What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Am I the only one? The Broncos stole Orton... (1 Viewer)

TheDirtyWord

Footballguy
I know there is alot of excitement in Bears country about the deal. On the surface, the Bears landed themselves the franchise QB they've been looking for generations to plug in behind center.

I only got to see Kyle Orton play once last year (against the Falcons). But that QB I saw was pretty good. In fact, prior to him badly spraining his ankle...he appeared to be having a breakthrough season of sorts.

I want to evaluate both QB's as fairly as possible.

Orton was a 4th round draft choice who was forced into action his rookie season because the Bears QB situation after Rex Grossman got injured dicated that he play. While he wasn't very good individually, the Bears went 10-5 with him under center. His stats were ugly, but again - he was a 4th round rookie. It's a little unfair to expect much more out of a kid put in his position. The next year, the job was handed to Grossman and he took them the SB. Orton didn't make a fuss...he simply continued to do what the team asked of him as a back-up and then last year he got his chance.

For his first 7.5 games before getting injured, Orton performed more than respectably.

61.9% Completion Rate

7.28 YPA

10 TD’s (4.10% TD rate)

4 INT’s (1.64% INT rate)

…when Orton came back faster than originally expected, he wasn’t the same player and performed at a noticeably lower level. So in fairness, there is doubt as to who Orton still is as an NFL QB. But Orton was certainly on an upward trend and had clearly developed since his pedestrian rookie season. It’s worth noting that his #1 WR was Devin Hester.

As for Cutler, there is no doubt that from a physical standpoint – Cutler is a stud. His arm has few peers and he’s got a prototype build. His big stat last year was his 4526 passing yards which solidified him as a young franchise QB.

But also take into account that Cutler had a:

62.3% Completion Rate

7.35 YPA

25 TD’s (4.06 TD rate)

18 INT’s (2.92 INT rate)

(…and his WR’s were Brandon Marshall, Eddie Royal and Brandon Stokely not to mention his HC, Mike Shanahan is considered one of the greatest NFL offensive minds over the last 20 years.)

These stats look remarkably similar to what Orton put up. And Orton did this in his 2nd season as a starter. Cutler put his line together with about 2.5 years. Not a big difference, but Cutler was anointed and Orton had to wait and bide his time.

Not to mention that we got a glimpse of Jay Cutler’s make-up during this entire ordeal which didn’t paint him in the greatest of lights and certainly showed that he could use thicker skin. He’ll need it in Chicago as he won’t get to deal with fun lovin’ crazu nut jobs like Woody Paige but rather slimy sharks like Jay Mariotti. Cutler has to work out immediately if you ask me because a slow start is going to bring a lot of second guessing.

Chicago has been homes to legends like Jordan, Payton, Butkus, Sandberg, Banks and Ditka. They take their sports heroes seriously and Cutler will probably, given the magnitude of this trade, be put on a pedestal he probably hasn’t earned yet. Orton with his neck beard and 4th round pedigree simply never was able to endear himself to the masses in Chicago as a potential long term solution for their never ending QB woes. Perhaps the outlook at this position after Sexy Rexy was more of the doom and gloom variety than giving Orton an honest look. What happens if Cutler shows off his turnover prone side as much as his prolific side? Chicago doesn’t exactly turn its attention away from big ticket underperformers. They may not be at New York’s level, but they certainly more intense than Denver.

I’m not saying Cutler isn’t better than Orton. At this point he is, and his upside is higher. But he’s not an elite QB at this point for sure. Would you rather have Matt Ryan or Jay Cutler? And Matt Ryan has some significant development to go. And now when you factor in that the Bears won’t pick in the first round without trading back into the first round until 2011…that was a steep price to pay. To me, this seems like the move of a front office and coaching staff that's putting their chips all in because the modus aperandi is starting to get stale and the natives are getting restless. For the Broncos, they potentially have a guy who is a long term solution at a lower cost and could develop Cassel-like under McDaniels’ tutelage.

To me, everyone is talking about the Bears side of the equation here, but I really think the Broncos did incredibly well in this deal - better than the Bears. In fact, I’d be shocked if they drafted Sanchez even if he were there at #12.

 
I agree.

My #1 concern with Orton's value is his contract. He's a UFA at season's end. If Orton does great in '09, he'll cost the Broncos some nice $$$. If he bombs as Cutler's replacement, everybody will crucify Denver's management. In an odd way, it's a lose-lose situation for Denver in '10.

