It will be now.I heard on the news locally that it's standard practice in America but not in Europe.According to CNN, there is no key. However, it was a major breach in policy to only have one person in that cockpit at the time.guy who hit the can didn't have a key?So either pilot crashed on purpose or had a heart attack or something that knocked him out?
That pilot is ####ed all right. Along with everyone else onboard#### that pilot!
"Deliberate attempt to destory aircraft" per Frency news conference which is ongoing.
There was a "deliberate attempt to destroy the aircraft," Marseille prosecutor Brice Robin says about the Germanwings crash. The most plausible explanation of the crash is that the co-pilot, "through deliberate abstention, refused to open the cabin door ... to the chief pilot, and used the button" to cause the plane to lose altitude, Robin said. He emphasized that his conclusions were preliminary.
Also not sure why he said "attempt" when the aircraft did in fact crash in to a mountain and disintegrated.#### that pilot!
"Deliberate attempt to destory aircraft" per Frency news conference which is ongoing.
What, have a flight attendant sit up there while captain over goes to lay cable? I doubt it.It will be now.
Maybe he was just committing suicide and forgot he had 150 people with him?French dude at presser says co-pilot, Andreas Lubitz, not a known terrorist. Well that is good to know!
Yeah good luck trying to walk that one back.There was a "deliberate attempt to destroy the aircraft," Marseille prosecutor Brice Robin says about the Germanwings crash. The most plausible explanation of the crash is that the co-pilot, "through deliberate abstention, refused to open the cabin door ... to the chief pilot, and used the button" to cause the plane to lose altitude, Robin said. He emphasized that his conclusions were preliminary.
Unlike the other thread, I welcome jokes of all kinds in my thread.why cant they build the whole plane out of the stuff they use for the black box?
Yup. Pilot slumped over in the cockpit too I think. Frosted windows.This one reminds me more of the Greek crash several years back. Am I remembering this right- weren't there jets following it, seeing passed out pilots, passengers before it hit the mountain?Depends I guess. In a "normal" situation, both the pilot and the passengers should have had access to oxygen. That's why those masks drop down. If that's what happened, then either:Just for my own information, if the pilots had passed out due to decompression, can I assume that everyone on the plane was unconscious well before the plane crashed?
-The decompression event damaged the oxygen supply, in which case, yes, most likely everyone was unconscious
-The decompression event damaged the pilot's cabin oxygen supply (but they typically have aux oxygen in a tank), and the passengers might have had access to their masks
-The decompression event was explosive in nature, which could've completely incapacitated everyone very quickly...I'd say this is doubtful. It's a rare event, and contrasts with auto-pilot doing a slow descent...somebody had to program that. Also, this would probably mean there is debris elsewhere from the decompression event as it would almost definately be structurally damaging.
I find it curious that in the Malaysia air crash, they jumped right to pilot suicide/terrorism so quickly, but in this one, they haven't really gone far down that route, yet both have minimal communication and similar "not sure what happened" circumstances.
ETA: Man...there's substance in this thread.
I think you're right here...I've read something similar. A lack of ability to override a computer seems scary to me. (as a pilot...)I've heard that the autopilot in Airbus aircraft cannot be overridden by the crew. If true, perhaps that may have had something to do with the crash?![]()
Airbus and Boeing have different philosophy about autopilot.
On the Boeing, a pilot can override the autopilot with a predetermined force applied on the controls. The autopilot disengages immediately when the pilot manually pushes the control column, the control wheel or depresses the rudder pedals harder than usual. A warning message *AUTOPILOT DISC* is displayed in the cockpit if the autopilot is manually or automatically disconnected.
The Airbus philosophy is different. There have been some issues on the design of the autopilots on the Airbus planes. They prefer to give more control to the computer, believing that it would eliminate pilot error.
ETA: Not a pilot. I am however in a travel status.
You're stupid.How much fuel does it take to climb 10000+ feet plus? Huh? If they go around the mountains they probably only have to climb to a couple of hundred feet. Pilots are stupid.Does too.Does not.Over saves fuel. HTHThey should just start flying around the mountains.
You can work up via the civilan path. I have some friends who have done it. The issue is just getting hours. It's expensive to get the thousands of hours needed on your own dime. Best ways to get the stick time are either the military, or becoming a flight instructor, and usually transitioning to sight-seeing flights, then ultimately working your way up via regional or cargo.The co-pilot joined the airline in 2013 right out of flight school. He only had 660 hrs logged.
Don't most of the US airlines hire ex-military? It can't be that easy to just go to a flight school and get a job sitting shotgun on an airbus.
To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
I was just talking with a guy at work about this.With what happened to MH370 and now GermanWings! I begin to worry that someone is hypnotizing pilots or co-pilots to crash planes.
Have a system that will limit deviation from the flight path without approval from ground (pilot over-ride). Take control from the pilot and have the plane fly on auto.To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
Maybe the safest route is just to fly them like you do with drones. The pilots sit in some building somewhere and never actually travel. Solves a lot of problems.
That would work too...sort of a "Red button" that they could press on the ground to take control of the plane in an emergency. I guess it just depends on how fast you could identify said emergency and take over, and if it would be too late.Have a system that will limit deviation from the flight path without approval from ground (pilot over-ride). Take control from the pilot and have the plane fly on auto.To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
Maybe the safest route is just to fly them like you do with drones. The pilots sit in some building somewhere and never actually travel. Solves a lot of problems.
