2023 Philadelphia Eagles - Nelson Mandela, Central Park 5, West Memphis 3, Big Dom. Yet another gross miscarriage of justice. Free Big Dom! (29 Viewers)

[The Noid]

I think he just knows he's going top 10.

It's basketball, but Cade Cunningham last year did the same, and said he would only visit with the team that had the #1 overall pick.

Keep in mind there's a few major differences in this situation: he's not a consensus #1 pick, he was involved in a tragic, off-field situation where he made some very bad decisions (lied to police, was racing/speeding after being pulled over for the same a few months prior), didn't test at the combine, interviewed poorly with some teams, and then had an awful pro day where he showed up out of shape, unprepared, and unable to finish the drills.

If none of the above happened, no one would blink an eye at this strategy. But since it did, it makes the strategy questionable, at best, and detrimental, at worst.

Tunsil slid to 13 for taking a bong hit, so Carter sliding outside of the top 10 for much more baggage isn't some remote possibility.

 

[jasvic]

Jalen Carter is about to fall big time. Refusing to talk to teams outside the top Ten now.

because he's going to go in the top 10.

He better, now that he's pulled this. It could backfire on him and cause a huge slide if he DOESN'T go top 10 because the rest of the teams are going to wonder what scared those teams off and avoid taking him in the teens or early twenties.

Lots of players have done this before, the whole "ill only visit top X teams"

I think no way we pass on him if he's there at 10.

But what is the rationale for doing this? What is the upside? What if a team outside of top 10 wanted to trade up for him?

From the outside, the only upside is he makes fewer visits. So comes off a bit lazy/selfish. Maybe it means nothing, maybe he's Albert Haynesworth. Top picks go under a microscope, so doing things like this is a bad look. His agent/team should know better.

Or maybe they have multiple teams in the top 10 that have already indicated they're taking him if he's there.

Very well could be. I just think in light of everything else surrounding him it's a bad look, but in 6 months no one will remember or care if he lives up to his potential.

 

[DJackson10]

Jalen Carter is about to fall big time. Refusing to talk to teams outside the top Ten now.

because he's going to go in the top 10.

He better, now that he's pulled this. It could backfire on him and cause a huge slide if he DOESN'T go top 10 because the rest of the teams are going to wonder what scared those teams off and avoid taking him in the teens or early twenties.

Lots of players have done this before, the whole "ill only visit top X teams"

I think no way we pass on him if he's there at 10.

But what is the rationale for doing this? What is the upside? What if a team outside of top 10 wanted to trade up for him?

Him and his agent are afraid of him falling do to all the issues with him. They are hoping it scares a top ten pick into taking him. Given all his issues I think he's a huge risk. You want UGA player in the top get me Nolan Smith

 

[DJackson10]

Jalen Carter is about to fall big time. Refusing to talk to teams outside the top Ten now.

because he's going to go in the top 10.

He better, now that he's pulled this. It could backfire on him and cause a huge slide if he DOESN'T go top 10 because the rest of the teams are going to wonder what scared those teams off and avoid taking him in the teens or early twenties.

Lots of players have done this before, the whole "ill only visit top X teams"

I think no way we pass on him if he's there at 10.

But what is the rationale for doing this? What is the upside? What if a team outside of top 10 wanted to trade up for him?

From the outside, the only upside is he makes fewer visits. So comes off a bit lazy/selfish. Maybe it means nothing, maybe he's Albert Haynesworth. Top picks go under a microscope, so doing things like this is a bad look. His agent/team should know better.

Arrogant selfish whatever you want to call it. This isn't a guy saying I won't go to X team he's saying I'm not going to multiple teams now. I spoke to a former scout I knew yesterday and he said given all the other issues with Carter that sends another red flag and he'd be telling his former team to take them off their board. Even if he becomes good negotiation a contract with this guy and his team doesn't seem worth the pain in the *** it's gonna eventually come.

 

[DJackson10]

I think he just knows he's going top 10.

It's basketball, but Cade Cunningham last year did the same, and said he would only visit with the team that had the #1 overall pick.

Keep in mind there's a few major differences in this situation: he's not a consensus #1 pick, he was involved in a tragic, off-field situation where he made some very bad decisions (lied to police, was racing/speeding after being pulled over for the same a few months prior), didn't test at the combine, interviewed poorly with some teams, and then had an awful pro day where he showed up out of shape, unprepared, and unable to finish the drills.

