What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

3rd spot, Is it really LJ? (1 Viewer)

Torew

Footballguy
Ok I have the thrid spot in a 12 team re-draft. RB gets 1/10 Ruyd , 1/10 Recyd, 0.5/recp, 6/TD and -1 for fum

More than likely LT goes 1 followed by SJ. Is LJ really the pick here? I know he should be but with a new QB and line problems plus the possibilty of a hold out. :wall: I don't draft until the last weekend in August so I should know more about the hold out. Was thinking Gore until he broke his hand. Addai and Westbrook are my other choices or am I missing someone? I really starting to not like the 3rd pick.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Between the heavy workload last year, the new QB, the lessened OL, and the hold out, I think you'd be an idiot to take him #3 right now. Even if the hold out ends before my draft I wouldn't take LJ before pick 6 at the earliest.

 
I have the 3rd pick as well. Not re-draft though. I am looking at R Bush or P Manning. We draft in a week, and unless LJs situation becomes clearer i really dont know what to do either.

 
I have the 3rd pick as well. Not re-draft though. I am looking at R Bush or P Manning. We draft in a week, and unless LJs situation becomes clearer i really dont know what to do either.
Don't waste a #3 (dynasty I assume) on Peyton...you gotta go RB. If it's PPR, Bush is good...no PPR Bush not good so early.
 
Of course he's the #3. Is there a chcne he holds out? Eh...maybe. But if he plays, he'll be good for 1700 total yards and 12+ TDs. That's your #3.

 
I hear what Colin is saying here and he's correct. However for me the big word is 'IF' and when I'm drafting in round one and especially so within the first few picks, I want a player as close to a sure thing as possible. That just isn't Larry Johnson right now. The offensive line isn't what it once was, the quarterback position has question marks and the team expects to lower Johnson's work load even if he does finally return healthy and motivated.

Personally I would take Frank Gore even with his broken arm that by all accounts should be ready to go prior to the season opener and the player quickly moving up my list, Shaun Alexander.

If I had to draft today, my pick would likely be Alexander. He is lighter than last year, motivated and the entire Seahawks offense should put last season's disappointment behind them.

 
Between the heavy workload last year, the new QB, the lessened OL, and the hold out, I think you'd be an idiot to take him #3 right now. Even if the hold out ends before my draft I wouldn't take LJ before pick 6 at the earliest.
Pretty much my thinking too. I might take LJ at #5, but I'd certainly take Gore before him...and I'd have to think for a while before passing up Addai or FWP.
 
Our draft is in a week, and I'm sitting at #4 in a 16-team league. It's looking like LT, SJ, and LJ are going 1-2-3. I know it may sound a little crazy, but I've pretty much decided I'm going to take Travis Henry from Denver at #4.

Gore's hand and history of injury + losing Norv Turner...?, Alexander's 30 and wasn't playing that great last year BEFORE he broke his foot, too much uncertainity with Addai and Maroney (how will they do as the main man?), McNabb's return will temper Westbrook's numbers - Philly is a pass-first team, I like Willie Parker but what he did last year is probably his best. And even if LJ was there at #4...I'm kinda down on him. The line is not what it once was, the QB situation is muddled and Edwards is such a conservative coach, he'll probably be facing 8 and 9 man fronts all season.

I'm looking for the closest thing I can get to a sure thing with my #1, with upside potential. Henry has always performed well when given the chance, and Denver's run scheme is a known plus. I think there is a huge upside potential with Henry and short of an injury bust, I think at a minimum he'll be a 1300-yd 10-TD guy, with a potential upside of 1600 yds and 18 TDs. Given the choices at #4...I can live with that.

 
whatever you do do not take LJ, even if he signs. Go for Addia esp. If you have ppr for Rb's. Otherwise try Gore. But the numbers for any back who has had as many touches as LJ had last year the following year are not nearly as good indeed and most have gotten hurt on top of it

 
I'm in a slow draft right now waiting for 1.02 to choose. I have SJax and Gore pre-drafted. Kinda hoping he takes Peyton (you never know) so SJax slips to me but Gore seems like a fairly safe bet to me after all the reading I did last night.

