What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Andy Dufresne's collection of in-season mock drafts. (1 Viewer)

yes and they used a supplemental pick on Paul Oliver from Georgia, but their secondary is still an area of concern. thanks
Decent 3rd and beyond corners can be found in the later rounds. The Chargers are one of the tougher teams to mock for. There aren't a lot of holes.I thought about Mike Hart to be LT's backup.
actually I see mike hart in Denver he's a perfect one cut type back IMO
 
yes and they used a supplemental pick on Paul Oliver from Georgia, but their secondary is still an area of concern. thanks
Decent 3rd and beyond corners can be found in the later rounds. The Chargers are one of the tougher teams to mock for. There aren't a lot of holes.I thought about Mike Hart to be LT's backup.
actually I see mike hart in Denver he's a perfect one cut type back IMO
Good spot. I think he's better than a lot of people give him credit for.
 
yes and they used a supplemental pick on Paul Oliver from Georgia, but their secondary is still an area of concern. thanks
Decent 3rd and beyond corners can be found in the later rounds. The Chargers are one of the tougher teams to mock for. There aren't a lot of holes.I thought about Mike Hart to be LT's backup.
actually I see mike hart in Denver he's a perfect one cut type back IMO
Good spot. I think he's better than a lot of people give him credit for.
I have bashed him, cause I think his measurables will push him down in the draft, and he wont break many 80 yard runs. But he could be a decent zone blocking type backup in the NFL, not sure if he can do special teams or not either.
 
People (ESPN Radio) around here seem to think that Beau Bell (UNLV LB) is getting the kind of attention from scouts normally reserved for first round picks. I don't know jack about him, but you might look into it and see what you see.

 
People (ESPN Radio) around here seem to think that Beau Bell (UNLV LB) is getting the kind of attention from scouts normally reserved for first round picks. I don't know jack about him, but you might look into it and see what you see.
He has moved up the charts and is one of the better prospects at the traditionally weak ILB position.He has 111 tackles and 4 interceptions on the year. I've never seen him play, but he will participate in the Senior Bowl this year.
 
I haven't seen Otah enough to give a decent opinion on him, but if he's the tackle the Chiefs most like in that spot, I'm all for it. They took Dwayne Bowe over the guy many thought they'd take, Robert Meachem, and that's working out very well.

As for your commentary, I'd suggest that the 'best player available' approach applies to the Chiefs as much as any team in the NFL for two main reasons: (1) they're reasonably talent-stricken, and upgrades at most positions are possible; and (2) they've proven over the last few years, and in Herm's tenure especially, that they'll take the best player on their board regardless of need. Certainly DE and WR have been need areas the previous two years when they selected Tamba Hali and Bowe, respectively, but in neither year were those positions the Chiefs' top priority.

I think Sedrick Ellis, Malcolm Jenkins (or their top-rated CB), their top-rated QB, Kenny Phillips and perhaps even their top-rated LB are options. The only aforementioned player, or position, that I think may be downgraded with the Chiefs is CB, mostly due to depth at the position in this draft and the cover-two scheme KC runs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I haven't seen Otah enough to give a decent opinion on him, but if he's the tackle the Chiefs most like in that spot, I'm all for it. They took Dwayne Bowe over the guy many thought they'd take, Robert Meachem, and that's working out very well. As for your commentary, I'd suggest that the 'best player available' approach applies to the Chiefs as much as any team in the NFL for two main reasons: (1) they're reasonably talent-stricken, and upgrades at most positions are possible; and (2) they've proven over the last few years, and in Herm's tenure especially, that they'll take the best player on their board regardless of need. Certainly DE and WR have been need areas the previous two years when they selected Tamba Hali and Bowe, respectively, but in neither year were those positions the Chiefs' top priority.I think Sedrick Ellis, Malcolm Jenkins (or their top-rated CB), their top-rated QB, Kenny Phillips and perhaps even their top-rated LB are options. The only aforementioned player, or position, that I think may be downgraded with the Chiefs is CB, mostly due to depth at the position in this draft and the cover-two scheme KC runs.
I can agree with all of that.
 
Just as an added extra tidbit, although it's purely my own speculation: Sedrick Ellis could be the real darkhorse. Some are arguing he's right up there on Dorsey's level and he has the potential to be a dominant pass-rushing, 3-technique DT. Herm Edwards is a big defense homer (and he spent a first-round pick on WR last year) and, most importantly of all, Herm loves nothing more than reminiscing about his Tampa days. Seriously - in every press conference it's Tampa this, Tampa that, Tampa blah blah blah.

Maybe Sedrick Ellis can be Herm's Warren Sapp?

