What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Any Buy-Low people that people really like this week? (1 Viewer)

Who's worth more? Mathews or Ingram? Was trying to work out a trade that fell apart when we differed greatly on these two. Just curious
An argument can be made either way. I'd rather have Ingram, but neither are worth enough to act like there's a big difference between the two.

 
How about Brandon Marshall, coming off 3 poor, and getting worse weeks, averaging well under 10 pts per game?
Calvin and Marshall are definite targets especially if the owners are 1-4 or worse. Desperation drives the price down.
2-3 Calvin owner who would welcome buy low offer.
2-3 Calvin owner checking in (4th/12 in points, 9th in standings, bad luck on matchups)

I wouldn't sell very low.

Who's worth more? Mathews or Ingram? Was trying to work out a trade that fell apart when we differed greatly on these two. Just curious
I own each in multiple leagues and the two together in one league.

Tough call, but I've been valuing Ingram more highly.

I'd sell Ingram and it wouldn't take much. High end WR3 maybe.
That may not be a bad thought either. I'd rather see how the lottery ticket pays off than sell for a WR3 type who's not much better than someone I could pull off the wire.

There's a chance he continues to do what he was doing for the first couple of weeks.
He's a TD dependent RB3/4. He was just running hot in the TD department. Sell high.
Disagree.

6.0 yards per carry through the first two weeks. And it showed, it wasn't a fluke or broken plays or great blocking, he was kicking ### and taking names.


 
How about Brandon Marshall, coming off 3 poor, and getting worse weeks, averaging well under 10 pts per game?
Calvin and Marshall are definite targets especially if the owners are 1-4 or worse. Desperation drives the price down.
2-3 Calvin owner who would welcome buy low offer.
2-3 Calvin owner checking in (4th/12 in points, 9th in standings, bad luck on matchups)

I wouldn't sell very low.

Who's worth more? Mathews or Ingram? Was trying to work out a trade that fell apart when we differed greatly on these two. Just curious
I own each in multiple leagues and the two together in one league.

Tough call, but I've been valuing Ingram more highly.

I'd sell Ingram and it wouldn't take much. High end WR3 maybe.
That may not be a bad thought either. I'd rather see how the lottery ticket pays off than sell for a WR3 type who's not much better than someone I could pull off the wire.

There's a chance he continues to do what he was doing for the first couple of weeks.
He's a TD dependent RB3/4. He was just running hot in the TD department. Sell high.
Disagree.

6.0 yards per carry through the first two weeks. And it showed, it wasn't a fluke or broken plays or great blocking, he was kicking ### and taking names.
Agreed but he's going to get 9-12ish carries a game and minimum receptions. lot's of sub 10 point games with that usage.

 
Mark Ingram

Saints on bye. Was running as well as any back in the league. I'd find where the other owner is weak overall (or even weak for just Week 6) and try to snatch him. IMO a borderline RB1/2 when healthy. Only thing keeping him from elite is workload. And on the bright side (in making offers for him), Pierre & Khiry both coming off big fantasy days.
Doubt it. Own him in one league and if I held him this long I'm not selling low.

 
Mark Ingram

Saints on bye. Was running as well as any back in the league. I'd find where the other owner is weak overall (or even weak for just Week 6) and try to snatch him. IMO a borderline RB1/2 when healthy. Only thing keeping him from elite is workload. And on the bright side (in making offers for him), Pierre & Khiry both coming off big fantasy days.
Doubt it. Own him in one league and if I held him this long I'm not selling low.
Agreed. He should be back next week, so if an owner had held onto until now, I don't think he's going to sell low on him.

 
Mark Ingram

Saints on bye. Was running as well as any back in the league. I'd find where the other owner is weak overall (or even weak for just Week 6) and try to snatch him. IMO a borderline RB1/2 when healthy. Only thing keeping him from elite is workload. And on the bright side (in making offers for him), Pierre & Khiry both coming off big fantasy days.
Doubt it. Own him in one league and if I held him this long I'm not selling low.
Agreed. He should be back next week, so if an owner had held onto until now, I don't think he's going to sell low on him.
Absolutely.

I might be bias as I drafted the guy and started him from week 1, but I held him and people have made offers along the way...didn't even consider a single one.

I tried to grab him in another league...that owner was not at all interested in anything I had to offer, either.

 
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.

 
I'm looking at Colston and wondering if things are going to get better or if this is the inevitable decline happening some people have been predicting the last few years. Can't decide which side of the coin to land on that.