I waffled on LJ, who probably should be the consensus #3. Perhaps it is overanalysis, but he has too many questions even though he may outperform most everybody else if he does come back.

I would have been gleeful to get LJ at #3 last year--funny how things change.

 
I am picking third this year and keeping Addai. 16 teams, PPR for WR/TE only. I hope to get Harrison in second round (19 pick) and Lee Evans 3rd round (45th pick), followed by BPA in the 4th.

 
I loved LJ last year and was a very happy owner. That being said, I wouldn't touch the guy in the 1st round.

 
Don't sweat it and just count on Addai or Parker. Too much risk on LJ and some with Gore too. I'd take Alexander over LJ at this point as well.

 
I rank Addai clearly above Gore/LJ/et al. Very low mileage since he didn't start even in college - and as Willie Parker showed, that's not necessarily a bad thing. Also, I swear the Colts in general duck out of bounds more often than any other team - probably plays a part in why they remain healthy year after year! =P

Plus, he's a very consistent runner who stays involved in the passing game. So he's less likely to give you a total stinker game than anyone else left, I think.

I think he's a solid bet to give you the same sort of production that Edge always used to, and with all the other question marks at this position I would draft him at #3 with no regrets.

FWP is rising up my board, too, but Pittsburgh's offense is less of a sure thing. And he's more of a boom-or-bust runner who could potentially stick you with a poor performance at the wrong time, especially with his fumbling issues. I am actually thinking about Henry - the O-line is getting old, and he's done almost nothing receiving except in '02, but that's about all that concerns me.

And I actually like LJ in the LATE first round, just because you know he's getting the ball in the red zone. But that's never going to actually happen.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
McNabb's return will temper Westbrook's numbers - Philly is a pass-first team
Fallacy. Westbrook is the #1 receiving threat as well as the #1 rushing threat on that team. His numbers will not suffer if Philly goes back to throwing the ball all the time. That being said, I wouldn't take Westbrook at #4 in a non-PPR league.
 
McNabb's return will temper Westbrook's numbers - Philly is a pass-first team
Fallacy. Westbrook is the #1 receiving threat as well as the #1 rushing threat on that team. His numbers will not suffer if Philly goes back to throwing the ball all the time. That being said, I wouldn't take Westbrook at #4 in a non-PPR league.
Exactly... That's why Westbrook is a top 5 RB. You can argue his durability, but we all know ANY RB can get hurt and miss games.
 
If LJ signs and a guy picks him late in the first you probably lost that league and should move on to the next one. I have never seen so many people scared of a little risk. LJ signs and he crushes Addai. Flat out crushes his numbers. LJ can score 18 -20 tds. LJ can total 2,000 no problem.

 
If LJ signs and a guy picks him late in the first you probably lost that league and should move on to the next one. I have never seen so many people scared of a little risk. LJ signs and he crushes Addai. Flat out crushes his numbers. LJ can score 18 -20 tds. LJ can total 2,000 no problem.
Why would you say this about LJ?I have him below Addai regardless of holdout status. The KC line is a shambles the QB situation is completely unsettled, there are zero receiving threats and Herman Edwards is not going to be mistaken for **** Vermeil any time soon. I don't understand why some people expect LJ to produce at Vermeil levels in Herm's 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust offense.LJ is talented but he is not so talented to be stuck in this offense and produce much more than low to mid top 10 numbers max.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There were zero receiving threats for years in KC. Lets go outside of FF for a minute. LJ is a much much better RB than Addai. He also has proved he can put up monster numbers by basically himself. ie last year. Good luck with Addai but obviously you are not seing the risk of the loss of glenn and the Peyton factor. To each his own I think if LJ is signed right now you would get some looks drafting addai before him. Most likely they would be smiles from the guy grabbing LJ after you.