I don't know. Just throwing it out there. He may not even be available when KC picks if he's as good as some think he might be.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just as an added extra tidbit, although it's purely my own speculation: Sedrick Ellis could be the real darkhorse. Some are arguing he's right up there on Dorsey's level and he has the potential to be a dominant pass-rushing, 3-technique DT. Herm Edwards is a big defense homer (and he spent a first-round pick on WR last year) and, most importantly of all, Herm loves nothing more than reminiscing about his Tampa days. Seriously - in every press conference it's Tampa this, Tampa that, Tampa blah blah blah. Maybe Sedrick Ellis can be Herm's Warren Sapp?I don't know. Just throwing it out there. He may not even be available when KC picks if he's as good as some think he might be.
Well, I do have him going right before KC's pick to Cincinnati. If the order is reversed, maybe he could be the pick.But didn't they draft two DT's last year?
 
Well, one, who was a third-round pick and hasn't done much yet, and a DE/DT hybrid, who has been pretty quiet himself.

I'm just hoping that their top-rated player when they're on clock is an OT, whether it's Otah, Oher or anyone else.

 
Andy> If you could give us the pros each player in the top five has the potential to resemble the most, that'd be great.
Bloom would be better to answer that, but I'll do some research and get back to you.For starters, I'd say Dorsey reminds me of a young Warren Sapp.Gholston is a bit like Demarcus Ware or even more closely Willie McGinest.Brohm reminds me of Brady or Palmer.Chris Long is like Patrick Kerney or maybe Jared Allen.Jake Long is like Joe Thomas. (I don't watch o-line play much).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne said:
5. Atlanta - Brian Brohm

Alternate: Darren McFadden

McFadden is certainly a temptation, but backs are easier to find than franchise QBs. Normally it would be a coin flip between Brohm and Ryan, but given Petrino's familiarity with Brohm, this seems a no-brainer.

McFadden would be the back that Petrino covets.

-----------------------------------------------

8. Kansas City - Jeff Otah, OT - Pittsburgh

Alternate: Malcolm Jenkins

Otah is the fast riser on the draft boards. Really, I can't see the Cheifs going anywhere but o-line here. Maybe they like someone like Baker or Clady (or Cherilus if he comes through in post-season workouts) better, but o-line is where it's at.

Jenkins is an option because Law and Surtain can't play forever.

-----------------------------------------------

9. Baltimore - Matt Ryan, QB - Boston College

1st: Alternate: Malcolm Jenkins

2nd Alternate: Early Doucet

McNair is obviously done and Boller HAS to be out of chances, doesn't he? Ryan has a swagger that I really like and it seems like he'd match up well with Billick. Maybe they give Troy Smith a chance, but Ryan has carried the BC team this year and I believe is a "franchise" QB.

Remember when McAllister and Rolle were good? I cannot believe that Mason & Clayton have combined for TWO touchdowns on the season.

-----------------------------------------------

10. Carolina - Andre Woodson, QB - Kentucky

1st: Sam Baker

2nd: Ryan Clady

Testaverde and Carr. Oye vay! I don't know what else to write.

Carolina is a mystery. Are the skilled offensive players not that skilled, or is the line just underacheiving?

-----------------------------------------------
Despite KC's investment in Croyle, they should also be in the QB derby.Given what I've seen of Ryan this year, especially the last 5 minutes @ Va Tech, I firmly believe he's going to be an outstanding NFL QB.

If I were Carolina or Baltimore, I'd be doing my best to trade into the #4 slot above Atlanta to ensure a Ryan selection.

Assuming Petrino does play the familiarity card & select Brohm, Carolina should talk with KC to get ahead of Baltimore.

 
Despite KC's investment in Croyle, they should also be in the QB derby.
Absolutely.
Given what I've seen of Ryan this year, especially the last 5 minutes @ Va Tech, I firmly believe he's going to be an outstanding NFL QB.If I were Carolina or Baltimore, I'd be doing my best to trade into the #4 slot above Atlanta to ensure a Ryan selection.Assuming Petrino does play the familiarity card & select Brohm, Carolina should talk with KC to get ahead of Baltimore.
Totally agree here too. Ryan is my #1 QB. Just a frog's hair ahead of Brohm, but still ahead.
 
The Chiefs will definitely have to consider QB going forward, and I'd contend that they really don't have much invested in Brodie Croyle other than time and practice reps, but I don't think they're going to take a QB in the first two rounds for a variety of reasons: (1) the prospects are very borderline and I personally can't see how a QB will be the best player available in either of the first three rounds, assuming it plays out as expected; (2) rightly or wrongly, they really do like Croyle; (3) their needs in the OL are much more significant; (4) it sends the wrong message to Croyle; (5) they would be under pressure to play the drafted QB at some point, which isn't a 'problem' they'd mind having with another position; (6) the team under Carl Peterson (I hope he's fired as much as the next guy but he won't be) hasn't drafted and developed QBs at all - to expect them to draft and play two within three years of each other is far-fetched; etc.

