What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Adrian Peterson vs the 2006 Rookie RBs (1 Viewer)

noneother

Footballguy
Well, Bush seems to be the Number 1 selection this year, Adrian Peterson appears to be the Number 1 next year.. of course all this depends on team needs and possible trades..

2 different backs, which would you rather have in the backfield? Is one barry sanders and the other emmit smith in relationship to how the NFL may use them?

 
Well, Bush seems to be the Number 1 selection this year, Adrian Peterson appears to be the Number 1 next year.. of course all this depends on team needs and possible trades..

2 different backs, which would you rather have in the backfield? Is one barry sanders and the other emmit smith in relationship to how the NFL may use them?
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSHBUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

 
I agree. Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eddie George.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.

 
Well, Bush seems to be the Number 1 selection this year, Adrian Peterson appears to be the Number 1 next year.. of course all this depends on team needs and possible trades..

2 different backs, which would you rather have in the backfield?  Is one barry sanders and the other emmit smith in relationship to how the NFL may use them?
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSHBUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH
This guy sure likes Bush.
 
I agree. Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
 
Well, Bush seems to be the Number 1 selection this year, Adrian Peterson appears to be the Number 1 next year.. of course all this depends on team needs and possible trades..

2 different backs, which would you rather have in the backfield?  Is one barry sanders and the other emmit smith in relationship to how the NFL may use them?
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSHBUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH
This guy sure likes Bush.
Who doesn't like Bush?
 
Peterson's hype next year at this time will not be that much different than the Bush glossing of this spring.

 
How early does my 1st round pick need to be next year for a reasonable shot at a starting RB? 1.02? 1.03?

 
I agree. Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
I'll take a faster Eric Dickerson with the moves of Marcus Allen over LT2 any day of the week.
 
Bush is the home run hitter. Peterson is the bull. I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time.

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.

 
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
:lmao: No way - NO WAY - that Bush can come anywhere near taking the workload that Dickerson did. Dickerson hit or passed 400 touches a year when he was healthy. Bush won't come close to that. What a silly comparison.

You want to compare Bush to someone, compare him to Sayers. Eyepopping talent/speed/change of direction & he rolled up phenominal averages with great big-play ability, but he had to surrender a lot of touches to Bull & Piccolo because of his size & inability to remain healthy unless his touches were limited.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
:lmao: No way - NO WAY - that Bush can come anywhere near taking the workload that Dickerson did. Dickerson hit or passed 400 touches a year when he was healthy. Bush won't come close to that. What a silly comparison.
Re-read it. He was talking about Peterson, for whom the Dickerson comparison has been drawn for over a year now.
 
I think Bush is a much better prospect.

Peterson is talented, but he runs high and takes a lot of monster hits. I think he'll be very effective in the NFL, but he seems destined for a short career.

As far as the 2007 class goes, I think the top dynasty prospects are WRs Clavin Johnson and Dwayne Jarrett. Those guys both project as top 5 picks in the NFL draft, if you ask me.

 
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
:lmao: No way - NO WAY - that Bush can come anywhere near taking the workload that Dickerson did. Dickerson hit or passed 400 touches a year when he was healthy. Bush won't come close to that. What a silly comparison.
Re-read it. He was talking about Peterson, for whom the Dickerson comparison has been drawn for over a year now.
So he was. My bad. I don't see Dickerson at all when I look at Peterson. I do see a lot of Emmitt, though.
 
Well, Bush seems to be the Number 1 selection this year, Adrian Peterson appears to be the Number 1 next year.. of course all this depends on team needs and possible trades..

2 different backs, which would you rather have in the backfield? Is one barry sanders and the other emmit smith in relationship to how the NFL may use them?
BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSHBUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH

BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH BUSH
This guy sure likes Bush.
I like a little bush every now & then too...
 
Ponyboy, I agree w/your initial assessment, you're right on.