 
Bears fans have no respect for taking a 7 game period and saying "hey look at what this kid can do".

Look back to Grossman's first 6 games in 06...

Orton is a solid QB who will limit turnovers and handle the game well. He just can not make all the throws needed to be a star in this league.

Orton is not a slinger, if Den doesn't improve that D, the Broncos are in serious trouble

 
I am very intrigued to see what Orton can do in Denver. In Chicago, we are talking about a franchise who's most prolific passer stopped playing about 60 years ago and very rarely has any thing resembling a prolific offense. When your best WR is still learning the postion, it's probably hard to look like a great QB.

I think it's impossible to say what Orton could do playing for an offensive oriented team with some great offensive weapons at his disposal.

By the same token, it'll also be interesting how Cutler does playing for a team that makes every QB look pretty average. Not that the others had Cutler's talent, but Chicago's style and mentality doesn't lend towards 4500 yard seasons.

 
Bears homer here.

At first I was hooting and hollering "YEAH! WE GOT CUTLER! WHO CARES WHAT WE GAVE UP." ...but breaking it down I began thinking the very thoughts you've got posted here.

 
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.

 
I will say with all the potential suitors out there it is interesting that the Broncos chose to go with Orton and the Bears offer. You know they picked that deal over at least the oppertunity to get Campbell - I wonder who else?

I certainly don't see it as being a slam dunk deal for the Bear - I think the Broncos made out quite nicely. I can see Orton running the McDaniels O like Cassel did last year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Marshall/Royal owner, I got no problem with this. They could have done a lot worse and it's not like Chicago has a clue how to play offense anyway. I do like that my backup TE Olsen has Cutler feeding him the ball.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
 
I haven't seen Orton much, but looking at the numbers . . .

In 33 games starts, he's had 250 passing yards 4 times (including 3 against bottom 10 passing teams). There are probably reasons above and beyond just Orton for that, but he's had more games with pedestrian numbers than top tier ones.

That could certainly all change going to Denver where they should be more passing oriented with a better receiving corps. It's very possible that Orton's numbers in Denver will be closer to Cutler's numbers in Denver and Cutler's numbers in Chicago could be closer to Orton's numbers in Chicago.

 
I think Denver ripped the Bears here. But not because of Orton. He's serviceable but not great. Another Brian Griese if you will. But I don't think Chicago is much better with Cutler minus the picks and Orton. I guess it would have depended on who they were able to draft with those picks. We won't know how that might have turned out for some time.

 
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.
NOT a chance he puts up those Numbers. Orton can't throw the ball downfield. Avg 237.5 yds a game for 3800? NO WAY. The bears gave up the 18th pick and next years 1st rounder which should be around the same pick, maybe a little later. A 3rd and kyle oront. The got a franchise QB that is 25yrs old. Great deal for the bears. Any bears fan that thinks otherwise is crazy.The broncos also did well because they had to trade him and got a lot for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a lot more to the game than stats. Orton has performed admirably for exactly half a season in his entire career.

If the Denver defense plays as badly this year as it did the last two years there's no way they sniff a .500 record with Orton as their starter.

 
But he’s (Cutler) not an elite QB at this point for sure.
I disagree, and I think many others would as well.On the other hand, if you say Kyle Orton is not an elite QB no one will disagree.
Would you rather have Matt Ryan or Jay Cutler?
Jay Cutler. And while I know that if you ran a poll most people would probably say Matt Ryan, there are still many that would say Jay Cutler.On the other hand, ask that question about Matt Ryan vs. Kyle Orton and be prepared to get laughed off the planet.
 
I am very intrigued to see what Orton can do in Denver. In Chicago, we are talking about a franchise who's most prolific passer stopped playing about 60 years ago and very rarely has any thing resembling a prolific offense. When your best WR is still learning the postion, it's probably hard to look like a great QB.I think it's impossible to say what Orton could do playing for an offensive oriented team with some great offensive weapons at his disposal. By the same token, it'll also be interesting how Cutler does playing for a team that makes every QB look pretty average. Not that the others had Cutler's talent, but Chicago's style and mentality doesn't lend towards 4500 yard seasons.
:banned: I am curious as to how Cutler will react to having far less talented pass catchers. Is he gonna flip out if Hester or Bennett run the wrong route leading to a pick? Marshall and Royal are both way better receivers than anything Chicago has had in the last decade or more. That doesn't even account for the difference in offensive systems. I have a hard time seeing Cutler putting up top 10 QB numbers in 2009.
 
