What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Andre Johnson wants out of the Texans (1 Viewer)

JohnnyU

Footballguy
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reported Andre Johnson has told the Texans "he wants to play for another team."
Rapoport added four teams have expressed interest in the veteran wide receiver, but Houston is resisting the move. It is unsurprising Johnson wants a trade. Entering his age-33 season, Johnson does not have time to wait through yet another rebuilding job. He is also unhappy the Texans refused a deal that would have paid him his $1 million workout bonus despite the fact that he missed several sessions. Even with the animosity, it is not a certainty Johnson leaves Houston. Rapoport believes the Texans could remedy the situation by paying Johnson his $1 million or promising him a roster spot in 2015. This has the look of a saga that could drag into camp.
Rotoworld
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.
If "grossly overstated" = $11.96 million as a 2014 salary cap hit, then I agree with you.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350097/article/andre-johnson-texans-face-salary-cap-hurdle-for-trade

 
The thing about 2015 deals with AJ's contract making him more attractive as a cut after 2014. $16m cap hit if he plays, $7m cap hit if he is released (and that's before doing any kind of June 1 designation to spread it over 2 years).

Though it seems really inconsistent that he reportedly wants to play for another team, but Rappaport thinks he would be willing to stay if they guarantee he'll stay on the team in 2015. Granted yeah, it's a lot more money, but I guess that means at least in Rappaport's eyes, the issue has big money components along with the wanting a shot at a ring.

My guess is they get something worked out and he comes into camp either on time or at worst a little late. Still concerns me though given he's had hamstring injuries in past years and you see those in guys who report late, not to mention O'brien's offense maybe requiring more of QB and receiver being on the same page about the coverage to dictate the route than Kubiak used. Still I'm sure he'd pick it up well, his early years in the league were under Chris Palmer as OC who had a lot of the same stuff, but it isn't really a source for optimism either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
If he's mad about the $1 million, I doubt he would pass his entire salary. Disgruntled employees sometimes sandbag though.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
If he's mad about the $1 million, I doubt he would pass his entire salary. Disgruntled employees sometimes sandbag though.
I personally see this as mostly overblown and overhyped. HOU is a season away from a 12 win season and still has a cadre of talent. Johnson has put up good numbers with less than stellar QB play in the past, and a case could be made that O'Brien will bring in a vertically friendly offense. I don't think that the Texans are in a complete rebuild mode and could again make a run at a playoff spot. If Johnson gets paid what his contract says he should be paid, I don't think this will be anything more than grumbling.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.
If "grossly overstated" = $11.96 million as a 2014 salary cap hit, then I agree with you.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350097/article/andre-johnson-texans-face-salary-cap-hurdle-for-trade
the article you linked mentions 12m in dead money, which is not the same as an additional cap hit, and I think maybe the source of confusion.

'dead money' is simply cap space hogged up by players no longer on the roster but still accounted into the cap that year due to their contracts --- the league won't let you just pay a guy 20m as a bonus up front and duck the cap consequences by dumping the player later, so you are still held a accountable for that cap even if he leaves.

because of prorated bonuses, or maybe guaranteed money, the texans are probably on the hook for 11-12m in cap accounting whether he's on the roster, or not.

however, if he is actually on the roster they are still responsible for the prorated bonus money, as well as his salary for this season, so it's not like he counts for 0 if he stays and 11 if he leaves -- he'll still account for a good chunk by staying, so you'd need to look at the difference between the figures to see the impact of a trade.

I think they're currently using the top 51 guys to calculate cap, so if he gets traded that 52nd guy would move up into the 51 and get counted in, but that would be peanuts..

 
cant see a team trading for him at the ~10 million price.

he will show up just before the season collect his 10 mill and probably get cut when the cap hit isnt as bad

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.
If "grossly overstated" = $11.96 million as a 2014 salary cap hit, then I agree with you.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350097/article/andre-johnson-texans-face-salary-cap-hurdle-for-trade
the article you linked mentions 12m in dead money, which is not the same as an additional cap hit, and I think maybe the source of confusion.

'dead money' is simply cap space hogged up by players no longer on the roster but still accounted into the cap that year due to their contracts --- the league won't let you just pay a guy 20m as a bonus up front and duck the cap consequences by dumping the player later, so you are still held a accountable for that cap even if he leaves.

because of prorated bonuses, or maybe guaranteed money, the texans are probably on the hook for 11-12m in cap accounting whether he's on the roster, or not.

however, if he is actually on the roster they are still responsible for the prorated bonus money, as well as his salary for this season, so it's not like he counts for 0 if he stays and 11 if he leaves -- he'll still account for a good chunk by staying, so you'd need to look at the difference between the figures to see the impact of a trade.