I do feel Peterson is more like Dickerson than Emmitt but he's basically himself, really. I would say that he's sorta a combination of those two. Peterson will break more long runs than maybe some think b/c he has great speed but his strength (like Emmitt) is what will allow him to do it at the Nfl level. AD has much more speed than Eddie George but they are similar too.

He's really been working on his recieving & getting involved in the passing game this season, & if OU helps add that part to their plan, then he's gonna have more Nfl folks going nuts over him than he already has. His hype will be big for sure.

 
Were are all those people who thought AP was the clear man over Bush a year and a half ago? :whistle: :tumbleweed:

I was saying it then and will stick by it now... Bush >>> Peterson. Both should be stars or at the very least very effective in the NFL though.

 
They are two completely different player types.

Peterson is very much a Campbell/Dickerson type. Peterson is a pounder with shocking field level speed for a man his size. He can make the first tackler miss but will most likely hit him and is not someone classified as a threat in the passing game. He is, though, the last player a LB or DB is going to want to see in the 3rd or 4th quarter of a football game coming between the tackles. He is going to run through you 20 plus times a game.

Bush is swift and looks ridiculously fast even on telelvision. His hands are soft and skilled like a WR and he is probably the last player a LB or DB want to see in space (one on one) or coming around the end. Bush is going to touch the ball 20 times a game in a variety of fashions and run away and past you.

They are each good at what they do.

People have very short memories...very short. Peterson played injured, ankles, all season with an extremely young line and QB...extremely young. This is the same player that had one of the largest recruiting romances a high school football player has ever seen. This is the same kid that pushed for a Heisman his freshman year, when he was surrounded with a more mature line; QB and WR. Lot of football left to be played in Norman.

I'll stand by Stoops' feelings and comments that OU was young last season but has the most talent of any team he has had.

I fully expect Peterson's pre draft hype to be equal of Bush's and they are each great players. Bush's talent and playing style lead me to believe he might play longer and not find himself on the weekly injury report. Conversely, I see Peterson as someone that will burn very bright for a number of seasons but eventually begin to be a player dinged or carrying nagging injuries.

 
What WhoDat said!!! Well put! I just wouldn't bother putting that up b/c I would be accused of homerism (probably fairly enough).

He had an incredible year last season despite all the things stacked against him like you said.

Look for a big year from him. don't forget he missed what equaled 4 games & still had over 1K for the year behind a poor line & green QB, WR! Wow.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Were are all those people who thought AP was the clear man over Bush a year and a half ago? :whistle: :tumbleweed:

I was saying it then and will stick by it now... Bush >>> Peterson. Both should be stars or at the very least very effective in the NFL though.
I'm still sticking to Peterson > Bush. Peterson has been nicked up and played without any semblance of a passing game and still put up good numbers, especially at the end of the year when he was healthy. As far as real football, I'd rather have Peterson if he can improve his receiving enough to be an every down back in the NFL.
 
Oh, I am a homer and make no bones about it but, living in Texas and having followed Peterson so closely, I do not think people truly understand the talent level that kid has or they have forgotten. He is that good, which is not implying Bush is not. They are just very different football players.

 
They are two completely different player types.

Peterson is very much a Campbell/Dickerson type. Peterson is a pounder with shocking field level speed for a man his size. He can make the first tackler miss but will most likely hit him and is not someone classified as a threat in the passing game. He is, though, the last player a LB or DB is going to want to see in the 3rd or 4th quarter of a football game coming between the tackles. He is going to run through you 20 plus times a game.

Bush is swift and looks ridiculously fast even on telelvision. His hands are soft and skilled like a WR and he is probably the last player a LB or DB want to see in space (one on one) or coming around the end. Bush is going to touch the ball 20 times a game in a variety of fashions and run away and past you.

They are each good at what they do.

People have very short memories...very short. Peterson played injured, ankles, all season with an extremely young line and QB...extremely young. This is the same player that had one of the largest recruiting romances a high school football player has ever seen. This is the same kid that pushed for a Heisman his freshman year, when he was surrounded with a more mature line; QB and WR. Lot of football left to be played in Norman.

