What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Al Saunders impact on Portis (1 Viewer)

Deuce'sWild

Footballguy
How much of an impact will Al Saunders have on Portis this year? He's obviously done very well producing RB numbers with Holmes and LJ (or anyone else for that matter). I realize KC's OL had a lot to do with the success of KC's backs, but Washington's OL isn't too bad, and they've got a lot of weapons to keep defenses honest.

There's a lot of talk about how Martz will impact K. Jones, but not much outta Washington on Portis. From his ADP, looks like Portis is going as the 1.4 or 1.5 pick for most leagues. I'm wondering if he can climb to the #1 or #2 spot with all things seemingly in place this year, and Saunders track record.

What say ye?

 
Saunder's impact on Portis will be outstanding, but he still shouldn't climb into the 1 or 2 spot. 1.4 1.5 is pretty much where he should go. I'm a huge redskins fan, and even I can't justify taking him over LT, LJ, or SA

 
I would take Portis 3rd this year (Over Alexander). He is about to take his game to the ELITE level(Holmes and Faulk level).

 
I did NOT like hearing Saunders say he will be working on getting the ball to Betts more this year.
I didn't see this. Is he talking as a change of pace, goaline, or 3rd down back? I'd think Portis will have to get 250-300 yds rec to merit a top 3 RB finish in 2006. Unless of course he goes for 1800 rush and 20 tds.
 
I did NOT like hearing Saunders say he will be working on getting the ball to Betts more this year.
I didn't see this. Is he talking as a change of pace, goaline, or 3rd down back? I'd think Portis will have to get 250-300 yds rec to merit a top 3 RB finish in 2006. Unless of course he goes for 1800 rush and 20 tds.
Lemme see about digging up that article for you.
 
Found it.

By Ryan O'Halloran

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

June 19, 2006 One player who has caught associate head coach Al Saunders' attention is running back Ladell Betts, who is again slated to be a kick returner and backup to Clinton Portis this season.

"I don't know if people realize what a quality player he is," Saunders said. "He's a three-dimensional player -- he runs the ball, he can catch it and he can block well enough to be successful. Clinton is Clinton, one of the dominant backs in the NFL. Having somebody like Ladell has been a surprise because I knew he was good, but not this good.

"We'll have situations where Ladell and Clinton will be in the game at the same time. Ladell deserves to play and we've got to find a way to get him on the field and not just as a back-up player to Clinton."
www.washtimes.com
 
I believe that the RB production in KC was more due to the o-line than anything else.

As far as Kevin Jones, I do believe that Martz will have a huge impact. Martz is the reason for the offense in STL (for fantasy players).......he simply passes the ball 60% or more of the time....it is his style of coaching and play calling that made that offense; in KC it was the o-line....

Also bare in mind that the skins have a horrid schedule...

 
I think this talk of Betts is overblown. Portis will not get 80% of the 'Skins carries anyway. There is plenty enough for Betts without taking anything from Portis.

 
Won't have much impact, imho. I'm projecting that the largest effect will be on the passing game. Remember, Saunders put a journeyman like Trent Green onto the leaderboard for passing yardage for several years. When you think about the old style of passing offense that Gibbs had been running and the additions of Lloyd and Randel El, expect a substantial shift toward the passing game.

 
from Here

The Redskins want to keep Ladell Betts very involved this year, perhaps while reducing Clinton Portis' workload. While he carried the team, Portis was worn out physically by the end of last season. …

 
In the last two years, as a 'Skin, Portis has totaled almost 700 carries and another 70 catches. That is a ton of touches.

While a Bronco, He only had 560 carries and 71 catches. But, all together, that is a ton of touches in a four year career.

Since Portis has come to Washington, Betts still has averaged 90 carries and 12.5 catches a year. It is not as though he is getting no touches. He is averaging about 6.5 touches a game with Portis in town.

And Rock Cartwright had 27 carries and 2 catches last year. I would think these would be the touches first take of Betts, not Portis'.

Could Portis use less carries? Yes. But, I do not think, short of injury, his workload will go down much, if at all. If it means one to three less touches a game, that is not that big of deal. He has had a ton of workload in his short career.

