What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

All this Jay Cutler Love? (1 Viewer)

Bizkiteer

Footballguy
LOL, listened to Mike & Mike this morning where they had Mel on. Mel vented about how people are trying to pump Jay Cutler up too much. Mel said he (Cutler) is good, but all the talk that Cutler showed excellent at the Senior Bowl and on is a bit too much. Basically he's not all world and quit advertising as though he is! Seeing how Mayock is in the biggest fan and has this love fest for Cutler...Mel's comments are directed straight at him IMO. Is Mayock starting to step on Mel's toes in draft analyst world? I say get them on pay per view...let's get ready to RUMBLE!!!!!

 
Mel was saying that if you loved Cutler back in December and you still love him he has no problem with that at all.

He does have a problem if you didn't love Cutler in December and all of a sudden fell in love with him after the senior bowl and combine because he feels like Cutler's senior bowl and combine were just ordinary

 
This isn't totally fair...Kiper posted an Insider column yesterday which, among other things, talked about Cutler being overhyped at this point [which I agree with]. But at no time today did he directly attack Mayock...and Mayock is FAR from the only guy out there singing Cutler's praises.

Mel's point was much more balanced...he said Cutler is a top 3 QB prospect, he will get drafted pretty high [he even left the door open for Cutler going ahead of Young even though he doesn't think that's warranted], but that his Senior Bowl and Combine performances were not exemplary and did nothing to vault him into the Leinart/Young category.

 
Mel is just pissed because he has to call his Draft Book back from the printers and make some changes.
Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.-- Thomas Jefferson

I'm sorry, but I couldn't help but respond to your sig.

 
Mel is just pissed because he has to call his Draft Book back from the printers and make some changes.
Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.-- Thomas Jefferson

I'm sorry, but I couldn't help but respond to your sig.
:goodposting: Might be the only good thing Jefferson ever said.

 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl. Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.

 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl. Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.
That's just the point. You've seen the combine and the Senior Bowl. Mayock has seen EVERY SINGLE THROW the kid made this year. Leave the evaluation to the pros please...
 
Mel is just pissed because he has to call his Draft Book back from the printers and make some changes.
Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law.-- Thomas Jefferson

I'm sorry, but I couldn't help but respond to your sig.
don't apologize to me.....apologize to George Washington.
 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl. Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.
That's just the point. You've seen the combine and the Senior Bowl. Mayock has seen EVERY SINGLE THROW the kid made this year. Leave the evaluation to the pros please...
Kiper's point was, if you were in love BEFORE these events, then you are still in love, if you weren't, these 2 events wouldn't cause that as they were ordinary.Leave your criticism for those who deserve it please.

 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl.  Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.
That's just the point. You've seen the combine and the Senior Bowl. Mayock has seen EVERY SINGLE THROW the kid made this year. Leave the evaluation to the pros please...
1) I highly doubt Mayock has seen every single throw Cutler has made...he often refers to "watching tape" on players and needs to have a working knowledge of hundreds of prospects.2) There's not a shred of evidence to suggest tha Mayock has seen more of Cutler than Kiper or any other draftnik.

3) Almost ever year football fans talk up the "other" guy as the one with "real" potential, and Cutler is this year's version. Losman, Big Ben [they were right that time], Leftwich, Frye, etc...etc...

 
3) Almost ever year football fans talk up the "other" guy as the one with "real" potential, and Cutler is this year's version. Losman, Big Ben [they were right that time], Leftwich, Frye, etc...etc...
I thought the real talk up that year was Rivers. That's one reason why he got drafted where he did and Ben slid.
 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl.  Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.
That's just the point. You've seen the combine and the Senior Bowl. Mayock has seen EVERY SINGLE THROW the kid made this year. Leave the evaluation to the pros please...
Kiper's point was, if you were in love BEFORE these events, then you are still in love, if you weren't, these 2 events wouldn't cause that as they were ordinary.Leave your criticism for those who deserve it please.
Um... you didn't even come close to making that point in your original post, which is why I responded how I did.
 
Mel was saying that if you loved Cutler back in December and you still love him he has no problem with that at all.

He does have a problem if you didn't love Cutler in December and all of a sudden fell in love with him after the senior bowl and combine because he feels like Cutler's senior bowl and combine were just ordinary
I think Kiper is a tool, but I sort of agree with this. I fall in the "late October Cutler love" category though, so he isn't calling me out at all. Me and Wildman (and a couple other diehard college football fans from the gambling threads) at FFToday were talking about Cutler's game (being more impressive than Leinart's) in early to mid season. He does have very impressive game. Jason, is right too. There is a faction out there that just wants to dis the big names and throw the underdog/unknown guy up there. Maybe they carry anti-"big name" sentiments (most likely). I don't care and I don't fit the category.

Fwiw, I have stated clearly (many times) why I like Cutler more than Leinart. There is no hatred for Matt. I have never suggested, as Mayock has, that Cutler will go before Leinart. I don't believe Mayock is paying close attention to his projections, but he has made some surreal calls like this in the past and been right, and I respect his scouting and insights (even when I disagree with him). That's an attitude we could use a little more of on this topic, btw. His projections have been better than Kiper's for a couple years. He is infinitely better when it comes to breaking down talent than Kiper. But I have to agree with Kiper on where these guys will be drafted.

In these days of good time Young bashing, I still cannot decide if I like Cutler more than Vince. I'm leaning towards NO. I think Young is just too freaky of a talent. So with people all of a sudden comfortable with the order Leinart, Cutler, Young... I have them reversed. :shrug:

Finally, I don't care where any of them are drafted (it means little as far as how they will play). It's fun to try and project this thing, but I expect Leinart to be the FIRST overall draft pick (before Bush and after a trade, and I think that's a doozy of a mistake). I think Young is still top 3 despite the current negative press. I think Cutler being top 5 is unlikley. Top 10, as Jason projects seems to be pushing it. Mid first round, probable. An Aaron Rodgers like slide, less probable, but I can see it. Too much talent at other positions.

 
1) I highly doubt Mayock has seen every single throw Cutler has made...he often refers to "watching tape" on players and needs to have a working knowledge of hundreds of prospects.

2) There's not a shred of evidence to suggest tha Mayock has seen more of Cutler than Kiper or any other draftnik.

3) Almost ever year football fans talk up the "other" guy as the one with "real" potential, and Cutler is this year's version. Losman, Big Ben [they were right that time], Leftwich, Frye, etc...etc...
1) He is legendary among his peers for watching hours and hours and hours of tape. At the combine they were talking about him preparing by doing all nighters to break down tape of the few players he had missed this past season. He also watches scouting tape, not televised game tape. Have you ever watched scouting tape? Very very cool. 2) :lmao: Kiper doesn't watch tape. He doesn't even know football very well. He has some contacts (college coaches) and he reads press clippings, and memorized players. That makes him a good source, but you'll never hear him being technical about a player's game (like Mayock). You'll never see Kiper breaking down tape on TV.

3) Agreed.

 
1) I highly doubt Mayock has seen every single throw Cutler has made...he often refers to "watching tape" on players and needs to have a working knowledge of hundreds of prospects.
Well then he's lying on national television, because he repeatedly said during the combine that he broke down every single throw the kid had made in 2005.
 
1) I highly doubt Mayock has seen every single throw Cutler has made...he often refers to "watching tape" on players and needs to have a working knowledge of hundreds of prospects.
Well then he's lying on national television, because he repeatedly said during the combine that he broke down every single throw the kid had made in 2005.
Fair enough, I didn't realize that was his contention. I still contend there aren't enough hours in the day for Mayock [or anyone] to make a practice of that, but perhaps he does that for particular players, ones that he knows he's somewhat outside the consensus on to really know whether he should be championing their causes.
 
what does the board think if the situation was reversed...

if leinert had gone to vandy & cutler had gone to USC...

isn't it likely leinert would get drafted lower & cutler higher...

would VY be considered as good a prospect by scouts if his arena had been appalachian state?

 
1) I highly doubt Mayock has seen every single throw Cutler has made...he often refers to "watching tape" on players and needs to have a working knowledge of hundreds of prospects.
Well then he's lying on national television, because he repeatedly said during the combine that he broke down every single throw the kid had made in 2005.
This is the same guy that has mucho man love for him too. So, I'd take it w/ a pinch of salt. Mayock says a whole bunch of stuff daily and his word is not gospel.
 
what does the board think if the situation was reversed...

if leinert had gone to vandy & cutler had gone to USC...

isn't it likely leinert would get drafted lower & cutler higher...
The obvious and easy answer is, of course. This is a flawed argument though. You cannot take away from Leinart the fact that he has five years of development in that system. It is part of his intangible value. Cutler would be remarkably better prepared had he been at USC, and Leinart would be demonstrably less ready for the NFL had he been at Vandy. But that isn't the case.

Leinart is better prepared because he was at USC. Good for him, tough luck for every other QB in the draft.

 
what does the board think if the situation was reversed...

if leinert had gone to vandy & cutler had gone to USC...

isn't it likely leinert would get drafted lower & cutler higher...

would VY be considered as good a prospect by scouts if his arena had been appalachian state?
I think Dan Patrick brought up a good point concerning Leinart, he stated that ESPN has been saying so many good things about him for the past year or two that it would appear that there is nothing else to say than negative things. I think his statement it's somewhat right. It looks as though people are jumping off his bandwagon quicker than they got on. It's become "in" to put him down.Cutler has only won 11 games since starting at Vandy. Note that it's not one season... Something to think about, even though his school isn't a football powerhouse.

 
FWIW, my take on the Mayock / Kiper / Cutler thing.

