What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Any new TO news about where he will wind up? (1 Viewer)

UFO

Footballguy
I know folks here are tired of TO talk but it seems rightfully so the topic has been back burnered for awile.With most seasons over it's time to look at 06Some possibilities for TOBrowns-something tells me these guys are a few players and another year of experience from being a playoff team.Ravens-Could he turn Boller into a StudTampa-Clayton looking like bust. TO/Gallowy receiving corp!Den- Smith getting older and Lelie a bustKC-the one piece to put them over the top. I mean imagine what Green could do with TO, he has turned Eddie Kennison into almost a stud!

 
I know folks here are tired of TO talk but it seems rightfully so the topic has been back burnered for awile.

With most seasons over it's time to look at 06

Some possibilities for TO

Browns-something tells me these guys are a few players and another year of experience from being a playoff team.

Ravens-Could he turn Boller into a Stud

Tampa-Clayton looking like bust. TO/Gallowy receiving corp!

Den- Smith getting older and Lelie a bust

KC-the one piece to put them over the top. I mean imagine what Green could do with TO, he has turned Eddie Kennison into almost a stud!
Browns - No way. Owens would rather sit than play with a team without an established QB. Plus the Browns have never shown to be the type of team that goes out and gets the high profile free agents.Ravens - Wouldn't bring him in after how he insulted them when he was a free/"not so free" agent. The fans and Baltimore media would eat him alive

Tampa - Again, no established QB = No TO

Den - Could be a legit possibility.

KC - Doubtful. If Vermeil stays, I don't think he could handle TO (nor do I think he would want someone who can be so disruptive)

You forgot about Miami...With the cap room they have, Sabans arrogance, and Miami looking to become a winner again in the short term this is probably the best choice. I know you are going to say that they don't have an established QB but I don't doubt Miami will have one by the time 2006 training camp starts.

Best bet is Denver or Miami.

Also, even though it would never happen, I'd really like to see him pair up with Moss in Oakland.

 
What about SDQuality QBTeam on berge of being a contenderAFC West pass happy divisionLT/Gates and McCardell already in place, TO would go insaneIfsWould Marty S put up with his BS?Do they have the cap money to bring him in?

 
Has'nt Blank already gone on record as saying no way to TO? Also Knapp the OC and TO are not exactly best buds!

 
If I was TO I would look at it like this:#1: I want a city that I can be the center of attention #2: Has a QB that is established#3: A coach that is going to tolerate my antics, even if I tone them down.I think that eliminates Atlanta. I know TO lives in Atlanta, but Vick would not be a good QB for TO. TO would being throwing fits about the lack of balls thrown to him by the 4th game.I like the Denver and Miami ideas. Denver has a coach that might cause a problem with wish #3 and Miami might have a problem with #2 wish.

 
is any coach really equipped to tolerate TO? the ones that come to mind will be gone, marriuci, tice, capers

 
Minnesota wouldn't suprise me.If Santana hadn't burst out this year, I think Snyder would've made a move for him.... but, given that he has, I think he'll refrain.

 
is any coach really equipped to tolerate TO?

the ones that come to mind will be gone, marriuci, tice, capers
I personally think Parcells could take him on. That Dallas offense would be scary with him and a guy like, say, Drew Brees.
 
Has'nt Blank already gone on record as saying no way to TO? Also Knapp the OC and TO are not exactly best buds!
Funny thing is, TO is the 1 player that could single handly stop Vick. He'd have him chewed up and spit out by game 5. When TO realizes Vick can't get him the ball he won't just throw him under the bus, he'll push him off the platform and into the train!
 
DENATLKC (although I think they have cap issues)SD (is Drew Bree the kind of QB that can get him the ball? If SD gets TO and he is cooperative AND they get good value for Rivers they will be a scary team for sometime)

 
TO did some self promoting and I see the emergence of TO in Green Bay.Favre's last year would have TO as the #1, Walker as the #2 with Driver in the slot/possession WR. With Green or Davenport at the RB with a possible Gado as the back up the Green Bay offense would almost be unstopable. TO and Walker go after the balls that Favre would throw up unlike Ferguson and the other Euro NFL WR's they have. TO in Green Bay would be sick.

 
Atlanta with Vick would never work out. Both of these players have huge egos. My best bet is that he will end up in Dallas. Bill Parcells will not take any of TO's crap, and he will force him to settle down. With Bledsoe, I think TO will have one of the best seasons of his career.

