I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
Except one team traded for AJ Brown and signed a superstar RB.Those are the kind of smart free agent signing that good teams do. The contracts didn't break the bank and the players were very good. You guys have managed the cap the way you're supposed to and your GM is similar to Brad Holmes in that he knows how to draft.Last year, the Eagles didn't win because of free agents or trades. They built their core through the draft. They had a couple of key players acquired via free agency and trades, namely Barkley and Brown but they didn't destroy their salary cap.
The biggest difference between the Lions and Eagles last year is the Lions were decimated with injuries and the Eagles weren't. Correct me if I'm wrong but I can't think of one major injury they had to an important player.
I'm not taking anything away from them but they were the healthiest team in the NFL last year and the Lions were the least healthy team.![]()
They lost Nakobe Dean in the playoff game vs. GB, but point taken. If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
But to your initial point, their roster was a combination of good drafting and picking the right FAs. Zach Baun, Saquon Barkley and CJGJ were homerun FA signings. They changed the entire complexion of the team on both sides of the ball.
We had to replace Davis.If signing Saquon for 3/38 constitutes “going all-in”, then the Lions already went all-in with DJ Reed at 3/48.We have watched the Eagle go all in (AJ Brown trade), win a Super Bowl, rebuild and go all in a second time (Saquon) to win a Super Bowl.
If anything Barkley’s a good argument for careful spending and value hunting rather than just throwing money and picks around.
You just compared signing Saquon to signing a corner to replace a corner. Makes zero sense.
Todays exampleThere is no guarantee of getting to the finish line. If they would have made a big move last year (use Max Crosby as an example) they still wouldn't have won the Super Bowl. They would have blown a hole in their cap and signing Hutchinson would push them near the limit by himself. They would have very little flexibility to improve their roster in free agency and would also be down at least 2 firsts. That would be crippling.The Lions were 3-13-1 in Brad Holmes first year, then 9-8, 12-5, then 15-2 with 6 defensive starters on IR. If they were healthy they arguably had the best roster in the NFL and at one point were favored to win the Super Bowl.
This exactly why you make a big move or two. They are very close, do what it takes to get to the finish line.
Edit to add: Obviously there are exceptions. For example, if they could acquire a really good player with a salary in the $15-20 million range for one first round pick at a position with a glaring weakness then, depending on the situation, then maybe you make a move. It has to be manageable under the salary cap. But that would be the exception rather than the rule.
There are no guarantees no matter what, and it wouldn't ruin their cap. The Eagles are signing people all the time, the Chiefs just freed up 50 million, Cowboys freed up a bunch of money, the Saints are like 80 million over every year before the new league season starts.
Get a guy like Crosby last year wasn't a one year move. It would have been for last year and the next couple.
They can't only do the cheap stuff, they have take some risks.
No kidding. Spartans Rule said signing a NEED was comparable to an "all in" move. It's not even close. Reed was simply a replacement.We had to replace Davis.If signing Saquon for 3/38 constitutes “going all-in”, then the Lions already went all-in with DJ Reed at 3/48.We have watched the Eagle go all in (AJ Brown trade), win a Super Bowl, rebuild and go all in a second time (Saquon) to win a Super Bowl.
If anything Barkley’s a good argument for careful spending and value hunting rather than just throwing money and picks around.
You just compared signing Saquon to signing a corner to replace a corner. Makes zero sense.
You didn't explain that clearly at all. Barkley signed for 3 years $38 million. Brown did not sign immediately after the trade and the Eagles didn't have a bunch of great players coming up for extensions. That's a huge difference.No kidding. Spartans Rule said signing a NEED was comparable to an "all in" move. It's not even close. Reed was simply a replacement.We had to replace Davis.If signing Saquon for 3/38 constitutes “going all-in”, then the Lions already went all-in with DJ Reed at 3/48.We have watched the Eagle go all in (AJ Brown trade), win a Super Bowl, rebuild and go all in a second time (Saquon) to win a Super Bowl.
If anything Barkley’s a good argument for careful spending and value hunting rather than just throwing money and picks around.
You just compared signing Saquon to signing a corner to replace a corner. Makes zero sense.