I think they're currently using the top 51 guys to calculate cap, so if he gets traded that 52nd guy would move up into the 51 and get counted in, but that would be peanuts..
$12 million in dead money = $12 million cap his for 2014 for Houston. So they don't pay out the actual money, but 10% of their 2014 salary cap would be wasted on accounting. The point being, they would have to take that cap hit to trade Johnson. Yes, they would have a $14.6 million salary cap charge if he stayed on the team, but at least they would have use of his services.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.
If "grossly overstated" = $11.96 million as a 2014 salary cap hit, then I agree with you.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350097/article/andre-johnson-texans-face-salary-cap-hurdle-for-trade
the article you linked mentions 12m in dead money, which is not the same as an additional cap hit, and I think maybe the source of confusion.

'dead money' is simply cap space hogged up by players no longer on the roster but still accounted into the cap that year due to their contracts --- the league won't let you just pay a guy 20m as a bonus up front and duck the cap consequences by dumping the player later, so you are still held a accountable for that cap even if he leaves.

because of prorated bonuses, or maybe guaranteed money, the texans are probably on the hook for 11-12m in cap accounting whether he's on the roster, or not.

however, if he is actually on the roster they are still responsible for the prorated bonus money, as well as his salary for this season, so it's not like he counts for 0 if he stays and 11 if he leaves -- he'll still account for a good chunk by staying, so you'd need to look at the difference between the figures to see the impact of a trade.

I think they're currently using the top 51 guys to calculate cap, so if he gets traded that 52nd guy would move up into the 51 and get counted in, but that would be peanuts..
$12 million in dead money = $12 million cap his for 2014 for Houston. So they don't pay out the actual money, but 10% of their 2014 salary cap would be wasted on accounting. The point being, they would have to take that cap hit to trade Johnson. Yes, they would have a $14.6 million salary cap charge if he stayed on the team, but at least they would have use of his services.
yeah, and if they trade him they would have the use of a draft pick -- if that was the trade, of course

if he really counts for 14m staying and 12m leaving you would actually be saving cap by trading him, and I know you understand this --- you would have to be out of your mind to think that would imply a massive cap hit by trading him.

there are clearly and obviously no cap ramifications from trading him, although some figures get cited and passed around the net, leading to confusion by the casual reader who doesn't want to be bothered to have to check every fact.

 
Still not sure why this is suddenly newsworthy two months after the first trade demand, but the Patriots do not currently have the cap room to orchestrate a trade for Johnson. They could cut people or redo existing to deals to clear room, but I think that would be unlikely.

A team would have to fit the newly acquired player under the cap at the time they acquired him, so they could not trade for Johnson and then work out all the salary cap accounting at a later date.

Conceivably, Johnson could renegotiate a deal with the Texans to make his contract less onerous and more trade friendly, but if that were the case the Texans might have more reason to hold on to him.

 
This has been going on for months already. It is unlikely the Texans would endure the cap hit to trade him, and it is equally unlikely any suitors would be willing to take on his salary. I doubt Johnson holds out and starts losing money trying to force a trade that does not make sense for either team.
I see this passed around quite a bit, and I may be completely wrong about this as I looked it up however many weeks ago, but I believe any texans cap consequence is being grossly overstated.

that said, there would certainly be contract issues to work out on the receiving end, and andre has always seemed to be one of those top dollar guys --- but I would've said the same about revis.
If "grossly overstated" = $11.96 million as a 2014 salary cap hit, then I agree with you.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000350097/article/andre-johnson-texans-face-salary-cap-hurdle-for-trade
the article you linked mentions 12m in dead money, which is not the same as an additional cap hit, and I think maybe the source of confusion.

'dead money' is simply cap space hogged up by players no longer on the roster but still accounted into the cap that year due to their contracts --- the league won't let you just pay a guy 20m as a bonus up front and duck the cap consequences by dumping the player later, so you are still held a accountable for that cap even if he leaves.

because of prorated bonuses, or maybe guaranteed money, the texans are probably on the hook for 11-12m in cap accounting whether he's on the roster, or not.

however, if he is actually on the roster they are still responsible for the prorated bonus money, as well as his salary for this season, so it's not like he counts for 0 if he stays and 11 if he leaves -- he'll still account for a good chunk by staying, so you'd need to look at the difference between the figures to see the impact of a trade.

