Ahmad Bradshaw owners (1 Viewer)

[Judge Smails]

What do you do with this guy? Any chance you put a guy who was in a walking boot on Wed and Thurs in your lineup on Sunday, even if it's vs the Chiefs? Was hoping he would go off with this matchup - but really nervous that his being "probable" is a stretch at this point.

 

[identikit]

What do you do with this guy? Any chance you put a guy who was in a walking boot on Wed and Thurs in your lineup on Sunday, even if it's vs the Chiefs? Was hoping he would go off with this matchup - but really nervous that his being "probable" is a stretch at this point.

I'm starting him...And hoping KC keeps it somewhat close so he doesn't get pulled early.

 

[KellysHeroes]

starting him in about 4 leagues; he has the ability to break it open. But he won't be closing the game tomorrow... so yeah we have to open NY doesn't get to big of a lead.

 

[VaTerp]

Have him on my bench at the moment but really want to start him.

Or I could trade him in a deal to get Roddy White.

Decisions, decisions.

 

[Nemesis Enforcer]

I have him in right now but may sit him as I have other options, even with Turner and Westy on a bye. I really liked this matchup heading into the week but I am a little nervous about the boot and the matchup itself. If they get out to an early lead they could just to lean on Jacobs or give Johnson some more PT.

 

[Franknbeans]

Pine Rider

I'll be all aboard the cup of joe train

 

[ScottyDog]

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

 

[ookook]

Sitting him. Last week I started him along with Jacobs with Bradshaw as my flex.

This week I am avoiding him, even in PPR.

Nothing against him, but I think Jacobs gets more looks and is less RBBC and more AB as the 3rd down back.

 

[buster c]

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

 

[Giant Wooden Badger]

On the bench behind AP, CJ, and Ray Rice.

 

[sho nuff]

Back and forth.

Right now he is on the bench behind LT and Caddy at RB and behind either S. Smith (Giants) or Holmes at flex.

 

[ScottyDog]

I come to this website for help and to share info but have been getting really frustrated with some of the posters here. Some of you seem to just want to be pot stirrers or in the case of this poster I am replying to, just plain smart a s s. What is your point? Or do you just enjoy being a p r i c k ?

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

 

[Restricted]

Have you all started him any week? I would think all he is worth is a flex spot...

 

[cubbie5150]

I WAS planning to start him this week but the injury news makes it a no-go for me...now I'm deciding between Grant, Moreno or D Brown. I really loved this match-up for Bradshaw, but won't risk him getting dinged & yanked from the game.

 

[zoos]

I come to this website for help and to share info but have been getting really frustrated with some of the posters here. Some of you seem to just want to be pot stirrers or in the case of this poster I am replying to, just plain smart a s s. What is your point? Or do you just enjoy being a p r i c k ?

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

i don't know what you're missing here..seems you have only been coming here for a month but the person said bradshaw is in (his lineup). what is your problem with that answer?

 

[fasteddie_21]

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

I think FJ is the safer play this week. Buffalo has said they are going to ease Lynch back in, so for this final week, I think I lean that way, in your case. HTH!

 

[Judge Smails]

With bye week issues, I'm left with Bradshaw vs. Mewelde Moore. I REALLY want to play Ahmad, but unless I see him sprinting in warmups myself I'll probably go with the latter, even though Mendenhall is supposedly gonna start. I had Moore last year - and have a LOT of faith in him. But I sure love the way a healthy Bradshaw runs...

 

[ScottyDog]

Zoos, I think you are missing it here. I said "chime in" if you have advice and the s m a r t ### just answered "in". Nothing else. He was just being a jerk.

I come to this website for help and to share info but have been getting really frustrated with some of the posters here. Some of you seem to just want to be pot stirrers or in the case of this poster I am replying to, just plain smart a s s. What is your point? Or do you just enjoy being a p r i c k ?

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

i don't know what you're missing here..seems you have only been coming here for a month but the person said bradshaw is in (his lineup). what is your problem with that answer?

 

[zoos]

not worth arguing but to me he chimed in. he chimed in by saying that he is going to go with bradshaw. i'm a bradshaw owner and i am sitting him, by the way. nice matchup but the boot scenario worries me plus i have to think jacobs does something soon to show why he is the top dog (a 130 yd 2 td performance). this might be the week.

 

[The Jerk]

not worth arguing but to me he chimed in. he chimed in by saying that he is going to go with bradshaw. i'm a bradshaw owner and i am sitting him, by the way. nice matchup but the boot scenario worries me plus i have to think jacobs does something soon to show why he is the top dog (a 130 yd 2 td performance). this might be the week.

Either way, is it really worth getting this upset over it? (referring to ScottyDog)When an unclear comment -- or even intentional snide remark -- can get you upset in multiple threads, it might be time to take a break from the message boards.I'm on the fence about whether the "in" was a play on "chime in" or an indicator of Bradshaw being in the lineup. I believe it was purposely vague.I don't have Bradshaw, but I'd start any Giant I could this week. If he's not scratched, I'd put him in the lineup without hesitation.