 
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low

(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low

(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)
I actually expected Romo to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb this season going into the season--and I believe that he's trending upwards as the season progresses. However--with Romo--much of the fantasy community feels that he's untrustable. One bad game--and he goes from being a decent fantasy qb to being a "trainwreck". if he does have a bad game against seattle--I assure you that many of his owners will abandon much of their loyalty towards him. In fact--there might be a buy low window now--ahead of the seattle game--as Romo owners might fear what happens in that game.

 
How about Brandon Marshall, coming off 3 poor, and getting worse weeks, averaging well under 10 pts per game?
Agreed. I'm trying to buy low on Marshall. The Marshall owner in my league needs a TE so I'm trying to deal Terrance Williams and Delanie Walker for Marshall and a bench RB. Might be too low though.

 
I'm looking at Jason Witten. Value is rock bottom but I think that's more because they have faced the 2nd, 6th, 7th, and 9th worst defenses for TEs.

Four of the next 5 weeks include the 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 8th BEST match-ups fantasy-wise for tight ends.

I also think that teams are going to start piling against the run to slow Dallas down and that will open up the passing game. Witten hasn't lost anything this year. He's just being asked to block more. I think that if teams are susceptible to the tight end he's going to be featured more.

 
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low

(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)
I actually expected Romo to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb this season going into the season--and I believe that he's trending upwards as the season progresses. However--with Romo--much of the fantasy community feels that he's untrustable. One bad game--and he goes from being a decent fantasy qb to being a "trainwreck". if he does have a bad game against seattle--I assure you that many of his owners will abandon much of their loyalty towards him. In fact--there might be a buy low window now--ahead of the seattle game--as Romo owners might fear what happens in that game.
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.

 
I am going to say Allen Robinson. About #20 in WR targets overall and # 9 in the past 3 weeks. Bortles will get better as the season progresses. JAX D stinks and there should be lots of PPR garbage point available. I am not usually high on rookie WR but I like this situation alot.

 
Zac Stacy.

He's finally got an offense around him. Now the TD's will come. Anyone that thinks Cunningham is any sort of threat isn't watching the games. Stacy is clearly the best runner in St. Louis.

 
Zac Stacy.

He's finally got an offense around him. Now the TD's will come. Anyone that thinks Cunningham is any sort of threat isn't watching the games. Stacy is clearly the best runner in St. Louis.
Stacy owner offered me him for Calvin Johnson, my response... "He's not dead" lol

 
Who's worth more? Mathews or Ingram? Was trying to work out a trade that fell apart when we differed greatly on these two. Just curious
An argument can be made either way. I'd rather have Ingram, but neither are worth enough to act like there's a big difference between the two.
I just sold Mathews in 14 team dynasty for trich and a 1st round pick next yr. Also own bradshaw. Mccoy Lbell and DMartin my other rb

 
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)
I actually expected Romo to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb this season going into the season--and I believe that he's trending upwards as the season progresses. However--with Romo--much of the fantasy community feels that he's untrustable. One bad game--and he goes from being a decent fantasy qb to being a "trainwreck". if he does have a bad game against seattle--I assure you that many of his owners will abandon much of their loyalty towards him. In fact--there might be a buy low window now--ahead of the seattle game--as Romo owners might fear what happens in that game.
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.
I don't think we are seeing eye to eye here. Many people that drafted Romo expected him to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb. According to your own stats--he has performed at QB12 so far--which to a lot of Romo owners is under-performing and possibly disappointing. Many fantasy owners who own a player that is not performing to their expectations may very well be motivated to sell that player prior to a matchup that they view as being very tough. I'm not sure how this dynamic is considered unique to the leagues that I play in?
 
Zac Stacy.

He's finally got an offense around him. Now the TD's will come. Anyone that thinks Cunningham is any sort of threat isn't watching the games. Stacy is clearly the best runner in St. Louis.
Other than being a Stacy owner,I have no idea how you came to that conclusion.

 
I am going to say Allen Robinson. About #20 in WR targets overall and # 9 in the past 3 weeks. Bortles will get better as the season progresses. JAX D stinks and there should be lots of PPR garbage point available. I am not usually high on rookie WR but I like this situation alot.
Look at the waiver wire. Mostly likely you can pick him up for free.

 
Zac Stacy.

He's finally got an offense around him. Now the TD's will come. Anyone that thinks Cunningham is any sort of threat isn't watching the games. Stacy is clearly the best runner in St. Louis.
Other than being a Stacy owner,I have no idea how you came to that conclusion.
Agreed. As a Stacy owner, I'm trying to sell but without success. He might be running well but there's not enough volume with Cunningham

around, and he has a tough schedule coming up (oh and he's dinged up). I'm finding he has not much trade value - people don't see much upside and don't think he's very talented.

