Grid71
Footballguy
Agree with you. It would be a stupid pick with far better players available at 17. Unfortunately, Steelers front office has made a habit of making terrible first round selections. What really sucks is last years Pickett selection could carry over to 2023 just because his old college teammate is coming out. 100% Addison wouldn’t be on the radar if Pickett wasn’t our QB. As you said, there are better receivers available not just OT, CB, DI or Safety.No, it would be as stupid a pick. Steelers need Addison zero percent, Burns was a stupid pick, for a different reason. If Addison was from Utah or Texas, no one would mention his name around Pittsburgh.This comment is clearly from someone who does not remember Artie Burns, or has some rose colored glasses. You're projecting that Addison won't even be able to start or contribute to this team in any meaningful manner? Addison would AT WORST be WR3, probably WR2 in 2024 if we don't re-sign Diontae, which is still a starter. You could make the argument about Bush, maybe, but Burns? C'mon.Branch from Alabama.If the top 3 tackles are gone, I think it is Banks or Addison at #17 . . . .
Addison would be even more stupid than Burns or Bush as a first rd pick.
There are about 7 OT and CB combined I think they would love to have, maybe 8. Picking at 17 they should get one, or Branch at safety.
If people are so excited to get Addison, why not take Flowers, who is better? Why settle for a guy cause he played a Pitt?
After Najee and Pickett selections back to back, I almost expect to see Addison