Folks, I disagree. the Bears did great here. they can pickup free agents that are proven for the money they will save on their first rounders and they got a clear top 10 QB with top 3 potential.

 
As a Marshall/Royal owner, I got no problem with this. They could have done a lot worse and it's not like Chicago has a clue how to play offense anyway. I do like that my backup TE Olsen has Cutler feeding him the ball.
I have to disagree. As a Marshall owner this is bad news. I am not happy. Orton is a career backup masquerading as a starting QB. People who are downplaying Cutler's ability are way off base. As a Vikings fan, I am disappointed too. The Bear's have just solidified a position that they haven't been very good at since the 1980s and Jim McMahon and the player they got is young enough that he will be a pain in the neck for the next ten years. Two first round picks and a backup QB? Who knows if ANY of those players will be any good?
 
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.
NOT a chance he puts up those Numbers. Orton can't throw the ball downfield. Avg 237.5 yds a game for 3800? NO WAY. The bears gave up the 18th pick and next years 1st rounder which should be around the same pick, maybe a little later. A 3rd and kyle oront. The got a franchise QB that is 25yrs old. Great deal for the bears. Any bears fan that thinks otherwise is crazy.The broncos also did well because they had to trade him and got a lot for him.
I strongly disagree about not being able to throw downfield. Did you see him play last year? Now I don't know for sure how well he throws the deep ball, but in the couple times I saw him pre-injury last year I specifically remember being impressed by the zip he had on some 25-30 yard outs. They were timing routes with small windows and he hung in the pocket and delivered them on a rope accurately.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What will people say if Orton has better FF numbers than Cutler next season? :clap: That's a very real possibility, IMO.
And it will be interesting to see what Marshall and Royal put up with Orton flinging it. Bears had a guy in Earl Bennett who didn't even sniff the field on a team with stiffs at WR. Even a WR like Bradley who was a 4-5 WR on the Bears looked like a solid #2 in KC. Who knows, maybe guys like Hester and Bennett will break out with a guy like Cutler, it certainly can't hurt since the WR position wasn't working with Orton.
 
I am very intrigued to see what Orton can do in Denver. In Chicago, we are talking about a franchise who's most prolific passer stopped playing about 60 years ago and very rarely has any thing resembling a prolific offense. When your best WR is still learning the postion, it's probably hard to look like a great QB.I think it's impossible to say what Orton could do playing for an offensive oriented team with some great offensive weapons at his disposal. By the same token, it'll also be interesting how Cutler does playing for a team that makes every QB look pretty average. Not that the others had Cutler's talent, but Chicago's style and mentality doesn't lend towards 4500 yard seasons.
:clap: I am curious as to how Cutler will react to having far less talented pass catchers. Is he gonna flip out if Hester or Bennett run the wrong route leading to a pick? Marshall and Royal are both way better receivers than anything Chicago has had in the last decade or more. That doesn't even account for the difference in offensive systems. I have a hard time seeing Cutler putting up top 10 QB numbers in 2009.
I see this opposite: you have to UPGRADE Hester and Bennett. And a little reminder: a couple of years ago we knew as little about Brandon Marshall as we do today about Bennett. Personally, I think he will be a surprise player and there has been good news about him coming out of the off season camp so far. And Hester, with his speed, will benefit from a QB who can throw the ball 70 yards and hit him on deep routes in stride.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.
NOT a chance he puts up those Numbers. Orton can't throw the ball downfield. Avg 237.5 yds a game for 3800? NO WAY. The bears gave up the 18th pick and next years 1st rounder which should be around the same pick, maybe a little later. A 3rd and kyle oront. The got a franchise QB that is 25yrs old. Great deal for the bears. Any bears fan that thinks otherwise is crazy.The broncos also did well because they had to trade him and got a lot for him.
I strongly disagree about not being able to throw downfield. Did you see him play last year? Now I don't know for sure how well he throws the deep ball, but in the couple times I saw him pre-injury last year I specifically remember being impressed by the zip he had on some 25-30 yard outs. They were timing routes with small windows and he hung in the pocket and delivered them on a rope accurately.
30 yard out on timing?Maybe on the moon. That's not a real route man. A "deep" out is like a 15 yard out.
 
