I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
Um...if Jacobs gets hurt, Bradshaw will be a stud. I don't know what you are smoking, but Bradshaw is already in line for Ward like numbers, even with Jacobs playing....I know I'll be targeting him in the middle of the draft.I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
clueless. he has speed, great hands, and surprising power.wrong... lolWare > Bradshaw
if BJ gets hurt, Ware will get touches... but Bradshaw will be the back to ownwrong... lolWare > Bradshaw
Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
Just make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
We should probably form a comity to make sure this gets bumped.Just make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
We should probably form a comity to make sure this gets bumped.Just make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.

Except he has also done very well whenever he has gotten a chance in the regular season too. It isn't like this is the first time he has proven what he can do. Whether or not he is an every down back is an unknown--he hasn't had the chance to prove it one way or another.I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
If Jacobs goes down, I imagine there will not be that much comity between Ward and Bradshaw as they vie for the carries.We should probably form a comity to make sure this gets bumped.Just make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
was hearing good things about Carr in the spring too.After being shellacked in Houston, he's getting it together and the time on the sideline and with the coaches has really helped him.He was always (IMO) more talented than the results so he's an interesting guy to watch in that his career may not be over as many presumed.dude it's preseason.....it's making david carr look good!
I loved the spike with the defender draped all over him.My favorite TD run this year...he bowled over the Panthers' DEF. Definitely looks good.

Of course, because slapping your headJust make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
at the end of the year when you get it wrong is no wear near as fun as being right, but its still got its entertainment value!!!During the Giants Super Bowl run, Bradshaw was easily their best RB (Ward was out with a broken leg though). In fact even in the fourth quarter of close games like Tampa Bay it was Bradshaw and not Jacobs who was on the field grinding out the clock.Bradshaw can most certainly be an everydown back. He has great vision, more than enough speed and surprising power for a "small" back. One of my favorite memories from the Giants-Pats SuperBowl was him carrying a DL 5 or six yards down the field on his back.Except he has also done very well whenever he has gotten a chance in the regular season too. It isn't like this is the first time he has proven what he can do. Whether or not he is an every down back is an unknown--he hasn't had the chance to prove it one way or another.I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
I've read that too but I am not a believer. Bradshaw has proven to be an effective RB while Ware has not. If Jacobs goes down it could well be a 50-50 split at most for Ware. I'm thinking 65-35 Bradshaw. IMHO Bradshaw is the guy to own.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
Wow, Mustang was going for "committee"? I was trying to figure out how "comity" in the legal sense was appropriate and couldn't figure it out, and was feeling a bitWe should probably form a comity to make sure this gets bumped.Just make sure you do it no matter how it ends.I'll tell you what I have saved this post, I'll be happy to post it back here at the end of the year. I respectfully think you could not be more wrong.Yep but that is why this is fun cause everyone has there own way of thinking. Bradshaw is not a stud, he is a comity back, he will never be a stud. He could do what D.Ward did last year but I think his numbers will be a bit lower then that. Hope I am wrong cause I do own him in contract salary cap dynasty, we shall see.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.

I see him as a great flex play option.Ahmad Bradshaw (NYG - RB)• Author: Scout Kevin Roberts Comments/Analysisre-Season UpdateWeek OneBradshaw looked absolutely ready to step in and take over for the departed Derrick Ward, as he ran over and around defenders in Monday night's action, helping the Giants start their pre-season with a 24-17 victory over the Panthers.With 35 yards rushing and a touchdown on just five carries, Bradshaw put forth further evidence that he should not merely be regarded as Brandon Jacobs' "hand-cuff".Bradshaw plays low to the ground, and while we already knew he was quick with good speed, he also plays with great power and runs with determination.This was very evident on an impressive 19-yard jaunt that had him ramming through two Carolina defenders, while shaking off a third as he rumbled into the end-zone.If it weren't official already, write it down: Bradshaw is draftable, with or without Jacobs in the equation.