I think they're currently using the top 51 guys to calculate cap, so if he gets traded that 52nd guy would move up into the 51 and get counted in, but that would be peanuts..
$12 million in dead money = $12 million cap his for 2014 for Houston. So they don't pay out the actual money, but 10% of their 2014 salary cap would be wasted on accounting. The point being, they would have to take that cap hit to trade Johnson. Yes, they would have a $14.6 million salary cap charge if he stayed on the team, but at least they would have use of his services.
yeah, and if they trade him they would have the use of a draft pick -- if that was the trade, of course

if he really counts for 14m staying and 12m leaving you would actually be saving cap by trading him, and I know you understand this --- you would have to be out of your mind to think that would imply a massive cap hit by trading him.

there are clearly and obviously no cap ramifications from trading him, although some figures get cited and passed around the net, leading to confusion by the casual reader who doesn't want to be bothered to have to check every fact.
They would be saving cap room overall ($2M) but would be replacing his services with a much lesser player. There's little benefit to the Texans to do that unless they are given a good, low salary player or pick for him.

 
Still not sure why this is suddenly newsworthy two months after the first trade demand, but the Patriots do not currently have the cap room to orchestrate a trade for Johnson. They could cut people or redo existing to deals to clear room, but I think that would be unlikely.

A team would have to fit the newly acquired player under the cap at the time they acquired him, so they could not trade for Johnson and then work out all the salary cap accounting at a later date.

Conceivably, Johnson could renegotiate a deal with the Texans to make his contract less onerous and more trade friendly, but if that were the case the Texans might have more reason to hold on to him.
Exactly. They would likely need a 1st to do something like that.

 
Trade compensation would also be an issue. A team having to take on a big salary for a 33 year old with a 3 year deal will likely only want to part with a 3rd or 4th round pick. Houston will want a first or a second.

Getting back to the Pats, Johnson requires $10 million in cap space and the Pats currently have only $6.4 million of space. Also, NE would not go more than $9 million a year for Moss or Welker, both of whom were 2 years younger than Johnson. Unless Johnson is willing to play for less, I don't see them pursuing Johnson.

 
The Texans would incur $12 million in dead money by trading or releasing Andre Johnson.

$11.96 million, to be exact. It's why Johnson has precious little leverage in his demands, and why the Texans are extremely unlikely to meet them. It wouldn't be inconceivable that a rebuilding club takes that cap hit, but the Texans simply have more reason to keep Johnson than to flip him. This story may not be going away any time soon, but the ending is fairly predictable.
So, a trade or release isn't going to happen at all...

 
The Texans would incur $12 million in dead money by trading or releasing Andre Johnson.

$11.96 million, to be exact. It's why Johnson has precious little leverage in his demands, and why the Texans are extremely unlikely to meet them. It wouldn't be inconceivable that a rebuilding club takes that cap hit, but the Texans simply have more reason to keep Johnson than to flip him. This story may not be going away any time soon, but the ending is fairly predictable.
So, a trade or release isn't going to happen at all...
Why not?

As stated earlier in the thread, if Houston keeps him , he costs 14.6 million toward the cap.

If they trade him, they save 2.6 million in cap space, and get a draft pick for guy that doesn't want to be there.

 
They would be saving cap room overall ($2M) but would be replacing his services with a much lesser player. There's little benefit to the Texans to do that unless they are given a good, low salary player or pick for him.
yeah, usually when you trade a player you no longer have his services, and replace him with another player.

that's the general mechanics of trading

 
The Texans would incur $12 million in dead money by trading or releasing Andre Johnson.

$11.96 million, to be exact. It's why Johnson has precious little leverage in his demands, and why the Texans are extremely unlikely to meet them. It wouldn't be inconceivable that a rebuilding club takes that cap hit, but the Texans simply have more reason to keep Johnson than to flip him. This story may not be going away any time soon, but the ending is fairly predictable.
So, a trade or release isn't going to happen at all...
omg

 
I don't see why they couldn't get a 3rd rounder for Andre from a contending team. He could easily play at a high level for 2 more years. That's perfect for a team like the Patriots. It would be a late 3rd but still.

Can the Patriots pay part of that cap hit like say give up a 3rd round pick and pay 3 million of his cap hit?

 
I don't see why they couldn't get a 3rd rounder for Andre from a contending team. He could easily play at a high level for 2 more years. That's perfect for a team like the Patriots. It would be a late 3rd but still.

Can the Patriots pay part of that cap hit like say give up a 3rd round pick and pay 3 million of his cap hit?
No. There are no halvsies or partial deferments. You have to take the whole enchilada.