 

[otb_lifer]

With bye week issues, I'm left with Bradshaw vs. Mewelde Moore. I REALLY want to play Ahmad, but unless I see him sprinting in warmups myself I'll probably go with the latter, even though Mendenhall is supposedly gonna start. I had Moore last year - and have a LOT of faith in him. But I sure love the way a healthy Bradshaw runs...

If it is a PPR situation of any sort, them MeMo is the better option there. I expect a shootout tonight in Steeltown.As far as Bradshaw, definitely sitting for me this week ... have both Jacobs and Bradshaw, started them both successfully last week. But with Coffee and Slaton, don't think I would've pulled the trigger this week, even if 100%. I expect to see Gatrell getting the mopup work in KC ... after Jacobs goes for 110/2, natch

 

[FF Maestro]

Starting Bradshaw over McFadden and L. Washington. I don't think he would have practiced fully on Friday if the ankle was a big issue.

 

[hauser42]

Starting Bradshaw and McFadden, and sitting Freddit Taylor against the Ravens.

 

[mdog1967]

Zoos, I think you are missing it here. I said "chime in" if you have advice and the s m a r t ### just answered "in". Nothing else. He was just being a jerk.

I come to this website for help and to share info but have been getting really frustrated with some of the posters here. Some of you seem to just want to be pot stirrers or in the case of this poster I am replying to, just plain smart a s s. What is your point? Or do you just enjoy being a p r i c k ?

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

i don't know what you're missing here..seems you have only been coming here for a month but the person said bradshaw is in (his lineup). what is your problem with that answer?

Gonna have to get a tougher skin suit my friend. There has not been a single smart alec post on this thread so far. You can get banned for calling people Pr***s so take another lap and come back.I am opting with Moreno and Brown this week myself, I think the Dallas D gets winded in Denver and I like the upside of Brown. I am resting Bradshaw even though a good match up. I think the Giants will not need to lean on him with a healthy Jacobs and bringing Johnson off the practice Sqaud. No need to bang up their best runner against KC.

 

[Judge Smails]

children please........

 

[Judge Smails]

Went from Probable to announced as Active - tough choice to make

 

[Instinctive]

Zoos, I think you are missing it here. I said "chime in" if you have advice and the s m a r t ### just answered "in". Nothing else. He was just being a jerk.

dude...man up. Grow some thicker skin and stop whining...if you didn't like it, just ignore it. There is an "ignore" button for posters

Went from Probable to announced as Active - tough choice to make

OMG I have Mason in right now and it is absolutely killing me. I wish the Ravens would say he was too sick, or that they'd say he was fine. I hate two guys on the edge like this.

 

[Nemesis Enforcer]

I am going Don Brown over him, just made the decision and I am going to walk away from the computer. The lack of catches, the injury, assuming Jacobs gets all the goal line looks, just points me to looking in another direction. I like the matchup, but I just don't to deal with another 70 yard day with no catches or tds.

 

[shims3]

Any updates on him playing this week?

 

[otis68]

Same song different week. Sat out Weds, light work on the side today. Doesn't sound like he's wearing the boot today at least.

 

[sho nuff]

Possibly starting him over Caddy or Jerome Harrison

 

[kwille]

Debating between Bradshaw and Choice.

 

[Cenobite]

I come to this website for help and to share info but have been getting really frustrated with some of the posters here. Some of you seem to just want to be pot stirrers or in the case of this poster I am replying to, just plain smart a s s. What is your point? Or do you just enjoy being a p r i c k ?

As of right now I am starting him over Fred Jackson, if anyone has an opinion about that decision please chime in.

in

See, I actually thought that was funny. I don't mind an attempt at comedy in a thread that will likely exceed 40 posts. I own Bradshaw and he sitting behind Caddy as my flex. He hasn't had many receptions and has not scored. He is a bye week filler. That said, if I had bye issues I would feel comfortable starting him against OAK especially since Manning will not be airing it out.

 

[Cenobite]

Zoos, I think you are missing it here. I said "chime in" if you have advice and the s m a r t ### just answered "in". Nothing else. He was just being a jerk.

dude...man up. Grow some thicker skin and stop whining...if you didn't like it, just ignore it. There is an "ignore" button for posters

Went from Probable to announced as Active - tough choice to make

OMG I have Mason in right now and it is absolutely killing me. I wish the Ravens would say he was too sick, or that they'd say he was fine. I hate two guys on the edge like this.

According to Roto Mason practiced.

 

[dwashington]

No other stunners at practice (or, as the case is, not at practice). Ahmad Bradshaw was still in his walking boot on the sideline and looked pretty bored. He was having a catch with one of the staffers and working on his quarterback drop. Hope he was careful about his plantar fascia while doing that. Hixon and Ware seemed like they were full go, although we'll have to wait and see the practice report before declaring them as full participants.

http://www.newsday.com/blogs/sports/t-rock...ksEnabled=false

 

[Cleat Spike]

Lets get Ware on the field.