If you target him in the "middle of the draft", it's a serious overdraft. Of 15 panelists on FBG, no one has him rated any higher than the 38th back this yearand several don't even have him in the top 50. I'm not saying that he can't exceed this draft position, just that I have my doubts that drafting him in themiddle rounds of the draft leaves much upside for him.Um...if Jacobs gets hurt, Bradshaw will be a stud. I don't know what you are smoking, but Bradshaw is already in line for Ward like numbers, even with Jacobs playing....I know I'll be targeting him in the middle of the draft.I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
He also had a great block downfield that helped Carr scramble for a first down....He whiffed on a block that got Carr sacked.
I was thinking 'comedy', but I wasn't sure how funny Bradshaw was.Wow, Mustang was going for "committee"? I was trying to figure out how "comity" in the legal sense was appropriate and couldn't figure it out, and was feeling a bit![]()
I was watching the same thing, but i wondered was he just suppose to give a slight chip then roll out to the flat for the dump off, sort like a inside screen. But the blitzer got there too quick that Carr just didnt make a throw.He whiffed on a block that got Carr sacked.
Carr being too slow on the throw wouldn't be shocking. hahaI was watching the same thing, but i wondered was he just suppose to give a slight chip then roll out to the flat for the dump off, sort like a inside screen. But the blitzer got there too quick that Carr just didnt make a throw.He whiffed on a block that got Carr sacked.
I like Bradshaw too but on that play im not sure exactly what happened as i dont know what the exactly play call was.
I have grown to love the great work that FBG staff members do here, but they are no better at figuring out who is what or what will happen than your average fantasy fanatic here in the shark pool. Matt was very High on Bradshaw coming out of college and I believe when he chimes in you will hear some praise. Matt by the way is the author of the RSP and no one and I mean no one does more in depth analysis of players coming into the NFL draft than Matt. Cecil and Sig are really good, but I would bet they have to be in a slight bit of awe of Matt's devotion to his work.Bradshaw is the real deal and fell to the 7th round due to character concerns. So believe your eye's or go with the flock. FBG staff gets a great deal right, sometimes they miss on a few. I am Fantasy Football for 300 plus days a year. I leave it alone in January and resume research in in the middle of February, I am an ardent supporter of the Rookie Scouting Portfolio and a big fan of FBG's. I tell all my league mates that they have to subscribe to this site to keep it going.Regardless of the amount of work that goes into the paid content of this sight, there is nothing more valuable then the insights and opinions of the Shark Pool. I would challenge anyone to find a more learned group than all of these misanthropes right here, right now.Your last statement about rated Higher than the 38th back? Well on the face of it that is ridiculous unless Bradshaw gets hurt. He will perform better in RBBC than your last ten starters.Bradshaw will finish no less than 20th best FFBL RB this year. You can take that to the bank ( sorry i forgot all the banks went belly up).If you target him in the "middle of the draft", it's a serious overdraft. Of 15 panelists on FBG, no one has him rated any higher than the 38th back this yearand several don't even have him in the top 50. I'm not saying that he can't exceed this draft position, just that I have my doubts that drafting him in themiddle rounds of the draft leaves much upside for him.Um...if Jacobs gets hurt, Bradshaw will be a stud. I don't know what you are smoking, but Bradshaw is already in line for Ward like numbers, even with Jacobs playing....I know I'll be targeting him in the middle of the draft.I am an owner of Bradshaw but know this if Jacobs gets hurt Bradshaw will not be a stud he is not an every down back. Also first team offense or not it is week one preseason football. Meaningless!Jacobs will get hurt this year, he is too big and runs too fierce to not get dinged. When he does Bradshaw is gonna be a stud.He ran over the first team defense of the Panthers.![]()
One is more important than the other.identikit said:He also had a great block downfield that helped Carr scramble for a first down....PahtyTom said:He whiffed on a block that got Carr sacked.
