What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Aaron Brooks is (possibly) a Steeler (1 Viewer)

Bri

Footballguy
G.O.A.T. Tier
Aaron Brooks, former quarterback for the New Orleans Saints and Oakland Raiders, has signed a one-year contract with the Pittsburgh Steelers. Brooks is expected to compete with Jared Zabransky for the third spot on the depth chart.

Pittsburgh will hold a press conference at 3 pm Wednesday to announce the signing.

Reports indicate that if Brooks makes the roster this fall, he will receive a one-year contract for the veteran minimum of $750,000.

In a statement released by his agent, the former Pro Bowler expressed his enthusiasm about the signing. "I'm very excited about the opportunity to play for one of the great franchises in the NFL. I've been through some tough times the past few years. Now I have a chance to revive my career, and I look forward to contribute in any way possible."

Last season, Brooks was out of football after being released by the Raiders.

For the first few years of his career, Brooks looked like a great quarterback prospect. He took over the starting job in 2000 after an injury to Jeff Blake and led the Saints to their first playoff win. His performance that year landed him a megacontract with the Saints. After a mediocre 2001, he bounced back to lead New Orleans to a 9-4 start. But a shoulder injury affected his play, and the Saints lost their last three games to miss the playoffs. The hostile fan reaction affected his confidence, leading to a downward spiral that ended with Brooks being benched late in the 2005 season, when the Saints were nomads due to the Superdome being damaged by Hurricane Katrina.

Oakland, famous for its reclamation projects, signed the former Virginia quarterback after his release by the Saints. The Raiders hoped that a fresh start with a new team would allow him to regain the form he showed early in his career.

Oakland owner Al Davis said that the Brooks signing was better for Pittsburgh than it looks on paper. "Brooks has a lot of talent. It's just that he wasn't in the right situation. We didn't have much of a team around him. And people forget that his only really bad season was 2005, when he didn't even have a home stadium."

Lane Kiffin, the current Oakland coach, expressed skepticism. "I didn't see anything that made me think he could be a contributor. That's why I didn't keep him around. But it's probably a good deal for the Steelers, since there's no risk involved for them." Raiders and Saints fans were critical of the signing. One Saints fan, using the name Siddhartha, called a local talk show and said "Looks like Tom Benson is no longer the dumbest black and gold owner." On an Oakland message board, Raiders fan Lou Flirpa posted that "the Steelers must think their defense needs practice returning interceptions."

http://www.steelersfever.com/editorials/0806.html

 
Last edited by a moderator:
title=figured I'd better cover the rumor angle, will change wednesday if not

never know on April 1st either

 
Last edited by a moderator:


Y?

I guess they need a #3? I get the "no risk" concept, but there's nothing to be gained either.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If its an April Fools Day joke, its a cruel one. Nor Rooney-esque.

Now, if anyone has a home for Byron Leftwich, I will rest easy knowing these guys won't be sleeping on the street.

 
Gotta be April Fools.

If they actually had quotes from Brooks and Davis, this would be reported on other news outlets.

 
Gotta be April Fools.

If they actually had quotes from Brooks and Davis, this would be reported on other news outlets.
Very lame joke if it is. The Steelers talked to him last year before deciding not to sign. This deal is contingent on him making the team so it's not even really a deal, if true.
 
Gotta be April Fools.If they actually had quotes from Brooks and Davis, this would be reported on other news outlets.
from the article...
In a statement released by his agent, the former Pro Bowler expressed his enthusiasm about the signing. "I'm very excited about the opportunity to play for one of the great franchises in the NFL. I've been through some tough times the past few years. Now I have a chance to revive my career, and I look forward to contribute in any way possible."
Lane Kiffin, the current Oakland coach, expressed skepticism. "I didn't see anything that made me think he could be a contributor. That's why I didn't keep him around. But it's probably a good deal for the Steelers, since there's no risk involved for them." Raiders and Saints fans were critical of the signing. One Saints fan, using the name Siddhartha, called a local talk show and said "Looks like Tom Benson is no longer the dumbest black and gold owner." On an Oakland message board, Raiders fan Lou Flirpa posted that "the Steelers must think their defense needs practice returning interceptions."
 
I like the kid. No one can look good for the Raiders, and the Saints aren't far behind. He'll be a fine QB#3 if he makes the team. Must be grooming him to become a lifetime backup. All he needs is to watch some old tapes from 93-99, I was a world class backup....still am.

 
Whether or not it is it is true, I love the difference of opinion between Kiffin and Davis...lol.

 
Oakland owner Al Davis said that the Brooks signing was better for Pittsburgh than it looks on paper. "Brooks has a lot of talent. It's just that he wasn't in the right situation. We didn't have much of a team around him. And people forget that his only really bad season was 2005, when he didn't even have a home stadium."