 
Nothing, not much....something like that.

Portis isn't the touchdown back Priest was and IMO he isn't as exciting as Priest was. Portis' career average of yards per season is at a hall of fame level right now. What is it? 1400? 1450? IMO that's gotta suffice in FF. He might get a few more TDs but I'd highly doubt it's 20 plus.

He and Moss are already very very solid players any improvement with them is gonna be minimal IMO.

Gibbs is no slouch of a coach and he's still there. Some Saunders threads here make it like Redskins players are going from playing for Rich Kotite to playing for Vermeil.

 
I did NOT like hearing Saunders say he will be working on getting the ball to Betts more this year.
Is he a FA after this year? I think many coaches say something similar in the summer and it amounts to the backup RB getting more catches in September, as they come in on 3rd down. I wouldn't worry

 
To all of you guys weighing in on Saunders statement that he wants to get Betts more touches and ya'll thinking it's Coach Speak or a minimal hit to Portis & his touches.

I sure hope you're right.... :worriedportisowner: :(

 
I've been giving Portis a lot of thought because a few weeks ago I drafted in a WCOFF sattelite league and selecting 5th I narrowed my choice to Lamont Jordan or Portis. I went with Jordan but have found myself wondering if I did not put enough thought into the Saunders influence.

My thought is Portis will touch the ball less than last year and they will give Betts a little more work. But I also believe, due to both Saunders and the improved WR depth on the team, that Portis will be much more efficient with the touches he does receive. The WCOFF league is a PPR reception league and I also believe that Portis pass catching totals are going to be considerably higher than what I am seeing people predict. I see something for Portis in the 50 range based on a 16 game season. My biggest concern with Portis has to do with Brunells ability to not get physically worn down.

 
I've been giving Portis a lot of thought because a few weeks ago I drafted in a WCOFF sattelite league and selecting 5th I narrowed my choice to Lamont Jordan or Portis. I went with Jordan but have found myself wondering if I did not put enough thought into the Saunders influence.

My thought is Portis will touch the ball less than last year and they will give Betts a little more work. But I also believe, due to both Saunders and the improved WR depth on the team, that Portis will be much more efficient with the touches he does receive. The WCOFF league is a PPR reception league and I also believe that Portis pass catching totals are going to be considerably higher than what I am seeing people predict. I see something for Portis in the 50 range based on a 16 game season. My biggest concern with Portis has to do with Brunells ability to not get physically worn down.
Bro if you drafted Lamont because of PPR and the expectation that he might come close to 70 catches again, you might be in for a real shock. Unless Art Shell has dramatically changed his offensive philosophy (which is possible), Lamont will probably only catch about 35 balls this year.The 70 catch number was the result of two major factors that are no longer in play:

1. Norv Turner's offense

2. Kerry Collins' inability to make a consistent 2nd read, leading to way too many dump offs to Jordan.

Jordan's a good back, but I suspect you'll be sorry for not taking CP. As a Raider fan tho, I wish you all the luck in the world with Lamont.

 
I've been giving Portis a lot of thought because a few weeks ago I drafted in a WCOFF sattelite league and selecting 5th I narrowed my choice to Lamont Jordan or Portis. I went with Jordan but have found myself wondering if I did not put enough thought into the Saunders influence.

My thought is Portis will touch the ball less than last year and they will give Betts a little more work. But I also believe, due to both Saunders and the improved WR depth on the team, that Portis will be much more efficient with the touches he does receive. The WCOFF league is a PPR reception league and I also believe that Portis pass catching totals are going to be considerably higher than what I am seeing people predict. I see something for Portis in the 50 range based on a 16 game season. My biggest concern with Portis has to do with Brunells ability to not get physically worn down.
Bro if you drafted Lamont because of PPR and the expectation that he might come close to 70 catches again, you might be in for a real shock. Unless Art Shell has dramatically changed his offensive philosophy (which is possible), Lamont will probably only catch about 35 balls this year.The 70 catch number was the result of two major factors that are no longer in play:

1. Norv Turner's offense

2. Kerry Collins' inability to make a consistent 2nd read, leading to way too many dump offs to Jordan.

Jordan's a good back, but I suspect you'll be sorry for not taking CP. As a Raider fan tho, I wish you all the luck in the world with Lamont.
How is 70 catches the result of Norv's offense? Emmit Smith's career high was 62 and he acheived that after Norv left. Stephen Davis did not catch many passes. Ricky Williams caught 47 and 50 under Norm but that's a reduction from the 60 he caught his last year in New Orleans. I see nothing to back up the claim that Norv's offense is conducive to the RB catching a lot of passes before Jordan.Regarding Collins I would agree he was to quick to dump it off but Mcallister caught 69 passes from Brooks in their only 16 game season together so I think Brooks has shown he's not afraid to dump it off either.

I think people forget Lamont caught 70 passes in 14 games, not 16. His per game pass catch production can decrease 20% and he will still catch 64 passes over a 16 game season which is about what I predict. Other than that I took Lamont because I expect him to run better and I expect the Raider offense as a whole to take off this year and Lamont to benefit greatly from that.

 
The 70 catch number was the result of two major factors that are no longer in play:

2. Kerry Collins' inability to make a consistent 2nd read, leading to way too many dump offs to Jordan.
Have you ever seen Aaron Brooks play? He's just as bad, if not worse, at doing that. All this analysis from years ago, isn't accurate. Offenses are tweaked to fit the talent on the roster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How is 70 catches the result of Norv's offense?
Norv ran a variation of the Air Coryell, similar to Vermeil's systems in St L and KC. The RB blocked, then released quickly and was often used for screens.Art's offenses were based on power running based on aggressive dominating line play and long-developing pass plays that require RBs to stay in and block. Will he run things differenty now? Maybe. But given the fact that he hired the same OC that got him fired twelve years ago makes me less optimistic.

I'd say 40-50 of Lamont's catches were a direct result of Norv's offense philosophy, with the remainder coming from an inept Kerry Collins.

All that said, I do think Lamont has great hands for an RB (despite leading the league in drops), but I'm am severely tempering my expectations for his receiving stats this year.

Portis, OTOH, will be the beneficiary of the same Air Coryell offense now that Saunders is in town. I expect his receiving stats to be way up from the last two years.

 
How is 70 catches the result of Norv's offense?
Norv ran a variation of the Air Coryell, similar to Vermeil's systems in St L and KC. The RB blocked, then released quickly and was often used for screens.Art's offenses were based on power running based on aggressive dominating line play and long-developing pass plays that require RBs to stay in and block. Will he run things differenty now? Maybe. But given the fact that he hired the same OC that got him fired twelve years ago makes me less optimistic.

I'd say 40-50 of Lamont's catches were a direct result of Norv's offense philosophy, with the remainder coming from an inept Kerry Collins.

All that said, I do think Lamont has great hands for an RB (despite leading the league in drops), but I'm am severely tempering my expectations for his receiving stats this year.

Portis, OTOH, will be the beneficiary of the same Air Coryell offense now that Saunders is in town. I expect his receiving stats to be way up from the last two years.
Norv ran the same offense he did with Dallas, Miami and Washington. And as I said earlier both Emmit Smith and Ricky Williams had career high's in catches WITHOUT Norv and Stephen Davis simply did not catch many passes. Before Jordan last year the highest pass catching total by a RB in Norv's system was Emmit who caught something in the mid 50 ranges.I am editing this to add that I forgot Norv was the OC for the Chargers in 2001. That year LT caught the most passes a RB ever has under Norv, which was 59. Of course when Norv left LT caught 79 and 100 so again I don't see who one can say Norv's offense is conducive to the RB catching the ball.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One area in which Saunders should have an impact is in the red zone. The Chiefs run/pass ratio as far as TDs scored was slanted heavily toward ground TDs, > 50% (the exact numbers are in another thread somewhere). The Redskins scored 40 offensive TDs last year. If the split between run/pass TDs is 50/50 or higher(which would be very much in line with the KC numbers) under Saunders, Portis' TD count will be bumped way up. Portis is every bit the NFL RB that Holmes/LJ were/are. He is the 'Skins' best player and will be featured all over the field including in the red zone.