If none of the above happened, no one would blink an eye at this strategy. But since it did, it makes the strategy questionable, at best, and detrimental, at worst.

Tunsil slid to 13 for taking a bong hit, so Carter sliding outside of the top 10 for much more baggage isn't some remote possibility.

I could see Caljncey, Siaka, Dexter, and others at his position going off the board before him now honestly.

 

[renesauz]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

 

[DJackson10]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

If he's there in the 3rd round depending what they do picks wise or get more picks I'd take him there. Like I said earlier I can see a lot of the other DT's going before his name is called. This isn't the I'm not playing for the Chargers like Eli thing. This is a guy with multiple off the field issues and then this gives an ultimate red flag. More then a few former NFL people I keep in touch with have said if they were on teams still they'd take him off their board completely or would put a asterisk with a draft if he drops to this we feel comfortable taking him at. Given we need to hit on our picks too much of a risk

 

[renesauz]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

If he's there in the 3rd round depending what they do picks wise or get more picks I'd take him there. Like I said earlier I can see a lot of the other DT's going before his name is called. This isn't the I'm not playing for the Chargers like Eli thing. This is a guy with multiple off the field issues and then this gives an ultimate red flag. More then a few former NFL people I keep in touch with have said if they were on teams still they'd take him off their board completely or would put a asterisk with a draft if he drops to this we feel comfortable taking him at. Given we need to hit on our picks too much of a risk

Not sure I'd go that far. Mid 2nd seems a reasonable risk/reward spot. Just two many red flags to be worth a 1, especially a relatively early 1. If you're gonna miss with a top 10 pick, it can't be at DT

 

[Deamon]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

If he's there in the 3rd round depending what they do picks wise or get more picks I'd take him there. Like I said earlier I can see a lot of the other DT's going before his name is called. This isn't the I'm not playing for the Chargers like Eli thing. This is a guy with multiple off the field issues and then this gives an ultimate red flag. More then a few former NFL people I keep in touch with have said if they were on teams still they'd take him off their board completely or would put a asterisk with a draft if he drops to this we feel comfortable taking him at. Given we need to hit on our picks too much of a risk

Not sure I'd go that far. Mid 2nd seems a reasonable risk/reward spot. Just two many red flags to be worth a 1, especially a relatively early 1. If you're gonna miss with a top 10 pick, it can't be at DT

you guys are nuts thinking he's going 2nd round. He's an absolute beast on the field.

 

[renesauz]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

If he's there in the 3rd round depending what they do picks wise or get more picks I'd take him there. Like I said earlier I can see a lot of the other DT's going before his name is called. This isn't the I'm not playing for the Chargers like Eli thing. This is a guy with multiple off the field issues and then this gives an ultimate red flag. More then a few former NFL people I keep in touch with have said if they were on teams still they'd take him off their board completely or would put a asterisk with a draft if he drops to this we feel comfortable taking him at. Given we need to hit on our picks too much of a risk

Not sure I'd go that far. Mid 2nd seems a reasonable risk/reward spot. Just two many red flags to be worth a 1, especially a relatively early 1. If you're gonna miss with a top 10 pick, it can't be at DT

you guys are nuts thinking he's going 2nd round. He's an absolute beast on the field.

Oh, I didn't say he'd last that long, I said I wouldn't want him before the 2nd (given what we know publicly...there could well be more private info to change my position).
Based on talent/performance (on tape) alone 7-10ish feels about right. He might slide some, but I'd be surprised if went past 20. Someone will take the chance.

 

[Unwrittenlaw]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

 

[Insein]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

They absolutely would spend more capital on DT. Between DT and OT, those are the most valued positions for the Eagles. Getting a stud player cheap for 5 years to pair with another cheap stud player who has 4 years left fits perfectly well when the QB is about to get $50m a year.

 

[Snotbubbles]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

LOL.

2022 traded a 1st for Wide Receiver AJ Brown
2021 1st - Wide Receiver DeVonta Smith
2020 1st - Wide Receiver Jalen Reagor
2019 2nd - Wide Receiver JJ Arcega-Whiteside

That's 3 1sts and a 2nd on one position in four straight drafts. If a DT is the #1 player on the board at 10 the Eagles will take a DT.

 

[Snotbubbles]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

They absolutely would spend more capital on DT. Between DT and OT, those are the most valued positions for the Eagles. Getting a stud player cheap for 5 years to pair with another cheap stud player who has 4 years left fits perfectly well when the QB is about to get $50m a year.