#1. The NFL Network is becoming a huge force. Most members of the "old" media view it very leerily. Players shun the beat reporter but fall all over themselves to be on with Rich Eisen on Total Access. The NFL Network has unprecedented access that the players gladly give up.

The televised games this year is just the natural progression of the Network doing more and more itself.

Bottom line for that is you can bet Kiper feels Mayock's presence in the Draft Guru turf wars and I'd be shocked if his stuff on Mike and Mike this morning was not directly intended as a shot there. Especially given the timing with Mayock just coming off his most visible week of the year. The way he said it was a thinly veiled shot saying the guy who says this only watched the Senior Bowl and even then he misjudged what he saw.

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember. If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.

But what it does now is draw some attention and get people talking about Mayock. And Cutler seems like a pretty safe guy to hang your hat on.

#3. I think when it's all boiled down, nothing really changes. Cutler is solid but he's not in the Leinart / Young group.

J

edited to add I meant to say I'd be shocked if Kiper's comments were NOT intended as a shot at Mayock. I definitely think he was taking a dig at Mayock when he said that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe, those are all good points, but I doubt the team that ends up getting Cutler will be that much better than the teams that get Young/Leinart.

 
Joe, those are all good points, but I doubt the team that ends up getting Cutler will be that much better than the teams that get Young/Leinart.
Hi Aaron,True. All depends on how far down Cutler falls. Of course, if he falls to the top of the 2nd round, he's in no better shape. I can potentially see a Roethlisberger - PIT type scenario for him where he goes to a decent team ready to make a push vs a terrible team like Young / Leinart will likely wind up on.

J

 
what does the board think if the situation was reversed...

if leinert had gone to vandy & cutler had gone to USC...

isn't it likely leinert would get drafted lower & cutler higher...

would VY be considered as good a prospect by scouts if his arena had been appalachian state?
I think Dan Patrick brought up a good point concerning Leinart, he stated that ESPN has been saying so many good things about him for the past year or two that it would appear that there is nothing else to say than negative things. I think his statement it's somewhat right. It looks as though people are jumping off his bandwagon quicker than they got on. It's become "in" to put him down.Cutler has only won 11 games since starting at Vandy. Note that it's not one season... Something to think about, even though his school isn't a football powerhouse.
Hi Biz,I think there's no way to hold Vandy against Cutler though. It's not his fault. My buddy is a Vandy grad and we were talking about the draft last night. We were talking about if Cutler was going to have a pro day since he worked out at the combine and my buddy laughed saying, "why would he want to throw to Vandy players at his pro day?"

Good point for a bigger picture. I don't think anyone holds the team against him. Actually the opposite. He seemed to singlehandedly lift that team to places nobody thought they could go.

He was much more valuable to Vandy than Leinart was to USC.

J

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To those who think Kiper is somehow jealous of Mayock...a few things to consider:

1) Kiper almost left ESPN for the NFL Network [Kiper went so far as to let his contract terminate] but ultimately ESPN gave him a new long-term deal...had that happened Mike Mayock would be no different than Jason Wood or Chaos Commish or Colin Dowling

2) While I, and many Shark Poolers, LOVE the NFL Network, it's reach remains miniscule relative to ESPN; it's not even close...Kiper has a far larger platform

Kiper could've just as easily been ripping Mort for all we know...Mort is the one who put out the first "Cutler is a stud" piece that was completely unfounded. At least in Mayock's case we know the guy actually has a basis for his man love and has seen the kid firsthand.

 
To those who think Kiper is somehow jealous of Mayock...a few things to consider:

1) Kiper almost left ESPN for the NFL Network [Kiper went so far as to let his contract terminate] but ultimately ESPN gave him a new long-term deal...had that happened Mike Mayock would be no different than Jason Wood or Chaos Commish or Colin Dowling
Hi Jason. For all I know personally of the situation, Mayock and Kiper could be best friends. I'm just outside looking in here.

But I think what you say above is why Kiper might be taking the shot. I think he sees all the love Mayock gets (mostly as a by product of NFL Network love) and he's feeling it. I get the sense the entire ESPN network feels it a little. He knows it could have been him and wonders about it. At the very least, he thinks he made the right call but now sees a "new Kiper" gaining tons of attention.

2) While I, and many Shark Poolers, LOVE the NFL Network, it's reach remains miniscule relative to ESPN; it's not even close...Kiper has a far larger platform

Kiper could've just as easily been ripping Mort for all we know...Mort is the one who put out the first "Cutler is a stud" piece that was completely unfounded. At least in Mayock's case we know the guy actually has a basis for his man love and has seen the kid firsthand.
I think what these guys see is the writing on the wall. I really do see a lot of the old school guys with some serious :unsure: when it comes to the NFL Network. Including the Networks. These guys are not the sharing kind. And they see suddenly that this league they've helped create is now rising up on it's own and doing all the things they used to do (promote the news / broadcast games etc) This is just me speculating but I really do think everyone else outside the NFL Network is watching this like a Baby T-Rex that just hatched. It's cute and cuddly now but they know exactly what it can grow in to.

Very interesting dynamic.

J

 
Last edited by a moderator:
To those who think Kiper is somehow jealous of Mayock...a few things to consider:

1) Kiper almost left ESPN for the NFL Network [Kiper went so far as to let his contract terminate] but ultimately ESPN gave him a new long-term deal...had that happened Mike Mayock would be no different than Jason Wood or Chaos Commish or Colin Dowling
Hi Jason. I think this is why Kiper might be taking the shot. I think he sees all the love Mayock gets (mostly as a by product of NFL Network love) and he's feeling it. I get the sense the entire ESPN network feels it a little.
2) While I, and many Shark Poolers, LOVE the NFL Network, it's reach remains miniscule relative to ESPN; it's not even close...Kiper has a far larger platform

Kiper could've just as easily been ripping Mort for all we know...Mort is the one who put out the first "Cutler is a stud" piece that was completely unfounded. At least in Mayock's case we know the guy actually has a basis for his man love and has seen the kid firsthand.
I think what these guys see is the writing on the wall. I really do see a lot of the old school guys with some serious :unsure: when it comes to the NFL Network. Including the Networks. These guys are not the sharing kind. And they see suddenly that this league they've helped create is now rising up on it's own and doing all the things they used to do (promote the news / broadcast games etc) This is just me speculating but I really do think everyone else outside the NFL Network is watching this like a Baby T-Rex that just hatched. It's cute and cuddly now but they know exactly what it can grow in to.

Very interesting dynamic.

J
You may be right Joe...if it turns out that way, Rich Eisen's decision to leave ESPN for the Network will be an enormously smart move in retrospect. I recall reading something at the time where Eisen said he would never be more than another "Sportscenter Guy" at ESPN but at the NFL Network he had the chance to be the next Chris Berman. Could turn out that way, dunno. :shrug:
 
To those who think Kiper is somehow jealous of Mayock...a few things to consider:

1) Kiper almost left ESPN for the NFL Network [Kiper went so far as to let his contract terminate] but ultimately ESPN gave him a new long-term deal...had that happened Mike Mayock would be no different than Jason Wood or Chaos Commish or Colin Dowling
Hi Jason. I think this is why Kiper might be taking the shot. I think he sees all the love Mayock gets (mostly as a by product of NFL Network love) and he's feeling it. I get the sense the entire ESPN network feels it a little.
2) While I, and many Shark Poolers, LOVE the NFL Network, it's reach remains miniscule relative to ESPN; it's not even close...Kiper has a far larger platform

Kiper could've just as easily been ripping Mort for all we know...Mort is the one who put out the first "Cutler is a stud" piece that was completely unfounded. At least in Mayock's case we know the guy actually has a basis for his man love and has seen the kid firsthand.
I think what these guys see is the writing on the wall. I really do see a lot of the old school guys with some serious :unsure: when it comes to the NFL Network. Including the Networks. These guys are not the sharing kind. And they see suddenly that this league they've helped create is now rising up on it's own and doing all the things they used to do (promote the news / broadcast games etc) This is just me speculating but I really do think everyone else outside the NFL Network is watching this like a Baby T-Rex that just hatched. It's cute and cuddly now but they know exactly what it can grow in to.

Very interesting dynamic.

J
You may be right Joe...if it turns out that way, Rich Eisen's decision to leave ESPN for the Network will be an enormously smart move in retrospect. I recall reading something at the time where Eisen said he would never be more than another "Sportscenter Guy" at ESPN but at the NFL Network he had the chance to be the next Chris Berman. Could turn out that way, dunno. :shrug:
I agree Jason. I remember the first Total Access shows and guests were joking about coming on the show in June because there was nothing to talk about. They've had some missteps but by and large, I think they've done a fantastic job. I think Adam Schefter saw sort of the same thing.

I could be :tinfoilhat: on this one but to me it looks like a very carefully crafted plan with logical progressions from the preseason game broadcast last year to the regular season game stuff on Thursdays this year. Interesting to watch.

J

 
Warning: Cutler Apologetics Below

This will be my last shot at the long answer. When Jason describes high praise of Cutler as unfounded, I have to... defend. Hopefully the format below at least can dispell the "unfounded" notion. If not, then I can be insulting too. I would use "ignorant" to describe those who say the praise is unfounded. I think that's accurate. I understand few got to watch Jay play this year, which explains the ignorance to an understandable degree. I had to specifically order games, and follow the little ball on the screen and read ongoing game chats. I strenuously object to being described as one who makes unfounded opinions (even indirectly and especially on this topic). I try hard to be informed because I want to get this right. Sometimes I think about this and wonder if I shouldn't have just followed the herd, but it's when I think about it that I remember why I like Cutler better than Leinart. So... here's almost my unabridged answer.

