If he goes supplemental, that would work well for teams at the end of the 2nd or top of the 3rd. That type of pick would probably be a steal for Brooks, but be high enough that no one would take the risk to lead with a higher pick. TX with a 3rd would work worlds for their defensive scheme.
Except teams have no clue as to what # pick they will have to give up. They will be forfeiting their 2007 draft pick of the round they select him. I would guess 3rd or 4th round is where he will go.
No clue seems a little over the top. I think a team can make a fair assessment of their competitiveness and have a decent idea, at least in tranches, where they expect to end up next year. Sure, you hope to, and may very well surprise, but, for example, do you think teams like Indy, Denver, Seattle, etc. can safely and reasonable bet that they will be drafting late next year, and teams like San Fran will be drafting early again. Sure you never exactly know, but you have a clue.They are not forfeiting the pick, they have the opportunity to use it now, and based on current draft order. So, TX for example has the least risk, they are at the top of the round and can only go down. Teams will weigh those factors in addition to where they think the pick would objectively land.
4th, I say no way. Plenty of teams need LB help and I am sure plenty of teams would throw a 3rd in the ring, but if a team really wants the guy, they might have to go a round earlier. It really depends on how he grades out but if he is as good as thought - 2nd or 3rd.
I mean, didn't Tony Hollings go for a 2nd? Come on. In the supplemental, there is usually one player worth grabing, and because you have to basically throw your bid out there without knowing what anyone else is bidding, if you really want the guy, sometimes you have to go with a pick earlier than you would like.