Not only that but DT might be the most highly coveted position on the defense. Just look at the NFL free agency. Javon Hargrave got the highest AAV of the offseason on defense. 5 DT in the top 13 highest paid free agents this offseason.

 

[Cowboysfan8]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

LOL.

2022 traded a 1st for Wide Receiver AJ Brown
2021 1st - Wide Receiver DeVonta Smith
2020 1st - Wide Receiver Jalen Reagor
2019 2nd - Wide Receiver JJ Arcega-Whiteside

That's 3 1sts and a 2nd on one position in four straight drafts. If a DT is the #1 player on the board at 10 the Eagles will take a DT.

To be fair, Whiteside and Reagor were terrible picks resulting in them having to use 2 MORE picks on WR

 

[Terpman22]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

LOL.

2022 traded a 1st for Wide Receiver AJ Brown
2021 1st - Wide Receiver DeVonta Smith
2020 1st - Wide Receiver Jalen Reagor
2019 2nd - Wide Receiver JJ Arcega-Whiteside

That's 3 1sts and a 2nd on one position in four straight drafts. If a DT is the #1 player on the board at 10 the Eagles will take a DT.

To be fair, Whiteside and Reagor were terrible picks resulting in them having to use 2 MORE picks on WR

True. Reminds me of the Lions just going to the well at WR until the eventually landed Calvin Johnson.

With that said, the Eagles have no depth at DT behind Williams, who is not really proven yet and Davis, who also is not proven yet. Cox won't be back next year. Pretty sure the Saints guy we just signed is a JAG, but maybe a rotation guy at best. No chance in hell, IMO, that Davis is *off* the Eagles board and no chance in hell he falls to the 2nd round. Drew Rosenhaus isn't an idiot, if he said "no meetings with teams outside the top 10" he definitely knows his guy will go high.

Carter reminds me of Warren Sapp, with both how dominant he is, the potential of the on field stuff and the potential off field stuff. During his career Sapp proved to be at least not a total turd. Once he retired, different story.

I really want this guy on the team. Red flags, what have you, IMO, the Eagles have a great locker room full of leaders that will be able to keep a guy like this in check while also coaching him up, showing him the tricks of the trade. Heck, even he could get into legal racing if he wants, a big thing Fletcher Cox does.

 

[Amused to Death]

No chance in hell, IMO, that Davis is *off* the Eagles board and no chance in hell he falls to the 2nd round. Drew Rosenhaus isn't an idiot, if he said "no meetings with teams outside the top 10" he definitely knows his guy will go high.

Correct, Drew Rosenhaus has been an NFL agent for 25 years. He had a reputation of being one of the most difficult agents to work with but his clients love him. IF Carter drops to 10 and IF the Eagles draft him, its because Howie did his due diligence. I agree the Eagles have a strong clubhouse with Cox, Johnson, Kelce, Graham, etc. Sure his pro day was a flag, but I can't imagine that negates his entire college career.

I also trust that IF the Eagles drafted him, they've already spoken with Carter's former teammates for their input and got a favorable reaction. Trust in Howie!

 

[DJackson10]

i don't want him at 10. Too many flags to take him that high. Given the apparent attitude, not sure I'd want him at 30 either

If he's there in the 3rd round depending what they do picks wise or get more picks I'd take him there. Like I said earlier I can see a lot of the other DT's going before his name is called. This isn't the I'm not playing for the Chargers like Eli thing. This is a guy with multiple off the field issues and then this gives an ultimate red flag. More then a few former NFL people I keep in touch with have said if they were on teams still they'd take him off their board completely or would put a asterisk with a draft if he drops to this we feel comfortable taking him at. Given we need to hit on our picks too much of a risk

Not sure I'd go that far. Mid 2nd seems a reasonable risk/reward spot. Just two many red flags to be worth a 1, especially a relatively early 1. If you're gonna miss with a top 10 pick, it can't be at DT

Considering the Eagles lack of picks this year I'm not wasting a 2nd on this guy unless we did a few trade backs for etc picks

 

[Amused to Death]

No chance in hell, IMO, that Davis is *off* the Eagles board and no chance in hell he falls to the 2nd round. Drew Rosenhaus isn't an idiot, if he said "no meetings with teams outside the top 10" he definitely knows his guy will go high.