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.
Maybe you're being shrewd and I'm being naive, but I think Mayock is sincere and not making a clever professional decision. There were some interesting games for film junkies last season. Mayock's late October love for Cutler coincided with several of ours at another site (where live blow by blow play by play of every college game was being discussed). It also coincided with some dicey performances by Leinart, but you had to watch the games (or read those forums to believe me). You cannot see this stuff in boxscores.

Leinart was bad in the first half against Oregon (sept. 24). The television analysts commented that the best QB on the field was Clemens. USC trailed 13-10 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

One week later (oct. 1) at Arizona State Leinart was very bad in the first half. The television analysts were saying the best QB on the field was Keller (and I agreed - it was obvious). USC trailed 21-3 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

Two weeks later everyone saw the ND game and interestingly that game launched Brady Quinn into the national spotlight with the common sentiment that he was better than Leinart that day, maybe just better. Quinn wasn't so great the rest of the year, but the comparison to Leinart still has him considered QB1 in his class (among other reasons, but this was his catalyst). I like Stanton better than Quinn myself, but we can do that next year this time. There was a theme here to those of us following USC every week. Leinart was not looking as impressive as opposing QBs. What the hey?

Leinart then had four consecutive impressive outings in the Pac 10. The stats piled up. I commented elsewhere that his questionable arm strength seemed vastly improved, and I figured he was recovered from the elbow surgery, which may have explained his poor early season play. Made sense. I was worried about his play and these 4 games seemed like a good sign. Though the Stanford coach commented that his QB (Trent Edwards) would post the same numbers as Leinart in that offense (interesting comment you hear all the time from pretty shrewd characters).

Then Leinart backslid finishing the regular season with two performances similar to the early ones. He wasn't effective against Fresno State. His boxscore doesn't look bad, but the throws were not impressive. Reggie went nuclear in that one and again the running game saved USC. After the game their was high praise for Pinegar who looked better than Leinart to many that day.

In the regular season finale against UCLA, there was a thread going here and the discussion was about how awful Leinart looked. It was a blowout, but Matt was way way off that day. He missed three easy TDs, and the ball was sailing early and often. No one suggested Olson was better though, because he was equally inept. Someone asked if Leinart always looked like this. I wasn't here to respond (read it later), but the correct answer is "not always, but a lot more than you would believe".

Leinart finally topped off this season of inexplicable play with a great performance (I thought) in the Rose Bowl-- the game everybody watched gave no one reason to question the guy. But, I watched them all (a few of them a few times), and I stand by this assessment. His reported accuracy is only applicable to the short game. He does not make tough throws into tight spaces. When he's been good, he's had ungodly protection and a choice of very talented wide open receivers. He's been bad much more than people know. And he really struggles with the deep ball. It's lobbed, it floats, it's not accurate, but sometimes a wide open reciever can track it down anyway.

During this same time period Cutler was also having an interesting season for film junkies like Mayock and the gambling crowd.

Someone here said he was horrible against LSU (oct 8). The boxscore sure looks that way, but this was the game that started the buzz. He managed a very difficult game with very smart play. He was knocked down something like 17 times, sacked five, etc. But he played smart and drove the Coms down the field late in the 3rd quarter and had two perfect TD passes dropped. Vandy would have led LSU late in a tough game if his receivers caught the ball. The 4th quarter was ugly, but not due to Cutler.

The next week at #5 Georgia was the game that started the hype. Cutler faced a fierce defense and picked it apart, but again was let down by his team.

Marlon White was running wide open toward the end zone, but Cutler's pass went through his hands so cleanly the ball bounced off his knee. Vandy instead settled for a 45-yard field goal by Bryant Hahnfeldt and pulled to 27-17 with 3:55 left in the third.

That was one of at least five dropped passes by the Commodores that had Johnson upset.

``I'm not saying we win the game if we catch some of those balls, but those plays prevent you from having a chance to win,'' Johnson said.
Cutler was 15-28 in the game, and I counted 7 drops, three that would have been scores. These weren't tough catches. They were nice throws. If he has a decent day from receivers he goes 22-28 and probably beats the #5 team in the country with a joke of a team. It was after this loss that people started talking about the Vandy QB as a candidate for SEC Player of the Year, an honor he later won. There's nothing unfounded about my opinion. He is the SEC Player of the Year. That is the toughest conference in the country. His team stunk. He rocked. It happens. Impressive isn't a strong enough superlative for how he played in this game. The next week against one of the best secondaries in the country, Ko Simpson Jonathan Joseph and the Gamecocks, Cutler was better than he was against Georgia. Joseph said Cutler had "an amazing arm". He picked them apart while avoiding pressure all day. It was almost his best game of the year. This is where I came to like him more than Leinart (who was undergoing the difficulties described above). This 87 yard drive to tie the game late in the 4th quarter was loaded with throws and decisions that translate very nicely to the NFL. Btw, a typical scouting report will praise Leinart for reading defenses. He's pretty good. Cutler is better. Watch this game. Amazingly quick reading and reacting. Very NFL-like. He had to learn to react quickly, correctly and accurately. Leinart rarely had that kind of pressure on him.

1st-10, VAN13 7:11 J. Cutler sacked by D. Coley

2nd-15, VAN8 6:30 J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the left for 23 yard gain

1st-10, VAN31 6:00 J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

2nd-10, VAN34 5:55 J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the right for 16 yard gain

1st-10, 50 5:30 J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR39 5:10 J. Cutler rushed up the middle for 16 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR26 5:00 J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

2nd-10, SCAR26 4:55 J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

3rd-10, SCAR26 4:54 J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

4th-10, SCAR26 4:53 J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR15 4:30 J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning to the left for 6 yard gain

2nd-4, SCAR9 4:11 J. Cutler rushed to the left for 2 yard gain

3rd-2, SCAR7 4:00 C. Garrison rushed up the middle for 7 yard touchdown. B. Hahnfeldt made PAT
Then South Carolina marched down the field to win the game. Not Jay's fault. Not a chance in this world Leinart can make that drive under those circumstances. Next Jay and his Vandy of reknown headed to Gainesville, where Vandy typically gets blown out by fitty. Cutler took the game into overtime. It was an impressive performance:

The Gators seemingly had the game wrapped up with 4:11 to play when Markus Manson's 2-yard TD run made it 35-21.

Cutler, however, had other plans. He directed a 61-yard scoring drive in 1:54 and capped it with a 2-yard pass to George Smith with 2:17 to play.

Andrew Pace recovered the onside kick for Vandy, and Cutler went to work again. He sliced up Florida's secondary -- most of it against Lewis, who replaced injured starter Vernell Brown -- and found Earl Bennett wide open in the end zone for a 6-yard score with 54 seconds remaining.

Johnson was ready to go for a 2-point conversion, but a celebration penalty against Bennett forced the Commodores to kick the extra point. Johnson called the penalty ``stupid.''

The Gators managed to regroup in overtime.

``Jay Cutler is a big-time quarterback,'' (Urban) Meyer said. ``That's an NFL quarterback.''
I already knew that, but at this point I couldn't honestly claim I believed Leinart was in Cutler's league. There's just a huge difference in what they are capable of as individuals. So, when you say Cutler isn't in Leinart's league that's fine, but Leinart didn't play up to the opinion. Not this year. The next week at Kentucky people are annoyingly saying Cutler reminds them of Brett Favre. Meh, I hate that kind of talk. So, Kentucky just mugs Vandy and Cutler looks pretty bad. The score is 34-3 Kentucky when Cutler leads a decent drive before the half to cut it to 34-10. Cutler finished with 396 yards and five TD passes, almost making the comeback. It was impressive, and I admit on a few of the plays, he was very reminiscent of Favre. He can generate amazing heat with stunning accuracy. Catch it or get hurt by it. He bounced similar throws off of Hagan and Williams in the Senior Bowl. NFL receivers catch those balls. I have never seen Leinart play like that, but Palmer sure did as a senior. Still, not Jay's best performance because he played the first half like Leinart early in the season.

The game winning drive against Tennessee has been discussed enough, so I'll spare you, but they do show the final TD pass all the time. Watch it and tell me if it reminds you of someone. Then consider Cutler had taken a fierce beating up to that point.

Liking Cutler over Leinart is just an opinion. But it isn't at all unfounded. Quite the opposite. Anyone who wants to sit down and watch these games would have to at least agree there is considerable substance to the opinion. You have to watch Leinart and Cutler struggle. They did. Then watch them both play well. Cutler's struggles were far more understandable given his team. I don't know what was up with Leinart in those games but he was bad. Cutler's solid play was much more impressive. That's what I saw with my eyes. What should I do? Join the herd and pretend I didn't see what I know I saw? I can't do that.

Leinart has been loved by the media and the fans, but scouts have always had some pretty serious questions-- not all scouts, but several respected ones. Rob Rang rates Cutler higher. He's been around for a long time and been on a few NFL payrolls. Chris Landry disagrees with Rang. Both are entitled to opinions and anyone claiming either of these quality pro scouts makes unfounded decisions or doesn't know what he's talking about is being absurd. Leinart and Cutler bring different qualities to the table and it is a matter of what you prefer. Bloom loves the Brady he sees in Leinart. I see that too, and I can respect that hopeful opinion. I see the Palmer or Favre in Cutler. Those kinds of tools are there and they're not under the surface. You just have to watch the individual, not the team. I have a preference for strong armed QBs, but I'll admit it takes a lot more than a big arm to get the job done. I have seen a lot more in Cutler.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember. If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:

 
NFL Legend

Dan Marino was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 15, 1961. He grew up in a working-class neighborhood near Pitt Stadium, so it was only natural that he would attend Pittsburgh after his All-American high school football career.