Lane Kiffin, the current Oakland coach, expressed skepticism. "I didn't see anything that made me think he could be a contributor. That's why I didn't keep him around. But it's probably a good deal for the Steelers, since there's no risk involved for them." Raiders and Saints fans were critical of the signing. One Saints fan, using the name Siddhartha, called a local talk show and said "Looks like Tom Benson is no longer the dumbest black and gold owner." On an Oakland message board, Raiders fan Lou Flirpa posted that "the Steelers must think their defense needs practice returning interceptions."

http://www.steelersfever.com/editorials/0806.html
My vote is April Fool's Day.I can't see Al Davis saying that the Raider's "didn't have much of a team around him" and I definitely can't see any coach, even Kiffin, saying "I didn't see anything that made me think he could be a contributor. That's why I didn't keep him around."

First, Kiffin never coached Brooks and he didn't make the decision not to keep Brooks.

Plus, there is no need to keep an experienced Vet as a #3 QB -- that is generally a developmental position.

 
One Saints fan, using the name Siddhartha, called a local talk show and said "Looks like Tom Benson is no longer the dumbest black and gold owner." On an Oakland message board, Raiders fan Lou Flirpa posted that "the Steelers must think their defense needs practice returning interceptions."

yeah a writter quoting message boards and talk show fans?

april fools joke.

 
You're better than this Bri.
sorry if it's wrongI've always been gullible to April fools jokes. I tried to be pretty obvious about the possible inaccuracy in post 1 and 2. At Philly.com is an article that starts with Lito was traded for Roy then the author says it's April Fools. If this winds up being April fools I didn't fall for that one so I guess I need it smack right in front of me saying it's an April Fool's joke :pickle:The thing about Aaron though is where's the shock value of the joke? I'd have picked so many other players. How about Steelers sign Ryan Leaf? And IIRC He was chatting with them and working out for them in hopes of getting a deal last year, so it would make some sense.
 
Aaron Brooks, former quarterback for the New Orleans Saints and Oakland Raiders, has signed a one-year contract with the Pittsburgh Steelers. Brooks is expected to compete with Jared Zabransky for the third spot on the depth chart.

Pittsburgh will hold a press conference at 3 pm Wednesday to announce the signing.

Reports indicate that if Brooks makes the roster this fall, he will receive a one-year contract for the veteran minimum of $750,000.

In a statement released by his agent, the former Pro Bowler expressed his enthusiasm about the signing. "I'm very excited about the opportunity to play for one of the great franchises in the NFL. I've been through some tough times the past few years. Now I have a chance to revive my career, and I look forward to contribute in any way possible."

Last season, Brooks was out of football after being released by the Raiders.

For the first few years of his career, Brooks looked like a great quarterback prospect. He took over the starting job in 2000 after an injury to Jeff Blake and led the Saints to their first playoff win. His performance that year landed him a megacontract with the Saints. After a mediocre 2001, he bounced back to lead New Orleans to a 9-4 start. But a shoulder injury affected his play, and the Saints lost their last three games to miss the playoffs. The hostile fan reaction affected his confidence, leading to a downward spiral that ended with Brooks being benched late in the 2005 season, when the Saints were nomads due to the Superdome being damaged by Hurricane Katrina.

Oakland, famous for its reclamation projects, signed the former Virginia quarterback after his release by the Saints. The Raiders hoped that a fresh start with a new team would allow him to regain the form he showed early in his career.

Oakland owner Al Davis said that the Brooks signing was better for Pittsburgh than it looks on paper. "Brooks has a lot of talent. It's just that he wasn't in the right situation. We didn't have much of a team around him. And people forget that his only really bad season was 2005, when he didn't even have a home stadium."

Lane Kiffin, the current Oakland coach, expressed skepticism. "I didn't see anything that made me think he could be a contributor. That's why I didn't keep him around. But it's probably a good deal for the Steelers, since there's no risk involved for them." Raiders and Saints fans were critical of the signing. One Saints fan, using the name Siddhartha, called a local talk show and said "Looks like Tom Benson is no longer the dumbest black and gold owner." On an Oakland message board, Raiders fan Lou Flirpa posted that "the Steelers must think their defense needs practice returning interceptions."

http://www.steelersfever.com/editorials/0806.html
Stopped reading after "Al Davis says..."Al Davis making comments to the media gets about the same attention as say, the Pope trying out for the Lakers. He came out if his fortress of solitude long enough to comment on the Steelers signing Brooks, and excuse his play by saying the Raiders didn't have much of a team around him? I don't think so.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top