Correct, Drew Rosenhaus has been an NFL agent for 25 years. He had a reputation of being one of the most difficult agents to work with but his clients love him. IF Carter drops to 10 and IF the Eagles draft him, its because Howie did his due diligence. I agree the Eagles have a strong clubhouse with Cox, Johnson, Kelce, Graham, etc. Sure his pro day was a flag, but I can't imagine that negates his entire college career.

I also trust that IF the Eagles drafted him, they've already spoken with Carter's former teammates for their input and got a favorable reaction. Trust in Howie!

I meant to add to the above, we are in peak smokescreen season. We have no idea what NFL teams think about Carter at this point. There isn't a person involved with an NFL war room who's leaking truthful, valuable information about their board or their intentions to beat writers, agents, twitter followers, or their spouse. If anything is leaked, its for a purpose.

Three weeks out from the draft, I don't trust any "leaked" information.

 

[ProstheticRGK]

love Carter's talent, but if he does slide to 10 and the Eagles pick him, I'll be joining the rest of you: chewing my fingernails hoping the off-field stuff is overblown and he comes to camp ready to ball out.

 

[renesauz]

No chance in hell, IMO, that Davis is *off* the Eagles board and no chance in hell he falls to the 2nd round. Drew Rosenhaus isn't an idiot, if he said "no meetings with teams outside the top 10" he definitely knows his guy will go high.

Correct, Drew Rosenhaus has been an NFL agent for 25 years. He had a reputation of being one of the most difficult agents to work with but his clients love him. IF Carter drops to 10 and IF the Eagles draft him, its because Howie did his due diligence. I agree the Eagles have a strong clubhouse with Cox, Johnson, Kelce, Graham, etc. Sure his pro day was a flag, but I can't imagine that negates his entire college career.

I also trust that IF the Eagles drafted him, they've already spoken with Carter's former teammates for their input and got a favorable reaction. Trust in Howie!

This is fair. Like I said, we don't have all the info. I won't go crazy if we get him. The raw talent is obvious

 

[Insein]

love Carter's talent, but if he does slide to 10 and the Eagles pick him, I'll be joining the rest of you: chewing my fingernails hoping the off-field stuff is overblown and he comes to camp ready to ball out.

If the Eagles take him at 10, the off the field stuff is overblown. They know way more details than the public. If they feel comfortable enough to take him, then they know.

 

[rockaction]

If the Eagles take him at 10, the off the field stuff is overblown. They know way more details than the public. If they feel comfortable enough to take him, then they know.

This logic is sort of faulty. I think it begs the question, actually. You're assuming a conclusion from an implied premise that isn't necessarily so. You're taking the result and using that result as a reason to disqualify the existence of a possibility. Just because the Eagles know way more details than the public doesn't mean they won't chance it.

Another fault is that one of the premises of your argument is unsound. They may not know more details than the public, making the premise wrong. Yeah, practically speaking, they're going to do their homework more than the average typist of columns, but how much can they really know about this guy? They're not the FBI or anything.

I don't know. Your logic just seems off.

If X, then Y because of X

If the Eagles draft him, then the off the field stuff is overblown because the Eagles did draft him.

That's a fallacious argument, IMO.

 

[ProstheticRGK]

If the Eagles take him at 10, the off the field stuff is overblown. They know way more details than the public. If they feel comfortable enough to take him, then they know.

This logic is sort of faulty. I think it begs the question, actually. You're assuming a conclusion from an implied premise that isn't necessarily so. You're taking the result and using that result as a reason to disqualify the existence of a possibility. Just because the Eagles know way more details than the public doesn't mean they won't chance it.

Another fault is that one of the premises of your argument is unsound. They may not know more details than the public, making the premise wrong. Yeah, practically speaking, they're going to do their homework more than the average typist of columns, but how much can they really know about this guy? They're not the FBI or anything.

I don't know. Your logic just seems off.

If X, then Y because of X

If the Eagles draft him, then the off the field stuff is overblown because the Eagles did draft him.

That's a fallacious argument, IMO.

Logically, you have a compelling argument. However, the missed subtext is because the Eagles have a good track record of being very risk averse, re: character issues, it is less likely that the off-field issues are as compelling as it seems in the pre-draft media hype circus, IF the Eagles DO draft him.

 

[Amused to Death]

If the Eagles take him at 10, the off the field stuff is overblown. They know way more details than the public. If they feel comfortable enough to take him, then they know.