Dan was an outstanding quarterback for Central Catholic High School in Pittsburgh, where he won Parade All-American honors. Because of his great passing ability, he was coveted by most of the top football programs in the country. He was also drafted by baseball's Kansas City Royals, but opted to attend the University of Pittsburgh.

Marino took over the starting quarterback job somewhere in the middle of his freshman season. He developed into an outstanding college quarterback over the next couple years, and in his junior year he threw 37 touchdown passes and was selected as an All-American.

After a disappointing senior season in which Marino saw his NFL value slip considerably, the Miami Dolphins selected Dan with the 27th overall pick in the 1983 draft. He was the fifth quarterback selected in that draft class.

On Sunday, October 9, 1983, Dan Marino made his first start in the NFL a success by throwing three touchdown passes and completing 19 of 29 passes for 322 yards. Unfortunately, the Dolphins lost in overtime to the Buffalo Bills.

In his first professional season, Marino threw for 2,210 yards and 20 touchdowns. He was named NFL Rookie of the Year and he was also the first rookie to start at quarterback in the Pro Bowl.

In 1984, Dan Marino really burst into the forefront of the NFL. It took him just eight games to beat Bob Griese's single-season team record for touchdown passes, and nine weeks to top Griese's record for most passing yards in one season.

Marino capped off an incredible season by setting the single-season NFL records for touchdown passes (48), completions (362), and yards (5,084). The only thing that could have made this dream season better would have been a Super Bowl victory, but unfortunately for Marino and the rest of the Dolphins, they were beaten in the Super Bowl by the San Francisco 49ers.

On November 12th, 1995, Marino broke the NFL record for career passing yards when he eclipsed Fran Tarkenton's mark of 47,003. On November 26th, Dan broke Tarkenton's record for most career touchdown passes by throwing number 343 against the Indianapolis Colts.

Dan Marino became the only quarterback to top the 60,000 yard passing mark. He also became the only quarterback to toss more than 400 touchdown passes. He has thrown more pass attempts and more completions than anyone else in the history of the game.

Check the bold.

Scouts and draft gurus don't always hit homeruns.

Dan the Man, the 5th QB taken. If I remember correctly (I was only 10 years old at the time, don't wan't to google for a thread full of stats and info), but it was a QB year with 5 in the 1st round. I don't remember who was taken ahead of Marino, but do remember some KC Chief QB who was supposed to the the next coming of Dawson. (Was it Todd Blackledge or something like that??)

Cutler=the next Marino???

Young=a cross between McNabb and Akali Smith???

Leinhart=Joe Montana or Archie Manning???

Who the hell knows until they do take that next step???

Mel or Mike???

F**k it, if you really NEED to know. Call Ms. Cleo. She'll tell you.

 
Warning: Cutler Apologetics Below

This will be my last shot at the long answer. When Jason describes high praise of Cutler as unfounded, I have to... defend. Hopefully the format below at least can dispell the "unfounded" notion. If not, then I can be insulting too. I would use "ignorant" to describe those who say the praise is unfounded. I think that's accurate. I understand few got to watch Jay play this year, which explains the ignorance to an understandable degree. I had to specifically order games, and follow the little ball on the screen and read ongoing game chats. I strenuously object to being described as one who makes unfounded opinions (even indirectly and especially on this topic). I try hard to be informed because I want to get this right. Sometimes I think about this and wonder if I shouldn't have just followed the herd, but it's when I think about it that I remember why I like Cutler better than Leinart. So... here's almost my unabridged answer.

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.
Maybe you're being shrewd and I'm being naive, but I think Mayock is sincere and not making a clever professional decision. There were some interesting games for film junkies last season. Mayock's late October love for Cutler coincided with several of ours at another site (where live blow by blow play by play of every college game was being discussed). It also coincided with some dicey performances by Leinart, but you had to watch the games (or read those forums to believe me). You cannot see this stuff in boxscores.

Leinart was bad in the first half against Oregon (sept. 24). The television analysts commented that the best QB on the field was Clemens. USC trailed 13-10 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

One week later (oct. 1) at Arizona State Leinart was very bad in the first half. The television analysts were saying the best QB on the field was Keller (and I agreed - it was obvious). USC trailed 21-3 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

Two weeks later everyone saw the ND game and interestingly that game launched Brady Quinn into the national spotlight with the common sentiment that he was better than Leinart that day, maybe just better. Quinn wasn't so great the rest of the year, but the comparison to Leinart still has him considered QB1 in his class (among other reasons, but this was his catalyst). I like Stanton better than Quinn myself, but we can do that next year this time. There was a theme here to those of us following USC every week. Leinart was not looking as impressive as opposing QBs. What the hey?

Leinart then had four consecutive impressive outings in the Pac 10. The stats piled up. I commented elsewhere that his questionable arm strength seemed vastly improved, and I figured he was recovered from the elbow surgery, which may have explained his poor early season play. Made sense. I was worried about his play and these 4 games seemed like a good sign. Though the Stanford coach commented that his QB (Trent Edwards) would post the same numbers as Leinart in that offense (interesting comment you hear all the time from pretty shrewd characters).

Then Leinart backslid finishing the regular season with two performances similar to the early ones. He wasn't effective against Fresno State. His boxscore doesn't look bad, but the throws were not impressive. Reggie went nuclear in that one and again the running game saved USC. After the game their was high praise for Pinegar who looked better than Leinart to many that day.

In the regular season finale against UCLA, there was a thread going here and the discussion was about how awful Leinart looked. It was a blowout, but Matt was way way off that day. He missed three easy TDs, and the ball was sailing early and often. No one suggested Olson was better though, because he was equally inept. Someone asked if Leinart always looked like this. I wasn't here to respond (read it later), but the correct answer is "not always, but a lot more than you would believe".

Leinart finally topped off this season of inexplicable play with a great performance (I thought) in the Rose Bowl-- the game everybody watched gave no one reason to question the guy. But, I watched them all (a few of them a few times), and I stand by this assessment. His reported accuracy is only applicable to the short game. He does not make tough throws into tight spaces. When he's been good, he's had ungodly protection and a choice of very talented wide open receivers. He's been bad much more than people know. And he really struggles with the deep ball. It's lobbed, it floats, it's not accurate, but sometimes a wide open reciever can track it down anyway.

During this same time period Cutler was also having an interesting season for film junkies like Mayock and the gambling crowd.

Someone here said he was horrible against LSU (oct 8). The boxscore sure looks that way, but this was the game that started the buzz. He managed a very difficult game with very smart play. He was knocked down something like 17 times, sacked five, etc. But he played smart and drove the Coms down the field late in the 3rd quarter and had two perfect TD passes dropped. Vandy would have led LSU late in a tough game if his receivers caught the ball. The 4th quarter was ugly, but not due to Cutler.

The next week at #5 Georgia was the game that started the hype. Cutler faced a fierce defense and picked it apart, but again was let down by his team.

Marlon White was running wide open toward the end zone, but Cutler's pass went through his hands so cleanly the ball bounced off his knee. Vandy instead settled for a 45-yard field goal by Bryant Hahnfeldt and pulled to 27-17 with 3:55 left in the third.

That was one of at least five dropped passes by the Commodores that had Johnson upset.

``I'm not saying we win the game if we catch some of those balls, but those plays prevent you from having a chance to win,'' Johnson said.
Cutler was 15-28 in the game, and I counted 7 drops, three that would have been scores. These weren't tough catches. They were nice throws. If he has a decent day from receivers he goes 22-28 and probably beats the #5 team in the country with a joke of a team. It was after this loss that people started talking about the Vandy QB as a candidate for SEC Player of the Year, an honor he later won. There's nothing unfounded about my opinion. He is the SEC Player of the Year. That is the toughest conference in the country. His team stunk. He rocked. It happens. Impressive isn't a strong enough superlative for how he played in this game. The next week against one of the best secondaries in the country, Ko Simpson Jonathan Joseph and the Gamecocks, Cutler was better than he was against Georgia. Joseph said Cutler had "an amazing arm". He picked them apart while avoiding pressure all day. It was almost his best game of the year. This is where I came to like him more than Leinart (who was undergoing the difficulties described above). This 87 yard drive to tie the game late in the 4th quarter was loaded with throws and decisions that translate very nicely to the NFL. Btw, a typical scouting report will praise Leinart for reading defenses. He's pretty good. Cutler is better. Watch this game. Amazingly quick reading and reacting. Very NFL-like. He had to learn to react quickly, correctly and accurately. Leinart rarely had that kind of pressure on him.

1st-10, VAN13    7:11  J. Cutler sacked by D. Coley

2nd-15, VAN8  6:30  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the left for 23 yard gain

1st-10, VAN31  6:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

2nd-10, VAN34  5:55  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the right for 16 yard gain

1st-10, 50  5:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR39  5:10  J. Cutler rushed up the middle for 16 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR26  5:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

2nd-10, SCAR26  4:55  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

3rd-10, SCAR26  4:54  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

4th-10, SCAR26  4:53  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR15  4:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning to the left for 6 yard gain

2nd-4, SCAR9  4:11  J. Cutler rushed to the left for 2 yard gain

3rd-2, SCAR7  4:00  C. Garrison rushed up the middle for 7 yard touchdown. B. Hahnfeldt made PAT
Then South Carolina marched down the field to win the game. Not Jay's fault. Not a chance in this world Leinart can make that drive under those circumstances. Next Jay and his Vandy of reknown headed to Gainesville, where Vandy typically gets blown out by fitty. Cutler took the game into overtime. It was an impressive performance:

The Gators seemingly had the game wrapped up with 4:11 to play when Markus Manson's 2-yard TD run made it 35-21.