 
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)
I actually expected Romo to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb this season going into the season--and I believe that he's trending upwards as the season progresses. However--with Romo--much of the fantasy community feels that he's untrustable. One bad game--and he goes from being a decent fantasy qb to being a "trainwreck". if he does have a bad game against seattle--I assure you that many of his owners will abandon much of their loyalty towards him. In fact--there might be a buy low window now--ahead of the seattle game--as Romo owners might fear what happens in that game.
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.
I don't think we are seeing eye to eye here. Many people that drafted Romo expected him to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb. According to your own stats--he has performed at QB12 so far--which to a lot of Romo owners is under-performing and possibly disappointing. Many fantasy owners who own a player that is not performing to their expectations may very well be motivated to sell that player prior to a matchup that they view as being very tough. I'm not sure how this dynamic is considered unique to the leagues that I play in?
Hopefully not too many.

FFC has his ADP as QB10 with the next three guys after him as Newton, Kaep, and Griffin.

Top 5 is asking a lot when you have Manning, Brees, Rodgers, Luck, and Stafford as basically the consensus top 5 and then Newton has been top 4-6 (varies by scoring of course) every season of his career to date. And then of course Matt Ryan with both WR's healthy

 
Mark Ingram

Saints on bye. Was running as well as any back in the league. I'd find where the other owner is weak overall (or even weak for just Week 6) and try to snatch him. IMO a borderline RB1/2 when healthy. Only thing keeping him from elite is workload. And on the bright side (in making offers for him), Pierre & Khiry both coming off big fantasy days.
Doubt it. Own him in one league and if I held him this long I'm not selling low.
Agreed. He should be back next week, so if an owner had held onto until now, I don't think he's going to sell low on him.
I think its the opposite....sell price is pretty good now and the risk that KRob is still going to be part of the committee looms large.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jvdesigns2002 said:
I still think Victor Cruz has some buy low potential. Also--I'm just forecasting here---but if Romo has a bad game in Seattle this week--which is very possible--I would automatically put him the buy low category for next week.
People fully expect offenses and offensive players to struggle at SEA though. Romo's season has been just fine, what we expected, no reason to believe it won't continue like that. I don't understand how a bad week @ SEA could possibly make somebody a buy low(In many leagues/typical scoring, Romo is QB12 right now...that's about right, isn't it?)
I actually expected Romo to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb this season going into the season--and I believe that he's trending upwards as the season progresses. However--with Romo--much of the fantasy community feels that he's untrustable. One bad game--and he goes from being a decent fantasy qb to being a "trainwreck". if he does have a bad game against seattle--I assure you that many of his owners will abandon much of their loyalty towards him. In fact--there might be a buy low window now--ahead of the seattle game--as Romo owners might fear what happens in that game.
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.
I don't think we are seeing eye to eye here. Many people that drafted Romo expected him to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb. According to your own stats--he has performed at QB12 so far--which to a lot of Romo owners is under-performing and possibly disappointing. Many fantasy owners who own a player that is not performing to their expectations may very well be motivated to sell that player prior to a matchup that they view as being very tough. I'm not sure how this dynamic is considered unique to the leagues that I play in?
Hopefully not too many.FFC has his ADP as QB10 with the next three guys after him as Newton, Kaep, and Griffin.

Top 5 is asking a lot when you have Manning, Brees, Rodgers, Luck, and Stafford as basically the consensus top 5 and then Newton has been top 4-6 (varies by scoring of course) every season of his career to date. And then of course Matt Ryan with both WR's healthy
I agree with your top 3 for sure at draft time. I think most would have put luck in the 4 position--and ryan, stafford, cam, romo--somewhere in the 5-8 range. Prior to the football regular season starting--many (including myself) predicted that the cowboys defense could be one of the worst defenses in the history of the league--and that the cowboys would be playing a lot of "catch-up" or be in a lot of shootouts because of this. This catch up generally tends to be a treasure trove for qb's when it comes to fantasy--so lots of fantasy owners saw some very high potential value here. Part of why I think Romo is still a buy low is because I'm still not sold that they are as solid as a team as they appear to be. I see lots of room for this "playing from behind dynamic" and "shootout" type games in the future. The cowboys still play the giants twice, the eagles twice, the redskins once, they play the bears, and the jags all before week 15. Aside from seattle this week--the only other game where Romo might not be a solid starting option is against Arizona--and frankly--they don't intimidate me much. If it comes to a buy low window--anybody that is interested in romo should either look to make a move now--or to hope for a bad game on Sunday and then act accordingly. The cowboys schedule the rest of the way appears to look very favorable to Romo in regards to fantasy.
 
Mark Ingram is a MUST HAVE player for the long haul..

final 6 weeks of the season, games against Ravens, Steelers, Panthers, Bears, Falcons, Bucs..

typical fantasy playoff weeks ( 13-15) in bold..