The Eagles didn't NEED to replace their RB. They chose to pay for one to win a Super Bowl.
They didn't need a WR like AJ Brown, they traded for him because they knew he increased their chances at a Super Bowl.
How can I explain this any more clearly?
The Eagles didn't spend crazy money for Barkley. They made a good trade for Brown but they had a good enough salary cap situation to do it.Except one team traded for AJ Brown and signed a superstar RB.Those are the kind of smart free agent signing that good teams do. The contracts didn't break the bank and the players were very good. You guys have managed the cap the way you're supposed to and your GM is similar to Brad Holmes in that he knows how to draft.Last year, the Eagles didn't win because of free agents or trades. They built their core through the draft. They had a couple of key players acquired via free agency and trades, namely Barkley and Brown but they didn't destroy their salary cap.
The biggest difference between the Lions and Eagles last year is the Lions were decimated with injuries and the Eagles weren't. Correct me if I'm wrong but I can't think of one major injury they had to an important player.
I'm not taking anything away from them but they were the healthiest team in the NFL last year and the Lions were the least healthy team.![]()
They lost Nakobe Dean in the playoff game vs. GB, but point taken. If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
But to your initial point, their roster was a combination of good drafting and picking the right FAs. Zach Baun, Saquon Barkley and CJGJ were homerun FA signings. They changed the entire complexion of the team on both sides of the ball.
I ask again, please tell me one case where Detroit did anything close to either of those deals.
Reed may have been a replacement for Carlton Davis but seeing the corners we had to play in the playoff game made it a need and a very important one at that.No kidding. Spartans Rule said signing a NEED was comparable to an "all in" move. It's not even close. Reed was simply a replacement.
I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
I agree, it was terrible and I don't get it, but even with all the turnovers we still scored 31 points.I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
I didn't think your offensive gameplan against Washington was very good.
Considering what a hot HC prospect Ben Johnson was, it wasn't his best game plan, plus Goff had a terrible day.I agree, it was terrible and I don't get it, but even with all the turnovers we still scored 31 points.I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
I didn't think your offensive gameplan against Washington was very good.
Score 31 points you are in position to win. Defense was in wet noodle mode. Just didn’t see how they could make it through the playoffs with the defense being so undermanned.I agree, it was terrible and I don't get it, but even with all the turnovers we still scored 31 points.I would have loved to play you guys last year with us being healthy. That would have been a classic.If you go back and read the "Who is the best team in week [X]?" threads, I said, it's the team that is the healthiest.
I didn't think your offensive gameplan against Washington was very good.
This is why I'd like to either bring back Zeitler or a suitable replacement at one guard position with Mahogany at the other. If there is room maybe have Glasgow stay as a swing backup for the interior 3 OL positions where he does have the experience at least. The whole team goes as the o line goes so imo this is an important priority.A lot of things went sideways in the Division Round, plenty of blame to go around. IMO the single biggest factor was Glasgow giving up 9 pressures, 7 to Jonathan Allen (whose season high was 3.) The team gave up 15 pressures in 44 snaps - 60% by one OL
A lot of things went sideways in the Division Round, plenty of blame to go around. IMO the single biggest factor was Glasgow giving up 9 pressures, 7 to Jonathan Allen (whose season high was 3.) The team gave up 15 pressures in 44 snaps - 60% by one OL.
I don’t get why so many come in here crapping on the team or Holmes. For the majority of last season they were 1st or 2nd in Power Rankings and the SB favorite. 21 players on IR was obviously a factor, but give them some credit for 15 wins including 11 straight (8 straight after Hutch went down.)
Expected level of turnover at the coordinators level, personally I’m encouraged by the fresh voices in the staff. Very solid core. Still early in the offseason, we are literally on Day 1 of the new league year today.
IDK what the local talk radio is shoveling these days but I can’t believe how little credit Sheila, Brad & Dan have achieved after 4 years. I have waited my 58 seasons for a team this well run.
