What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

9/11 Museum set to open. Muslims are offended. (1 Viewer)

With the museum opening on May 21, it has shown the film to several groups, including an interfaith advisory group of clergy members. Those on the panel overwhelmingly took strong exception to the film, believing some of the terminology in it casts aspersions on all Muslims, and requested changes. But the museum has declined. In March, the sole imam in the group resigned to make clear that he could not endorse its contents.
I'm shocked you misrepresented the article in the title.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They should be offended. The word "Islamist" means someone who is dedicated to a radicalized anti-western version of fundamentalist Islam. I understand that, and hopefully others here do too, but the public at large is not going to. They're going to assume that it means anyone who is Islamic.

The memorial should be about remembrance of what happened that day, not about breeding resentment against Islam.

 
With the museum opening on May 21, it has shown the film to several groups, including an interfaith advisory group of clergy members. Those on the panel overwhelmingly took strong exception to the film, believing some of the terminology in it casts aspersions on all Muslims, and requested changes. But the museum has declined. In March, the sole imam in the group resigned to make clear that he could not endorse its contents.
I'm shocked you misrepresented the article in the title.
I sense some sarcasm here.

 
They should be offended. The word "Islamist" means someone who is dedicated to a radicalized anti-western version of fundamentalist Islam. I understand that, and hopefully others here do too, but the public at large is not going to. They're going to assume that it means anyone who is Islamic.

The memorial should be about remembrance of what happened that day, not about breeding resentment against Islam.
If you understand that, you also understand that people are muslim, not islamic.

 
Is there a link to view this film? It isn't in the NYT article. I would like to see what the offended are offended about.

 
They should be offended. The word "Islamist" means someone who is dedicated to a radicalized anti-western version of fundamentalist Islam. I understand that, and hopefully others here do too, but the public at large is not going to. They're going to assume that it means anyone who is Islamic.

The memorial should be about remembrance of what happened that day, not about breeding resentment against Islam.
If you understand that, you also understand that people are muslim, not islamic.
Ha! You're right.
 
Is there a link to view this film? It isn't in the NYT article. I would like to see what the offended are offended about.
:goodposting:

I'm not sure how we're supposed to judge whether there's anything offensive about this film or not without being able to see it, or least reading a transcript or something.

 
Unrelated

While I don't have any intention or desire to visit the museum, the Memorial is incredibly powerful. Recommended.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To be fair, Muslims are offended that they are being unfairly lumped into the group that took down the buildings. That's all.

I think it's a pretty fair gripe. :shrug:

 
With the museum opening on May 21, it has shown the film to several groups, including an interfaith advisory group of clergy members. Those on the panel overwhelmingly took strong exception to the film, believing some of the terminology in it casts aspersions on all Muslims, and requested changes. But the museum has declined. In March, the sole imam in the group resigned to make clear that he could not endorse its contents.
I'm shocked you misrepresented the article in the title.
I sense some ironic sarcasm here.
fyp

 
Is there a link to view this film? It isn't in the NYT article. I would like to see what the offended are offended about.
I agree. Kind of hard to judge from the article if the film in its current version does enough to distinguish between the religion and some extremists who claim to be believers in that religion

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top