I agree with the first part... it's going be a heavyweight fightThis is a knock down, drag out, 50-50 proposition right here. Let's go RAVENS, HON!
Sheesh.PIT -6O/U 33.5I'll sayIT -4O/U 37.5
GO STEELERS!
I want to face them. I want to crush them. I hope they play a terrible game, and then say to themselves, "Man, the Steelers are good and we suck." That would make me happyWell, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Ranven's D.27-10 Steelers.Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
Why would this game be any different than the 2 before it. Flacco played 2 great games. The Steelers outplayed them for 15 seconds in the 1st game and 2 minutes in the 2nd. If you want to say the defense let us down in those 2 games than I would agree, but Flacco isn't going to get exposed....I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Ranven's D.27-10 Steelers.Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
I sure hope so. The Ravens backfield is a mess and I dont see a rookie QB winning his first three playoff games, but that defense scares me.I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Ranven's D.27-10 Steelers.Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
OK, thanks Jack Handey.I want to face them. I want to crush them. I hope they play a terrible game, and then say to themselves, "Man, the Steelers are good and we suck." That would make me happyWell, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
I like Pitt to roll. Pitt D is better and their offense is more experienced. Big Ben has won the big games before plus at home I dont see Balt winning this game.beermutts said:Why would this game be any different than the 2 before it. Flacco played 2 great games. The Steelers outplayed them for 15 seconds in the 1st game and 2 minutes in the 2nd. If you want to say the defense let us down in those 2 games than I would agree, but Flacco isn't going to get exposed....CrossEyed said:I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Ranven's D.27-10 Steelers.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
27 for 59 for 307, 1 TD, 2 INT.Two great games?beermutts said:Why would this game be any different than the 2 before it. Flacco played 2 great games. The Steelers outplayed them for 15 seconds in the 1st game and 2 minutes in the 2nd. If you want to say the defense let us down in those 2 games than I would agree, but Flacco isn't going to get exposed....CrossEyed said:I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Ranven's D.27-10 Steelers.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens.
But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
He did, did he?Flacco game one vs. Pitt:16 for 31, 192 yards, 51.6% completions, 1 TD, no picks, QB rating of 81.7Why would this game be any different than the 2 before it. Flacco played 2 great games.
Agreed. As great as that Baltimore defense is playing, this is a game Tomlin NEEDS to win if he wants to wear the big boy pants.If the Steelers let a rookie QB come in to their house and win the AFCCG then it will be a loss that will haunt Tomlin the rest of his career.
That's how I took it though. "Letting Flacco come in and go ape-s%$@#% to beat them for the AFCC will haunt him." If they wind up losing to Baltimore 6-3 and Flacco looks like sauteed dog crap then that's more of a "them's the breaks" kinda thing.I don't agree. If the Ravens defense "brings it" then they may win, and thats just they way it goes.If Flacco goes 18/25 for 255 and 3TDs... then it may well have a "haunting" effect.Agreed. As great as that Baltimore defense is playing, this is a game Tomlin NEEDS to win if he wants to wear the big boy pants.If the Steelers let a rookie QB come in to their house and win the AFCCG then it will be a loss that will haunt Tomlin the rest of his career.
One of MY favorite Steeler memories. Wouldn't be the last time Dan did it, either.Is Dan even on a roster these days? I know St. Louis picked him up earlier this year. No idea if he was on the team at the end of the season or not.At one point, FB Dan Kreider pancaked Ray Lewis into the ground!
2002. Smart!One of my favorite Steeler moments ever was the 27-10 pounding of Baltimore in the 2000 playoffs.
A little bit of overstatement here, considering they were coming off a Super Bowl championship season?It was so great seeing those cocky losers go down in flames. Brian Billick kept wincing in pain on the sidelines, as if to say, "But I'm such a genius - how could this be happening again?!"
Well.. yeah... that was a pretty rough go.Elvis Grbac
Thanks, I was about to post something similar. In addition to the 22.2 rating, the Ravens offense (not fair just to blame Flacco):1. failed to convert in the red zoneHe did, did he?Flacco game one vs. Pitt:16 for 31, 192 yards, 51.6% completions, 1 TD, no picks, QB rating of 81.7Why would this game be any different than the 2 before it. Flacco played 2 great games.