:goodposting: EnjoyAnd I never hated Orton, but hes not a big time qb. Nowhere close to it.
I, like you, am a Bears fan. You cannot honestly say whether Orton will be a good QB in Denver because Orton had 2 chances here in Chicago - 1) when he was a rookie, and did only what he was asked to do, and 2) last year, when the Bears had ZERO receiving talent. ZERO. Plus, his OL was no prize line.I thought he performed very well considering his bad offensive circumstances.
 
I know there is alot of excitement in Bears country about the deal. On the surface, the Bears landed themselves the franchise QB they've been looking for generations to plug in behind center.

I only got to see Kyle Orton play once last year (against the Falcons). But that QB I saw was pretty good. In fact, prior to him badly spraining his ankle...he appeared to be having a breakthrough season of sorts.

I want to evaluate both QB's as fairly as possible.

Orton was a 4th round draft choice who was forced into action his rookie season because the Bears QB situation after Rex Grossman got injured dicated that he play. While he wasn't very good individually, the Bears went 10-5 with him under center. His stats were ugly, but again - he was a 4th round rookie. It's a little unfair to expect much more out of a kid put in his position. The next year, the job was handed to Grossman and he took them the SB. Orton didn't make a fuss...he simply continued to do what the team asked of him as a back-up and then last year he got his chance.

For his first 7.5 games before getting injured, Orton performed more than respectably.

61.9% Completion Rate

7.28 YPA

10 TD’s (4.10% TD rate)

4 INT’s (1.64% INT rate)

…when Orton came back faster than originally expected, he wasn’t the same player and performed at a noticeably lower level. So in fairness, there is doubt as to who Orton still is as an NFL QB. But Orton was certainly on an upward trend and had clearly developed since his pedestrian rookie season. It’s worth noting that his #1 WR was Devin Hester.

As for Cutler, there is no doubt that from a physical standpoint – Cutler is a stud. His arm has few peers and he’s got a prototype build. His big stat last year was his 4526 passing yards which solidified him as a young franchise QB.

But also take into account that Cutler had a:

62.3% Completion Rate

7.35 YPA

25 TD’s (4.06 TD rate)

18 INT’s (2.92 INT rate)

(…and his WR’s were Brandon Marshall, Eddie Royal and Brandon Stokely not to mention his HC, Mike Shanahan is considered one of the greatest NFL offensive minds over the last 20 years.)

These stats look remarkably similar to what Orton put up. And Orton did this in his 2nd season as a starter. Cutler put his line together with about 2.5 years. Not a big difference, but Cutler was anointed and Orton had to wait and bide his time.

Not to mention that we got a glimpse of Jay Cutler’s make-up during this entire ordeal which didn’t paint him in the greatest of lights and certainly showed that he could use thicker skin. He’ll need it in Chicago as he won’t get to deal with fun lovin’ crazu nut jobs like Woody Paige but rather slimy sharks like Jay Mariotti. Cutler has to work out immediately if you ask me because a slow start is going to bring a lot of second guessing.

Chicago has been homes to legends like Jordan, Payton, Butkus, Sandberg, Banks and Ditka. They take their sports heroes seriously and Cutler will probably, given the magnitude of this trade, be put on a pedestal he probably hasn’t earned yet. Orton with his neck beard and 4th round pedigree simply never was able to endear himself to the masses in Chicago as a potential long term solution for their never ending QB woes. Perhaps the outlook at this position after Sexy Rexy was more of the doom and gloom variety than giving Orton an honest look. What happens if Cutler shows off his turnover prone side as much as his prolific side? Chicago doesn’t exactly turn its attention away from big ticket underperformers. They may not be at New York’s level, but they certainly more intense than Denver.

I’m not saying Cutler isn’t better than Orton. At this point he is, and his upside is higher. But he’s not an elite QB at this point for sure. Would you rather have Matt Ryan or Jay Cutler? And Matt Ryan has some significant development to go. And now when you factor in that the Bears won’t pick in the first round without trading back into the first round until 2011…that was a steep price to pay. To me, this seems like the move of a front office and coaching staff that's putting their chips all in because the modus aperandi is starting to get stale and the natives are getting restless. For the Broncos, they potentially have a guy who is a long term solution at a lower cost and could develop Cassel-like under McDaniels’ tutelage.