I think that he is right there with the big three, personally. I wouldn't take him ahead of LT, LJ, or Alexander, but I'll try like gangbusters to trade down to the fourth spot in every redraft league this year.

 
I believe that the RB production in KC was more due to the o-line than anything else.
That and the backs themselves. Holmes was no scrub and Johnson is a first-round talent.I don't think Saunders will have a big impact on Portis. Saunder's skills are mainly in the passing game. If you look at his career and what he did in KC, his biggest successes are within the passing game. He made productive receivers out of guys like Chris Horn, Samie Parker and, dare I say it, Eddie Kennison. As a Chiefs fan, I don't look for any -- not even the slightest -- drop-off in performance from Larry Johnson, because Saunders wasn't the best coordinator for him or for any backs. But I will greatly miss what he brought to the aerial assault. The schemes, the mismatches, the motion, the formations, etc.
 
One area in which Saunders should have an impact is in the red zone. The Chiefs run/pass ratio as far as TDs scored was slanted heavily toward ground TDs, > 50% (the exact numbers are in another thread somewhere). The Redskins scored 40 offensive TDs last year. If the split between run/pass TDs is 50/50 or higher(which would be very much in line with the KC numbers) under Saunders, Portis' TD count will be bumped way up. Portis is every bit the NFL RB that Holmes/LJ were/are. He is the 'Skins' best player and will be featured all over the field including in the red zone.

I think that he is right there with the big three, personally. I wouldn't take him ahead of LT, LJ, or Alexander, but I'll try like gangbusters to trade down to the fourth spot in every redraft league this year.
I would agree, but I again think a lot of this goes back to the O-Line. On a lot of Holmes and LJ touchdowns the last 3 years they have walked into the endzone without getting touched. Either that toss they do where Priest walks sideways into the endzone is some great play that defense can't defend, or KCs O-line was just that good.
 
I would agree, but I again think a lot of this goes back to the O-Line. On a lot of Holmes and LJ touchdowns the last 3 years they have walked into the endzone without getting touched. Either that toss they do where Priest walks sideways into the endzone is some great play that defense can't defend, or KCs O-line was just that good.
The Redskins' o-line is pretty solid, too. Not KC-good, true, but plenty good enough. They played particularly well down the stretch last year, and Portis' 2nd half stat line reflects some pretty good run blocking. Even assuming that the Redskins' offense merely treads water in 2006 (I think that they'll improve with all of the additions), 40 team TDs is plenty for Portis to approach 20 if Saunders runs in the red zone like he did in KC. If you were coaching the 'Skins, would you feel more confident featuring Portis or Mark Brunnell inside the five?I'm not projecting Portis to outscore the big three, but I wouldn't be surprised if he did, either. I think that teir 1 is four deep this year.

 
I believe that the RB production in KC was more due to the o-line than anything else.
The thing is if it's just about the O-line how does one explain how LJ ran for 5.2 yards a pop while Priest ran for 3.8?
 
The thing is if it's just about the O-line how does one explain how LJ ran for 5.2 yards a pop while Priest ran for 3.8?
That's one thing that LJ doubters (I don't know what else to call them; after last year, it's a reach to still take credit from him) have never been able to explain. The reality is that, and i'm fully aware of this as a Chiefs fan, the offensive line greatly benefits whoever's running the ball in Kansas City. But the line can only get you so far for most of the time.

On occassion, it will dominate the line of scrimmage so much so that the back has an easy 20+ yards. The thing with this is that Johnson would take it 50 yards (as he did in the Cincinnati game with a wide open hole) and Priest wouldn't make much more than 15 yards from it. The debate is whether other backs would've taken it 50 yards like Johnson did. Tomlinson, Portis, among a few others would've, imo. Some elite backs wouldn't.

And then getting back to what I saw most frequently - the offensive line would get the back to the line of scrimmage and so there's little backfield-duking that's required. But then it's upto the back to make his yards. Priest was shifty and tried to be creative but so often failed. He just didn't look very elusive and the defense got the better of him; that explains his yards per carry average.