 
The KC line is a shambles the QB situation is completely unsettled, there are zero receiving threats and Herman Edwards is not going to be mistaken for **** Vermeil any time soon. I don't understand why some people expect LJ to produce at Vermeil levels in Herm's 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust offense.LJ is talented but he is not so talented to be stuck in this offense and produce much more than low to mid top 10 numbers max.
Odd, outside of the QB situation, we heard the same thing last year. Then Green went down. Oh, I forgot, last year he lost his FB, Richardson, and that was going to be the reason why he was going to bust.Look, even with McIntosh out, at worst, the line is the same as last year. Solid interior, and the Tackles suck. They stacked 9 in the box against Huard last year...what, are they just not going to use any DB's at all against the Chiefs this year? The two starting receivers are, at worst, the same. At best, you have DBowe providing at least the threat of a big play receiver...he doesn't actually have to be one, just the threat would be enough.And far as I can tell, same HC as last year, with his 3yds & a cloud, and LJ still getting 1750 rushing yds.I'm surprised you didn't at least mention the 400 carries nonsense. You know, how all these backs with 400 carries suck the next year? You know, all four of them that we have for a huge sample size? The only thing that concerns me about LJ is his running style. He takes a lot of punishment the way he runs, he nearly got decapitated in AZ, he was constantly getting nailed behind the line and having to break all those tackles to get his. To be honest, I think missing TC is probably to his benefit. And he'll be more pissed off than ever when he does sign.LJ will get his. Again. :thumbup:
 
LJ is a beast and you know this. Comparing Addai to LJ is weird. If you dont want to draft LJ just admit it is because the uncertainty of his contract situation that I can handle. But lets stop comparing these two.

 
The KC line is a shambles the QB situation is completely unsettled, there are zero receiving threats and Herman Edwards is not going to be mistaken for **** Vermeil any time soon. I don't understand why some people expect LJ to produce at Vermeil levels in Herm's 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust offense.LJ is talented but he is not so talented to be stuck in this offense and produce much more than low to mid top 10 numbers max.
Odd, outside of the QB situation, we heard the same thing last year. Then Green went down. Oh, I forgot, last year he lost his FB, Richardson, and that was going to be the reason why he was going to bust.Look, even with McIntosh out, at worst, the line is the same as last year. Solid interior, and the Tackles suck. They stacked 9 in the box against Huard last year...what, are they just not going to use any DB's at all against the Chiefs this year? The two starting receivers are, at worst, the same. At best, you have DBowe providing at least the threat of a big play receiver...he doesn't actually have to be one, just the threat would be enough.And far as I can tell, same HC as last year, with his 3yds & a cloud, and LJ still getting 1750 rushing yds.I'm surprised you didn't at least mention the 400 carries nonsense. You know, how all these backs with 400 carries suck the next year? You know, all four of them that we have for a huge sample size? The only thing that concerns me about LJ is his running style. He takes a lot of punishment the way he runs, he nearly got decapitated in AZ, he was constantly getting nailed behind the line and having to break all those tackles to get his. To be honest, I think missing TC is probably to his benefit. And he'll be more pissed off than ever when he does sign.LJ will get his. Again. :football:
Will Shields played last year.Brodie Coyle is listed as the #1 QB.LJ had to carry the ball 416 times to put up his stellar numbers, Herm will probably try to do that to him again this season with inferior supporting talent. If he gets into camp by week 3 of training camp then top 10 numbers are still attainable but don't expect this guy to bust off top 3 numbers. It's not going to happen.
 
Quick straw poll: Who is more likely to be a top 3 back?

1) The unquestioned #1 RB for an offense guaranteed to finish top 3 in scoring and yards.

2) The unquestioned #1 RB for an offense that will rank middle-of-the-pack (and that is being very generous).

