here is the rams report for FBG (offense reports made it into magazine but not defense)... probably not too much has changed since written back in may... post-draft...
http://www.footballguys.com/05teamreport-ram.htm
in retrospect, i may have come off as overly optimistic on atogwe. no one really knows who will start opposite archuleta... probably not even the rams yet.
but i thought at the time, & nothing has changed my opinion in the interim, that he has the best combination of athleticism, talent & skills to earn the starting nod.
since the team report, i have recently seen KFFL list michael stone, michael hawthorne, atogwe, jerome carter & furrey as possible starters at SS... which is just restating that they & no one knows. i'd be shocked if furrey starts. the little highlights i saw of carter, i came away not quite as impressed as a i thought i would be... hard to put my finger on it, but if i had to boil it down it had to do with him seeming a little slower reacting & not as quick to the spot, compared to atogwe... & some scouts think he may have trouble in coverage...
of course atogwe could too... many safeties who were studs at the collegiate level struggle with the transition to covering bigger, faster WRs in the pros.
i would also be surprised if hawthorne starts, who sounds more like a CB/S-tweener who will hopefully be a ST demon & possibly the nickle back... this also describes michael stone... though i did hear his name mentioned as one of the early favorites for the other safety... but i think that is premature & pretty speculative.
bartell was a second rounder & was both a FS & CB in college... the word is the rams would like to leave him at CB for now. they could use an upgrade at nickle back from groce & garrett (he may be hard pressed to make team... i think he is jammer's cousin & blazing fast but not physical enuf).
tino is definitely the WLB... there was a lot of talk about him switching to SS, but that experiment was aborted early on... as far as i know, b4 they even actually tried it. i think he has the requisite athleticism to pull it off, but some scouts think he has the potential to be an all-pro LB, so perhaps that is best to let him grow into the WLB position. i'm not sure, but the move may have been prompted by concerns that he could be undersized, & that the shoulder he had problems with in '04 may not be able to withstand the pounding he will surely get over the long haul from the LB position.
it is interesting that there was talk about moving archuleta to FS... was that to accomodate the aborted tino position switch... or due to similar concerns about his herniated disc/s? than he was back SS for a minute... now he is back to FS. are they still concerned about his health?
i think archuleta's rookie contract ends this season. i'm glad somebody above noticed the logical contradiction. martz was emphatic about saying their defensive scheme was shifting to one in which they no longer distinguished between SS & FS... ie - getting away from old school division of labor with a LB-like hammer in run support who may not be adept in coverage, & a CB-like safety who can cover with good aerial skills, but may be deficient in run support.
instead just called right & left safety... i believe the giants were like this a few years ago (b4 coughlin) where the SS was expected to cover & the FS could be a weapon against the run.
in calling arch a FS, i think we can only conclude that some of the old school ways of parsing skill sets are still in play... or why bother calling them SS & FS at all?
i have no doubt they would like their SS to be able to cover & their FS to be able to tackle... but we could say that about every team in the league... that is obviously the ideal to have two interchangeable parts at the two safeties (much tougher for offenses to exploit on run & pass plays)... great idea in theory, but much harder in practice to be lucky enough to find even one guy, let alone two, equally adept in coverage & run support. everybody would like to have a SS that can cover like ed reed... & a FS like ken hamlin that can knock you into next week is similarly unusual (even last may not be greatest exemplar as he may have some coverage deficiencies).
coverage is almost always listed as a weakness for archuleta... i'm not sure if he was really asked to do that too much in the past. he is very fast (sub-4.4?) & has decent change of direction... with the important caveat & proviso... when his back is right. so it is possible that he could take on additional coverage responsibilities & not be a huge liabilty... if he is asked to do that a lot more, we'll have to see if he bites too hard on play action from being overly aggressive (in the past he was asked to go forward & rarely in reverse), how his run/pass read & recognition is, etc.
imo, though, he is a superior athlete who should be OK in this area. he does have notoriously & horrifically bad hands for a good athlete, though... don't know if a little practice in the off-season will magically confer upon him good hands.
it would be astounding if he gets anything more than 1-2 INTs (if that).
* edit/add - agreed with the... he'll be OK regardless part. only i thought he was dating jennifer walcott? this is a family joint so no links or Shick will give me the heave ho
... but if you are over 18 & know how to look things up on google...
** edit/add II - a big problem with rams D, & why that got gashed in the run game repeatedly (see ATL playoff game... ouch) was appallingly bad tackling in the back seven... claiborne & coakley imo will be vastly superior to thomas & polley... the secondary got hammered by injuries last season... not just arch but aeneas williams & travis fisher... if fisher & archuleta are healthy, & they can plug somebody in at the other safety position, their last line of defense could be greatly improved... one reason i am high on the rams prospects to get back to the playoffs & make more noise this season.
with their schedule, & barring injuries, i think 10-6 or 11-5 is doable, which most likely makes me a contrarian. this is still accounting for the fact that ARI should be better in '05. in the AFC, i predict at least one team will finish 10-6 & be left on the outside looking in come playoff time... i'm not sure, but i don't think that has happened since they went to current playoff format (if ever?).