Johnson, on the other hand, simply dominated. He ran around people, over people and through people. If a back takes it to the house whilst running over defenders after a free run to the line of scrimmage is all due to the "great offensive line", that's fine. But then I'd love to see the argument, and especially the tangible support, where other backs do the same thing without getting any help and when they're juking defensive inemen in the backfield, because I just didn't see that happen all that often last year.

 
I don't think Saunders will have a big impact on Portis. Saunder's skills are mainly in the passing game. If you look at his career and what he did in KC, his biggest successes are within the passing game. He made productive receivers out of guys like Chris Horn, Samie Parker and, dare I say it, Eddie Kennison.
Kennison was rookie of the year a llllong time ago IIRC. Took him a long time to grow up. If Saunders taught him to "grow up" well then kudos but the ability+results were there before and that's more personal than coaching/offensive scheme really IMO.Horn and Parker haven't done squat in the NFL.

I don't disagree with Saunders having success in the passing game but with your reasoning. I'd say something more like that their WRs are :yucky: and Trent still throws for 4k "every" year

 
Kennison was rookie of the year a llllong time ago IIRC. Took him a long time to grow up. If Saunders taught him to "grow up" well then kudos but the ability+results were there before and that's more personal than coaching/offensive scheme really IMO.

Horn and Parker haven't done squat in the NFL.
Hense the, "dare I say it" comment prefacing Kennison's mention. His career years all came in Kansas City, too. And Parker, as a fourth-round pick, has performed above and beyond what was expected of him.
I don't disagree with Saunders having success in the passing game but with your reasoning. I'd say something more like that their WRs are :yucky: and Trent still throws for 4k "every" year
That is essentially what I have said. Didn't you read the post? A summation of my comments could be: Saunders got a lot of success out of questionable talent. Outside of Gonzalez, who peaks at 1200 yards, the Chiefs don't have a great deal of talent, and yet there's still around 3000 yards being passed for.

 
Kennison was rookie of the year a llllong time ago IIRC. Took him a long time to grow up. If Saunders taught him to "grow up" well then kudos but the ability+results were there before and that's more personal than coaching/offensive scheme really IMO.

Horn and Parker haven't done squat in the NFL.
Hense the, "dare I say it" comment prefacing Kennison's mention. His career years all came in Kansas City, too. And Parker, as a fourth-round pick, has performed above and beyond what was expected of him.
I don't disagree with Saunders having success in the passing game but with your reasoning. I'd say something more like that their WRs are  :yucky: and Trent still throws for 4k "every" year
That is essentially what I have said. Didn't you read the post? A summation of my comments could be: Saunders got a lot of success out of questionable talent. Outside of Gonzalez, who peaks at 1200 yards, the Chiefs don't have a great deal of talent, and yet there's still around 3000 yards being passed for.
doesn't really matter, have a good day
 
So, are we to expect big things out of Brunnell then? He seems to have more talent than Green had with Saunders.

Cooley

Moss

Lloyd

Randle El

Patten

Portis

Not a bad group. If Saunders turned Green into a 4000 yd passer, why not Brunnel?

 
Yahoo Sports article on Portis and Saunders

ASHBURN, Va. – There were times when Clinton Portis spent his bruised and battered regular-season Mondays dying for days like this. He would bite his tongue, mutter curse words under his breath in meetings and then pray. For what? "A guy like Al Saunders," the running back said of the Washington Redskins' new offensive coordinator. "And an offense like this."

In fact, the first time Portis sat down and really went through some of the offensive film produced by Saunders – highlight clips featuring backs like Priest Holmes, Marshall Faulk and Larry Johnson – he cursed again. "I remember saying this is the (expletive) I've been waiting for," Portis said.

As far as Portis can see, what Saunders brings to Washington is like nothing he's ever seen. Four- and five-wide receiver sets. Snappy huddles. Adjustments at the line of scrimmage. Up-tempo management. And most importantly, spacious running lanes that would rival the tarmac at Washington Dulles International Airport. All of which – to Portis – provides hope for a career year. Larry Johnson can have his 2,000-yard season in Kansas City. Portis could be making a run at the single-season record for rushing touchdowns.