 
Did you look at LJ's playoff schedule?

week 14 KC at Denver

week 15 Tenn at KC

week 16 KC at Det

If the knock is the 400 carries then missing camp and a few games might be good for him.

When they give him the $ Herm will make him earn it

 
Chaka said:
shadow2k said:
Chaka said:
The KC line is a shambles the QB situation is completely unsettled, there are zero receiving threats and Herman Edwards is not going to be mistaken for **** Vermeil any time soon. I don't understand why some people expect LJ to produce at Vermeil levels in Herm's 3-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust offense.LJ is talented but he is not so talented to be stuck in this offense and produce much more than low to mid top 10 numbers max.
Odd, outside of the QB situation, we heard the same thing last year. Then Green went down. Oh, I forgot, last year he lost his FB, Richardson, and that was going to be the reason why he was going to bust.Look, even with McIntosh out, at worst, the line is the same as last year. Solid interior, and the Tackles suck. They stacked 9 in the box against Huard last year...what, are they just not going to use any DB's at all against the Chiefs this year? The two starting receivers are, at worst, the same. At best, you have DBowe providing at least the threat of a big play receiver...he doesn't actually have to be one, just the threat would be enough.And far as I can tell, same HC as last year, with his 3yds & a cloud, and LJ still getting 1750 rushing yds.I'm surprised you didn't at least mention the 400 carries nonsense. You know, how all these backs with 400 carries suck the next year? You know, all four of them that we have for a huge sample size? The only thing that concerns me about LJ is his running style. He takes a lot of punishment the way he runs, he nearly got decapitated in AZ, he was constantly getting nailed behind the line and having to break all those tackles to get his. To be honest, I think missing TC is probably to his benefit. And he'll be more pissed off than ever when he does sign.LJ will get his. Again. :moneybag:
Will Shields played last year.Brodie Coyle is listed as the #1 QB.LJ had to carry the ball 416 times to put up his stellar numbers, Herm will probably try to do that to him again this season with inferior supporting talent. If he gets into camp by week 3 of training camp then top 10 numbers are still attainable but don't expect this guy to bust off top 3 numbers. It's not going to happen.
Yes, Shields played. I never said otherwise. Keep in mind though, Waters was in a walking boot during camp. When he came back, Shields was out with an ankle injury. And the LT/RT spots were never settled, it was like the high school slut, where everyone takes a turn. That O-line didn't once practice together in preseason before the season started. Shields was either hurt, old, or both last year, because he wasn't the same pro-bowl G we'd seen here for years. He was decent, but he got beat much more than he ever had in the past. Welbourn moved into his position, and will fill in just fine, compared to what Shields did last year.Croyle "listed" as the #1 QB means nothing. Heck, TC hasn't even broke yet for the first preseason games, nothing is decided yet. Croyle will take the snaps with the first team in preseason game #1, Huard will do it in game #2. Obviously you missed the point though. Huard played last year, and many teams put NINE men in the box against LJ, and LJ still got his numbers. How often do you see people scared of teams stacking eight in the box against their RB's? He had nine, and still got it done. Do you think any team will put 10 in the box against Croyle? Because if not, then it's no worse.And no, they won't be running LJ 416 times this year. Let's just say he gets only 3/4th's of the touches he got last year. He scored 410.2pts in my league last year. Anything above 300 puts him at #8 for last year. And that's taking away 1/4th of his total production. I don't see them cutting him back to 312 carries and 31rec. That's less than 20 carries a game...for a guy who carried the ball 39 times in one game last year, and 30+ in five others. There's really no reason for his production to drop off from last year on a per touch basis, if you saw what exactly went on last year. To me, all it comes down to, is how much work he'll get. He scored 60 more points than the #4 back in my league last year. That's basically 1/7th of his production. Take away 1/7th of his carries, he'd have had 356....probably right on track for what he'll get this year. So FWIW, the backs below him were...Westbrook, who had a career year with his first 1,000yd season? Gore, who's got a broken hand I think, and already had fumble problems. Tiki, who retired. Then Parker, who blew up last year, still finishing 80pts behind LJ in my league. Next closest after that? MJD, over 100pts behind.What about guys like Addai? 226 carries...give him 1/3rd more touches, for 1/3rd more points as well, and he'd have been around 370pts. He just lost his LT too, right? There's really only two other backs people have been thinking about before LJ that I haven't mentioned. SA, and Henry. I won't knock SA, he could still have another good year in him if he's completely healthy, and it sounds like he might be. And Henry could do some nice things in Den. But really, I just don't see SA blowing up like he did two years ago. And Henry, while solid with a good cast around him...is not a top five back in any system.Obviously we can't play this year based on last years stats, but it's the only tangible thing we have to go on. Considering his situation is almost identical to last year, it's not too far fetched to consider similar numbers being put up. The passing game will suck, the tackles will suck, the interior line will be solid, same HC/Coords, and everyone doubting him once again. Same thing, one year later. Only this time, I don't have to point out why losing his pro-bowl FB Richardson won't hurt him as much as everyone seemed to think. I mean, he was running behind a converted freakin TE last year! :sarcasm:
 