Flacco game 2 vs. Pitt: 11 for 28, 115 yards, 39.3% completions, no TDs, 2 picks, QB rating of 22.2
First game Flacco was pretty decent. That loss certainly wasn't on him. The second game, however, the Steelers defense made him their kitty, in his house no less.
By comparison:
Roethlisberger game one vs. Balt: 14 for 24, 191 yards, 58.3% completions, 1 TD, 1 pick, QB rating of 80.4
Roethlisberger game two vs. Balt: 22 for 40, 246 yards, 55.0% completions, 1 TD, no picks, QB rating of 81.9
The Ravens may well win, but it probably isn't going to be because of Joe Flacco. Just my opinion.
Me? Um...no. This game should set football back about 35 years. I'll watch, 'cause I'm a fan of football, but I'm MUCH more interested in the NFC championship. Offense is appealing.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens.
But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
Titans played the Ravens very well. Steelers will surely be watching that and mixing that in with their previous success but IIRC Flacco only threw 8 passes in the first half. I'd expect the Ravens to do much of the same, pound the run game and only expose the rook a minimal amount.CrossEyed said:I think the Steeler D will expose Flacco's inexperience and I think the Steelers will move the ball better against a tired Raven's D.27-10 Steelers.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens. But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
There have been 18 previous instances in the NFL playoffs of a team playing an opponent it has beaten twice already that year.The team that won the first two games has won the third game 11 out of 18 games (61%)very hard to beat one team three times in a year.
Came up often with NFC East teams in the playoffs, years ago with Pats Colts in playoffs and AFC East, AFC West teams when Denver was real good......there's alot of precedent. I think it's something to keep in mind before people gift the Steelers a 3rd W.
I don't take it as that. 7 of 18 times the team and/or fans were confident they'd win a 3rd time based on the previous two wins. My point(and whoever thought to look it up and discuss years ago) is simply that the first two Ws doesn't assure a 3rd W.I don't follow that last qualifying line.There have been 18 previous instances in the NFL playoffs of a team playing an opponent it has beaten twice already that year.The team that won the first two games has won the third game 11 out of 18 games (61%)very hard to beat one team three times in a year.
Came up often with NFC East teams in the playoffs, years ago with Pats Colts in playoffs and AFC East, AFC West teams when Denver was real good......there's alot of precedent. I think it's something to keep in mind before people gift the Steelers a 3rd W.
When at home and with a better record, the results improve to 9-4 (69%)
See for yourself (and add the Giants beating the Cowboys last year) at Pro-Football-Reference
The "it's hard to beat a good team three times" line is basically a myth, based on those numbers.
Now it's also a possibility that it's a misapplied statement. After all, many times (like Giants-Eagles this season), teams meet for a third time having already split; therefore, it's a guarantee that neither team can win all three games.
I'm so glad someone finally put up #s to blow up that stupid maxim. It's no harder to beat a team for a third time in one year than it is to beat them the first time.There have been 18 previous instances in the NFL playoffs of a team playing an opponent it has beaten twice already that year.The team that won the first two games has won the third game 11 out of 18 games (61%)very hard to beat one team three times in a year.
Came up often with NFC East teams in the playoffs, years ago with Pats Colts in playoffs and AFC East, AFC West teams when Denver was real good......there's alot of precedent. I think it's something to keep in mind before people gift the Steelers a 3rd W.
When at home and with a better record, the results improve to 9-4 (69%)
See for yourself (and add the Giants beating the Cowboys last year) at Pro-Football-Reference
The "it's hard to beat a good team three times" line is basically a myth, based on those numbers.
Now it's also a possibility that it's a misapplied statement. After all, many times (like Giants-Eagles this season), teams meet for a third time having already split; therefore, it's a guarantee that neither team can win all three games.
F'in Billick was just on Mike & Mike spewing this exact nonsense. What a pud.I'm so glad someone finally put up #s to blow up that stupid maxim. It's no harder to beat a team for a third time in one year than it is to beat them the first time.There have been 18 previous instances in the NFL playoffs of a team playing an opponent it has beaten twice already that year.The team that won the first two games has won the third game 11 out of 18 games (61%)very hard to beat one team three times in a year.