Cutler, however, had other plans. He directed a 61-yard scoring drive in 1:54 and capped it with a 2-yard pass to George Smith with 2:17 to play.

Andrew Pace recovered the onside kick for Vandy, and Cutler went to work again. He sliced up Florida's secondary -- most of it against Lewis, who replaced injured starter Vernell Brown -- and found Earl Bennett wide open in the end zone for a 6-yard score with 54 seconds remaining.

Johnson was ready to go for a 2-point conversion, but a celebration penalty against Bennett forced the Commodores to kick the extra point. Johnson called the penalty ``stupid.''

The Gators managed to regroup in overtime.

``Jay Cutler is a big-time quarterback,'' (Urban) Meyer said. ``That's an NFL quarterback.''
I already knew that, but at this point I couldn't honestly claim I believed Leinart was in Cutler's league. There's just a huge difference in what they are capable of as individuals. So, when you say Cutler isn't in Leinart's league that's fine, but Leinart didn't play up to the opinion. Not this year. The next week at Kentucky people are annoyingly saying Cutler reminds them of Brett Favre. Meh, I hate that kind of talk. So, Kentucky just mugs Vandy and Cutler looks pretty bad. The score is 34-3 Kentucky when Cutler leads a decent drive before the half to cut it to 34-10. Cutler finished with 396 yards and five TD passes, almost making the comeback. It was impressive, and I admit on a few of the plays, he was very reminiscent of Favre. He can generate amazing heat with stunning accuracy. Catch it or get hurt by it. He bounced similar throws off of Hagan and Williams in the Senior Bowl. NFL receivers catch those balls. I have never seen Leinart play like that, but Palmer sure did as a senior. Still, not Jay's best performance because he played the first half like Leinart early in the season.

The game winning drive against Tennessee has been discussed enough, so I'll spare you, but they do show the final TD pass all the time. Watch it and tell me if it reminds you of someone. Then consider Cutler had taken a fierce beating up to that point.

Liking Cutler over Leinart is just an opinion. But it isn't at all unfounded. Quite the opposite. Anyone who wants to sit down and watch these games would have to at least agree there is considerable substance to the opinion. You have to watch Leinart and Cutler struggle. They did. Then watch them both play well. Cutler's struggles were far more understandable given his team. I don't know what was up with Leinart in those games but he was bad. Cutler's solid play was much more impressive. That's what I saw with my eyes. What should I do? Join the herd and pretend I didn't see what I know I saw? I can't do that.

Leinart has been loved by the media and the fans, but scouts have always had some pretty serious questions-- not all scouts, but several respected ones. Rob Rang rates Cutler higher. He's been around for a long time and been on a few NFL payrolls. Chris Landry disagrees with Rang. Both are entitled to opinions and anyone claiming either of these quality pro scouts makes unfounded decisions or doesn't know what he's talking about is being absurd. Leinart and Cutler bring different qualities to the table and it is a matter of what you prefer. Bloom loves the Brady he sees in Leinart. I see that too, and I can respect that hopeful opinion. I see the Palmer or Favre in Cutler. Those kinds of tools are there and they're not under the surface. You just have to watch the individual, not the team. I have a preference for strong armed QBs, but I'll admit it takes a lot more than a big arm to get the job done. I have seen a lot more in Cutler.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember.  If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:
I applaud the empassioned response :thumbup: I still maintain that Cutler isn't nor should be considered in Leinart's class, but kudos to you for taking the minority viewpoint under your wings with such fervor. :thumbup:

 
Mel was saying that if you loved Cutler back in December and you still love him he has no problem with that at all.

He does have a problem if you didn't love Cutler in December and all of a sudden fell in love with him after the senior bowl and combine because he feels like Cutler's senior bowl and combine were just ordinary
I actually agree with this viewpoint on players.
 
I didn't see the entire combine but I saw a fair number of the Cutler throws and I also saw the Senior Bowl.  Based on those 2 events alone, I can't see how anyone is in love with Cutler.

So, I guess I have to agree with Kiper(ouch).

Mayock's man love for the kid is borderline creepy.
That's just the point. You've seen the combine and the Senior Bowl. Mayock has seen EVERY SINGLE THROW the kid made this year. Leave the evaluation to the pros please...
Kiper's point was, if you were in love BEFORE these events, then you are still in love, if you weren't, these 2 events wouldn't cause that as they were ordinary.Leave your criticism for those who deserve it please.
I would have thought his point would be "Go by the player's entire body of work, not just 1 or 2 events."
 
2) :lmao: Kiper doesn't watch tape. He doesn't even know football very well. He has some contacts (college coaches) and he reads press clippings, and memorized players. That makes him a good source, but you'll never hear him being technical about a player's game (like Mayock). You'll never see Kiper breaking down tape on TV.
So a guy so clueless about college football and it;s players i s the primary spokesperson for the largest Sports information company in the world. Sure, this makes seems
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3) Almost ever year football fans talk up the "other" guy as the one with "real" potential, and Cutler is this year's version. Losman, Big Ben [they were right that time], Leftwich, Frye, etc...etc...
I thought the real talk up that year was Rivers. That's one reason why he got drafted where he did and Ben slid.
:goodposting: A few websites had Big Ben number one all year long. Rivers was a 2nd round prospect who shot up through the Senior Bowl and displaced where Big Ben should have been taken. Big Ben was always an elite prospect and I thank Philip Rivers and guys like Mayock everyday for the hype they gave him.
 
I've loved Cutler since I watched him play at a local high school. So I've got all you bandwagon jumpers beat.

For the record, I didn't think five years ago that I'd be listening to Jay be "overhyped" before the NFL Draft. At that time, I just hoped he'd get a shot to get drafted at all. Ken Dilger was a QB at the same high school, but got switched to TE in college. I figured Jay would need to make a position change to play on Sundays. Goes to show what I know.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Warning:  Cutler Apologetics Below

This will be my last shot at the long answer.  When Jason describes high praise of Cutler as unfounded, I have to... defend.  Hopefully the format below at least can dispell the "unfounded" notion.  If not, then I can be insulting too.  I would use "ignorant" to describe those who say the praise is unfounded.  I think that's accurate.  I understand few got to watch Jay play this year, which explains the ignorance to an understandable degree.  I had to specifically order games, and follow the little ball on the screen and read ongoing game chats.  I strenuously object to being described as one who makes unfounded opinions (even indirectly and especially on this topic).  I try hard to be informed because I want to get this right.  Sometimes I think about this and wonder if I shouldn't have just followed the herd, but it's when I think about it that I remember why I like Cutler better than Leinart.  So... here's almost my unabridged answer. 

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.
Maybe you're being shrewd and I'm being naive, but I think Mayock is sincere and not making a clever professional decision. There were some interesting games for film junkies last season. Mayock's late October love for Cutler coincided with several of ours at another site (where live blow by blow play by play of every college game was being discussed). It also coincided with some dicey performances by Leinart, but you had to watch the games (or read those forums to believe me). You cannot see this stuff in boxscores.

Leinart was bad in the first half against Oregon (sept. 24). The television analysts commented that the best QB on the field was Clemens. USC trailed 13-10 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

One week later (oct. 1) at Arizona State Leinart was very bad in the first half. The television analysts were saying the best QB on the field was Keller (and I agreed - it was obvious). USC trailed 21-3 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

Two weeks later everyone saw the ND game and interestingly that game launched Brady Quinn into the national spotlight with the common sentiment that he was better than Leinart that day, maybe just better. Quinn wasn't so great the rest of the year, but the comparison to Leinart still has him considered QB1 in his class (among other reasons, but this was his catalyst). I like Stanton better than Quinn myself, but we can do that next year this time. There was a theme here to those of us following USC every week. Leinart was not looking as impressive as opposing QBs. What the hey?

Leinart then had four consecutive impressive outings in the Pac 10. The stats piled up. I commented elsewhere that his questionable arm strength seemed vastly improved, and I figured he was recovered from the elbow surgery, which may have explained his poor early season play. Made sense. I was worried about his play and these 4 games seemed like a good sign. Though the Stanford coach commented that his QB (Trent Edwards) would post the same numbers as Leinart in that offense (interesting comment you hear all the time from pretty shrewd characters).

Then Leinart backslid finishing the regular season with two performances similar to the early ones. He wasn't effective against Fresno State. His boxscore doesn't look bad, but the throws were not impressive. Reggie went nuclear in that one and again the running game saved USC. After the game their was high praise for Pinegar who looked better than Leinart to many that day.

In the regular season finale against UCLA, there was a thread going here and the discussion was about how awful Leinart looked. It was a blowout, but Matt was way way off that day. He missed three easy TDs, and the ball was sailing early and often. No one suggested Olson was better though, because he was equally inept. Someone asked if Leinart always looked like this. I wasn't here to respond (read it later), but the correct answer is "not always, but a lot more than you would believe".

Leinart finally topped off this season of inexplicable play with a great performance (I thought) in the Rose Bowl-- the game everybody watched gave no one reason to question the guy. But, I watched them all (a few of them a few times), and I stand by this assessment. His reported accuracy is only applicable to the short game. He does not make tough throws into tight spaces. When he's been good, he's had ungodly protection and a choice of very talented wide open receivers. He's been bad much more than people know. And he really struggles with the deep ball. It's lobbed, it floats, it's not accurate, but sometimes a wide open reciever can track it down anyway.

During this same time period Cutler was also having an interesting season for film junkies like Mayock and the gambling crowd.

Someone here said he was horrible against LSU (oct 8). The boxscore sure looks that way, but this was the game that started the buzz. He managed a very difficult game with very smart play. He was knocked down something like 17 times, sacked five, etc. But he played smart and drove the Coms down the field late in the 3rd quarter and had two perfect TD passes dropped. Vandy would have led LSU late in a tough game if his receivers caught the ball. The 4th quarter was ugly, but not due to Cutler.