This logic is sort of faulty. I think it begs the question, actually. You're assuming a conclusion from an implied premise that isn't necessarily so. You're taking the result and using that result as a reason to disqualify the existence of a possibility. Just because the Eagles know way more details than the public doesn't mean they won't chance it.

Another fault is that one of the premises of your argument is unsound. They may not know more details than the public, making the premise wrong. Yeah, practically speaking, they're going to do their homework more than the average typist of columns, but how much can they really know about this guy? They're not the FBI or anything.

I don't know. Your logic just seems off.

If X, then Y because of X

If the Eagles draft him, then the off the field stuff is overblown because the Eagles did draft him.

That's a fallacious argument, IMO.

Logically, you have a compelling argument. However, the missed subtext is because the Eagles have a good track record of being very risk averse, re: character issues, it is less likely that the off-field issues are as compelling as it seems in the pre-draft media hype circus, IF the Eagles DO draft him.

Teams do their own investigations, right? I doubt teams are relying on what Adam Schefter tweets to his followers.

As I posted upthread, this is peak smokescreen season. Its my opinion that the vast majority of public info is out there to serve someone's purpose. I'll defer to Howie and the Eagles' war room.

 

[DJackson10]

If the Eagles take him at 10, the off the field stuff is overblown. They know way more details than the public. If they feel comfortable enough to take him, then they know.

This logic is sort of faulty. I think it begs the question, actually. You're assuming a conclusion from an implied premise that isn't necessarily so. You're taking the result and using that result as a reason to disqualify the existence of a possibility. Just because the Eagles know way more details than the public doesn't mean they won't chance it.

Another fault is that one of the premises of your argument is unsound. They may not know more details than the public, making the premise wrong. Yeah, practically speaking, they're going to do their homework more than the average typist of columns, but how much can they really know about this guy? They're not the FBI or anything.

I don't know. Your logic just seems off.

If X, then Y because of X

If the Eagles draft him, then the off the field stuff is overblown because the Eagles did draft him.

That's a fallacious argument, IMO.

Logically, you have a compelling argument. However, the missed subtext is because the Eagles have a good track record of being very risk averse, re: character issues, it is less likely that the off-field issues are as compelling as it seems in the pre-draft media hype circus, IF the Eagles DO draft him.

Teams do their own investigations, right? I doubt teams are relying on what Adam Schefter tweets to his followers.

As I posted upthread, this is peak smokescreen season. Its my opinion that the vast majority of public info is out there to serve someone's purpose. I'll defer to Howie and the Eagles' war room.

Most do private with their own people. They also interview friends, family and teammates and coaches. Most teams don't put out all the info. Scheftar just reports what teams tell him. You can get an educated guess on stuff from it too. Just based on the guys off field issues and everything it's safe to suggest Carter could possible drop pretty far just looking at other players in past drafts who have dropped for far less and just as good or better.

 

[JAA]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

 

[Deamon]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

 

[JAA]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

 

[Deamon]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

 

[jasvic]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

 

[Snotbubbles]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I was on drafttek.com and looking at the Eagles past draft history under Howie Roseman, in rounds 1 & 2 he reaches for the players he wants. In rounds 3 through 7 he goes for value.

Here are the round 1 & 2 value picks since 2016: DeVonta Smith, Andre Dillard, Derek Barnett, JJ Arcega-Whiteside. NOTE: What's interesting about the Smith pick is it would have been a reach if they stayed in their original position but moving down to get Smith made it a value pick)

Here are the round 1 & 2 reach picks since 2016: Jordan Davis, Cam Jurgens, Landon Dickerson, Jalen Reagor, Jalen Hurts, Miles Sanders, Dallas Goedert, Sidney Jones, Carson Wentz

According to drafttek...

At #10 here are some value picks that could be available: Peter Skoronski (OT), Paris Johnson (OT), Christian Gonzalez (CB), Bijan Robinson (RB)

At #10 here are some reach picks that could be available: Jalen Carter (DT), Nolan Smith (DE), Broderick Jones (OT), Lukas Van Ness (DE), Devon Witherspoon (CB)

If I had to guess, I'd say the Eagles will be taking one of the players in the reach picks.

ETA: The more I read about Broderick Jones, the more I think he's the type of OL the Eagles like and might be a better fit for Philly than Skoronski. Kelce-like speed and athleticism with good size and room to grow. Possible trade down candidate.