I'll stand by Stoops' feelings and comments that OU was young last season but has the most talent of any team he has had.

I fully expect Peterson's pre draft hype to be equal of Bush's and they are each great players. Bush's talent and playing style lead me to believe he might play longer and not find himself on the weekly injury report. Conversely, I see Peterson as someone that will burn very bright for a number of seasons but eventually begin to be a player dinged or carrying nagging injuries.
Actually I don't see that happening unless AP has a 2000 yard season and wins the Heisman. Bush had a string of spectacular games last year that were shown repeatedly on Sportscenter. Now that the shine from his freshman performance has worn off, I don't see him having the kind of highlight-filled season like Bush did to drive the hype frenzy.
 
They are two completely different player types. 

Peterson is very much a Campbell/Dickerson type.  Peterson is a pounder with shocking field level speed for a man his size.  He can make the first tackler miss but will most likely hit him and is not someone classified as a threat in the passing game.  He is, though, the last player a LB or DB is going to want to see in the 3rd or 4th quarter of a football game coming between the tackles.  He is going to run through you 20 plus times a game. 

Bush is swift and looks ridiculously fast even on telelvision.  His hands are soft and skilled like a WR and he is probably the last player a LB or DB want to see in space (one on one) or coming around the end.  Bush is going to touch the ball 20 times a game in a variety of fashions and run away and past you.

They are each good at what they do.

People have very short memories...very short.  Peterson played injured, ankles, all season with an extremely young line and QB...extremely young.  This is the same player that had one of the largest recruiting romances a high school football player has ever seen.  This is the same kid that pushed for a Heisman his freshman year, when he was surrounded with a more mature line; QB and WR.  Lot of football left to be played in Norman.   

I'll stand by Stoops' feelings and comments that OU was young last season but has the most talent of any team he has had. 

I fully expect Peterson's pre draft hype to be equal of Bush's and they are each great players.  Bush's talent and playing style lead me to believe he might play longer and not find himself on the weekly injury report.  Conversely, I see Peterson as someone that will burn very bright for a number of seasons but eventually begin to be a player dinged or carrying nagging injuries.
Actually I don't see that happening unless AP has a 2000 yard season and wins the Heisman. Bush had a string of spectacular games last year that were shown repeatedly on Sportscenter. Now that the shine from his freshman performance has worn off, I don't see him having the kind of highlight-filled season like Bush did to drive the hype frenzy.
He'll push for the Heisman and, if Stoops can get anything out of the QB position, Peterson will have a MONSTER year. You are right, though, that he might not have a once in a lifetime game (USC v. Fresno) that puts him over the top but I am calling my shot now.If Peterson destroys the Longhorns early next fall during the Fair and OU is in the hunt for the national championship all year, AD will be on Sportscenter early and often and the hype will be no different.

 
Bush is the home run hitter. Peterson is the bull. I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time.

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
 
Bush is the home run hitter. Peterson is the bull. I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time.

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
Yes, Yes, No.
 
Bush is the home run hitter. Peterson is the bull. I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time.

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
Yes, Yes, No.
:goodposting:
 
Bush is the home run hitter.  Peterson is the bull.  I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time. 

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
That's an interesting question. If Williams is back in MIA, I'd take Bush over Brown. If not, I'd take Brown instead. I think Caddy will put up good numbers with Gruden in TB, so I like Caddy in that match up. We have no idea what Benson is capable of, though early returns don't look good, so I'd certainly take a risk on Bush over Benson.If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense. If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style. He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders. He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.

There's a lot of unknowns going on here that won't be answered for a few months, but some people think Bush is going to jump to the pros and be able to dominate the way he did in college. Color me very doubtful on that.

 
If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense. If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style. He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders. He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.
You know this is exactly what was said about Clinton Portis too.
 