"The last time I saw a field spread out like this was in Denver," Portis said. "We didn't spread it out around here. That wasn't our system. You had to adapt. You had to change your game to fit whatever they brought to you. Now I've got the golden opportunity. For two years, I had the opportunity of getting pounded. Pounded here and pounded there. But I found a way out of that and I have the opportunity of my career. You don't have to talk to those guys who have gone through him before. Just go look at the film. When Marshall Faulk was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. When Priest was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. If I'm in my prime, I'm in the right place."

Some will scoff at the idea of Portis making a run at 20-plus touchdowns, particularly in what might be the NFL's toughest division. But even the upgrades by the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles don't promise to improve run defenses that ranked from 12th to 21st last season. Portis is counting on Saunders and other offseason additions to make a difference, especially after seeing a diminutive Holmes – almost the exact size of Portis – develop into one of the most prolific scorers in league history with the Chiefs.

For a player who ran through a series of brick walls during his first season under Joe Gibbs, Portis has seen the Redskins' offense come a long way from the rudimentary power scheme he once labeled as "vanilla." Now the offense has arguably as many options as Saunders had when he helped the Rams win Super Bowl XXXIV – from the explosiveness of Santana Moss and the versatility of Antwaan Randle El to the possession capabilities of Brandon Lloyd, David Patten and Chris Cooley.

Barring another spate of injuries on the offensive line, or the loss of one of the principals (Portis, Moss or quarterback Mark Brunell), the unit should be diverse enough to avoid the sputtering it encountered in the playoffs last season. "Looking around at Lloyd and Randle El and Patten – looking around at guys that should have spectacular years, along with Santana and Cooley – that's going to open [things] up a lot," Portis said. "You can't put eight people in the box. If you do, we're going to throw a bomb on you. You'll rather give me 20 or 30 [yards] than give them 80."

As Joe Gibbs put it more succinctly: "You need to be able to keep people off balance. That's what we'll be striving for." Whether or not the offensive production clicks will depend on Brunell and the receivers. Saunders' passing offense heavily favors timing – to the point where Brunell will be expected to make quicker drops in the pocket and release some of his passes before his target makes his final cut. Brunell broke a finger early in June and missed the team's final minicamp, so his repetitions in practice have been nonexistent over the last month.

"It will be fine. I've got some work to do – we all do with this scheme – but we have some time to get it together," Brunell said. "Actually, I'm really excited. We made a lot of moves in the offseason to try and get better, but I honestly think Al might have been the biggest of all of them. "Everyone is working hard with his scheme. You can see it's paying off, too. Guys were starting to click and make plays out there [in minicamp], so you can see how it's going to open things up – especially for Clinton."

Portis said he expects to arrive in training camp between 210 and 212 pounds, shedding the weight he gained to sustain last year's pounding. Now he's styling a more cut physique to suit the quickness Saunders' offense requires. And Portis points out that he's just now entering the four-year window that should be the peak of his career. "I've got to hit some home runs before people start writing me off and saying I can't do it anymore," he said. "I'm looking for a couple of 90-yarders this year.

"You look at my start in this league, and only Eric Dickerson and Edgerrin James have had [an initial four seasons] like me. I look back, two years ago, I had 1,300 yards. People wrote me off like I was a bust. And the people that [the media] are hugging up on now haven't even had 1,300 yards. If 1,300 is my worst season, bro, I'm all for that." And with the new scheme? "Hopefully, the only thing that changes for me is by the third quarter I'll be sitting on the sideline with my hat turned to the back, waving to the cameras, talking about how this win is in the books and we'll see you next week."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yahoo Sports article on Portis and Saunders

ASHBURN, Va. – There were times when Clinton Portis spent his bruised and battered regular-season Mondays dying for days like this. He would bite his tongue, mutter curse words under his breath in meetings and then pray. For what? "A guy like Al Saunders," the running back said of the Washington Redskins' new offensive coordinator. "And an offense like this."

In fact, the first time Portis sat down and really went through some of the offensive film produced by Saunders – highlight clips featuring backs like Priest Holmes, Marshall Faulk and Larry Johnson – he cursed again. "I remember saying this is the (expletive) I've been waiting for," Portis said.

