This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
About 2ft for us in 2 separate bands, first is the storm and the second is the back of the front creating lake effect as the winds wrap around. Could be worse the west end and towards Superior WI are looking at over 3ft. Heading down near Menomonee for Thanksgiving where they're getting 1-3. Snowblower is gassed up and ready to go for when we get back.
Coach says the team they are playing this week is the best team on their schedule? You going to tell me water is wet next?
If Miami beats Pittsburgh, wake forest beats Duke and VT beats UVa then Miami goes to Charlotte. VT winning is the longest shot there but definitely a possibility.
I’m excited for VATech! I’m from Ohio and thus a Buckeye fan but I also like VATech and have for a long time. I’m about 10 years from retirement and the Blacksburg region is one of our target retirement areas, so I keep up with them. Gonna try and go to at least one game next year and experience Enter Sandman.
And a 4 star OT as well. I wonder how many Penn St commits will follow.
This feels like it would be a +1200 ML parlay
Talking heads at ESPN don't actually watch the teams/follow the stories, they just want to yell about known brands.
I don't disagree. Would be far from the first time ESPN misunderstood what it's audience wants.
Alabama got embarrassed by Florida State so the SEC sucks and I guess the entire playoff should be the Big Ten?
It seems that they do care. Where was Miami ranked the first week of the season? If high, then it could be like Texas. Pimp them so those rankings don't look as crappy as they were.
The audio mix on this game is atrocious, I could barely hear the announcers over the sound of the band
It was Tessitore and Palmer so this is a good thing.
Previous AD sold it for $10M for NIL money. New AD says he isn't doing that with the big games moving forward. They are playing Tennessee at Bobby Dodd next year or the year after. They might play Louisville or someone like that at the Benz.
To be fair, I showed my son some highlights from the 90s earlier and we both said how much more fun it sounded to hear the band and the crowd vs only the booth. I do think that’s a missing element nowadays, but UGA needs some new material.
Wait. Are you comparing decisions made under the BCS era rules and circumstances to that of what might happen under the second year of a brand new system that has rules, circumstances and factors completely different (like night and day different) and then labeling people based on those situations that have no business being compared because of how different they are?
I don't remember or care about 1993. Head to head should matter in 2025. It should be about who you beat not who has the best losses. Miami over ND isn't even a question for me. Miami won the game on the field and both would be 10-2 assuming wins tomorrow. ND has one decent win (USC) which doesn't make up for that loss.
Ok. There's a large section of people who choose emotion over objectivity when arguing the silly merits of CFB including ND dudes. That's a pretty water is wet statement. I dont really think this example proves or shows anything meaningful like you think it does though. Thanks for the clarification. No further questions.
Pre-BCS. Just pointing that out.
Don't lose to BC at home?
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
Don't lose to BC at home?
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
Just one tiny point as I’m otherwise staying out of this one - BC was #17 when they upset ND in that game. So it was a ranked lossDon't lose to BC at home?
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
Don't lose to BC at home.
Don't lose to two unranked teams.
Long as you're being consistent, we're all good.
I mean I don't really have a dog in it...but you could definitely say the head to head matters, and that in some case, the losses are to such bad teams and there arent good wins etc that the head to head win is overcome.
Just one tiny point as I’m otherwise staying out of this one - BC was #17 when they upset ND in that game. So it was a ranked lossDon't lose to BC at home?
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
Don't lose to BC at home.
Don't lose to two unranked teams.
Long as you're being consistent, we're all good.
If it makes you feel better then yeah let's do that for 1993. I'll give you a hug too.
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
I would have no problem if Texas gets in if they win tonight. They shouldn't be penalized for having the balls to schedule Ohio State and have some serious wins on their resume.
If it makes you feel better then yeah let's do that for 1993. I'll give you a hug too.
Great, so you'd apply that criteria equally if you did look at 1993 and would say ND was robbed of a national championship.
Glad to have you on board GB.
Can we retroactively apply this to 1990 when Colorado got a 5th down to beat Missouri and make GT the national champion and get rid of this shared nonsense?
![[icon]](/data/avatars/s/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