This is why I'd like to either bring back Zeitler or a suitable replacement at one guard position with Mahogany at the other. If there is room maybe have Glasgow stay as a swing backup for the interior 3 OL positions where he does have the experience at least. The whole team goes as the o line goes so imo this is an important priority.A lot of things went sideways in the Division Round, plenty of blame to go around. IMO the single biggest factor was Glasgow giving up 9 pressures, 7 to Jonathan Allen (whose season high was 3.) The team gave up 15 pressures in 44 snaps - 60% by one OL
As always, remember to bet irresponsibly.
That's unbelievable value. I believe there is a really good chance Levi turns more of those pressures into sacks. He really hasn't played much. I think there's a ton of untapped potential.Pressure rate among free agent DTs:
Milton Williams: 12.5%
Tershawn Wharton: 8.2%
Javon Kinlaw: 6.9%
Levi Onwuzurike: 9.7%
APY:
Williams: $26 million
Wharton: $18 million
Kinlaw: $15 million
Onwuzurike: $5.5 million
I've seen 1 year, 5.5 million, which makes a ton more sense to me. Glad to have him back for at least one more year.Lions re-sign Levi Onwuzerike for 2 year $5.5 million. That's a really good deal for the Lions. There is still a lot of upside there.
Edit: 2 minutes late.![]()
Brad Holmes was named Exective of the Year last season, which was well deserved. Brad Holmes has executed 4 of the top 6 drafts in Lions history. When was a Lions GM ever considered the best in football? Pretty safe guess is never. Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell have been the best thing ever to happen to the Lions organization and a large number of fans still constantly criticize and second guesses them. Pretty amazing.
While I agree, is it not ok to question them? Building a team is one thing. Winning a Super Bowl is another.
I'm amazed how many Lion fans are content with just being very good.
I've seen 1 year, 5.5 million, which makes a ton more sense to me. Glad to have him back for at least one more year.Lions re-sign Levi Onwuzerike for 2 year $5.5 million. That's a really good deal for the Lions. There is still a lot of upside there.
Edit: 2 minutes late.![]()
Kevin Zeitler signs with Tennessee for 1 year $9 million. I would have loved to have him back but that's a bit much given he will be 36 years old.
Scherff would be a nice consolation to losing Zeitler.
Interesting player I wasn't familiar with, rare to see a guard drafted that high.Scherff would be a nice consolation to losing Zeitler.
In the next 2 years, the following players will be eligible for contract extensions:
Aiden Hutchinson
Kerby Joseph
Jameson Williams
Jahmyr Gibbs
Jack Campbell
Sam LaPorta
Brian Branch
Those are all great young players that are part of the core of this team. None of the teams mentioned have this many important players up for contract extensions in that short of a time frame. They are probably not going to afford all of them right now so spending a bunch of money would mean we lose even more of them. That makes zero sense.
Lions stood by him throughout all the injuries and unavailability. Campbell expressed his belief that he would contribute significantly one day. Don’t know what his market was but it’s really interesting that he chose to continue with the Lions.Levi Onwuzurike appeared primed to cash in this week. Instead, the Lions were able to re-sign their former second-round pick for another season. The relatively modest agreement is reportedly worth up to $5.5 million, according to the NFL Network.
I think it's part because they stood by him and part because he's comfortable with the scheme. This is the best place for him to succeed which gives him a shot at a nice contract next year.Lions stood by him throughout all the injuries and unavailability. Campbell expressed his belief that he would contribute significantly one day. Don’t know what his market was but it’s really interesting that he chose to continue with the Lions.Levi Onwuzurike appeared primed to cash in this week. Instead, the Lions were able to re-sign their former second-round pick for another season. The relatively modest agreement is reportedly worth up to $5.5 million, according to the NFL Network.
I just love how people are bashed for having a different opinion on things.Brad Holmes was named Exective of the Year last season, which was well deserved. Brad Holmes has executed 4 of the top 6 drafts in Lions history. When was a Lions GM ever considered the best in football? Pretty safe guess is never. Brad Holmes and Dan Campbell have been the best thing ever to happen to the Lions organization and a large number of fans still constantly criticize and second guesses them. Pretty amazing.
While I agree, is it not ok to question them? Building a team is one thing. Winning a Super Bowl is another.
I'm amazed how many Lion fans are content with just being very good.
I am not a big fan of people who have constant negativity when people are working their butts off and doing an outstanding job. I would prefer to be supportive. Not saying you can't have some criticism or questioning their decisions as everyone makes mistakes and can improve.