A previous poster mentioned the Chiefs trading down with a team that might consider moving up for the last 'big three' QB left on the board, possibly Andre' Woodson. This is an extremely likely scenario if KC can be compensated fairly. They have made it very clear that they want to stockpile picks and trading down in the first round would be a great tool with which to further achieve that goal (they already have a boatload of picks). I think one thing you'll hear or read many times in the draft build-up over the coming months is, "[this] team could move down a bit and draft [this] player who'd fit nicely; they really don't need to be this high". I think that applies to a decent number of teams for a variety of reasons, with the main two being that (1) they each have numerous significant holes on their team; and (2) they could draft a similar player which they would earlier without losing a great deal of value. For example, I think the Chiefs could move from No. 9 overall to #15-18 and draft their top-rated OT, CB or DT. I think a team like Cincinnati could do a similar thing and select their top-rated DT, DE or LB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Andy Dufresne said:
-----------------------------------------------

28. Jacksonville - Chris Ellis, DE - Virginia Tech

1st: Andre Caldwell

2nd: Chris Williams

-----------------------------------------------
Good job Andy. With DE being such a weakness for the Jags, Chris Ellis would fit nicely.

 
Admittingly I have not seen Brohm much but I have seen Ryan and Woodson. Personally I think Woodson is light years ahead of Ryan. Better arm, better mobility, smarter and he has great size. Plus he has improved every year and to me this is a great trait to have. If the Panthers draft him have Woodson learn under Jake for 2 years and then take over, I like that option.

 
Admittingly I have not seen Brohm much but I have seen Ryan and Woodson. Personally I think Woodson is light years ahead of Ryan. Better arm, better mobility, smarter and he has great size. Plus he has improved every year and to me this is a great trait to have. If the Panthers draft him have Woodson learn under Jake for 2 years and then take over, I like that option.
I don't know how you can say Woodson has a better arm than Ryan. Ryan has a quicker release too.
 
McFadden will be running the "Wild Hog" for the Vikings next year. Just watch.
:moneybag: Wouldn't that be something.I'd love it if they could land Jackson, Doucet, or Kelly.
I think Doucet would benefit the Vikings the most right away as a possession guy and I think he runs better routes. But I still think McFadden is the guy they need. With the Vikings emerging O-Line, I think lining McFadden, Taylor, and ADP up in the backfield would be incredibly fun to watch.
 
Admittingly I have not seen Brohm much but I have seen Ryan and Woodson. Personally I think Woodson is light years ahead of Ryan. Better arm, better mobility, smarter and he has great size. Plus he has improved every year and to me this is a great trait to have. If the Panthers draft him have Woodson learn under Jake for 2 years and then take over, I like that option.
I don't know how you can say Woodson has a better arm than Ryan. Ryan has a quicker release too.
Ryan may have a quicker release but AW has a shoulder cannon. Ryan seems to do better on the short passes with touch. AW seems to zip every pass in there. But believe it or not, I am not an NFL scout.
 
McFadden will be running the "Wild Hog" for the Vikings next year. Just watch.
:lol: Wouldn't that be something.I'd love it if they could land Jackson, Doucet, or Kelly.
I think Doucet would benefit the Vikings the most right away as a possession guy and I think he runs better routes. But I still think McFadden is the guy they need. With the Vikings emerging O-Line, I think lining McFadden, Taylor, and ADP up in the backfield would be incredibly fun to watch.
If they stay in the teens, they should be able to get a WR that can really help. I can't imagine that Kelly/Doucet/Jackson would all be gone at around the 15 spot (assuming Kelly declares).
Admittingly I have not seen Brohm much but I have seen Ryan and Woodson. Personally I think Woodson is light years ahead of Ryan. Better arm, better mobility, smarter and he has great size. Plus he has improved every year and to me this is a great trait to have. If the Panthers draft him have Woodson learn under Jake for 2 years and then take over, I like that option.
I don't know how you can say Woodson has a better arm than Ryan. Ryan has a quicker release too.
Ryan may have a quicker release but AW has a shoulder cannon. Ryan seems to do better on the short passes with touch. AW seems to zip every pass in there. But believe it or not, I am not an NFL scout.
That's funny, neither am I! :blackdot: :confused:
 
You seem to be quite high on Doucet. I've heard (sorry, no sources I have quotes from) that he's extremely soft.

Does that have any impact on your ranking of him?

 
You seem to be quite high on Doucet. I've heard (sorry, no sources I have quotes from) that he's extremely soft.

Does that have any impact on your ranking of him?
Maybe a bit, but not much. The only place that I've heard he's soft is around here.He's been injured with a mysterious groin/abdominal injury that's really slowed him this year.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top