And while I agree, in theory, with what you say that he could help a contending team, the contenders are predominantly already up against the cap and likely could not afford him. To acquire him, a team must be able to fit his entire $10 million salary under the cap unless his contract is reworked BEFORE he gets traded . . . which means only the Texans could get him to renegotiate BEFORE the trade. A team could rework his contract AFTER the trade, but he would have to fit under the cap at the time the trade was completed. The same thing happened when the Pats acquired Randy Moss, but at that point they had more cap flexibility.

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).

 
They would be saving cap room overall ($2M) but would be replacing his services with a much lesser player. There's little benefit to the Texans to do that unless they are given a good, low salary player or pick for him.
yeah, usually when you trade a player you no longer have his services, and replace him with another player.

that's the general mechanics of trading
:lol:

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
I believe you're right.

From his salary page it looks like $7M would be accelerated to the 2014 cap and they have just over $7M in cap room.

 
I don't see why they couldn't get a 3rd rounder for Andre from a contending team. He could easily play at a high level for 2 more years. That's perfect for a team like the Patriots. It would be a late 3rd but still.

Can the Patriots pay part of that cap hit like say give up a 3rd round pick and pay 3 million of his cap hit?
Even if they could get a 3rd why would they?

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.
in which one of my posts did I advocate them trading him for a 3rd?? JFC this board

#######g mike judge is a visionary

 
I don't see why they couldn't get a 3rd rounder for Andre from a contending team. He could easily play at a high level for 2 more years. That's perfect for a team like the Patriots. It would be a late 3rd but still.

Can the Patriots pay part of that cap hit like say give up a 3rd round pick and pay 3 million of his cap hit?
Even if they could get a 3rd why would they?
A couple reasons.

1. They don't want to be good this year.

2. Andre has been nothing but fantastic for them for a long time. He wants out. Them being worse this year helps them. Why not oblige him?

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.
But Zero years of AJ < 3rd and $2M in cap room.

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.
in which one of my posts did I advocate them trading him for a 3rd?? JFC this board

#######g mike judge is a visionary
OH YEAHHH!

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Since you asked . . . I haven't been following the Texans signings for draft picks, so it would be conceivable (albeit unlikely) that they would need space to sign their draft picks from the most recent draft. And again, in theory, if they traded for a player and not a draft pick they would need to fit that guy under the cap as well. Logistically, if they didn't have much cap room left and had to eat what little they had to have dead money for Johnson, they could be hamstrung heading into the season. Should they suffer some injuries and needed to go sign some street free agents they would need room for those guys too.

So while you are technically right (they have to have room for him now to even roster him), it is always as black and white as you want to make it. IN THIS CASE it would not make a difference, but it could be possible that a team would have to eat a greater cap hit than a player's designated salary. For example, if a team trade someone and had to eat $30 million as a cap hit for paid out signing bonus money and the player was only due an $8 million salary that year, the cap hit would far exceed what his cap hit would have been.

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.
in which one of my posts did I advocate them trading him for a 3rd?? JFC this board

#######g mike judge is a visionary
What do you think is realistic compensation the Texas could receive for him?
 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Since you asked . . . I haven't been following the Texans signings for draft picks, so it would be conceivable (albeit unlikely) that they would need space to sign their draft picks from the most recent draft. And again, in theory, if they traded for a player and not a draft pick they would need to fit that guy under the cap as well. Logistically, if they didn't have much cap room left and had to eat what little they had to have dead money for Johnson, they could be hamstrung heading into the season. Should they suffer some injuries and needed to go sign some street free agents they would need room for those guys too.

So while you are technically right (they have to have room for him now to even roster him), it is always as black and white as you want to make it. IN THIS CASE it would not make a difference, but it could be possible that a team would have to eat a greater cap hit than a player's designated salary. For example, if a team trade someone and had to eat $30 million as a cap hit for paid out signing bonus money and the player was only due an $8 million salary that year, the cap hit would far exceed what his cap hit would have been.
WHAT??

wtf is wrong with you --- is this david yudkin?

 
IIRC, the Texans would have to eat the $12 million cap charge immediately and would have to apply it to their 2014 salary cap. Some articles make it sound like they had the option to break up the cap hit across this year and next year, but I am 99% teams only have that option when they cut a player outright and not trade him. Last I looked, HOU had about $10 million of cap room (who know how accurate that is), so technically they have room to move Johnson (over $14 million already allocated to him for this year).
HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY NOT HAVE CAP ROOM TO MOVE HIM WHEN IT'S LESS CAP TO TRADE HIM THAN IT IS TO KEEP HIM??????????
Gotcha. Still think you're missing the point that it doesn't benefit the Texans to trade him for something like a 3rd.

