Brown was Goff's "first read" on the failed second-down play, "so we're good. We just didn't get it connected on."
Goff said Tuesday on 97.1 The Ticket that "it's a delicate balance" between playing to win and potentially leaving time on the clock for Seattle "and I’ve got a lot of respect for that balance that Dan played."
"Of course you want to get six there, you want to score a touchdown on any of those plays," said Goff. "But at the same time, there's an idea in the back of your head that you don’t want to kick a field goal with 45 seconds left. You do have to run those scenarios as you’re going, and it is a delicate dance there."
"We methodically drove it down, I love what Ben (Johnson) called, I thought Goff did a heck of a job," said Campbell. "We missed on a throw there, but ultimately we had plenty of time to answer. But we did what we needed to do to get into overtime."
And then, the coin fell in Seattle's favor.
Yesterday everyone was jumping on these comments like it was a gotcha moment. I looked at it as insight into his thought process. I’m OK with folks who come to different conclusions if I can at least follow how they got there.
His aggressiveness adds way more win probability. He makes the gutsy calls we wish more HCs would at least think about. People say he coaches too much by the seat of his pants. It’s true, he does take into consideration the situation. Sometimes he’s wrong. BB made a lot of curious decisions in his 6 SB run. Sometimes the first reaction was “that’s crazy” and more often than not a deeper analytic dive proved him right.
I’m not comparing MCDC to HIM. But I don’t think it’s a coincidence many of his “audacious” decisions are the correct one from a win probability added view. To conventional thinkers it’s reckless, but in reality it is well thought out.
IMO
Not perfect, he hasblond*blind spots. But I’m glad he’s ours.
*Freudian slip
Faulty logic you aggressively play for the TD and take the FG if you can’t. The TD puts you up by 4 and Seattle has to score a TD to win.Yet if you hear some people talk he's a terrible coach.Lions head coach Dan Campbell leads the league in WP added over expected on fourth-down, 2PAT, timeout, etc. decisions through two games.
Last season he ranked 3rd in WP added over expected for the year.
People on Reddit and X losing their minds over what he said on 97.1 yesterday.
Campbell:
Campbell: Lions' final drive was "end of half" scenario, not end of game
Do I agree with Coach here? No, but that’s OK. I’m a CPA who spent 25 years in tech M&A. I can speak as a SME on the things I spent thousands of hours doing. I’ll defer to the guy who is quantitatively, statistically one of the best decision makers in the league when it comes to end game decisions.
Trailing by three with 1:44 remaining in their Week 2 loss to Seattle, the Lions took over at midfield with all three timeouts. From that point on, Dan Campbell said the Lions were in an "end-of-half" scenario, not end of game. They would force the game to overtime with a field goal as time expired, before losing the coin toss and then losing the game.
"To me, you’re down three, in the worst-case scenario you’re going in tied at halftime playing to overtime," Campbell said Tuesday on 97.1 The Ticket. "We agree with that? So we know, at worst, that’s what we need to end up with. At best, we’re going to get a touchdown. That is not end-of-game scenario, in my mind. That is end of half. That’s like, we’re the end of the second quarter, is how we’re playing that scenario."
Campbell said that because the Lions had just "come back from two scores down," they wanted to ensure that "at minimum," they brought the game into overtime: "We are going to get a field goal and we are not going to give them the chance to answer before halftime."
The drive began with a 12-yard completion to Josh Reynolds. The Lions ran their next play at 1:05, a handoff to Kalif Raymond that went for 11 yards. They let the clock run down to 32 seconds before Goff hit Jahmyr Gibbs for a short gain to the Seahawks' 23. At that point, Campbell called his first timeout with 26 seconds to go.
For the Lions, the approach changed after the next play when Goff failed to connect with Amon-Ra St. Brown over the middle for a potential first down. When they wound up facing 4th and 3 after another short pass to Gibbs on third down, Campbell let the clock wind down to 3 seconds before taking his second timeout to set up the game-tying field goal.
Asked if they thought about taking a shot to the end zone at any point in the final series, Campbell said, "No, I wanted to get a first down, call a timeout and then we had three shots to the end zone." He added that St. Brown was Goff's "first read" on the failed second-down play, "so we're good. We just didn't get it connected on."
Goff said Tuesday on 97.1 The Ticket that "it's a delicate balance" between playing to win and potentially leaving time on the clock for Seattle "and I’ve got a lot of respect for that balance that Dan played."
"Of course you want to get six there, you want to score a touchdown on any of those plays," said Goff. "But at the same time, there's an idea in the back of your head that you don’t want to kick a field goal with 45 seconds left. You do have to run those scenarios as you’re going, and it is a delicate dance there."
"We methodically drove it down, I love what Ben (Johnson) called, I thought Goff did a heck of a job," said Campbell. "We missed on a throw there, but ultimately we had plenty of time to answer. But we did what we needed to do to get into overtime."
And then, the coin fell in Seattle's favor.
Yesterday everyone was jumping on these comments like it was a gotcha moment. I looked at it as insight into his thought process. I’m OK with folks who come to different conclusions if I can at least follow how they got there.
His aggressiveness adds way more win probability. He makes the gutsy calls we wish more HCs would at least think about. People say he coaches too much by the seat of his pants. It’s true, he does take into consideration the situation. Sometimes he’s wrong. BB made a lot of curious decisions in his 6 SB run. Sometimes the first reaction was “that’s crazy” and more often than not a deeper analytic dive proved him right.
I’m not comparing MCDC to HIM. But I don’t think it’s a coincidence many of his “audacious” decisions are the correct one from a win probability added view. To conventional thinkers it’s reckless, but in reality it is well thought out.
IMO
Not perfect, he hasblond*blind spots. But I’m glad he’s ours.
*Freudian slip
Lot less risky than fake punts from your 18 yard line needing at least 2 yards to go. They just made that BTW. Fail they turn the ball over in the red zone and KC in good shape for the TD. Likely they win and Lions lose.
Reminds me of last year’s first Vikes game when MCDC went soft and conservative and kicked the FG. Lions also lost that game. Campbell said he wouldn’t do that again but I think he just did.
I think the time to go conservative was when he went for it on 4th down on our side of the field and interestingly we had a 4 point lead. We failed Seattle went on to score and it was a turning point.
Not complaining per se about it but not consistent.
I like DC’s aggressiveness and creativity but playing passive and more for the tie is not his game.