If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense.  If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style.  He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders.  He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.
You know this is exactly what was said about Clinton Portis too.
I don't recall anything of the kind being said about Portis, to be honest. I do remember that when DEN took him that some people thought he would fit the system very, very well.
 
If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense. If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style. He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders. He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.
You know this is exactly what was said about Clinton Portis too.
I don't recall anything of the kind being said about Portis, to be honest. I do remember that when DEN took him that some people thought he would fit the system very, very well.
Portis had to learn to be a one cut runner in camp which made his eventual start all the more impressive. He was critisized for dancing too much at first.
 
Were are all those people who thought AP was the clear man over Bush a year and a half ago?  :whistle:   :tumbleweed:

I was saying it then and will stick by it now... Bush >>> Peterson.  Both should be stars or at the very least very effective in the NFL though.
I'm still sticking to Peterson > Bush. Peterson has been nicked up and played without any semblance of a passing game and still put up good numbers, especially at the end of the year when he was healthy. As far as real football, I'd rather have Peterson if he can improve his receiving enough to be an every down back in the NFL.
I agree with cstu. People seem to have a short memory on Adrian Peterson. He was the best high school prospect I have ever seen. He was the Lebron James of football. I honestly believe he could have went straight to the NFL out of high school and been successful. He is a physical freak with amazing talent and has the prototypical size and skills required for an NFL RB. It would be close but I would draft AP over Bush.

 
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
:lmao: No way - NO WAY - that Bush can come anywhere near taking the workload that Dickerson did. Dickerson hit or passed 400 touches a year when he was healthy. Bush won't come close to that. What a silly comparison.
Re-read it. He was talking about Peterson, for whom the Dickerson comparison has been drawn for over a year now.
So he was. My bad. I don't see Dickerson at all when I look at Peterson. I do see a lot of Emmitt, though.
I could see that. I do see a lot of Dickerson in AP though. One thing is for sure, if he stays healthy and comes out, this will be an interesting debate this time next year.
 
People have not forgoten Peterson one iota. They have just finally realized how great of a player Bush is. I remember having these very debates near 2 years ago with people that flat out never even watched Bush play. I would imagin since then, damn nerar all of those people have watched him and wised up. ;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Were are all those people who thought AP was the clear man over Bush a year and a half ago?  :whistle:   :tumbleweed:

I was saying it then and will stick by it now... Bush >>> Peterson.  Both should be stars or at the very least very effective in the NFL though.
I can't remember if I was one of the people hyping AP over Bush back then, but I do think Peterson will be more productive (from a fantasy standpoint) than Bush. I only wish they were coming out at the same time so there could be some instant results for that argument. I definitely agree that they both should be stars in the NFL. Bush has some crazy skills and so does Peterson, and their playing styles are so different that a lot of it depends on where they land and what kind of system their teams run.

Should be fun to watch either way.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bush is the home run hitter.  Peterson is the bull.  I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time. 

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
That's an interesting question. If Williams is back in MIA, I'd take Bush over Brown. If not, I'd take Brown instead. I think Caddy will put up good numbers with Gruden in TB, so I like Caddy in that match up. We have no idea what Benson is capable of, though early returns don't look good, so I'd certainly take a risk on Bush over Benson.If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense. If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style. He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders. He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.

There's a lot of unknowns going on here that won't be answered for a few months, but some people think Bush is going to jump to the pros and be able to dominate the way he did in college. Color me very doubtful on that.
Good answers from all. I am in your camp as well. If we are talking fantasy production I would even think that Benson could be more productive than Bush because he would be the goal line back. However TJ is still in the picture. I am having trouble projecting Bush in the pros. I think he will be a better NFL player than a fantasy player though. If Bush is not un Houston his fantasy value goes up a lot. Switching gears slightly, couldn't you see Dom Davis being traded to the Colts?

 
Bush is the home run hitter. Peterson is the bull. I'd take Peterson's ability to carry the ball 25+ times a game regularly for significant average with his ability out of the backfield over Bush's flash in limited playing time.