The next week at #5 Georgia was the game that started the hype. Cutler faced a fierce defense and picked it apart, but again was let down by his team.

Marlon White was running wide open toward the end zone, but Cutler's pass went through his hands so cleanly the ball bounced off his knee. Vandy instead settled for a 45-yard field goal by Bryant Hahnfeldt and pulled to 27-17 with 3:55 left in the third.

That was one of at least five dropped passes by the Commodores that had Johnson upset.

``I'm not saying we win the game if we catch some of those balls, but those plays prevent you from having a chance to win,'' Johnson said.
Cutler was 15-28 in the game, and I counted 7 drops, three that would have been scores. These weren't tough catches. They were nice throws. If he has a decent day from receivers he goes 22-28 and probably beats the #5 team in the country with a joke of a team. It was after this loss that people started talking about the Vandy QB as a candidate for SEC Player of the Year, an honor he later won. There's nothing unfounded about my opinion. He is the SEC Player of the Year. That is the toughest conference in the country. His team stunk. He rocked. It happens. Impressive isn't a strong enough superlative for how he played in this game. The next week against one of the best secondaries in the country, Ko Simpson Jonathan Joseph and the Gamecocks, Cutler was better than he was against Georgia. Joseph said Cutler had "an amazing arm". He picked them apart while avoiding pressure all day. It was almost his best game of the year. This is where I came to like him more than Leinart (who was undergoing the difficulties described above). This 87 yard drive to tie the game late in the 4th quarter was loaded with throws and decisions that translate very nicely to the NFL. Btw, a typical scouting report will praise Leinart for reading defenses. He's pretty good. Cutler is better. Watch this game. Amazingly quick reading and reacting. Very NFL-like. He had to learn to react quickly, correctly and accurately. Leinart rarely had that kind of pressure on him.

1st-10, VAN13    7:11   J. Cutler sacked by D. Coley

2nd-15, VAN8  6:30  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the left for 23 yard gain

1st-10, VAN31  6:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

2nd-10, VAN34  5:55  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the right for 16 yard gain

1st-10, 50  5:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR39  5:10  J. Cutler rushed up the middle for 16 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR26  5:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

2nd-10, SCAR26  4:55  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

3rd-10, SCAR26  4:54  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

4th-10, SCAR26  4:53  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR15  4:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning to the left for 6 yard gain

2nd-4, SCAR9  4:11  J. Cutler rushed to the left for 2 yard gain

3rd-2, SCAR7  4:00  C. Garrison rushed up the middle for 7 yard touchdown. B. Hahnfeldt made PAT
Then South Carolina marched down the field to win the game. Not Jay's fault. Not a chance in this world Leinart can make that drive under those circumstances. Next Jay and his Vandy of reknown headed to Gainesville, where Vandy typically gets blown out by fitty. Cutler took the game into overtime. It was an impressive performance:

The Gators seemingly had the game wrapped up with 4:11 to play when Markus Manson's 2-yard TD run made it 35-21.

Cutler, however, had other plans. He directed a 61-yard scoring drive in 1:54 and capped it with a 2-yard pass to George Smith with 2:17 to play.

Andrew Pace recovered the onside kick for Vandy, and Cutler went to work again. He sliced up Florida's secondary -- most of it against Lewis, who replaced injured starter Vernell Brown -- and found Earl Bennett wide open in the end zone for a 6-yard score with 54 seconds remaining.

Johnson was ready to go for a 2-point conversion, but a celebration penalty against Bennett forced the Commodores to kick the extra point. Johnson called the penalty ``stupid.''

The Gators managed to regroup in overtime.

``Jay Cutler is a big-time quarterback,'' (Urban) Meyer said. ``That's an NFL quarterback.''
I already knew that, but at this point I couldn't honestly claim I believed Leinart was in Cutler's league. There's just a huge difference in what they are capable of as individuals. So, when you say Cutler isn't in Leinart's league that's fine, but Leinart didn't play up to the opinion. Not this year. The next week at Kentucky people are annoyingly saying Cutler reminds them of Brett Favre. Meh, I hate that kind of talk. So, Kentucky just mugs Vandy and Cutler looks pretty bad. The score is 34-3 Kentucky when Cutler leads a decent drive before the half to cut it to 34-10. Cutler finished with 396 yards and five TD passes, almost making the comeback. It was impressive, and I admit on a few of the plays, he was very reminiscent of Favre. He can generate amazing heat with stunning accuracy. Catch it or get hurt by it. He bounced similar throws off of Hagan and Williams in the Senior Bowl. NFL receivers catch those balls. I have never seen Leinart play like that, but Palmer sure did as a senior. Still, not Jay's best performance because he played the first half like Leinart early in the season.

The game winning drive against Tennessee has been discussed enough, so I'll spare you, but they do show the final TD pass all the time. Watch it and tell me if it reminds you of someone. Then consider Cutler had taken a fierce beating up to that point.

Liking Cutler over Leinart is just an opinion. But it isn't at all unfounded. Quite the opposite. Anyone who wants to sit down and watch these games would have to at least agree there is considerable substance to the opinion. You have to watch Leinart and Cutler struggle. They did. Then watch them both play well. Cutler's struggles were far more understandable given his team. I don't know what was up with Leinart in those games but he was bad. Cutler's solid play was much more impressive. That's what I saw with my eyes. What should I do? Join the herd and pretend I didn't see what I know I saw? I can't do that.

Leinart has been loved by the media and the fans, but scouts have always had some pretty serious questions-- not all scouts, but several respected ones. Rob Rang rates Cutler higher. He's been around for a long time and been on a few NFL payrolls. Chris Landry disagrees with Rang. Both are entitled to opinions and anyone claiming either of these quality pro scouts makes unfounded decisions or doesn't know what he's talking about is being absurd. Leinart and Cutler bring different qualities to the table and it is a matter of what you prefer. Bloom loves the Brady he sees in Leinart. I see that too, and I can respect that hopeful opinion. I see the Palmer or Favre in Cutler. Those kinds of tools are there and they're not under the surface. You just have to watch the individual, not the team. I have a preference for strong armed QBs, but I'll admit it takes a lot more than a big arm to get the job done. I have seen a lot more in Cutler.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember.  If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:
I applaud the empassioned response :thumbup: I still maintain that Cutler isn't nor should be considered in Leinart's class, but kudos to you for taking the minority viewpoint under your wings with such fervor. :thumbup:
You bring up some really great points and I really want to get a second look at Cutler now.
 
Warning: Cutler Apologetics Below

This will be my last shot at the long answer. When Jason describes high praise of Cutler as unfounded, I have to... defend. Hopefully the format below at least can dispell the "unfounded" notion. If not, then I can be insulting too. I would use "ignorant" to describe those who say the praise is unfounded. I think that's accurate. I understand few got to watch Jay play this year, which explains the ignorance to an understandable degree. I had to specifically order games, and follow the little ball on the screen and read ongoing game chats. I strenuously object to being described as one who makes unfounded opinions (even indirectly and especially on this topic). I try hard to be informed because I want to get this right. Sometimes I think about this and wonder if I shouldn't have just followed the herd, but it's when I think about it that I remember why I like Cutler better than Leinart. So... here's almost my unabridged answer.

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.
Maybe you're being shrewd and I'm being naive, but I think Mayock is sincere and not making a clever professional decision. There were some interesting games for film junkies last season. Mayock's late October love for Cutler coincided with several of ours at another site (where live blow by blow play by play of every college game was being discussed). It also coincided with some dicey performances by Leinart, but you had to watch the games (or read those forums to believe me). You cannot see this stuff in boxscores.

Leinart was bad in the first half against Oregon (sept. 24). The television analysts commented that the best QB on the field was Clemens. USC trailed 13-10 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

One week later (oct. 1) at Arizona State Leinart was very bad in the first half. The television analysts were saying the best QB on the field was Keller (and I agreed - it was obvious). USC trailed 21-3 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

Two weeks later everyone saw the ND game and interestingly that game launched Brady Quinn into the national spotlight with the common sentiment that he was better than Leinart that day, maybe just better. Quinn wasn't so great the rest of the year, but the comparison to Leinart still has him considered QB1 in his class (among other reasons, but this was his catalyst). I like Stanton better than Quinn myself, but we can do that next year this time. There was a theme here to those of us following USC every week. Leinart was not looking as impressive as opposing QBs. What the hey?

Leinart then had four consecutive impressive outings in the Pac 10. The stats piled up. I commented elsewhere that his questionable arm strength seemed vastly improved, and I figured he was recovered from the elbow surgery, which may have explained his poor early season play. Made sense. I was worried about his play and these 4 games seemed like a good sign. Though the Stanford coach commented that his QB (Trent Edwards) would post the same numbers as Leinart in that offense (interesting comment you hear all the time from pretty shrewd characters).

Then Leinart backslid finishing the regular season with two performances similar to the early ones. He wasn't effective against Fresno State. His boxscore doesn't look bad, but the throws were not impressive. Reggie went nuclear in that one and again the running game saved USC. After the game their was high praise for Pinegar who looked better than Leinart to many that day.

In the regular season finale against UCLA, there was a thread going here and the discussion was about how awful Leinart looked. It was a blowout, but Matt was way way off that day. He missed three easy TDs, and the ball was sailing early and often. No one suggested Olson was better though, because he was equally inept. Someone asked if Leinart always looked like this. I wasn't here to respond (read it later), but the correct answer is "not always, but a lot more than you would believe".