Capt. Sully was just interviewed, and he said the passengers, especially up in the front, would absolutely have known something was wrong for about 8 minutes. He said if a pilot is locked out there is something he or she can do to re-enter, but a pilot inside the cockpit has the means to prevent that from happening.I was hoping this was the case but it's looking more and more like everyone was completely aware of their impending doom :(Just for my own information, if the pilots had passed out due to decompression, can I assume that everyone on the plane was unconscious well before the plane crashed?
Because it would weigh too much.why cant they build the whole plane out of the stuff they use for the black box?
Would it really be easier to impersonate an airline pilot, infiltrate a cabin crew, and then take over a plane, killing yourself in the process, than to hack a flight system?Have a system that will limit deviation from the flight path without approval from ground (pilot over-ride). Take control from the pilot and have the plane fly on auto.To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
Maybe the safest route is just to fly them like you do with drones. The pilots sit in some building somewhere and never actually travel. Solves a lot of problems.
The co-pilot joined the airline in 2013 right out of flight school. He only had 660 hrs logged.
Don't most of the US airlines hire ex-military? It can't be that easy to just go to a flight school and get a job sitting shotgun on an airbus.
Its a discount airline, you have to figure they cut some corners...Everything I've read is that it was a slow decent. The French prosecutor reported today that the co-pilot's breathing was normal (which would indicate that there was not likely a medical issue). I'm sure they know a lot more than they're leading on and are pretty convinced this was deliberate.Seems like either they know more than they're saying or the prosecutor is making a snap judgment about this deliberate thing....
Is there any way the pilot could have passed out or had some other medical incident that would cause a steep descent?
They haven't found the data recorder so perhaps once that's found there will be more info, unless they have something not being released to the public.
I didn't even think of hacking...good point there too. Flying is a lot more scary when you have crazy pilots to consider. I became comfortable with they physics a while ago...now the psychological side is what's bothering me.Would it really be easier to impersonate an airline pilot, infiltrate a cabin crew, and then take over a plane, killing yourself in the process, than to hack a flight system?Have a system that will limit deviation from the flight path without approval from ground (pilot over-ride). Take control from the pilot and have the plane fly on auto.To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
Maybe the safest route is just to fly them like you do with drones. The pilots sit in some building somewhere and never actually travel. Solves a lot of problems.
I don't see how automation is the solution, and imo it would be mistake for the powers that be to move in this direction for the sake of security, at least at this point in the information age.
They do not think the co-pilot passed out because he did something manually with the flight control.Seems like either they know more than they're saying or the prosecutor is making a snap judgment about this deliberate thing....
Is there any way the pilot could have passed out or had some other medical incident that would cause a steep descent?
They haven't found the data recorder so perhaps once that's found there will be more info, unless they have something not being released to the public.
The co-pilot also overrode whatever measure the pilot can take to re-enter the cockpit once locked out.They do not think the co-pilot passed out because he did something manually with the flight control.Seems like either they know more than they're saying or the prosecutor is making a snap judgment about this deliberate thing....
Is there any way the pilot could have passed out or had some other medical incident that would cause a steep descent?
They haven't found the data recorder so perhaps once that's found there will be more info, unless they have something not being released to the public.
The history of the co-pilot is now probably the key focus. Some facts here.They do not think the co-pilot passed out because he did something manually with the flight control.Seems like either they know more than they're saying or the prosecutor is making a snap judgment about this deliberate thing....
Is there any way the pilot could have passed out or had some other medical incident that would cause a steep descent?
They haven't found the data recorder so perhaps once that's found there will be more info, unless they have something not being released to the public.
Just post here. That other thread is awful.Can we merge the two threads, or was that capability lost in the Great Downgrade of '15?
ThisWould it really be easier to impersonate an airline pilot, infiltrate a cabin crew, and then take over a plane, killing yourself in the process, than to hack a flight system?Have a system that will limit deviation from the flight path without approval from ground (pilot over-ride). Take control from the pilot and have the plane fly on auto.To be honest, most of these planes could fly themselves from destination to destination completely autonomously. The issue is just how to program them to deal with unexpected events.Or just pilots...Time to think about banning planes.
Maybe the safest route is just to fly them like you do with drones. The pilots sit in some building somewhere and never actually travel. Solves a lot of problems.
I don't see how automation is the solution, and imo it would be mistake for the powers that be to move in this direction for the sake of security, at least at this point in the information age.
28 years old. Too ####### young to have that responsibility even if you are not crazy.The co-pilot joined the airline in 2013 right out of flight school. He only had 660 hrs logged.
Don't most of the US airlines hire ex-military? It can't be that easy to just go to a flight school and get a job sitting shotgun on an airbus.
Honestly, I agree. There could easily be an airport designation on the GPS that would allow "ground contact" at airports.Seems like if the plane has an alarm to warn the pilots to pull up because the ground is approaching that the plane would in fact pull its self up to avoid crashing...On the other hand if that was the case, after takeoff the plane would never land. Oh well back to the drawing board.
Hey not bad, you have put some thought into this.Possible solution
Flight path entered by pilot prior to take off.
Flight path approval needed by air traffic control.
If plane deviates from the flight path without ground approval.
Autopilot automatically engages and plane continues on original flight path.
Pilots lose control of plane, and plane is flown by autopilot until ATC gives control back to pilots.
We need a quick fix first... How about puttng chamber pots in the cockpit?Possible solution
Flight path entered by pilot prior to take off.
Flight path approval needed by air traffic control.
If plane deviates from the flight path without ground approval.
Autopilot automatically engages and plane continues on original flight path.
Pilots lose control of plane, and plane is flown by autopilot until ATC gives control back to pilots.