I'm in a slow draft right now waiting for 1.02 to choose. I have SJax and Gore pre-drafted. Kinda hoping he takes Peyton (you never know) so SJax slips to me but Gore seems like a fairly safe bet to me after all the reading I did last night.I waffled on LJ, who probably should be the consensus #3. Perhaps it is overanalysis, but he has too many questions even though he may outperform most everybody else if he does come back.I would have been gleeful to get LJ at #3 last year--funny how things change.
Why don't you have LT2 predrafted in case the the one who picks #1 is a schmuck and picks Peyton?
 
I'm in a slow draft right now waiting for 1.02 to choose. I have SJax and Gore pre-drafted. Kinda hoping he takes Peyton (you never know) so SJax slips to me but Gore seems like a fairly safe bet to me after all the reading I did last night.

I waffled on LJ, who probably should be the consensus #3. Perhaps it is overanalysis, but he has too many questions even though he may outperform most everybody else if he does come back.

I would have been gleeful to get LJ at #3 last year--funny how things change.
Why don't you have LT2 predrafted in case the the one who picks #1 is a schmuck and picks Peyton?
Because he is waiting on #2 to pick, as #1 has already picked.
 
I'm in a slow draft right now waiting for 1.02 to choose. I have SJax and Gore pre-drafted. Kinda hoping he takes Peyton (you never know) so SJax slips to me but Gore seems like a fairly safe bet to me after all the reading I did last night.

I waffled on LJ, who probably should be the consensus #3. Perhaps it is overanalysis, but he has too many questions even though he may outperform most everybody else if he does come back.

I would have been gleeful to get LJ at #3 last year--funny how things change.
Why don't you have LT2 predrafted in case the the one who picks #1 is a schmuck and picks Peyton?
Because he is waiting on #2 to pick, as #1 has already picked.
Update: I got Gore, Rudi at 2.08 (10-teamer), and MJD at 3.03. NICELJ went at #6, behind Westbrook and Addai.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LJ is not going to hold out; NO..... has for the QB play; nothing to worry about... LJ did just fine when Green went out.

LJ is a freak... he'll be fine this yr... no doubt he'll be top 5. The guy almost got his neck snapped last yr and it didn't phase him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's looking and sounding like LJ and the Chiefs are going to agree to an extension sooner rather than later.

And now the playing field becomes further clouded.

LJ will very likely NOT holdout. With no holdout, is LJ the clear #3 pick behind LT and Jackson? Is he now the #2 pick?

Or are people still hopping back and forth among Gore, Addai, Alexander, etc.?

 
It's looking and sounding like LJ and the Chiefs are going to agree to an extension sooner rather than later.

And now the playing field becomes further clouded.

LJ will very likely NOT holdout. With no holdout, is LJ the clear #3 pick behind LT and Jackson? Is he now the #2 pick?