To me, everyone is talking about the Bears side of the equation here, but I really think the Broncos did incredibly well in this deal - better than the Bears. In fact, I’d be shocked if they drafted Sanchez even if he were there at #12.
Great post.Regarding the bolded part:

Yeah, they "potentially" do have a replacement at QB in Orton. But I can't recall too many people that thought he was a long term answer at QB for anyone a week ago.

For another thing, his contract is up in a year. Long term answers are signed to long-term deals. Wouldn't surprise me if the Broncos tried to lock him up, however.

Lastly, "McDaniels tutelage" doesn't mean anything to me, until he does it without Belichick, Moss, Welker, that line, and on and on. A lot of QB coaches/offensive coordinators got a lot less smart when their talent level dipped.

 
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.
NOT a chance he puts up those Numbers. Orton can't throw the ball downfield. Avg 237.5 yds a game for 3800? NO WAY. The bears gave up the 18th pick and next years 1st rounder which should be around the same pick, maybe a little later. A 3rd and kyle oront. The got a franchise QB that is 25yrs old. Great deal for the bears. Any bears fan that thinks otherwise is crazy.The broncos also did well because they had to trade him and got a lot for him.
I strongly disagree about not being able to throw downfield. Did you see him play last year? Now I don't know for sure how well he throws the deep ball, but in the couple times I saw him pre-injury last year I specifically remember being impressed by the zip he had on some 25-30 yard outs. They were timing routes with small windows and he hung in the pocket and delivered them on a rope accurately.
30 yard out on timing?Maybe on the moon. That's not a real route man. A "deep" out is like a 15 yard out.
Might have been a post corner? Irregardless, it was definitely longer than 15 yards. I don't think 25 yards is a stretch.
 
I haven't seen Orton much, but looking at the numbers . . .In 33 games starts, he's had 250 passing yards 4 times (including 3 against bottom 10 passing teams). There are probably reasons above and beyond just Orton for that, but he's had more games with pedestrian numbers than top tier ones.That could certainly all change going to Denver where they should be more passing oriented with a better receiving corps. It's very possible that Orton's numbers in Denver will be closer to Cutler's numbers in Denver and Cutler's numbers in Chicago could be closer to Orton's numbers in Chicago.
I'd probably throw out his first year - the guy was forced into starting as a rookie and clearly wasn't ready. Last season was a different story - before he went down with his ankle injury he was doing quite well. He does not throw the deep ball well but he's not bad.
 
I think it is way too early to say much about this trade. Denver is going to be really bad this year--nothing they get in this rather unspectacular draft is going to make much of an impact on this team THIS year.

Orton may be servicable this year, but with Denver's schedule, I would put the over under at probably 4 wins. Denver has no chemistry. Just a bunch of parts--some of whom I am guessing are not sold on McDork and his New Englandization (I just made that word up) of this team. New coach, new offense scheme, a gaggle of running backs with no star amongst them, a soon to be suspended WR, an offense that is based on blocking TEs and the team doesn't have one that specializes in that. Yeah, that is a recipe for success.

The only way Denver comes out on top in this deal is if one of these picks turns out to be a star in this league--bottom line.

What will absolutley irk me off is if Denver packages these two 1st rounders to trade up and get Sanchez. That will basically mean that we traded Cutler for an unknown Rookie QB who will cost this team more $$$ before he even throws a pass than the Pro Bowl QB we had.

Chicago is the easy early winner in this deal. There wasn't going to be a player available in their 1st round slot that would have put this team over the hump like Cutler will. But I believe the final grade can't be determined for at least 2-3 years.

 
I think it is way too early to say much about this trade. Denver is going to be really bad this year--nothing they get in this rather unspectacular draft is going to make much of an impact on this team THIS year. Orton may be servicable this year, but with Denver's schedule, I would put the over under at probably 4 wins. Denver has no chemistry. Just a bunch of parts--some of whom I am guessing are not sold on McDork and his New Englandization (I just made that word up) of this team. New coach, new offense scheme, a gaggle of running backs with no star amongst them, a soon to be suspended WR, an offense that is based on blocking TEs and the team doesn't have one that specializes in that. Yeah, that is a recipe for success.The only way Denver comes out on top in this deal is if one of these picks turns out to be a star in this league--bottom line. What will absolutley irk me off is if Denver packages these two 1st rounders to trade up and get Sanchez. That will basically mean that we traded Cutler for an unknown Rookie QB who will cost this team more $$$ before he even throws a pass than the Pro Bowl QB we had.Chicago is the easy early winner in this deal. There wasn't going to be a player available in their 1st round slot that would have put this team over the hump like Cutler will. But I believe the final grade can't be determined for at least 2-3 years.
:goodposting:
 