I mean really, can it get any better than that..Panthers/Falcons are home games, Bears on the road..

Chicago Dec 15th, perfect time to pound the Bears the running game..

for this week, I'd say Randle if available, J. Hunter

 
Marshall is a guy I'm targeting heavily.

Also foles is Another guy that I want. Chip should get that offense performing at a high level sooner than later

 
Mark Ingram is a MUST HAVE player for the long haul..

final 6 weeks of the season, games against Ravens, Steelers, Panthers, Bears, Falcons, Bucs..

typical fantasy playoff weeks ( 13-15) in bold..

I mean really, can it get any better than that..Panthers/Falcons are home games, Bears on the road..

Chicago Dec 15th, perfect time to pound the Bears the running game..

for this week, I'd say Randle if available, J. Hunter
Who would you recommend the rest of the way....Ingram or Moreno? Both are available in a short bench league.

 
Benjamin and Foles good for a team starting Austin Davis/Romo at QB? Or would Floyd and Foles be good enough for Brandon Marshall?

Marshall owners?

 
I'm trying to buy low on any of Foles and Newton and possibly Big Ben, although he may not be considered "buy low".

Mainly because my qb sucks and they are the only guys out there that I still think could salvage some upside as the season goes on.

 
Mark Ingram is a MUST HAVE player for the long haul..

final 6 weeks of the season, games against Ravens, Steelers, Panthers, Bears, Falcons, Bucs..

typical fantasy playoff weeks ( 13-15) in bold..

I mean really, can it get any better than that..Panthers/Falcons are home games, Bears on the road..

Chicago Dec 15th, perfect time to pound the Bears the running game..

for this week, I'd say Randle if available, J. Hunter
Who would you recommend the rest of the way....Ingram or Moreno? Both are available in a short bench league.
Moreno is intriguing as a buy low candidate right now, IMO. I was hoping someone would mention him as I am curious to hear thoughts on his outlook ROS.
 
I'm looking at Jason Witten. Value is rock bottom but I think that's more because they have faced the 2nd, 6th, 7th, and 9th worst defenses for TEs.

Four of the next 5 weeks include the 3rd, 5th, 6th, and 8th BEST match-ups fantasy-wise for tight ends.

I also think that teams are going to start piling against the run to slow Dallas down and that will open up the passing game. Witten hasn't lost anything this year. He's just being asked to block more. I think that if teams are susceptible to the tight end he's going to be featured more.
My #2 guy that I'm trading for this week is Victor Cruz. He's 27th in targets but is 7th in YPC (among the top target leaders). As the Giants offense rounds into shape, with people now having to defend both Randle and Donnell, as well as a re-surging ground game with both Jennings and Williams, I think the field is going to open up a bit for Cruz. I would not be surprised to see him make the jump into the top 15 in targets ROS and add 6-7 TDs to his already decent yardage rate per game. For reference, I was able to trade Cooks for Cruz this past week (non-PPR... in PPR I'd rather have Cooks).

His schedule is also pretty good, with JAX, WAS, PHI, and two games against DAL left.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.
I don't think we are seeing eye to eye here. Many people that drafted Romo expected him to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb. According to your own stats--he has performed at QB12 so far--which to a lot of Romo owners is under-performing and possibly disappointing. Many fantasy owners who own a player that is not performing to their expectations may very well be motivated to sell that player prior to a matchup that they view as being very tough. I'm not sure how this dynamic is considered unique to the leagues that I play in?
Incorrect. Many people that drafted Romo HOPED he would be a value pick and a top 5-8 fantasy QB. He was solidly in the QB10-QB15 range preseason. Big difference as if they expected him to be a top 5, they would have drafted him top 5.

 
Who do you play with that you think they will panic and sell low on a guy because he plays at SEA next week? That just doesn't seem to make any sense.
I don't think we are seeing eye to eye here. Many people that drafted Romo expected him to be a top 5-8 fantasy qb. According to your own stats--he has performed at QB12 so far--which to a lot of Romo owners is under-performing and possibly disappointing. Many fantasy owners who own a player that is not performing to their expectations may very well be motivated to sell that player prior to a matchup that they view as being very tough. I'm not sure how this dynamic is considered unique to the leagues that I play in?
Incorrect. Many people that drafted Romo HOPED he would be a value pick and a top 5-8 fantasy QB. He was solidly in the QB10-QB15 range preseason. Big difference as if they expected him to be a top 5, they would have drafted him top 5.
I expected Romo to be a top 5-8 quarterback that I could draft in the 10-15 range. I expected Dallas to need to pass much more frequently and not have the running game that they have.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top