Depends on the point in time...One is more important than the other.identikit said:He also had a great block downfield that helped Carr scramble for a first down....PahtyTom said:He whiffed on a block that got Carr sacked.
Ahmad Bradshaw, RBHeight: 5-9 Weight: 198 Age: 23]Bradshaw reminds me a little of DWill in the fact that people are getting tired of "waiting" for the guy. Not saying he's going to ever have DWill numbers, and yes, their pedigrees are different. But they both had expectations, and they both failed to meet them in the first few years largely due to a lack of carries.
I've been a big backer of AB here, own him in several leagues, and even I got a little discouraged after last year (where I was sure he'd be the RB2 there.) But my eyes are telling me this kid really has something - it's just evident every time he gets the ball - regular season, preseason, whatever.
Ok, this is the year where he pays off for all of us guys who've been holding him.
Please explain, he had 5 catches last year. ThanksDigging Bradshaw this year, especially in ppr leagues.
Jacobs has gotten 46% of the rushing attempts in each of the past two years (obviously, may have been more if he stayed healthy). Ward got 38% of the rushing attempts last year (though almost 5x the number of targets in the passing game). Bradshaw had 15% of the rushing attempts and was barely used in the passing game.In 2007, Brandon also had 46% of the rushing attempts; Ward had 29%; Droughns had almost 20%; and Bradshaw had about 5%. The difference between Jacobs and Ward is greater, IMO, than the difference between Bradshaw and Ware. And, of course, I think Bradshaw and Ware are generally more interchangeable than Jacobs is with anyone else, and have relatively similar skill sets. Plus, if Jacobs were to go down for any extended period of time, they really wouldn't have much depth with Andre Brown already out for the year - so I would have to think they wouldn't want to overload any particular back.So, what makes you think that Bradshaw will get 65% of the carries when Jacobs, the clear #1 on the team, doesn't today?I've read that too but I am not a believer. Bradshaw has proven to be an effective RB while Ware has not. If Jacobs goes down it could well be a 50-50 split at most for Ware. I'm thinking 65-35 Bradshaw. IMHO Bradshaw is the guy to own.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
I agree with the bolded part for sure, but you can't cherry pick percentages like that. He was making a guess that it would be 65-35 if Jacobs went down. You are saying Brandon only got 46% of the carries, which is for the entire season, including the games Jacobs missed. You need to look at the percentage of carries Jacobs gets in games he is actually playing to get an idea of what the split might be when he is out, or look at what the splits between Ward/Bradshaw were during games Jacobs was out. Tell me what those splits were, and then I can have a better guess on what the Bradshaw/Ware splits might be if Jacobs misses games. I do agree with you that the split probably wouldn't be as high as 65-35, but your reasoning is not a fair analysis IMO.Jacobs has gotten 46% of the rushing attempts in each of the past two years (obviously, may have been more if he stayed healthy). Ward got 38% of the rushing attempts last year (though almost 5x the number of targets in the passing game). Bradshaw had 15% of the rushing attempts and was barely used in the passing game.In 2007, Brandon also had 46% of the rushing attempts; Ward had 29%; Droughns had almost 20%; and Bradshaw had about 5%.I've read that too but I am not a believer. Bradshaw has proven to be an effective RB while Ware has not. If Jacobs goes down it could well be a 50-50 split at most for Ware. I'm thinking 65-35 Bradshaw. IMHO Bradshaw is the guy to own.I think Bradshaw's role stays the same, and Ware steps in where Ward left off.
The difference between Jacobs and Ward is greater, IMO, than the difference between Bradshaw and Ware. And, of course, I think Bradshaw and Ware are generally more interchangeable than Jacobs is with anyone else, and have relatively similar skill sets. Plus, if Jacobs were to go down for any extended period of time, they really wouldn't have much depth with Andre Brown already out for the year - so I would have to think they wouldn't want to overload any particular back.
So, what makes you think that Bradshaw will get 65% of the carries when Jacobs, the clear #1 on the team, doesn't today?