As far as Portis can see, what Saunders brings to Washington is like nothing he's ever seen. Four- and five-wide receiver sets. Snappy huddles. Adjustments at the line of scrimmage. Up-tempo management. And most importantly, spacious running lanes that would rival the tarmac at Washington Dulles International Airport. All of which – to Portis – provides hope for a career year. Larry Johnson can have his 2,000-yard season in Kansas City. Portis could be making a run at the single-season record for rushing touchdowns.

"The last time I saw a field spread out like this was in Denver," Portis said. "We didn't spread it out around here. That wasn't our system. You had to adapt. You had to change your game to fit whatever they brought to you. Now I've got the golden opportunity. For two years, I had the opportunity of getting pounded. Pounded here and pounded there. But I found a way out of that and I have the opportunity of my career. You don't have to talk to those guys who have gone through him before. Just go look at the film. When Marshall Faulk was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. When Priest was in his prime, coach Saunders was there. If I'm in my prime, I'm in the right place."

Some will scoff at the idea of Portis making a run at 20-plus touchdowns, particularly in what might be the NFL's toughest division. But even the upgrades by the Cowboys, Giants and Eagles don't promise to improve run defenses that ranked from 12th to 21st last season. Portis is counting on Saunders and other offseason additions to make a difference, especially after seeing a diminutive Holmes – almost the exact size of Portis – develop into one of the most prolific scorers in league history with the Chiefs.

For a player who ran through a series of brick walls during his first season under Joe Gibbs, Portis has seen the Redskins' offense come a long way from the rudimentary power scheme he once labeled as "vanilla." Now the offense has arguably as many options as Saunders had when he helped the Rams win Super Bowl XXXIV – from the explosiveness of Santana Moss and the versatility of Antwaan Randle El to the possession capabilities of Brandon Lloyd, David Patten and Chris Cooley.

Barring another spate of injuries on the offensive line, or the loss of one of the principals (Portis, Moss or quarterback Mark Brunell), the unit should be diverse enough to avoid the sputtering it encountered in the playoffs last season. "Looking around at Lloyd and Randle El and Patten – looking around at guys that should have spectacular years, along with Santana and Cooley – that's going to open [things] up a lot," Portis said. "You can't put eight people in the box. If you do, we're going to throw a bomb on you. You'll rather give me 20 or 30 [yards] than give them 80."

As Joe Gibbs put it more succinctly: "You need to be able to keep people off balance. That's what we'll be striving for." Whether or not the offensive production clicks will depend on Brunell and the receivers. Saunders' passing offense heavily favors timing – to the point where Brunell will be expected to make quicker drops in the pocket and release some of his passes before his target makes his final cut. Brunell broke a finger early in June and missed the team's final minicamp, so his repetitions in practice have been nonexistent over the last month.

"It will be fine. I've got some work to do – we all do with this scheme – but we have some time to get it together," Brunell said. "Actually, I'm really excited. We made a lot of moves in the offseason to try and get better, but I honestly think Al might have been the biggest of all of them. "Everyone is working hard with his scheme. You can see it's paying off, too. Guys were starting to click and make plays out there [in minicamp], so you can see how it's going to open things up – especially for Clinton."

Portis said he expects to arrive in training camp between 210 and 212 pounds, shedding the weight he gained to sustain last year's pounding. Now he's styling a more cut physique to suit the quickness Saunders' offense requires. And Portis points out that he's just now entering the four-year window that should be the peak of his career. "I've got to hit some home runs before people start writing me off and saying I can't do it anymore," he said. "I'm looking for a couple of 90-yarders this year.

"You look at my start in this league, and only Eric Dickerson and Edgerrin James have had [an initial four seasons] like me. I look back, two years ago, I had 1,300 yards. People wrote me off like I was a bust. And the people that [the media] are hugging up on now haven't even had 1,300 yards. If 1,300 is my worst season, bro, I'm all for that." And with the new scheme? "Hopefully, the only thing that changes for me is by the third quarter I'll be sitting on the sideline with my hat turned to the back, waving to the cameras, talking about how this win is in the books and we'll see you next week."
:banned: Drink up
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top