We can debate whatever you want, but here were some things that came up that were on my list of things to review:
TEAM KICKERS
Since so many teams lost out on kicker points when teams switched kickers, this seems like a decent idea. This way no one gets a big fat goose egg at kicker. However, I am not sure if we should revist the scoring for kickers, as I suspect that the scoring difference between teams is pretty small (although I haven't checked and numbers one way or the other.
I dont really care one way or the other
POST-SEASON SCORING INCREASE
Some people loved it, some people hated it. But I thought it kept teams in the hunt almost all the way to the end. In an effort to make fantasy football more like real football (better teams go to the playoffs in real football), I felt inclined to DOUBLE points scored in the post season. This one I am not 100% sold on, so we can open this up for debate.
I support this so that post season predictions for players has a more significant impact.
TRADING AND ROSTER MOVES
Several people asked for the ability to do this, and IMO it makes things too chaotic. Teams would in essence be forced to trade players at similar positions (remember the roster requirements), so I'm not sure what the point would be. Similarly, there would be no fair way to run waivers with this many teams, and I have no desire to get involved in free agent bidding time and time again. So I doubt there is a good logistical way to do this.
I love trading but I don't think it should be allowed. To me this league is more a test of predicting how players perform over the course of a season. Trading, picking starting line ups and WW moves are completly different skills imho.
BEST BALL SCORING
This was brought up as a way to minimize the impact of injuries. I agree that injuries are a problem, and I think the solution is to expand rosters to 20 and score the best 18. However, I think the fairest way to go about it is to draft all teams like last year (must fill roster requirments in first 18 picks) and then each owner can add whatever two position players he wants to add that are remaining in rounds 19 and 20 (there will not be any QB, DEF, or PK left if we go with team PK). The intent is not to have someone hoarde any one position and give everyone a fair chance at filling up their roster with servicable players.
I don't really care one way or another on this. Those extra picks could end up being better than players picked earlier though and further help a injury free team compared to others. I don't think this fixes the injury problem. It just makes rosters deeper.
TIMING OUT ON DRAFT PICKS
This was a major P.I.T.A. last year, as those waiting to pick would get tired of waiting around for a pick that never was made. I then had to either skip over the pick and wait for that owner to get in touch with me for a pick and it turned into a mess, so to keep the competitiveness of the teams I tried picking someone for that owner. Then he would get mad that I picked someone he didn't want, and the aggravation cycle continued. I am open for suggestions on how to deal with this one, but I am incline to suggest that I will pick the highest non-drafted player/team for that team based on current ADP. So if the highest player that is not yet drafted was Byron leftwich, that team would be the proud owner of JAX TEAM QB (assuming they didn't already have 2 TEAM QB filled).
What is the time limit on picks? I have heard slow draft but I don't know what the pick time limit is. Draft picks that time out should be moved to the end of the round. Owners should be commited enough to not let picks time out. Predraft or use an alternate who can pick for you if you know you will be away for extended period of time.
There is no reason for me to have to pick any players for any owners, as you can predraft or you can PM or email me with guys you would want if you are going to be away from a computer. Heck, last year I talked to guys on cell phones to make picks!
What else ya got for suggestions (or more likely complaints).