What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2025 Philadelphia Eagles - Ring-a-ding-ding (14 Viewers)

Saquon tops the NFL list of top selling player merchandise for 2024-25, with Hurts in 3rd:
  1. Saquon
  2. Mahomes
  3. Hurts
  4. Jayden Daniels
  5. CJ Stroud
  6. Josh Allen
  7. Aidan Hutchinson
  8. Amon-Ra St. Brown
  9. Micah Parsons
  10. Justin Jefferson
This was the list for 2023-24:
  1. Hurts
  2. Jason Kelce
  3. Mahomes
  4. Travis Kelce
  5. Christian McCaffrey
  6. Aaron Rodgers
  7. Joe Burrow
  8. Brock Purdy
  9. Micah Parsons
  10. Justin Jefferson
 
The Philadelphia Eagles are expected to hire LSU director of player personnel Preston Tiffany, sources tell @CBSSports.

Before LSU, Tiffany — who has been one of the rising stars in the college personnel world — was director of player personnel at Ole Miss.
 
Saquon taking it easy on his body, after all those carries last season:

“Everyone that I trust told me basically sit my [butt] down for a little bit. In past years when I was younger, you would think, ‘Oh, someone’s getting better than me.’ I’m relaxing and I see Derrick Henry running hills or Christian McCaffrey post something, the old me would be like, ‘Oh, I gotta go, I gotta go.’ I still have my competitive nature, but it’s two completely different seasons.”
Saquan has also said if he retired it’ll be out of nowhere and he could pull a Barry sanders
 
Jason Kelce fires back at Tom Brady

Tom Brady didn’t hold back, throwing a sharp jab at Travis Kelce with a grin: “If he’d focused more on football than Taylor Swift, the Chiefs might’ve had a three-peat.” The internet barely had time to blink before Jason Kelce fired back: “I love Brady, but maybe if he’d focused more on his wife, he’d still have one.” It wasn’t just playful banter—it was a mic-drop moment that had fans gasping like they were watching a family barbecue turn into a roast battle... Watch below
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging

A few of those teams womt be as good though. One game at a time. I like our chances. Just win the division
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging

A few of those teams womt be as good though. One game at a time. I like our chances. Just win the division
Yeah, the rest of the division has mostly the same schedule, and they aren't as good as us.
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
By the time December rolls around and the Birds are once again looking like a powerhouse, I can promise you someone on here is going to come in here and still say "wow easy schedule" and I'm going to laugh. Its become a yearly tradition on here.
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
While the schedule and the strength of the teams on that schedule will certainly factor into the success the Eagles have during the 2025 season, neither are the biggest obstacle to repeating as champs. I do not find the schedule worrisome.

The Philadelphia Eagles will repeat as Super Bowl Champions.
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
While the schedule and the strength of the teams on that schedule will certainly factor into the success the Eagles have during the 2025 season, neither are the biggest obstacle to repeating as champs. I do not find the schedule worrisome.

The Philadelphia Eagles will repeat as Super Bowl Champions.
If I was a betting man, I would take the field.
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
By the time December rolls around and the Birds are once again looking like a powerhouse, I can promise you someone on here is going to come in here and still say "wow easy schedule" and I'm going to laugh. Its become a yearly tradition on here.
It’s been true lately. Not sure what to tell you
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
By the time December rolls around and the Birds are once again looking like a powerhouse, I can promise you someone on here is going to come in here and still say "wow easy schedule" and I'm going to laugh. Its become a yearly tradition on here.
It’s been true lately. Not sure what to tell you
Its all entertainment for me broski all good

Do you think as of right now the schedule looks tough?

Yes? No? Deflection? Ghost?
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
While the schedule and the strength of the teams on that schedule will certainly factor into the success the Eagles have during the 2025 season, neither are the biggest obstacle to repeating as champs. I do not find the schedule worrisome.

The Philadelphia Eagles will repeat as Super Bowl Champions.
If I was a betting man, I would take the field.
I mean, that's pretty obvious.
 
Looking at the schedule again, it's kind of amazing how difficult it appears. 11 games against playoff teams from last year, plus 3 more against teams that are bubble teams that could easily make that leap (Broncos, Dallas twice). Only 3 games against patsies (Browns, Giants), and two of those are division games (which should NEVER be considered gimmes, especially on the road!) It won't be the popular take, but I think in another division the Bears could make that leap to playoff team also. Then looking at the unusual timing/setup, I can't remember seeing any schedule so ....not sure the word I'm looking for, daunting isn't quite right for a contender, but certainly challenging
While the schedule and the strength of the teams on that schedule will certainly factor into the success the Eagles have during the 2025 season, neither are the biggest obstacle to repeating as champs. I do not find the schedule worrisome.

The Philadelphia Eagles will repeat as Super Bowl Champions.
If I was a betting man, I would take the field.
I would not consider myself a betting man but, I will stand firm on my prediction.
 
Easy or hard, the schedule it is what it is. The best team in the league could play the worst team in the league 16 straight weeks and the best team will not win them all, nor come close to it. The only thing that matters is actually playing each of the games to conclusion.
 
This team is just different though.

1st. I don't think anyone is satisfied. They want to run it back.
2nd. We are bringing back 10 starters on offense. Goedert is a big piece in the success of the offense in both the run and pass.
3rd. I think we will become a balanced offense. The passing game will be utilized more.
4th. Barkley has shown to manage his workload well. I don't think we'll see as many stalled drives as we had when Gainwell stepped in.
5th. The vanilla gorilla will play. We have a DT rotation that any group should be as effective as the other.
6th. CJGJ is interesting. In both seasons when he was an Eagles we went to the Super Bowl. But for some strange reason teams can only deal with CJGJ for a one season at a time. I don't think he's been with a team in consecutive years.
7th. The dudes we lost in free agency I like who is replacing them.
8th. We are a young defense with an experienced offense.
9th. As Cooper Dejean said in his podcast this is our second year under Fangio. Dejean, Blankenship and Baun expect to be better.
10th. Howie's not done. There will be a late camp signing. My guess is Kyle Pitts.
 
This team is just different though.

1st. I don't think anyone is satisfied. They want to run it back.
2nd. We are bringing back 10 starters on offense. Goedert is a big piece in the success of the offense in both the run and pass.
3rd. I think we will become a balanced offense. The passing game will be utilized more.
4th. Barkley has shown to manage his workload well. I don't think we'll see as many stalled drives as we had when Gainwell stepped in.
5th. The vanilla gorilla will play. We have a DT rotation that any group should be as effective as the other.
6th. CJGJ is interesting. In both seasons when he was an Eagles we went to the Super Bowl. But for some strange reason teams can only deal with CJGJ for a one season at a time. I don't think he's been with a team in consecutive years.
7th. The dudes we lost in free agency I like who is replacing them.
8th. We are a young defense with an experienced offense.
9th. As Cooper Dejean said in his podcast this is our second year under Fangio. Dejean, Blankenship and Baun expect to be better.
10th. Howie's not done. There will be a late camp signing. My guess is Kyle Pitts.
What about Freiermuth?
 
Its all entertainment for me broski all good
No it’s not. You take every bit of it personally. That’s why it bothers you so much when someone says their schedule has been weak the last few years. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Won the Super Bowl 140 days ago today. I'm extremely bothered by it.

You know the term "Rent is due"

You're late on your payments bro, you literally are living in our team thread.
 
Its all entertainment for me broski all good
No it’s not. You take every bit of it personally. That’s why it bothers you so much when someone says their schedule has been weak the last few years. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Won the Super Bowl 140 days ago today. I'm extremely bothered by it.

You know the term "Rent is due"

You're late on your payments bro, you literally are living in our team thread.
🤦

I replied because you quoted me
 
Its all entertainment for me broski all good
No it’s not. You take every bit of it personally. That’s why it bothers you so much when someone says their schedule has been weak the last few years. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Won the Super Bowl 140 days ago today. I'm extremely bothered by it.

You know the term "Rent is due"

You're late on your payments bro, you literally are living in our team thread.
🤦

I replied because you quoted me
You originally quoted me, I wasn't talking to you at all :ponder:
 
Its all entertainment for me broski all good
No it’s not. You take every bit of it personally. That’s why it bothers you so much when someone says their schedule has been weak the last few years. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Won the Super Bowl 140 days ago today. I'm extremely bothered by it.

You know the term "Rent is due"

You're late on your payments bro, you literally are living in our team thread.
🤦

I replied because you quoted me
You originally quoted me, I wasn't talking to you at all :ponder:
:lmao:

Ok. Sorry for posting on a public message board
 
Its all entertainment for me broski all good
No it’s not. You take every bit of it personally. That’s why it bothers you so much when someone says their schedule has been weak the last few years. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Won the Super Bowl 140 days ago today. I'm extremely bothered by it.

You know the term "Rent is due"

You're late on your payments bro, you literally are living in our team thread.
🤦

I replied because you quoted me
You originally quoted me, I wasn't talking to you at all :ponder:
:lmao:

Ok. Sorry for posting on a public message board
I'm not sure whats going on here. You don't have to apologize.

I'm just pointing out the fact that.

1. I didn't reach out to you
2. You quoted me
3. You, the Cowboys fan
4. That posts more in the Eagles thread than he does the Cowboys thread
5. I hope you are having a good day
6. Go Birds

You certainly are not the only one that tries to do this "easy schedule" thing its all good, just an observation I have noticed.
 

1. I didn't reach out to you
2. You quoted me
3. You, the Cowboys fan
4. That posts more in the Eagles thread than he does the Cowboys thread
5. I hope you are having a good day
6. Go Birds
How many times would you say you’ve posted here about people saying the Eagles have had a weak schedule.

What does it matter what team I follow?

The Cowboys thread is generally boring. There aren’t many Cowboys fans here.

I pointed out to one of your friends recently that I post in alot of threads on fbg. More than probably all of the eagles fans here combined. You’re not special.

I hope your having a good day also

Eff the eagles
 

1. I didn't reach out to you
2. You quoted me
3. You, the Cowboys fan
4. That posts more in the Eagles thread than he does the Cowboys thread
5. I hope you are having a good day
6. Go Birds
How many times would you say you’ve posted here about people saying the Eagles have had a weak schedule.

What does it matter what team I follow?

The Cowboys thread is generally boring. There aren’t many Cowboys fans here.

I pointed out to one of your friends recently that I post in alot of threads on fbg. More than probably all of the eagles fans here combined. You’re not special.

I hope your having a good day also

Eff the eagles
I don't think I have said the Eagles have ever had an easy schedule. I kinda don't believe in the idea honestly. Too much changes each week to get a general idea of "who for sure" is a "great/terrible" team. So I laugh at the whole thing, mainly b/c the measuring tool is...what exactly? Subjective right?

Doesn't matter to me at all what team you follow. The people I have met in real life that are Cowboys fans have made me the way I am towards them long before I came on here.

We all know for various reasons, the Eagles are the most talked about team on here. Whether they are in contention for a Super Bowl, or on a historic collapse, the Eagles just generate FBG Ratings.

Another day as a fan of the Super Bowl champions is a good day. Just got my discounted NFC East Title 2024 hat today. I am REALLY hoping someone makes a "Back to Back" NFC East Champs hat after this year, that s*** would be hilarious.
 
Terrible news here. Eagles Super Fan Shaun Young confirmed this on his Facebook page too. According to Shaun a gofundme is set up and Braman former Hou Teammate JJ Watt has donated 10K so far. Was in touch with some former teammates and it’s not good at all

Eagles Superbowl Champion DE Bryan Braman is battling an extremely rare form of cancer and is in critical condition.

Braman’s cancer diagnosis has depleted his finances and left him homeless.

“He is required to have a 24-hour caregiver, but his insurance doesn’t pay for housing for this program. He has no home currently as he has had to pay out of pocket for much of his treatment and even sold his last vehicle to raise the money for the motel for this week.”

“Bryan has had to undergo several surgical procedures. The main problem has been that Bryan has not been able to recover from the procedures because of his lowered immunity due to all of these treatments. By the time he was able to recover so he could continue with the chemo, the cancer has grown expedentially faster, and is now growing around his vital organs.”

“The Dr’s are now concerned because of his treatment, his chemo options are very limited. They have tried all of the various treatment options, and unfortunately, none of them are working against this cancer. But Bryan has not given up. He is looking into other trial treatment programs, and is determined to never give up.”

Braman, 38, was a member of the Eagles’ Super Bowl LII team that defeated the Patriots in 2018.

Prayers up for Braman🙏
 

Jon Runyan over Todd Herremans.

David Akers over Jake Elliot.
He tried to make it look like an actual roster and already had a bunch of OT-only guys, which is why he passed over Runyan for Herremans.

Elliot is the most important kicker in team history and scored a bunch of points in both SB wins. There is no choice here IMO.

The writer didn't judge by "importance", he judged by "level of play specifically with the Eagles."

Elliot: 1 Pro Bowl, 1 AP-2
Akers: 5 Pro Bowls, 1 AP-1, 4 AP-2

It's not even close.

ETA: I'm not even sure why Sproles is listed at RB. He only had 295 carries as an Eagle. If we're going by important, then LeGarrette Blount should be in. If we're going by performance then Miles Sanders should be in.
 
Last edited:

Jon Runyan over Todd Herremans.

David Akers over Jake Elliot.
He tried to make it look like an actual roster and already had a bunch of OT-only guys, which is why he passed over Runyan for Herremans.

Elliot is the most important kicker in team history and scored a bunch of points in both SB wins. There is no choice here IMO.

The writer didn't judge by "importance", he judged by "level of play specifically with the Eagles."

Elliot: 1 Pro Bowl, 1 AP-2
Akers: 5 Pro Bowls, 1 AP-1, 4 AP-2

It's not even close.
Pro Bowl voting is a sham and a popularity contest more than anything.

Akers mostly didn't have to compete with Justin Tucker for All-Pro honors.

Your argument doesn't move me.
 

Jon Runyan over Todd Herremans.

David Akers over Jake Elliot.
He tried to make it look like an actual roster and already had a bunch of OT-only guys, which is why he passed over Runyan for Herremans.

Elliot is the most important kicker in team history and scored a bunch of points in both SB wins. There is no choice here IMO.

The writer didn't judge by "importance", he judged by "level of play specifically with the Eagles."

Elliot: 1 Pro Bowl, 1 AP-2
Akers: 5 Pro Bowls, 1 AP-1, 4 AP-2

It's not even close.
Pro Bowl voting is a sham and a popularity contest more than anything.

Akers mostly didn't have to compete with Justin Tucker for All-Pro honors.

Your argument doesn't move me.

Sure thing. Here are some of the guys who made APs during Elliot's Eagle tenure: Wil Lutz x 2, Brandon Aubrey x 2, Robbie Gould, Matt Prater, Aldrick Rosas, Josh Lambo, Younghoe Koo, Jason Sanders, Matt Gay, Jason Myers, Daniel Carlson, Chase McLaughlin, and Chris Boswell. A who's who of stud kickers.
 