 

[Unwrittenlaw]

Thinking it might be DE now. Did a deeper dive on this and just noticed Philly signed Slay to a 3 yr contract. Probably Lukas Van Ness. He seems more similar to the body type of Graham and Sweat. Graham is signed to a a 1 yr contract and is 34 yrs old. Sweat's salary jumps to $14 mil and there's a potential out next offseason.

 

[need2know]

As long as they don't draft a qb or kicker in round one I'm cool

 

[Deamon]

According to drafttek...

At #10 here are some value picks that could be available: Peter Skoronski (OT), Paris Johnson (OT), Christian Gonzalez (CB), Bijan Robinson (RB)

At #10 here are some reach picks that could be available: Jalen Carter (DT), Nolan Smith (DE), Broderick Jones (OT), Lukas Van Ness (DE), Devon Witherspoon (CB)

If I had to guess, I'd say the Eagles will be taking one of the players in the reach picks.

This stuff is weird because Carter I feel would fit into value pick (would be going below almost everywhere he's mocked), and Bijan would be a reach (would be going way earlier than where he's mocked almost everywhere).

I would be shocked if we went with Skoronski or Johnson at 10.

 

[rockaction]

Sweat's salary jumps to $14 mil and there's a potential out next offseason

I roster Sweat in IDP. He won me Week 16 (semis) this year with that bat and pick six against the Cowboys. So sweet watching him stiff arm Dak and motor forty-five or so sweet yards for the score. So many fantasy points there. Defended pass, interception, return yards, TD. I had such a weak offensive output Week 16 and along came that.

LOL. Sorry while I gloat a bit. Y'all care about my team, I know.

Oh, but eff this guy not meeting with teams out of the top ten after fleeing the cops. I want no part of this dude. Especially when you're hoping your 1.10 stays with you for a reasonable second contract when you're negotiating against the option year. This guy seems the type that might quit once he's paid.

 

[renesauz]

Pretty sure we trade down from that #10 to pick up a couple picks later and/or a 1+ in 2024

 

[SoBeDad]

Pretty sure we trade down from that #10 to pick up a couple picks later and/or a 1+ in 2024

When Miami traded up from 1.12 to 1.06 in the 2021 draft with the goal of getting Chase or Waddle, the experts said Miami overpaid by giving up their 2022 1st and a 2021 4th, getting back a 2021 5th. Not only that, but giving up a future first is a huge risk, remember Miami started 1-7 in 2021.

I don't think PHI gets a trading partner for their 1.10 pick who is willing to give up a future 1st. To get DeVonta Smith at 1.10, PHI gave up their 1.12 (Micah!) and 3.20 to Dallas. I could see a similar value trade up of a few picks for Carter or one of the OTs, getting back a 3rd.

OTOH, if one if the QBs fall, something bigger could be offered.

 

[SoBeDad]

I had forgotten about other 2021 trades. CHI trade 1.20 for 1.11 in 2021 to get Fields. They gave up a 2022 1st and 4th round pick, and a 2021 5th.

And the Jets traded up 9 spots from 1.23 to 1.14 and gave up two 3rd rounders in 2021 and got back a 4th rounder.

And there were other trades involving 1st round picks with Adams, Orlando Brown, and Ramsey. Plus the SF trade up for Lance. 2021 was crazy.

 

[rockaction]

And there were other trades involving 1st round picks with Adams

I was thinking along the lines of what renesauz was thinking. A trade back makes sense, especially if one of the QBs happens to fall for some reason.

We got two for Adams. Yes, I said, we. Everybody knows I'm a Jets fan.

Thievery. For a box safety, no less.

Thank you, sneaky Pete.

 

[DJackson10]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I was on drafttek.com and looking at the Eagles past draft history under Howie Roseman, in rounds 1 & 2 he reaches for the players he wants. In rounds 3 through 7 he goes for value.

Here are the round 1 & 2 value picks since 2016: DeVonta Smith, Andre Dillard, Derek Barnett, JJ Arcega-Whiteside. NOTE: What's interesting about the Smith pick is it would have been a reach if they stayed in their original position but moving down to get Smith made it a value pick)

Here are the round 1 & 2 reach picks since 2016: Jordan Davis, Cam Jurgens, Landon Dickerson, Jalen Reagor, Jalen Hurts, Miles Sanders, Dallas Goedert, Sidney Jones, Carson Wentz

According to drafttek...