Leinart finally topped off this season of inexplicable play with a great performance (I thought) in the Rose Bowl-- the game everybody watched gave no one reason to question the guy. But, I watched them all (a few of them a few times), and I stand by this assessment. His reported accuracy is only applicable to the short game. He does not make tough throws into tight spaces. When he's been good, he's had ungodly protection and a choice of very talented wide open receivers. He's been bad much more than people know. And he really struggles with the deep ball. It's lobbed, it floats, it's not accurate, but sometimes a wide open reciever can track it down anyway.

During this same time period Cutler was also having an interesting season for film junkies like Mayock and the gambling crowd.

Someone here said he was horrible against LSU (oct 8). The boxscore sure looks that way, but this was the game that started the buzz. He managed a very difficult game with very smart play. He was knocked down something like 17 times, sacked five, etc. But he played smart and drove the Coms down the field late in the 3rd quarter and had two perfect TD passes dropped. Vandy would have led LSU late in a tough game if his receivers caught the ball. The 4th quarter was ugly, but not due to Cutler.

The next week at #5 Georgia was the game that started the hype. Cutler faced a fierce defense and picked it apart, but again was let down by his team.

Marlon White was running wide open toward the end zone, but Cutler's pass went through his hands so cleanly the ball bounced off his knee. Vandy instead settled for a 45-yard field goal by Bryant Hahnfeldt and pulled to 27-17 with 3:55 left in the third.

That was one of at least five dropped passes by the Commodores that had Johnson upset.

``I'm not saying we win the game if we catch some of those balls, but those plays prevent you from having a chance to win,'' Johnson said.
Cutler was 15-28 in the game, and I counted 7 drops, three that would have been scores. These weren't tough catches. They were nice throws. If he has a decent day from receivers he goes 22-28 and probably beats the #5 team in the country with a joke of a team. It was after this loss that people started talking about the Vandy QB as a candidate for SEC Player of the Year, an honor he later won. There's nothing unfounded about my opinion. He is the SEC Player of the Year. That is the toughest conference in the country. His team stunk. He rocked. It happens. Impressive isn't a strong enough superlative for how he played in this game. The next week against one of the best secondaries in the country, Ko Simpson Jonathan Joseph and the Gamecocks, Cutler was better than he was against Georgia. Joseph said Cutler had "an amazing arm". He picked them apart while avoiding pressure all day. It was almost his best game of the year. This is where I came to like him more than Leinart (who was undergoing the difficulties described above). This 87 yard drive to tie the game late in the 4th quarter was loaded with throws and decisions that translate very nicely to the NFL. Btw, a typical scouting report will praise Leinart for reading defenses. He's pretty good. Cutler is better. Watch this game. Amazingly quick reading and reacting. Very NFL-like. He had to learn to react quickly, correctly and accurately. Leinart rarely had that kind of pressure on him.

1st-10, VAN13    7:11  J. Cutler sacked by D. Coley

2nd-15, VAN8  6:30  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the left for 23 yard gain

1st-10, VAN31  6:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

2nd-10, VAN34  5:55  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the right for 16 yard gain

1st-10, 50  5:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR39  5:10  J. Cutler rushed up the middle for 16 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR26  5:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

2nd-10, SCAR26  4:55  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

3rd-10, SCAR26  4:54  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

4th-10, SCAR26  4:53  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR15  4:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning to the left for 6 yard gain

2nd-4, SCAR9  4:11  J. Cutler rushed to the left for 2 yard gain

3rd-2, SCAR7  4:00  C. Garrison rushed up the middle for 7 yard touchdown. B. Hahnfeldt made PAT
Then South Carolina marched down the field to win the game. Not Jay's fault. Not a chance in this world Leinart can make that drive under those circumstances. Next Jay and his Vandy of reknown headed to Gainesville, where Vandy typically gets blown out by fitty. Cutler took the game into overtime. It was an impressive performance:

The Gators seemingly had the game wrapped up with 4:11 to play when Markus Manson's 2-yard TD run made it 35-21.

Cutler, however, had other plans. He directed a 61-yard scoring drive in 1:54 and capped it with a 2-yard pass to George Smith with 2:17 to play.

Andrew Pace recovered the onside kick for Vandy, and Cutler went to work again. He sliced up Florida's secondary -- most of it against Lewis, who replaced injured starter Vernell Brown -- and found Earl Bennett wide open in the end zone for a 6-yard score with 54 seconds remaining.

Johnson was ready to go for a 2-point conversion, but a celebration penalty against Bennett forced the Commodores to kick the extra point. Johnson called the penalty ``stupid.''

The Gators managed to regroup in overtime.

``Jay Cutler is a big-time quarterback,'' (Urban) Meyer said. ``That's an NFL quarterback.''
I already knew that, but at this point I couldn't honestly claim I believed Leinart was in Cutler's league. There's just a huge difference in what they are capable of as individuals. So, when you say Cutler isn't in Leinart's league that's fine, but Leinart didn't play up to the opinion. Not this year. The next week at Kentucky people are annoyingly saying Cutler reminds them of Brett Favre. Meh, I hate that kind of talk. So, Kentucky just mugs Vandy and Cutler looks pretty bad. The score is 34-3 Kentucky when Cutler leads a decent drive before the half to cut it to 34-10. Cutler finished with 396 yards and five TD passes, almost making the comeback. It was impressive, and I admit on a few of the plays, he was very reminiscent of Favre. He can generate amazing heat with stunning accuracy. Catch it or get hurt by it. He bounced similar throws off of Hagan and Williams in the Senior Bowl. NFL receivers catch those balls. I have never seen Leinart play like that, but Palmer sure did as a senior. Still, not Jay's best performance because he played the first half like Leinart early in the season.

The game winning drive against Tennessee has been discussed enough, so I'll spare you, but they do show the final TD pass all the time. Watch it and tell me if it reminds you of someone. Then consider Cutler had taken a fierce beating up to that point.

Liking Cutler over Leinart is just an opinion. But it isn't at all unfounded. Quite the opposite. Anyone who wants to sit down and watch these games would have to at least agree there is considerable substance to the opinion. You have to watch Leinart and Cutler struggle. They did. Then watch them both play well. Cutler's struggles were far more understandable given his team. I don't know what was up with Leinart in those games but he was bad. Cutler's solid play was much more impressive. That's what I saw with my eyes. What should I do? Join the herd and pretend I didn't see what I know I saw? I can't do that.

Leinart has been loved by the media and the fans, but scouts have always had some pretty serious questions-- not all scouts, but several respected ones. Rob Rang rates Cutler higher. He's been around for a long time and been on a few NFL payrolls. Chris Landry disagrees with Rang. Both are entitled to opinions and anyone claiming either of these quality pro scouts makes unfounded decisions or doesn't know what he's talking about is being absurd. Leinart and Cutler bring different qualities to the table and it is a matter of what you prefer. Bloom loves the Brady he sees in Leinart. I see that too, and I can respect that hopeful opinion. I see the Palmer or Favre in Cutler. Those kinds of tools are there and they're not under the surface. You just have to watch the individual, not the team. I have a preference for strong armed QBs, but I'll admit it takes a lot more than a big arm to get the job done. I have seen a lot more in Cutler.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember.  If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:
Nice post.RESPECT :thumbup:

 
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?

He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:
Hi CC,Yes, I meant to say Mayock there. What he'll say is something like "I had Leinart and Young up there too" is what I should have said. Bigger picture is he won't have a hard time if Leinart and Young do well.

It's really a pretty smart position for the new guy to take.

J

 
Warning: Cutler Apologetics Below

This will be my last shot at the long answer. When Jason describes high praise of Cutler as unfounded, I have to... defend. Hopefully the format below at least can dispell the "unfounded" notion. If not, then I can be insulting too. I would use "ignorant" to describe those who say the praise is unfounded. I think that's accurate. I understand few got to watch Jay play this year, which explains the ignorance to an understandable degree. I had to specifically order games, and follow the little ball on the screen and read ongoing game chats. I strenuously object to being described as one who makes unfounded opinions (even indirectly and especially on this topic). I try hard to be informed because I want to get this right. Sometimes I think about this and wonder if I shouldn't have just followed the herd, but it's when I think about it that I remember why I like Cutler better than Leinart. So... here's almost my unabridged answer.

#2. Mayock I'm sure really likes Cutler but it seems to me he's chosen Cutler as his guy to hitch his wagon to. It's a pretty smart pick. He doesn't have to worry about Cutler being taken before Young or Leinart. Which means he'll likely go to a better team. And means he's got a fair shot to have success first.
Maybe you're being shrewd and I'm being naive, but I think Mayock is sincere and not making a clever professional decision. There were some interesting games for film junkies last season. Mayock's late October love for Cutler coincided with several of ours at another site (where live blow by blow play by play of every college game was being discussed). It also coincided with some dicey performances by Leinart, but you had to watch the games (or read those forums to believe me). You cannot see this stuff in boxscores.

Leinart was bad in the first half against Oregon (sept. 24). The television analysts commented that the best QB on the field was Clemens. USC trailed 13-10 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

One week later (oct. 1) at Arizona State Leinart was very bad in the first half. The television analysts were saying the best QB on the field was Keller (and I agreed - it was obvious). USC trailed 21-3 and just shoved the running game down their throats in the second half.

Two weeks later everyone saw the ND game and interestingly that game launched Brady Quinn into the national spotlight with the common sentiment that he was better than Leinart that day, maybe just better. Quinn wasn't so great the rest of the year, but the comparison to Leinart still has him considered QB1 in his class (among other reasons, but this was his catalyst). I like Stanton better than Quinn myself, but we can do that next year this time. There was a theme here to those of us following USC every week. Leinart was not looking as impressive as opposing QBs. What the hey?