Or are people still hopping back and forth among Gore, Addai, Alexander, etc.?
LJ is easily the #2 overall if he signs within the week. Jackson could also easily be #2. It' really your preference of whom you like more this year. LJ on a mediocre to bad team or Jackson on a mediocre team - This is the question...

 
I am being offered Addai and Gates for Johnson in a keeper league.

sorry LJ, but I think I have to pull the trigger on that one.

 
Between the heavy workload last year, the new QB, the lessened OL, and the hold out, I think you'd be an idiot to take him #3 right now. Even if the hold out ends before my draft I wouldn't take LJ before pick 6 at the earliest.
Maybe I am old or maybe I am #### and an LJ lover. I don't ever remember hearing about Walter Payton having a great QB or O'line. OJ never had a great QB and only one member of his O'line is in the HOF. Eric Dickerson is in the same boat as OJ. The Rams had a good line but they were not world class. Only Slater is in the HOF. I do not disregard that LJ is a candidate to break down, I just don't feel that after only 800+ NFL carries that this guy is that big of a risk. His attitude and ability will find a way to succeed.
 
LJ is still #2 behind LT.

No injury history- NONE

As far as RBs go, he had less football wear and tear on him than most RBs(even in college he had to sit and wait)

He's GOING to sign

He's going to get more receptions but less carries which will even themselves out number-wse but will put less wear on his frame

oh yeah, he's also a freak of nature.

 
Ok I have the thrid spot in a 12 team re-draft. RB gets 1/10 Ruyd , 1/10 Recyd, 0.5/recp, 6/TD and -1 for fumMore than likely LT goes 1 followed by SJ. Is LJ really the pick here?
I asked Adrian Peterson this very question and he responded, "All Day".
 
If you don't like LJ @ the #3 spot, chances are really good that someone in your league does. Trade down and pick up some value in the second round.

I have the #3 in my re-draft, and I have a conditional trade worked out so I can drop to #5 (condition being LT and SJ are off the board - the guys drafting #1 and #2 are rooks and who knows - someone might do something crazy like draft Peyton or LJ first overall).

I like Henry, Gore or Addai much better @ 5 than LJ @ 3.

 
well, what did everyone do who had their drafts already?

I have the 3rd pick on Tuesday.

I can make a case for LJ, Gore and Addai in a PPR league.

So this will just go right to the last second. My gut tells me Addai, my brain tells me pick LJ and worry about him signing later. My gut tells me in a bad way to avoid Gore (not sure why)

But one monkey wrench is Gore has a much easier schedule

 
Go with Addai. He'll get catches, lots of touches. He won't have to worry about any RB behind him getting carries. And he's in Indy's offense. Think Edge's numbers with Indy, maybe even better.

 
I have the third pick for a redraft, non-ppr league this sunday (26th) and i think i am going to stay as far away from LJ as i can. I just have a bad feeling about the whole situation. Mostly the heavy workload and bad OL and QB situations.

However i was thinking about taking Willie Parker @ #3 behind LT and SJ (hopefully #2 pick goes Manning, start 2 qb league). Everyone on this topic that is going with Parker seems to be a Steelers fan, so i dont know if they are being homers or what. I just really like what i have seen from him so far and i expect big things this year.

 
I drew the third pick in a 16 team league. The draft is Friday, and I'm not sure what to do. I emailed the league and said I'm open to trade offers for the #3 pick. My thinking was that if I moved down a few spots, I could still get one of LJ, Parker, Addai, Henry, Gore. My only hesitation in doing that is that I don't know the guy picking #2, and think it is possible he could let Jackson fall to me.

 
Decision still seems to be one of Larry Johnson or Frank Gore.

Who's OLine is better: Kansas City or San Franciso?

There's been much talk about the depleted state of Larry Johnson's OLine. But I'm wondering just how good (or bad) Frank Gore's is.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top