At #10 here are some value picks that could be available: Peter Skoronski (OT), Paris Johnson (OT), Christian Gonzalez (CB), Bijan Robinson (RB)

At #10 here are some reach picks that could be available: Jalen Carter (DT), Nolan Smith (DE), Broderick Jones (OT), Lukas Van Ness (DE), Devon Witherspoon (CB)

If I had to guess, I'd say the Eagles will be taking one of the players in the reach picks.

ETA: The more I read about Broderick Jones, the more I think he's the type of OL the Eagles like and might be a better fit for Philly than Skoronski. Kelce-like speed and athleticism with good size and room to grow. Possible trade down candidate.

Smith they traded up for. I don't think RB at that spot is value at all.

If they go for DL they are taking Nolan Smith similar size ability as Hassan Reddick

 

[DJackson10]

Thinking it might be DE now. Did a deeper dive on this and just noticed Philly signed Slay to a 3 yr contract. Probably Lukas Van Ness. He seems more similar to the body type of Graham and Sweat. Graham is signed to a a 1 yr contract and is 34 yrs old. Sweat's salary jumps to $14 mil and there's a potential out next offseason.

Nolan Smith he has similar size to Hassan Reddick

 

[DJackson10]

Pretty sure we trade down from that #10 to pick up a couple picks later and/or a 1+ in 2024

When Miami traded up from 1.12 to 1.06 in the 2021 draft with the goal of getting Chase or Waddle, the experts said Miami overpaid by giving up their 2022 1st and a 2021 4th, getting back a 2021 5th. Not only that, but giving up a future first is a huge risk, remember Miami started 1-7 in 2021.

I don't think PHI gets a trading partner for their 1.10 pick who is willing to give up a future 1st. To get DeVonta Smith at 1.10, PHI gave up their 1.12 (Micah!) and 3.20 to Dallas. I could see a similar value trade up of a few picks for Carter or one of the OTs, getting back a 3rd.

OTOH, if one if the QBs fall, something bigger could be offered.

I'm perfectly fine giving up on Parson's for Smith. Smith was huge in getting to the SB. I barely heard a word from Parsons in the playoffs and he seems to talk more then show up for big games. I'm letting Carter fall honestly I think people are underestimating how much this dude could drop. Teams are less willing to risk a high pick on guy with character issues. I'd be shocked if someone took Carter high.

 

[DJackson10]

I had forgotten about other 2021 trades. CHI trade 1.20 for 1.11 in 2021 to get Fields. They gave up a 2022 1st and 4th round pick, and a 2021 5th.

And the Jets traded up 9 spots from 1.23 to 1.14 and gave up two 3rd rounders in 2021 and got back a 4th rounder.

And there were other trades involving 1st round picks with Adams, Orlando Brown, and Ramsey. Plus the SF trade up for Lance. 2021 was crazy.

And all 3 QBs ended up being pretty terrible picks

 

[Deamon]

Over the past 20 years this is what the Eagles used their first round pick on.

D-Line: 8
O-Line: 4
WR: 4
QB: 1
LB: 0
TE: 0
CB: 0
RB: 0
S: 0

 

[Snotbubbles]

According to drafttek...

At #10 here are some value picks that could be available: Peter Skoronski (OT), Paris Johnson (OT), Christian Gonzalez (CB), Bijan Robinson (RB)

At #10 here are some reach picks that could be available: Jalen Carter (DT), Nolan Smith (DE), Broderick Jones (OT), Lukas Van Ness (DE), Devon Witherspoon (CB)

If I had to guess, I'd say the Eagles will be taking one of the players in the reach picks.

This stuff is weird because Carter I feel would fit into value pick (would be going below almost everywhere he's mocked), and Bijan would be a reach (would be going way earlier than where he's mocked almost everywhere).

I would be shocked if we went with Skoronski or Johnson at 10.

The reach value is where drafttek ranks the players on their big board. They have Jalen Carter ranked 11th overall and Bijan Robinson 4th overall.

 

[Snotbubbles]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I was on drafttek.com and looking at the Eagles past draft history under Howie Roseman, in rounds 1 & 2 he reaches for the players he wants. In rounds 3 through 7 he goes for value.