Leinart then had four consecutive impressive outings in the Pac 10. The stats piled up. I commented elsewhere that his questionable arm strength seemed vastly improved, and I figured he was recovered from the elbow surgery, which may have explained his poor early season play. Made sense. I was worried about his play and these 4 games seemed like a good sign. Though the Stanford coach commented that his QB (Trent Edwards) would post the same numbers as Leinart in that offense (interesting comment you hear all the time from pretty shrewd characters).

Then Leinart backslid finishing the regular season with two performances similar to the early ones. He wasn't effective against Fresno State. His boxscore doesn't look bad, but the throws were not impressive. Reggie went nuclear in that one and again the running game saved USC. After the game their was high praise for Pinegar who looked better than Leinart to many that day.

In the regular season finale against UCLA, there was a thread going here and the discussion was about how awful Leinart looked. It was a blowout, but Matt was way way off that day. He missed three easy TDs, and the ball was sailing early and often. No one suggested Olson was better though, because he was equally inept. Someone asked if Leinart always looked like this. I wasn't here to respond (read it later), but the correct answer is "not always, but a lot more than you would believe".

Leinart finally topped off this season of inexplicable play with a great performance (I thought) in the Rose Bowl-- the game everybody watched gave no one reason to question the guy. But, I watched them all (a few of them a few times), and I stand by this assessment. His reported accuracy is only applicable to the short game. He does not make tough throws into tight spaces. When he's been good, he's had ungodly protection and a choice of very talented wide open receivers. He's been bad much more than people know. And he really struggles with the deep ball. It's lobbed, it floats, it's not accurate, but sometimes a wide open reciever can track it down anyway.

During this same time period Cutler was also having an interesting season for film junkies like Mayock and the gambling crowd.

Someone here said he was horrible against LSU (oct 8). The boxscore sure looks that way, but this was the game that started the buzz. He managed a very difficult game with very smart play. He was knocked down something like 17 times, sacked five, etc. But he played smart and drove the Coms down the field late in the 3rd quarter and had two perfect TD passes dropped. Vandy would have led LSU late in a tough game if his receivers caught the ball. The 4th quarter was ugly, but not due to Cutler.

The next week at #5 Georgia was the game that started the hype. Cutler faced a fierce defense and picked it apart, but again was let down by his team.

Marlon White was running wide open toward the end zone, but Cutler's pass went through his hands so cleanly the ball bounced off his knee. Vandy instead settled for a 45-yard field goal by Bryant Hahnfeldt and pulled to 27-17 with 3:55 left in the third.

That was one of at least five dropped passes by the Commodores that had Johnson upset.

``I'm not saying we win the game if we catch some of those balls, but those plays prevent you from having a chance to win,'' Johnson said.
Cutler was 15-28 in the game, and I counted 7 drops, three that would have been scores. These weren't tough catches. They were nice throws. If he has a decent day from receivers he goes 22-28 and probably beats the #5 team in the country with a joke of a team. It was after this loss that people started talking about the Vandy QB as a candidate for SEC Player of the Year, an honor he later won. There's nothing unfounded about my opinion. He is the SEC Player of the Year. That is the toughest conference in the country. His team stunk. He rocked. It happens. Impressive isn't a strong enough superlative for how he played in this game. The next week against one of the best secondaries in the country, Ko Simpson Jonathan Joseph and the Gamecocks, Cutler was better than he was against Georgia. Joseph said Cutler had "an amazing arm". He picked them apart while avoiding pressure all day. It was almost his best game of the year. This is where I came to like him more than Leinart (who was undergoing the difficulties described above). This 87 yard drive to tie the game late in the 4th quarter was loaded with throws and decisions that translate very nicely to the NFL. Btw, a typical scouting report will praise Leinart for reading defenses. He's pretty good. Cutler is better. Watch this game. Amazingly quick reading and reacting. Very NFL-like. He had to learn to react quickly, correctly and accurately. Leinart rarely had that kind of pressure on him.

1st-10, VAN13    7:11  J. Cutler sacked by D. Coley

2nd-15, VAN8  6:30  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the left for 23 yard gain

1st-10, VAN31  6:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

2nd-10, VAN34  5:55  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett to the right for 16 yard gain

1st-10, 50  5:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR39  5:10  J. Cutler rushed up the middle for 16 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR26  5:00  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

2nd-10, SCAR26  4:55  J. Cutler incomplete pass down the middle

3rd-10, SCAR26  4:54  J. Cutler incomplete pass to the right

4th-10, SCAR26  4:53  J. Cutler passed to E. Bennett down the middle for 11 yard gain

1st-10, SCAR15  4:30  J. Cutler passed to D. Dunning to the left for 6 yard gain

2nd-4, SCAR9  4:11  J. Cutler rushed to the left for 2 yard gain

3rd-2, SCAR7  4:00  C. Garrison rushed up the middle for 7 yard touchdown. B. Hahnfeldt made PAT
Then South Carolina marched down the field to win the game. Not Jay's fault. Not a chance in this world Leinart can make that drive under those circumstances. Next Jay and his Vandy of reknown headed to Gainesville, where Vandy typically gets blown out by fitty. Cutler took the game into overtime. It was an impressive performance:

The Gators seemingly had the game wrapped up with 4:11 to play when Markus Manson's 2-yard TD run made it 35-21.

Cutler, however, had other plans. He directed a 61-yard scoring drive in 1:54 and capped it with a 2-yard pass to George Smith with 2:17 to play.

Andrew Pace recovered the onside kick for Vandy, and Cutler went to work again. He sliced up Florida's secondary -- most of it against Lewis, who replaced injured starter Vernell Brown -- and found Earl Bennett wide open in the end zone for a 6-yard score with 54 seconds remaining.

Johnson was ready to go for a 2-point conversion, but a celebration penalty against Bennett forced the Commodores to kick the extra point. Johnson called the penalty ``stupid.''

The Gators managed to regroup in overtime.

``Jay Cutler is a big-time quarterback,'' (Urban) Meyer said. ``That's an NFL quarterback.''
I already knew that, but at this point I couldn't honestly claim I believed Leinart was in Cutler's league. There's just a huge difference in what they are capable of as individuals. So, when you say Cutler isn't in Leinart's league that's fine, but Leinart didn't play up to the opinion. Not this year. The next week at Kentucky people are annoyingly saying Cutler reminds them of Brett Favre. Meh, I hate that kind of talk. So, Kentucky just mugs Vandy and Cutler looks pretty bad. The score is 34-3 Kentucky when Cutler leads a decent drive before the half to cut it to 34-10. Cutler finished with 396 yards and five TD passes, almost making the comeback. It was impressive, and I admit on a few of the plays, he was very reminiscent of Favre. He can generate amazing heat with stunning accuracy. Catch it or get hurt by it. He bounced similar throws off of Hagan and Williams in the Senior Bowl. NFL receivers catch those balls. I have never seen Leinart play like that, but Palmer sure did as a senior. Still, not Jay's best performance because he played the first half like Leinart early in the season.

The game winning drive against Tennessee has been discussed enough, so I'll spare you, but they do show the final TD pass all the time. Watch it and tell me if it reminds you of someone. Then consider Cutler had taken a fierce beating up to that point.

Liking Cutler over Leinart is just an opinion. But it isn't at all unfounded. Quite the opposite. Anyone who wants to sit down and watch these games would have to at least agree there is considerable substance to the opinion. You have to watch Leinart and Cutler struggle. They did. Then watch them both play well. Cutler's struggles were far more understandable given his team. I don't know what was up with Leinart in those games but he was bad. Cutler's solid play was much more impressive. That's what I saw with my eyes. What should I do? Join the herd and pretend I didn't see what I know I saw? I can't do that.

Leinart has been loved by the media and the fans, but scouts have always had some pretty serious questions-- not all scouts, but several respected ones. Rob Rang rates Cutler higher. He's been around for a long time and been on a few NFL payrolls. Chris Landry disagrees with Rang. Both are entitled to opinions and anyone claiming either of these quality pro scouts makes unfounded decisions or doesn't know what he's talking about is being absurd. Leinart and Cutler bring different qualities to the table and it is a matter of what you prefer. Bloom loves the Brady he sees in Leinart. I see that too, and I can respect that hopeful opinion. I see the Palmer or Favre in Cutler. Those kinds of tools are there and they're not under the surface. You just have to watch the individual, not the team. I have a preference for strong armed QBs, but I'll admit it takes a lot more than a big arm to get the job done. I have seen a lot more in Cutler.

Next year if Cutler becomes the 2004 version of Roethlisberger, he'll look pretty smart. If he doesn't play or play well, more will forget than remember.  If Leinart or Young play great, Leinart can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2.
I think you meant to say "Mayock (not Leinart) can say sure, I had them on my board at #1 and #2. Right?He has Leinart and Young at #2 and #3. He actually is saying Cutler will be drafted first. I'm guilty of having the out that you're saying Mayock has. I like Cutler better than Leinart but expect Leinart to be drafted first. So, I can always backtrack and say sure I had Leinart ahead of Cutler (but I won't do that). I think it will take awhile, but I'm saying Cutler will be the better NFL QB, regardless of draft position. Mayock is saying he will be the first QB drafted. Maybe he knows what I have speculated about Sean Payton? Leinart has the wrong skillset for Payton's offense. :dunno:
Hi CC,Good post. That's the great thing about the draft, you can make pick your guys and make your case.

Good thoughts.

J

 
"

why would he want to throw to Vandy players at his pro day?"
actually they had a pretty good reciever down there this year. earl bennett, he led the team with about 900 yds and 9 tds, he is also a freshman.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top