I honestly think that the Broncos ripped off the Bears here. Two first rounders is insane! Orton isn't even that bad - with Brandon Marshall, Scheffler, and Royal, that offense is still going to be good. I could see him putting up 3800-4200 yards a year no problem with those guys. Plus, they're going to get a ton of defensive help through the draft now.
NOT a chance he puts up those Numbers. Orton can't throw the ball downfield. Avg 237.5 yds a game for 3800? NO WAY. The bears gave up the 18th pick and next years 1st rounder which should be around the same pick, maybe a little later. A 3rd and kyle oront. The got a franchise QB that is 25yrs old. Great deal for the bears. Any bears fan that thinks otherwise is crazy.

The broncos also did well because they had to trade him and got a lot for him.
I strongly disagree about not being able to throw downfield. Did you see him play last year? Now I don't know for sure how well he throws the deep ball, but in the couple times I saw him pre-injury last year I specifically remember being impressed by the zip he had on some 25-30 yard outs. They were timing routes with small windows and he hung in the pocket and delivered them on a rope accurately.
30 yard out on timing?Maybe on the moon. That's not a real route man. A "deep" out is like a 15 yard out.
Just for you boss, Falcons vs. Bears on the moon. Go to 2:31 of the video Play started at the 17, caught in the back of the end zone, looks like a 25 yard out to me.
 
And Hester, with his speed, will benefit from a QB who can throw the ball 70 yards and hit him on deep routes in stride.
VERY :unsure: He (Hester) was open so often last lear, and Orton rarely hit him with the long ball.Hopefully Cutler will take care of all that.
 
I just dont think the Bears had anyone they really liked at #19 this year. It would likely have been a second tier OL, DE or WR taken at that pick.

Now instead Denver might be able to get the first RB off the board.

Sure two firsts sounds like a lot, but when you look at the Bears Recent 1st round picks, it becomes clear that our scouting department isn't up to par.

 
I think Orton's been short changed a bit by Bears fans/Jerry Angelo. He did put up 2 of the 3 winning seasons for the Bears since 2001, which has to account for something despite the Bears special teams/defense.

 
Bears fans have no respect for taking a 7 game period and saying "hey look at what this kid can do".Look back to Grossman's first 6 games in 06... Orton is a solid QB who will limit turnovers and handle the game well. He just can not make all the throws needed to be a star in this league. Orton is not a slinger, if Den doesn't improve that D, the Broncos are in serious trouble
he has that luxury on the Bears due to their defense. On Denver he"ll be behind and have throw to keep in ball games. The situation he"s going to is the opposite of the one he was in.
 
Teams spend millions of dollars, and waste months of manhours finding a qb. The bears got Cutler for a song. There are only so many franchise qbs out there....and cutler is one of em.

Another waste of money, is Denver signing Jordan, arrington, and cbuck and Dawkins. Wonder how they feel now?

In your dynasty league, would you trade two mid to late 1st rounders for a stud qb? i know I would.

Angelo is a lousy talent evaluator. The broncos did him a favor by taking the picks off his hands.

orton's lucky to just be in the league. Chris redman had success too ya know....

 
I think Orton's been short changed a bit by Bears fans/Jerry Angelo. He did put up 2 of the 3 winning seasons for the Bears since 2001, which has to account for something despite the Bears special teams/defense.
The D is the only reason he won games as a rookie
 
Make no mistake about it. There was only ONE "franchise" QB moved in this deal and it was NOT Kyle Orton.

Denver got very good compensation by getting a servicable QB who has a winning track record, and by doubling up on 1st round picks in '09 & '10.

However, if we are talking about a team getting to (and winning) a Superbowl, then the Bears are the team that just became a contender via this trade - not the Broncos. The Bears have taken a huge step forward by acquiring that rarest of all NFL commodities - a young franchise QB who will give them a chance to win it all in any given season for the foreseeable future...