Came up often with NFC East teams in the playoffs, years ago with Pats Colts in playoffs and AFC East, AFC West teams when Denver was real good......there's alot of precedent. I think it's something to keep in mind before people gift the Steelers a 3rd W.
When at home and with a better record, the results improve to 9-4 (69%)
See for yourself (and add the Giants beating the Cowboys last year) at Pro-Football-Reference
The "it's hard to beat a good team three times" line is basically a myth, based on those numbers.
Now it's also a possibility that it's a misapplied statement. After all, many times (like Giants-Eagles this season), teams meet for a third time having already split; therefore, it's a guarantee that neither team can win all three games.
Seriously? I know it wont be a shootout, but anyone that has played football can apreciate these two teams knocking the snot out of each other for 60 minutes.Me? Um...no. This game should set football back about 35 years. I'll watch, 'cause I'm a fan of football, but I'm MUCH more interested in the NFC championship. Offense is appealing.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens.
But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
It is weird that people continue to say it when it is absolute rubbish. That being said the two previous Ravens games could have gone the other way and I expect this game to be more of the same. The two things the Steelers have going for them is that Baltimore is pretty beat up and the Steelers are playing at home. Still I was surprised to hear the Ravens were getting 5 points.I'm so glad someone finally put up #s to blow up that stupid maxim. It's no harder to beat a team for a third time in one year than it is to beat them the first time.
VERY This is going to be a great football game.Seriously? I know it wont be a shootout, but anyone that has played football can apreciate these two teams knocking the snot out of each other for 60 minutes.Me? Um...no. This game should set football back about 35 years. I'll watch, 'cause I'm a fan of football, but I'm MUCH more interested in the NFC championship. Offense is appealing.poopdawg said:Well, if theres one team I dont want to face, its the Ravens.
But then again, this is going to be the hard-nosed type of football that you love to watch.
I like the Steelers to win this one something along the lines of 17-13 or 24-20.It is weird that people continue to say it when it is absolute rubbish. That being said the two previous Ravens games could have gone the other way and I expect this game to be more of the same. The two things the Steelers have going for them is that Baltimore is pretty beat up and the Steelers are playing at home. Still I was surprised to hear the Ravens were getting 5 points.I'm so glad someone finally put up #s to blow up that stupid maxim. It's no harder to beat a team for a third time in one year than it is to beat them the first time.
I'll take it!!If Suggs and Rolle can play at full speed, then I think the Ravens could maybe get lucky and steal another one. The Steelers special teams and trouble in pass protection, coupled with the big play capability of Baltimore's D, could make possible another 13-10 squeaker. But I'm thinking a 24-6 Steelers win that isn't in question by the start of the 4th quarter is more likely.
Really good analysis here. I agree 100% with every word you said except I can't see the Steelers getting that far ahead by the start of the 4th. Possible, but I wouldn't say likely. Great post.As a Ravens season ticket owner, I thought Baltimore's season was going to end last week. 17 straight weeks of play, a banged-up team on a short week after playing on the road in the heat at Miami -- and the Ravens definitely looked a step slow and fatigued in their tackling. Chris Johnson would have eaten them up if he had stayed in the game, and would have ended that no-100-yard rusher vs. the Ravens streak in the process.But the Ravens showed unbelievable heart and stole a game they had no business winning. One of the things I admire about the defense is the way it never concedes anything, even when the opponent is inside the 10. I think that's part of why the Ravens hated the replay TD in the second game this year so much -- they felt like the refs let the Steelers in the end zone instead of making Pittsburgh earn it themselves.So, I feel about this game like I did last week's -- only moreso. The Ravens aren't practicing until Wednesday, so that's probably the earliest we'll get much good injury info, but the Ravens were already walking wounded (Mason, Heap, Reed) and now they're a lot worse off (I bet Rolle will be out, which is a disaster; Willie Anderson, McClain, Leonhard, Suggs). I will say that the Ravens don't fear Parker -- even if healthy -- the way they do a truly elite back with speed, like CJ. To me, Parker's game seems to be based on bursting through an empty gap and then using his speed to outrun pursuit. With the Ravens, there are no empty gaps and since Parker is not a good tackle-breaker, he doesn't do much vs. baltimore. His careers stats vs the Ravens:08: 14 for 4707: 23 for 4206: 10 for 22, 13 for 2905: 14 for 63, 18 for 59I'm much more worried about Pittsburgh's WRs. They killed the Ravens twice this year once they spread the field -- in particular, the Ravens seem unable to defend the Steelers when they line up in that bunch formation, either with 3 WRs, or 2 WRs and a TE. And if Rolle is out, then it's going to be even worse.If Suggs and Rolle can play at full speed, then I think the Ravens could maybe get lucky and steal another one. The Steelers special teams and trouble in pass protection, coupled with the big play capability of Baltimore's D, could make possible another 13-10 squeaker. But I'm thinking a 24-6 Steelers win that isn't in question by the start of the 4th quarter is more likely.