One year of AJ > 3rd and $2M in cap room.
in which one of my posts did I advocate them trading him for a 3rd?? JFC this board

#######g mike judge is a visionary
What do you think is realistic compensation the Texas could receive for him?
well, that would really vary by team and I'd need a crystal ball up my ### or a front office position in the nfl to give any kind of meaningful opinion on that.

if you just want an opinion from some ####### guy on a message board I'd have to guess something like a 2nd round pick because of his age and contract -- that seems to be the most popular opinion, anyway.

if you look around for precedent you'll see all kinds of trades that get done that wouldn't get done with other teams -- like any other kind of trading, price is generally what you can get.

the pats got moss for less, if I remember right, but of course he had that oakland baggage and was willing to tear up his big money deal to get out of oakland --- I don't really see andre doing that.

think the pats ended up getting a third(?) for him from minny a few years later -- yudkin probably remembers exactly what it was, but that was partway into the season already.

bill o'brien was on staff for both of those deals.

richard seymour is maybe another point of comparison --- they actually got a first rounder for him from al davis, but unfortunately al is dead now.

bill o'brien was on that patriots team.

what did you think of the cassel deal --- fair, or did one side fleece the other?

that cassel deal was as much about contracts as anything else, like a lot of these deals.

the reality is you might as well ask minny what herschel walker is worth.

sometimes teams value players differently than we do, but I think a first would probably be unlikely just because of how cost controlled these young guys are --- you need just the right match of partners on a lot of these things.

and let's not forget --- many of us fantasy players had given up already on andre johnson 2 years ago.

I know because I drafted him the last 2 or 3 years and won't forget the ridicule I was subjected to --- everybody felt he lost a step, was painfully slow, couldn't score, etc, etc, and that was, like, 2 years ago.

let's also not forget how he was the focus of that offensive scheme --- I won't say he was freeloading, but the coaching staff gave that guy a ton more opportunity than he might've had elsewhere, and there's a chance he's looking for a fitzgerald contract.

you will not see pierre garcon with 184 targets this year.

 
Ill be thrilled if he lands in New England, imo its the perfect spot for him to play a couple years. But unless he restructures to a team friendly deal, I don't expect the pats to do it. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if they shipped Mallett and like a late rounder for AJ.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eagles couldnt get even a 7th for Desean Jackson who is 27 and was only making $10mil per. No way he gets traded. He either comes back and shuts his mouth or holds out hoping for a release.

 
http://overthecap.com/closer-look-andre-johnson-financials/

Because we are now past June 1, Johnson’s “dead money” will split between 2014 and 2015, which makes the contract reasonable for the Texans to trade. Currently Johnson counts for $15,644,583 against the Houston Texans salary cap and $11 million against their cash payroll. If traded or released his cap charge would reduce to $4,644,583 in 2014, an $11 million savings. In 2015 his cap would drop from $16,144,583 to $7,319,583, an $8.825 million savings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insein said:
Eagles couldnt get even a 7th for Desean Jackson who is 27 and was only making $10mil per. No way he gets traded. He either comes back and shuts his mouth or holds out hoping for a release.
Comparing DJax to AJ does a disservice to pretty much every WR not name Desean Jackson.

They aren't even in the same realm.

 
Insein said:
Eagles couldnt get even a 7th for Desean Jackson who is 27 and was only making $10mil per. No way he gets traded. He either comes back and shuts his mouth or holds out hoping for a release.
Comparing DJax to AJ does a disservice to pretty much every WR not name Desean Jackson.They aren't even in the same realm.
33 year old Andre Johnson making $16 mil vs 27 year old DJax making $10 mil. The comparison is valid.

 
Insein said:
Eagles couldnt get even a 7th for Desean Jackson who is 27 and was only making $10mil per. No way he gets traded. He either comes back and shuts his mouth or holds out hoping for a release.
Comparing DJax to AJ does a disservice to pretty much every WR not name Desean Jackson.They aren't even in the same realm.
33 year old Andre Johnson making $16 mil vs 27 year old DJax making $10 mil. The comparison is valid.
I don't know man, Andre Johnson is a 100 catch per season monster. I'd take 33 year old Andre over a 27 year old Jackson. Johnson is much more versatile and has phenomenal size, technique, and toughness.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top