 

[az_prof]

Lets get Ware on the field.

Still trying to figure out what Ware has done to be even mentioned in this thread? I didn't believe it is this summer and it seems even less relevant now that Bradshaw has once again shown how he is an outstanding back.

 

[Tommy Collins]

Such a favorable matchup but I have decided to take him out of my lineup for *gulp* Clinton Portis. He hasn't been able to practice and with Big Daddy Jacobs there the team does not need to play Bradshaw and so I don't expect them to.

 

[identikit]

Such a favorable matchup but I have decided to take him out of my lineup for *gulp* Clinton Portis. He hasn't been able to practice and with Big Daddy Jacobs there the team does not need to play Bradshaw and so I don't expect them to.

You know Bradshaw played this last week, right?12-64....

Not gangbusters but still....

 

[BobbyLayne]

Lets get Ware on the field.

Still trying to figure out what Ware has done to be even mentioned in this thread? I didn't believe it is this summer and it seems even less relevant now that Bradshaw has once again shown how he is an outstanding back.

When Jacobs and Derrick Ward were running for over 1,000, the 3rd string/KR (Bradshaw) was relevant.I don't get the 'I didn't believe it is this summer' comment...did you watch the preseason games when Danny Ware looked impressive? The dude is right there with Choice as the most talented RB3 in the league. At some point he'll be active, and he will be relevant.

Danny Ware-RB- Giants Oct. 7 - 6:23 pm et Giants RB Danny Ware (elbow) has resumed practicing on a limited basis.Ware's been out since dislocating his elbow in the opener. He looks ready to resume third-string duties and should be rostered in deep leagues. Ware will be a fantasy option if Brandon Jacobs or Ahmad Bradshaw goes down.Source: giants.com

I'm started Bradshaw in the flex last weekend, but prolly gonna go with Mason or Roddy White this week. Maybe.

 

[Judge Smails]

If Ahmad can get healthy he could be a top 12 guy easily. He is outplaying Jacobs by far. What is it, 5.2 YPC vs. 3 and change? For Jacobs not to average 4 YPC with that line is a joke. And it's not as if he's getting chunks on draw plays on 3rd and 15. Same opps as Jacobs. Optimistic after he played last week following the walking boot scenario..

 

[The Gray Hood]

if carr actually starts vs oakland could the giants run the ball 40x?

 

[chihawk]

if carr actually starts vs oakland could the giants run the ball 40x?

Even if Manning plays...there probably will be enough carries to start both Jacobs and Bradshaw.

 

[Instinctive]

if carr actually starts vs oakland could the giants run the ball 40x?

Even if Manning plays...there probably will be enough carries to start both Jacobs and Bradshaw.

Really depending on this...picked a lot of week 5 bye players. Which I prefer, having a bunch on bye at once instead of always.But need Bradshaw to come through for me here.BTW guy who posted a bunch of news today....all the questions you answered were about last week. Not this one. Just check dates in the future.

 

[az_prof]

Lets get Ware on the field.

Still trying to figure out what Ware has done to be even mentioned in this thread? I didn't believe it is this summer and it seems even less relevant now that Bradshaw has once again shown how he is an outstanding back.

When Jacobs and Derrick Ward were running for over 1,000, the 3rd string/KR (Bradshaw) was relevant.I don't get the 'I didn't believe it is this summer' comment...did you watch the preseason games when Danny Ware looked impressive? The dude is right there with Choice as the most talented RB3 in the league. At some point he'll be active, and he will be relevant.

Danny Ware-RB- Giants Oct. 7 - 6:23 pm et Giants RB Danny Ware (elbow) has resumed practicing on a limited basis.Ware's been out since dislocating his elbow in the opener. He looks ready to resume third-string duties and should be rostered in deep leagues. Ware will be a fantasy option if Brandon Jacobs or Ahmad Bradshaw goes down.Source: giants.com

I'm started Bradshaw in the flex last weekend, but prolly gonna go with Mason or Roddy White this week. Maybe.

I don't judge backs by preseason work. Lots of hall of famers in the preseason. I judge by regular season work, where, unless I am mistaken, Ware has nothing this year or last year.

 

[packersfan]

Bradshaw practiced today.

 

[Judge Smails]

Bradshaw practiced today.

Music to my ears - in my lineup now for sure..

 

[LOCO]

going with bradshaw over ronnie.

 

[red]

going with bradshaw over steve smith(nyg)...regardless of the eli/carr situation, nyg doesn't have to pass the ball to win this game. oak won't score much (if any points), and nyg can just ice the game with hand offs in the 4th quarter.

 

[Giant Wooden Badger]

You guys are playing Bradshaw over established guys like Ronnie Brown? I can't see it. If they get that far ahead I don't see them using Bradshwe to grind the clock late with a banged up leg. Seems like they'd just rest him at that point and use one of the other backups, no?

I have him behind AP, Chris Johnson, and Ray Rice so I won't be using him this week regardless. Just curious.