well, two teams have cleared up the confusion at rb. thats nice. barlow needs a change of scenery. probably his last chance. Hope Gore can stay healthy now.ESPN just reported that Barlow was traded to the Jets .
Verywell, two teams have cleared up the confusion at rb. thats nice. barlow needs a change of scenery. probably his last chance. Hope Gore can stay healthy now.ESPN just reported that Barlow was traded to the Jets .
any details of the trades?ESPN just reported that Barlow was traded to the Jets .
http://49ers.com/pressbox/news_detail.php?PRKey=218349ers Trade RB Barlowany details of the trades?ESPN just reported that Barlow was traded to the Jets .
So where does that move Gore and Barlow on the the ADP?One would think they both move up. I have Gore up to 2nd tier. Any projections for Barlow with the Jets?http://49ers.com/pressbox/news_detail.php?PRKey=2183
49ers Trade RB Barlow
The San Francisco 49ers announced Sunday that they have traded RB Kevan Barlow to the New York Jets for an undisclosed 2007 draft pick. The trade is contingent on Barlow passing a physical.
Barlow (6-1, 234) originally joined the 49ers as a third round draft pick out of Pittsburgh in 2001.
Said head coach Mike Nolan on the trade, “This is a great opportunity for Kevan because of New York’s need at running back. Kevan has been committed to our program and done well. With the depth at running back we felt we could make this move.”
Barlow started and played in 12 games in 2005 before going on injured reserve late in the season with a knee injury. He finished second on offense in rushing with 176 carries for 581 yards, also tying for team-lead with Frank Gore and Maurice Hicks with three rushing touchdowns.
Originally a third round (80th pick overall) draft choice by San Francisco in 2001, Barlow started 30 games for the 49ers and produced a 1,000-yard rushing season in 2004 with his career-high 1,024 yards on the ground.
Oak O line in "transition" -- a year away. Gore - very quick, better than Barlow Bryant - Smith look good together but they haven't really stretched the field. You will be amazed at how different Smith looks this year -- they are rolling him out and moving him a lot and his mechanics are troubling (lots of throwing w/o setting up) but the results have been way better than before. SF O Line is 1000% better. They've been protecting Moss and he's been chafing over it but I think it's smart.Looking forward to seeing:-how the Oak Oline is coming.-how Gore looks (Dang West coast teams that suck, never get to watch them on the East coast.)-how Bryant and Smith look together.-how the 9ers D looks this year.-if SF Oline is really any better.-Brooks throwing to Moss more this game.
Gore clearly moves up a good bit now. Barlow, I'm not so sure. It's really hard to say where at on the depth chart he will be right now. NYJ seems like they are just throwing darts blindly and seeing what sticks.So where does that move Gore and Barlow on the the ADP?One would think they both move up. I have Gore up to 2nd tier. Any projections for Barlow with the Jets?
Hey, you jipped me! No info on that 9ers D! J/k, thanks for the info.Oak O line in "transition" -- a year away. Gore - very quick, better than Barlow Bryant - Smith look good together but they haven't really stretched the field. You will be amazed at how different Smith looks this year -- they are rolling him out and moving him a lot and his mechanics are troubling (lots of throwing w/o setting up) but the results have been way better than before. SF O Line is 1000% better. They've been protecting Moss and he's been chafing over it but I think it's smart.Looking forward to seeing:-how the Oak Oline is coming.-how Gore looks (Dang West coast teams that suck, never get to watch them on the East coast.)-how Bryant and Smith look together.-how the 9ers D looks this year.-if SF Oline is really any better.-Brooks throwing to Moss more this game.
Bettis on FOX saying SA is missing some "hardware."![]()
GB having no context to the statement.Bettis on FOX saying SA is missing some "hardware."![]()
is he gonna play that card every week? talk about a tired angle.
![]()
i'm bumping him down thenmy league subtracts points for negative carriesGore -2 carries for 15 yrds
2-1-OAK 45 (11:37) A.Brooks to OAK 37 for -8 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at OAK 37. A.Brooks to OAK 37 for no gain (J.Ulbrich).