That said, Brad/Sheila/Dan re-built this franchise from being a dumpster fire into one of the best franchises in football. They did it with a vision of building a culture of character and work ethic and doing it mostly through the draft while filling in with some bargain FA. That is their vision and it has worked tremendously.
So, yeah, I don't see it as respectful to what they have worked hard to build to suggest they abandon their vision. Things like forget about character, they need to draft the player i like. Or let's go all in on a a few FA and make it so we can't extend the players we drafted and love. Things like being quick to call picks a bust before they have a chance to blossom. Things like questioning Holmes ability to draft because he might have missed on a couple players, when every other GM wiffs on about 80% of their picks, not 20 percent. They have produced the results to deserve a benefit of the doubt. This process and this team can win championships and contend for the next 5 years, or really as long as Dan and Brad hang around.
Yeah, I am a very positive person when people are working hard and producing amazing results. I don't like constant negativity from the hind-sighted peanut gallery that seems to believe it is impossible to win unless they abandon what made this team great and a joy to watch.
In the next 2 years, the following players will be eligible for contract extensions:
Aiden Hutchinson
Kerby Joseph
Jameson Williams
Jahmyr Gibbs
Jack Campbell
Sam LaPorta
Brian Branch
Those are all great young players that are part of the core of this team. None of the teams mentioned have this many important players up for contract extensions in that short of a time frame. They are probably not going to afford all of them right now so spending a bunch of money would mean we lose even more of them. That makes zero sense.
It can be somewhere in the middle as well, doesn’t have to be an extreme POV either way. I don’t think anyone is saying Brad can do no wrong, but it is okay to celebrate the guy for all of the right he has done. The franchise is now a contender after decades of not. Hard to argue with the majority of his moves. Yes, we can “go all in”, but does that guarantee a SB? The answer is no. They signed a player who many ranked as the best FA available and some are still not content. Let’s see what the draft brings and then judge Brad’s plan for this year. So far during his tenure he has transformed a bottom tier franchise into extreme relevancy. The Niners are a good example of going “all in” over the years and have nothing to show for it (recent years during that plan). They are now wiping the slate clean and essentially starting over. There is no right or wrong answer, it can only be judged by the final conclusion. We are all disappointed in the last few years results, but we have no idea if one more impact player would have got us a trophy.In the next 2 years, the following players will be eligible for contract extensions:
Aiden Hutchinson
Kerby Joseph
Jameson Williams
Jahmyr Gibbs
Jack Campbell
Sam LaPorta
Brian Branch
Those are all great young players that are part of the core of this team. None of the teams mentioned have this many important players up for contract extensions in that short of a time frame. They are probably not going to afford all of them right now so spending a bunch of money would mean we lose even more of them. That makes zero sense.
If Brad is as good as you think he is, why can't he draft replacements for a few of these guys over the next two drafts? Answer....he can.
So this is not a reason to avoid adding salary to acquire a player that could put you over the top.
Again, teams restructure all the time. Or, sometimes you have to let good players go. That's the cost of doing business.
I'm absolutely dumbfounded by the few of you content with just being very good the next 2-3 years.
I have news for you, everyone around you has gotten better. The Bears are better. We are not better.
We have almost an entire new coaching staff. We just lost a key player on the O Line.
The O Line has gotten another year older.
I want the Lions to win a Super Bowl and do whatever it takes to accomplish that.
Whatever. I give up. I guess I should just be a Brad Bot and believe the man can do no wrong.
I'm done with this conversation. Hope everyone has a good day.
The Lions were 15-2 last year and before the injuries were favored to win the Super Bowl. But people complain that they didn't make a big move. Really? Holmes built a roster that did the above. You don't have to make big all in moves to have a great team. They proved that last year.I'm absolutely dumbfounded by the few of you content with just being very good the next 2-3 years.
The Niners are a good example of going “all in” over the years and have nothing to show for it (recent years during that plan).
Going for it” doesn’t guarantee anything. Reckless spending & kicking the cap hit down the road doesn’t ensure you will having a Woodward Avenue parade. There is risk & considerable downside if you gamble and lose.