Peterson is going to give you the production game-in and game-out, whereas Bush's production is going to come in huge spikes with troughs in between, IMO.
If true would you take Caddy, Ronnie Brown or Cedric benson over Bush?
That's an interesting question. If Williams is back in MIA, I'd take Bush over Brown. If not, I'd take Brown instead. I think Caddy will put up good numbers with Gruden in TB, so I like Caddy in that match up. We have no idea what Benson is capable of, though early returns don't look good, so I'd certainly take a risk on Bush over Benson.If Bush does end up in HOU, he'll be running in Kubiak's offense. If it ressembles DEN's O at all, Bush will get a small amount of receptions, and I don't think the one-cut between the tackles rushing fits his style. He seems more fitted to a single RB backfield where he can stretch out plays until he finds a seam - more like what DET did with Barry Sanders. He'll also lose touches to other RBs there.

There's a lot of unknowns going on here that won't be answered for a few months, but some people think Bush is going to jump to the pros and be able to dominate the way he did in college. Color me very doubtful on that.
Good answers from all. I am in your camp as well. If we are talking fantasy production I would even think that Benson could be more productive than Bush because he would be the goal line back. However TJ is still in the picture. I am having trouble projecting Bush in the pros. I think he will be a better NFL player than a fantasy player though. If Bush is not un Houston his fantasy value goes up a lot. Switching gears slightly, couldn't you see Dom Davis being traded to the Colts?
no cause HOU and IND are the same division, BUT i could see HOU be shortsighted, and take Mario Williams (Bush dollar demands, and Davis) and letting NO, pick up Bush, or trade down, or Trade Deuce to INDY for a 2006 and 7 first, I mean really, the indy first will at best be #15 next year
 
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't sleep on Lynch, he's going to be a monster in the NFL. As for Peterson, I agree the guy runs too upright.

 
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?
I don't think a fast Eddie George is a slight at all - wouldn't that be Dickerson?About Emmitt, I don't see that one. The two most recent guys that remind me a lot of Emmitt are Cadillac and DeAngelo. Both of them are smaller (5-9ish, 215lb) backs who are very productive, especially getting to the endzone, without elite speed.

 
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
I'll take a faster Eric Dickerson with the moves of Marcus Allen over LT2 any day of the week.
If both stay healthy over the first five years of their career, AP will be the better back and you can quote me on that. Peterson is the next coming of Eric Dickerson with tremendous acceleration and tackle breaking ability. He'll be a consistent 1700 yard back if he can stay healthy. He'll easily win the Heisman if he plays in all of the Sooners games.
 
Don't sleep on Lynch, he's going to be a monster in the NFL.  As for Peterson, I agree the guy runs too upright.
This is an urban legend so to speak. There have been plenty of great upright runners in the NFL and Peterson will be fine. Look at Larry Johnson's style then add a little more speed. The term "upright runner" as some sort of negative connotation is almost humorous. It means almost nothing except to a hand full of scouts who would quickly change their verbiage when a Dickerson, George, Johnson, Campbell, or Peterson came along.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?
I would be absolutly shocked if AP ran a sub 4.4 40.
 
What WhoDat said!!! Well put! I just wouldn't bother putting that up b/c I would be accused of homerism (probably fairly enough).
Well there's no way I will be accused of homerism, and I think Peterson is fantastic. He is a great, great prospect. I don't have a good enough read on Bush to compare them, but they are in the same ballpark (quality-wise).I'm not sure why, but about every ten years, a Sooner comes along that I don't loathe. Thomas Lott, Bobby Witt, Hollis Price. Peterson is currently that guy.

Like EBF, my only concern with Peterson is his health. I can't put my finger on it, but there is something that just looks funny about him. It's not the way he runs --- that looks great --- but something about his body type looks a little off. His legs are a little skinny. I'm not too worried about it right now, but another year of nagging injuries would turn me off of him as an uberprospect.

 
I agree.  Reggie Bush.

