-jb-
Footballguy
I’ve seen it in different ADP lists. I’ve heard it on podcasts. I see it on this bored.
By this point in the preseason, things have tended to settle in to the common industry group think. Everyone is IN on this player. Everyone is OUT on that player. Everyone knows EXACTLY what to expect from each team.
Not this year.
I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen so much variation in rankings and opinions. I’ve even heard podcasters say, “you know, I actually have no idea what’s going to happen with Player X.” While refreshing, it’s candidly kind of messed up my typical starting approach. We probably all take a look at ADP or rankings, knowing/believing that they are largely the same from site to site, then identifying the players we believe the market has undervalued. It’s still your own take, but based on that groupthink that has been common over the last decade (at least). This year, it’s seemingly out the window.
This is really good news for folks who have time and are good analyzers and bad for those who are the opposite of those things.
Are others seeing/feeling this, as well?
How has this state of affairs changed your approach to the draft, if at all?
The lack of general predictability is out the window, which has made me pretty much ignore everyone’s ranks/ADPs outside of the first two rounds (though round 2 is also pretty significantly varied).
I don’t really care where this thread goes, I guess. Just wanted to see if I’m on an island with this perception.
By this point in the preseason, things have tended to settle in to the common industry group think. Everyone is IN on this player. Everyone is OUT on that player. Everyone knows EXACTLY what to expect from each team.
Not this year.
I can’t remember the last time I’ve seen so much variation in rankings and opinions. I’ve even heard podcasters say, “you know, I actually have no idea what’s going to happen with Player X.” While refreshing, it’s candidly kind of messed up my typical starting approach. We probably all take a look at ADP or rankings, knowing/believing that they are largely the same from site to site, then identifying the players we believe the market has undervalued. It’s still your own take, but based on that groupthink that has been common over the last decade (at least). This year, it’s seemingly out the window.
This is really good news for folks who have time and are good analyzers and bad for those who are the opposite of those things.
Are others seeing/feeling this, as well?
How has this state of affairs changed your approach to the draft, if at all?
The lack of general predictability is out the window, which has made me pretty much ignore everyone’s ranks/ADPs outside of the first two rounds (though round 2 is also pretty significantly varied).
I don’t really care where this thread goes, I guess. Just wanted to see if I’m on an island with this perception.
Last edited: