Bojang0301 said:
gianmarco said:
Mendenhall is talented, but I agree that he may be a year away from having a legit impact. With Mewelde Moore also in the mix on 3rd downs, I just don't see enough balls for either of these guys. Injury could straighten it out, we'll have to see. Russell will likely be battling for a roster spot. Steelers like to carry 3 RB's, I believe...
I think he's the odd man out if Parker and Mendenhall are both healthy.
I doubt it. He'll stay their 3rd down and Receiving back and Tomlin loves him.I think Russell is gone IF Mendy picks up the tough yardage
how did he look in limited action this year? i heard he looked bad... and the stat lines arnt very impressive.. i think they are like 9 - 28 and 10-30..... i drafted him at 1.2 from the potential i saw in college, just looking for some reassurance!! i didnt expect significant stats this year anyways.
small sample size makes it irrelevant.
Not being a large sample size doesn't make it significant, but just because it's a small sample size doesn't mean it's irrelevant. It's foolish to completely ignore things like this blaming it on the "small sample size" excuse.
It pretty much is irrelevant because 19 carries does not make a career... and I thought, as did other Steelers fans, he ran hard and looked decent against the Ravens.
Felix Jones only had 30 carries in 2008. Only 11 more than Mendenhall and would seem "irrelevant". Watching Felix vs. RM, DESPITE being a small sample size, I like what I saw from Felix a lot more. You can still get good information from small sample sizes, you just have to be careful not to jump to conclusions based on them. But again, just because it's a small sample size doesn't make it irrelevant. The consensus from those who watched RM was that he did not look good on those 19 carries. On the flipside, Felix looked very good on just 30 carries. That doesn't necessarily mean that Felix is > RM, but to ignore what they showed from the start is foolish, IMO.
But hey, if it's irrelevant to you, then so be it.