 
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
I think the Broncos really helped themselves here.As a Charger fan, I wish this deal had never happened.
 
"The Broncos stole Orton..."

:rolleyes: :lmao: Let the spin begin. 3 months ago if you tried to tell a Bronco fan that swapping Cutler for Orton wasn't really much of a downgrade they'd have laughed their ### off.

 
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
I think the Broncos really helped themselves here.As a Charger fan, I wish this deal had never happened.
Do you mean before Cutler's meltdown, or after? I can understand the position from a Charger perspective of wanting Denver to be stuck with a malcontent, but if we're talking about pre-February Culter, this is absolutely a killer for the franchise unless they hit home runs with the two 1st rounders. And at 18 and likely mid-20s next year, the picks are just as likely to be Ashley Lelie than another Jay Cutler.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
I think the Broncos really helped themselves here.As a Charger fan, I wish this deal had never happened.
It certainly gives the Broncos the opportunity to re-build the right way long-term. Losing a very good 25 YO QB is never ideal, but there is a great opportunity in this. When best part about a team's season is that it's young QB threw for a ton of yards, that's never a good thing. 4500 passing yards got them an 8-8 season in a terrible division. A different approach is probably more ideal. Now the Broncos can go about doing that.This should be a very good looking team when Jack Elway III arrives in 2012 or 2013.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
I think the Broncos really helped themselves here.As a Charger fan, I wish this deal had never happened.
Do you mean before Cutler's meltdown, or after? I can understand the position from a Charger perspective of wanting Denver to be stuck with a malcontent, but if we're talking about pre-February Culter, this is absolutely a killer for the franchise unless they hit home runs with the two 1st rounders. And at 18 and likely mid-20s next year, the picks are just as likely to be Ashley Lelie than another Jay Cutler.
Denver got two number ones and a number three. That's huge.(I don't think there's a big difference between the pre-February Cutler and the present Cutler. I think they're both poor leaders.)
 
I think the Broncos did well.
I agree with you. 2 months agao I would have been pissed at this trade as a Broncos fan. I do think Denver is a worse team because of this, but given the circumstances, they did really well. I also think Pat Bowlen and Bus Cook should both be tarred and feathered.Congratulations to Charger fans. The AFC West is yours for years to come.
I think the Broncos really helped themselves here.As a Charger fan, I wish this deal had never happened.
Do you mean before Cutler's meltdown, or after? I can understand the position from a Charger perspective of wanting Denver to be stuck with a malcontent, but if we're talking about pre-February Culter, this is absolutely a killer for the franchise unless they hit home runs with the two 1st rounders. And at 18 and likely mid-20s next year, the picks are just as likely to be Ashley Lelie than another Jay Cutler.
Denver got two number ones and a number three. That's huge.(I don't think there's a big difference between the pre-February Cutler and the present Cutler. I think they're both poor leaders.)
they aren't top picks and they'll still need to get productive players out of them.
 
Teams spend millions of dollars, and waste months of manhours finding a qb. The bears got Cutler for a song. There are only so many franchise qbs out there....and cutler is one of em.Another waste of money, is Denver signing Jordan, arrington, and cbuck and Dawkins. Wonder how they feel now?In your dynasty league, would you trade two mid to late 1st rounders for a stud qb? i know I would.Angelo is a lousy talent evaluator. The broncos did him a favor by taking the picks off his hands.orton's lucky to just be in the league. Chris redman had success too ya know....
;) Too many people are dismissing Cutlers' shortcomings. Rumors have been swirling for well over a year about him being a me-first, egotistical player. Then the incident with Cassel and McDaniels comes to light, and Cutler behaves like a child. He wasn't a winner at Vandy, and he hasn't won anything with the Broncos. The QB is supposed to be the team leader. Cutler has a long ways to go to prove he's any type of leader. Orton, while not possessing the same physical gifts as Cutler, has been a winner. He won at Purdue, and he's 20-11 as the Bears starter. He's a team player. He made big strides as a passer last year before getting hurt. I happen to think he has a real chance at becoming a quality NFL starter. There's plenty of reasons that QBs fail in the NFL. Physical talent is no more important than mental acumen or toughness. Ryan Leaf and Jeff George had the same type of cannons that Cutler has. They flamed out. Cutler could very well grow up and make himself into one of the NFL greats. His actions to date don't point that way though IMO.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top