I see Reggie as comparable to LT2 and Adrian Peterson as a fast Eric Dickersonwith the moves of Marcus Allen.

Marshawn Lynch is going to be awesome as well, and is comparable to a bigger Portis, in my opinion.
Fixed - Bush is a game breaker. AP is gonna get the ball 30 times a game in the NFL.
:lmao: No way - NO WAY - that Bush can come anywhere near taking the workload that Dickerson did. Dickerson hit or passed 400 touches a year when he was healthy. Bush won't come close to that. What a silly comparison.

You want to compare Bush to someone, compare him to Sayers. Eyepopping talent/speed/change of direction & he rolled up phenominal averages with great big-play ability, but he had to surrender a lot of touches to Bull & Piccolo because of his size & inability to remain healthy unless his touches were limited.
Nevermind
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's an interesting article on Peterson. It wasn't an NCAA infraction according to OU, but something seems strange about it to me. Read for yourself.

link: http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?acti...ARLSON-04-20-06

By JENNI CARLSON

The Oklahoman

20-APR-06

Adrian Peterson broke no laws and violated no rules.

He went to a dealership, picked out a car and filled out the paperwork. After driving the car for a couple weeks, Oklahoma's stud running back returned it because, as his mother said, the family couldn't afford the payments.

An internal investigation at OU determined it wasn't an NCAA infraction.

So, why does this whole thing give me a queasy feeling?

Not because of the football program. Not because of the athletic department either, though it goes before the NCAA's infractions committee later this week and faces charges of lacking institutional control after the men's basketball program made excessive calls to recruits. It's not even that the dealership that let Peterson drive free was all about getting people into cars, then hammering out the financing. The practice isn't common, but it isn't unheard of either.

No, the heebie jeebies are because of Peterson. The kid is so darn close to realizing every dream he's ever had. Heisman Trophy. National championship. No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft. Fortune could be his. So could fame.

Peterson is on the verge of having it all.

But he has none of it yet.

Yo, Adrian. Don't be a knucklehead. Dream Street is right around the corner, but there's still time to detour. It can happen to anyone, even the best of players.

Peterson might have done nothing wrong, but forcing an internal investigation is never a good thing.

A trip down Maurice Clarett Way proves as much. First came the charges that the former Ohio State standout falsified a police report. Then improper academic help to stay eligible, then thousands of dollars in improper benefits, then two charges of aggravated robbery.

Peterson's indiscretions are minor compared to that. He missed enough class last fall that he had to sit out a practice, then had this car deal.

Not exactly Clarett-like.

Thing is, Peterson needs to be careful. There is no such thing as a can't-miss player. There is shouldn't-miss. There are no guarantees beyond that.

But if Peterson just plays it straight for the next nine months, he won't miss.

This is it for him, after all. His Oklahoma days are over once the 2006-07 campaign is. It'll be the worst kept secret of next season.

Healthy knees are a precious commodity in football, particularly for running backs. And if last season's ankle injury did anything, it showed Peterson how fleeting health can be.

Peterson can make a mint if he can just avoid pitfalls.

No doubt Peterson is still a youngster. Even though he recently turned 21, plenty of us can attest we made our silliest decisions when we were that age.

Thing is, few of us were known by the masses and stood to make millions upon college graduation. The expectations on Peterson are higher. They just are. It might not seem fair. But it's part of the deal when you're a big-time college football player.

Lest you think these expectations impossible for Peterson to bear, roll this one around in your head _ Peterson is a month and a half older than Chris Paul.

The Hornets rookie handled it in the NBA. So can Peterson.

He must realize he is operating under different rules. There is right, there is wrong, and there is the appearance of wrong. Situations like this car deal might turn out to be legit, but they look sketchy. They bring investigators running, and that's never a good thing.

Frankly, it's not like Peterson has to be eligible for sainthood once his college career is done. He just needs to remember how close his dreams are and how quickly they can take a hit.

You don't have to do something wrong to make a mistake.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top