I think that is the key... playing in the heat in Miami... playing a physical battle against Tennessee on the road... and the fact that their BYE week was in Week 2... all of that seems to point to fatigue.The only concern on that end as a Steelers fan is the fact that Ben sometimes makes stupid mistakes or tries to make something happen when nothing is there. You can't do that against these ball hawking ravens. Doesn't bode well. Plus... you can FORGET fatigue a little when you are playing your rivals with everything on the line. The Steelers IMO need to start fast in order to make the Ravens REMEMBER that they are tired. Maybe that analysis is too simple but I believe it. You gotta break the Ravens will early and you gotta rattle Flacco's cage. Cam Cameron scares me because he has shown that he can get the most out of Flacco and his laser rocket arm.As a Ravens season ticket owner, I thought Baltimore's season was going to end last week. 17 straight weeks of play, a banged-up team on a short week after playing on the road in the heat at Miami -- and the Ravens definitely looked a step slow and fatigued in their tackling. Chris Johnson would have eaten them up if he had stayed in the game, and would have ended that no-100-yard rusher vs. the Ravens streak in the process.
But the Ravens showed unbelievable heart and stole a game they had no business winning. One of the things I admire about the defense is the way it never concedes anything, even when the opponent is inside the 10. I think that's part of why the Ravens hated the replay TD in the second game this year so much -- they felt like the refs let the Steelers in the end zone instead of making Pittsburgh earn it themselves.
So, I feel about this game like I did last week's -- only moreso. The Ravens aren't practicing until Wednesday, so that's probably the earliest we'll get much good injury info, but the Ravens were already walking wounded (Mason, Heap, Reed) and now they're a lot worse off (I bet Rolle will be out, which is a disaster; Willie Anderson, McClain, Leonhard, Suggs).
Dang nice posting!! Bringing the knowledge!!I love stats.I love me some Ravens, but I'm also a realist. If Rolle can't play, then the Ravens can't blitz effectively, and that's what their defense is based on.Will be watching the replays of the previous Balt-Pitt games tonight on NFL Network -- and I'm almost positive that Pittsburgh began moving the ball on Baltimore in the rematch after Rolle went out with injury and was replaced by Frank Walker.If the Ravens are to compete, they need to let Flacco take some shots. Vs. the Titans, eleven times the Ravens faced a down and distance of second down with less than 10 yards to go. Nine times they ran the ball. The Titans were not respecting the pass and completely snuffed those second down runs.Here are the second downs, with yards to go, and the play's result:4 yards to go, rush for -4 yards8 to go, rush for -12 to go, rush for 17 to go, incl. pass8 to go, rush for -29 to go, pass to Mason for 10 yards3 to go, rush for 4 (First Down)2 to go, rush for -18 to go, rush for -24 to go, rush for 29 to go, rush for 0In summary, on second down when facing fewer than 10 yards to go:9 carries for -3 yards, one first down.1 for 2 passing, 10 yards, one first down.The Ravens actually had some first down success, but second down was a disaster. Vs. Pittsburgh, that needs to be Flacco's play action passing down -- and he has to throw something other than 10-yard outs and fake 10-yard outs that use a double move to become a fly pattern.Where is Heap and the crossing route? Where are the checkdowns to the RBs?