Akers vs. Elliott is close enough to be a coin flip, but some (non-SB related, where Jake has the NFL record of 16 points in a SB, 2nd most total career SB kicker points, and is perfect 9 for 9 in SB FGs) numbers that I think give Jake the edge:

FG% with Eagles (Regular & Playoffs):

Jake: 84.8%
Akers: 82.6%

50+ yard FG:

Jake: 61.7% (29 made in 8 seasons)
Akers: 47% (16 made in 12 seasons)

60+ yard FG:

Jake: 2-2
Akers: 0-0

Playoffs only:

Jake: 27 attempts, 1 miss
Akers: 38 attempts, 7 misses

Could also argue that only Akers has ever cost us a playoff game (2010, 21-16 home loss vs. GB where he missed a 34 and 41 yard FG.)
 
Akers vs. Elliott is close enough to be a coin flip, but some (non-SB related, where Jake has the NFL record of 16 points in a SB, 2nd most total career SB kicker points, and is perfect 9 for 9 in SB FGs) numbers that I think give Jake the edge:

FG% with Eagles (Regular & Playoffs):

Jake: 84.8%
Akers: 82.6%

50+ yard FG:

Jake: 61.7% (29 made in 8 seasons)
Akers: 47% (16 made in 12 seasons)

60+ yard FG:

Jake: 2-2
Akers: 0-0

Playoffs only:

Jake: 27 attempts, 1 miss
Akers: 38 attempts, 7 misses

Could also argue that only Akers has ever cost us a playoff game (2010, 21-16 home loss vs. GB where he missed a 34 and 41 yard FG.)

Few things about these numbers. Coaches, especially Andy Reid, rarely attempted long FGs until probably around 2010 or so when teams started trying them with more regularity (I look at a guy who had a long career like Adam Vinatieri and the same pattern occurred with him around 2010). Back in the early 2000s, a 50 yard FG were a rarity. So this isn't an Akers thing since later in his career, once the shift occurred he went 12-18 on 50+ FGs. Akers long-kick percentages are simply skewed due other factors like coaching decisions. I'll also say, the way Elliot has been trending, if he makes it to 12 seasons, I'd be willing to bet those %'s nose dive as he ages. He looked flat out unreliable as a kicker last season and if he continues his trend, he won't be around in 4 years.

I see the Elliot argument is trending in the same manner the Eli Manning HOF arguments trend. People want to put more weight on games in the playoffs and not look at the more dominant player based on his peers.
 
Akers vs. Elliott is close enough to be a coin flip, but some (non-SB related, where Jake has the NFL record of 16 points in a SB, 2nd most total career SB kicker points, and is perfect 9 for 9 in SB FGs) numbers that I think give Jake the edge:

FG% with Eagles (Regular & Playoffs):

Jake: 84.8%
Akers: 82.6%

50+ yard FG:

Jake: 61.7% (29 made in 8 seasons)
Akers: 47% (16 made in 12 seasons)

60+ yard FG:

Jake: 2-2
Akers: 0-0

Playoffs only:

Jake: 27 attempts, 1 miss
Akers: 38 attempts, 7 misses

Could also argue that only Akers has ever cost us a playoff game (2010, 21-16 home loss vs. GB where he missed a 34 and 41 yard FG.)

Few things about these numbers. Coaches, especially Andy Reid, rarely attempted long FGs until probably around 2010 or so when teams started trying them with more regularity (I look at a guy who had a long career like Adam Vinatieri and the same pattern occurred with him around 2010). Back in the early 2000s, a 50 yard FG were a rarity. So this isn't an Akers thing since later in his career, once the shift occurred he went 12-18 on 50+ FGs. Akers long-kick percentages are simply skewed due other factors like coaching decisions. I'll also say, the way Elliot has been trending, if he makes it to 12 seasons, I'd be willing to bet those %'s nose dive as he ages. He looked flat out unreliable as a kicker last season and if he continues his trend, he won't be around in 4 years.

I see the Elliot argument is trending in the same manner the Eli Manning HOF arguments trend. People want to put more weight on games in the playoffs and not look at the more dominant player based on his peers.
47% on 50-yarders or longer isn't "dominant".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top