 
I know folks here are tired of TO talk
:confused: What kind of crazy talk is that??GB another TO thread whoo hoooo :thumbup: :thumbup:

Anyone have a current video of him playing b-ball in the driveway?

 
Mortenson said he will land in Miami. Close 2nd was Denver/Dallas
I don't understand this logic. He left SF because he didn't want to play with a QB who did a great job getting the ball to him... McNabb is 2nd fiddle to everyone... yet he'd be willing to go to MIA where they've yet to determine their QB for 2006??? That doesn't make any logical, TO-sense!
 
Mortenson said he will land in Miami. Close 2nd was Denver/Dallas
I don't understand this logic. He left SF because he didn't want to play with a QB who did a great job getting the ball to him... McNabb is 2nd fiddle to everyone... yet he'd be willing to go to MIA where they've yet to determine their QB for 2006??? That doesn't make any logical, TO-sense!
That's probably the strongest argument I've heard for TO going to MIA yet. Have any of his moves thus far made any logical sense?
 
Mortenson said he will land in Miami. Close 2nd was Denver/Dallas
Isnt Chambers considered a legit #1? (At least IMO he is)With all the other needs the Phins need offensively and defensively, I cant see an upgrade above Chambers/Booker/McMichael as a primary need.

 
If Norv Turner stays, Oakland is the team for Owens. He'll be able to walk all over Turner and denounce Collins as much as he wants.

 
TO is probably going to Dallas next season....whether Dallas fans want him or not. And Chris Mortensen will probably be right as usual....Bill Parcells will likely retire and avoid the potential nightmares and heart attacks that would no doubt ensue. jmho.

 
Has'nt Blank already gone on record as saying no way to TO? Also Knapp the OC and TO are not exactly best buds!
Funny thing is, TO is the 1 player that could single handly stop Vick. He'd have him chewed up and spit out by game 5. When TO realizes Vick can't get him the ball he won't just throw him under the bus, he'll push him off the platform and into the train!
I could see something like "I'm not the one who's herpes broke out during the superbowl and limited my play" coming out of his mouth.
 
I would love to see him in NE next year with a 1 year incentive laden contract.They had no problems with the "cancerous" Dillon.Belichick demands respect and I think TO will fall into line. Could you imagine that team?

 
I think cap room will limit most teams. Den, KC, Atl, TB, I am pretty sure are not going to be able to afford him. What about San Diego? With Mcardell's contract up and Reche Caldwell's coming to an end as well they need a WR.Imagine LT, Gates, and TO :eek:

 
Den- Smith getting older and Lelie a bust
Den - Could be a legit possibility.
There is no way Shannahan would bring him in. He got rid of Deltha O'neal for the same reason TO is the way that he is. O'neal wasn't even half as bad as TO is though.
 
Jets | Maintaining an interest in T. O.Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:40:18 -0800Dave Hutchihson, of the Star-Ledger, reports the New York Jets reportedly are keeping Philadelphia Eagles WR Terrell Owens on their radar for 2006. Tuesday, Dec. 27, offensive coordinator Mike Heimerdinger said the team needs a speedy, game-breaking receiver. "He's right," the person said. "When the Jets break the huddle, they don't have anyone who the other team is afraid of."

 
TO did some self promoting and I see the emergence of TO in Green Bay.

Favre's last year would have TO as the #1, Walker as the #2 with Driver in the slot/possession WR. With Green or Davenport at the RB with a possible Gado as the back up the Green Bay offense would almost be unstopable. TO and Walker go after the balls that Favre would throw up unlike Ferguson and the other Euro NFL WR's they have.

TO in Green Bay would be sick.
:goodposting: I think I had that dream couple nights ago, The wife said I was mumbling something about Favre throwing his 5th TD pass against the Bears on Monday Night Football!! :bag:

 
I broke out my crystal ball, and I saw:New York Jets:HC: Mike HeimerdingerQB: Billy VolekRB: Reggie BushWR: Terrell OwensOh, my God that would be sick. And, no, I'm not a Jets fan...

 
I broke out my crystal ball, and I saw:

New York Jets:

HC: Mike Heimerdinger

QB: Billy Volek

RB: Reggie Bush

WR: Terrell Owens

Oh, my God that would be sick. And, no, I'm not a Jets fan...
I am a Jet fan - if that happens I would be doing a happy dance for months!!!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top