Brooks being Brooksfor anyone watching, what was this?
2-1-OAK 45 (11:37) A.Brooks to OAK 37 for -8 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at OAK 37. A.Brooks to OAK 37 for no gain (J.Ulbrich).
Listening to game...I believe it was a botched hand-off.Brooks being Brooksfor anyone watching, what was this?
2-1-OAK 45 (11:37) A.Brooks to OAK 37 for -8 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at OAK 37. A.Brooks to OAK 37 for no gain (J.Ulbrich).
It was supposed to be either a handoff or a play-action pass; the ball slipped out of Brooks' hands before the running back got there. Looks like last year; the Niners defense is the solution to any team having problems throwing the ball.for anyone watching, what was this?
2-1-OAK 45 (11:37) A.Brooks to OAK 37 for -8 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at OAK 37. A.Brooks to OAK 37 for no gain (J.Ulbrich).
This was a long pass, 40 yards through the air. Brooks led Whitted just a little too much; a better WR would have made the reception, Whitted didn't even seem to try very hard, though he got his fingers on it.3-8-OAK 45 (1:28) A.Brooks pass incomplete deep left to A.Whitted.punt
Yes, the Niners have not put any pressure on him; the only time they got in on him they totally whiffed on the tackle and he ran for 25 yards.Is Brooks getting the time to look down feild?
It was supposed to be either a handoff or a play-action pass; the ball slipped out of Brooks' hands before the running back got there.for anyone watching, what was this?
2-1-OAK 45 (11:37) A.Brooks to OAK 37 for -8 yards. FUMBLES, and recovers at OAK 37. A.Brooks to OAK 37 for no gain (J.Ulbrich).
Brooks being Brooks
Funny how that translates into passing success isn't it.Yes, the Niners have not put any pressure on him; the only time they got in on him they totally whiffed on the tackle and he ran for 25 yards.Is Brooks getting the time to look down feild?
Wasn't LJ one of the best GL backs last year (not 100% sure...going off of memory) why not let him opund it twice.Oakland Raiders begin at 13:361-10-SF 15 (13:36) L.Jordan right end to SF 5 for 10 yards (S.Davis).1-5-SF 5 (13:10) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for 4 yards (J.Maxwell).2-1-SF 1 (12:30) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for no gain (R.Fields).3-1-SF 1 (11:51) A.Brooks pass middle to C.Anderson for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN NULLIFIED by Penalty. PENALTY on OAK-C.Anderson, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at SF 1 - No Play.
It seems that what the 9ers were thinking too, since the pass play worked (other than the weak penalty call).Wasn't LJ one of the best GL backs last year (not 100% sure...going off of memory) why not let him opund it twice.Oakland Raiders begin at 13:361-10-SF 15 (13:36) L.Jordan right end to SF 5 for 10 yards (S.Davis).1-5-SF 5 (13:10) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for 4 yards (J.Maxwell).2-1-SF 1 (12:30) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for no gain (R.Fields).3-1-SF 1 (11:51) A.Brooks pass middle to C.Anderson for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN NULLIFIED by Penalty. PENALTY on OAK-C.Anderson, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at SF 1 - No Play.
Jordan had 6 TDs on 16 attempts, which is below average. And the pass went for a TD, so it's hard to second-guess the call.Wasn't LJ one of the best GL backs last year (not 100% sure...going off of memory) why not let him opund it twice.Oakland Raiders begin at 13:361-10-SF 15 (13:36) L.Jordan right end to SF 5 for 10 yards (S.Davis).1-5-SF 5 (13:10) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for 4 yards (J.Maxwell).2-1-SF 1 (12:30) L.Jordan left tackle to SF 1 for no gain (R.Fields).3-1-SF 1 (11:51) A.Brooks pass middle to C.Anderson for 1 yard, TOUCHDOWN NULLIFIED by Penalty. PENALTY on OAK-C.Anderson, Offensive Pass Interference, 10 yards, enforced at SF 1 - No Play.