Here are the round 1 & 2 value picks since 2016: DeVonta Smith, Andre Dillard, Derek Barnett, JJ Arcega-Whiteside. NOTE: What's interesting about the Smith pick is it would have been a reach if they stayed in their original position but moving down to get Smith made it a value pick)

Here are the round 1 & 2 reach picks since 2016: Jordan Davis, Cam Jurgens, Landon Dickerson, Jalen Reagor, Jalen Hurts, Miles Sanders, Dallas Goedert, Sidney Jones, Carson Wentz

According to drafttek...

At #10 here are some value picks that could be available: Peter Skoronski (OT), Paris Johnson (OT), Christian Gonzalez (CB), Bijan Robinson (RB)

At #10 here are some reach picks that could be available: Jalen Carter (DT), Nolan Smith (DE), Broderick Jones (OT), Lukas Van Ness (DE), Devon Witherspoon (CB)

If I had to guess, I'd say the Eagles will be taking one of the players in the reach picks.

ETA: The more I read about Broderick Jones, the more I think he's the type of OL the Eagles like and might be a better fit for Philly than Skoronski. Kelce-like speed and athleticism with good size and room to grow. Possible trade down candidate.

Smith they traded up for. I don't think RB at that spot is value at all.

If they go for DL they are taking Nolan Smith similar size ability as Hassan Reddick

They traded up after they traded down. Their original position was #6.

 

[Terpman22]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I'd like to hear your reasoning as "lucked out with Mailata" - was it purely "luck" they drafted a guy that never played American Football in his entire life, to the point he didn't even know how to properly put a helmet on and he just turned into a top 10 LT in the league? Or, maybe, just maybe, The Eagles OL Coach Jeff Stoutland is one of the best, if not the best OL coach in the league? If you lean more toward the latter then you'd understand the reasoning some of us think/lean that we won't take a T that high and we will rely on our guy to properly develop OL with more value picks.

 

[Snotbubbles]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I'd like to hear your reasoning as "lucked out with Mailata" - was it purely "luck" they drafted a guy that never played American Football in his entire life, to the point he didn't even know how to properly put a helmet on and he just turned into a top 10 LT in the league? Or, maybe, just maybe, The Eagles OL Coach Jeff Stoutland is one of the best, if not the best OL coach in the league? If you lean more toward the latter then you'd understand the reasoning some of us think/lean that we won't take a T that high and we will rely on our guy to properly develop OL with more value picks.

They were so sold on Mailata and his potential in 2018 that they spent a first round pick on Andre Dillard, a player who played the same position, in 2019. It was a classic, take-a-flyer on a player with good measurables.

 

[modogg]

There is no way they are drafting a DT in the 1st rd. They've spent Jordan Davis 1st rd draft capital and Milton Williams 3rd rder the past few years. If anything, they're drafting a CB.

My vote is OL. Someone versatile who can rotate, Tackle, Center, Guard.

we have such a good track record of getting OL talent later in the draft, I'd be pretty surprised if we took one at 10.

Lane Johnson?

Yes, one guy. The team has been fantastic at drafting late round OL that develop into starters. Would be totally shocked if they went OL at 10.

A bit disingenuous. Jurgens was a 2nd, Dickerson was a 2nd, Dillard was the plan at LT and a 1st but was a bust and they lucked out with Mailata.

I can't imagine Lane will be playing too much longer. Mailata has had back issues in the past and right now the only tackle they have behind them worth anything is Driscoll. Wouldn't be surprised in the least if they grab an OT at 10 or wherever that pick ends up. Especially since they probably won't be picking this high again in the near future.

I'd assume their board for that top pick is either OT/DL and then a CB.

I'd like to hear your reasoning as "lucked out with Mailata" - was it purely "luck" they drafted a guy that never played American Football in his entire life, to the point he didn't even know how to properly put a helmet on and he just turned into a top 10 LT in the league? Or, maybe, just maybe, The Eagles OL Coach Jeff Stoutland is one of the best, if not the best OL coach in the league? If you lean more toward the latter then you'd understand the reasoning some of us think/lean that we won't take a T that high and we will rely on our guy to properly develop OL with more value picks.

They were so sold on Mailata and his potential in 2018 that they spent a first round pick on Andre Dillard, a player who played the same position, in 2019. It was a classic, take-a-flyer on a player with good measurables.

the "word" was actually that they had their eyes on Mailata the whole time, so i wouldn't put it in a luck category. if i remember correctly they had actually traded up in the 7th round to grab Mailatta because they knew some other teams were ready to pounce on him too