What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anybody else think this was bush league? (2 Viewers)

Dallas did enough to beat themselves today. It's a good learning experience. If they can't stop a few consecutive dive plays at the end of the game, that's on them.

 
Koya said:
This has nothing to do with "classy" The goal is to win games on way to winning a championship. A few thoughts:While a FG gives them a near impossible to overcome three possession lead, a FG (one could argue) has a chance to get blocked, run back, then suddenly its a one possession game. If you don't punch it in, they STILL have to march down 99 yards with no (or one?) TO and then get an onside and then score.You get a chance to give a guy that works his ### off for not much acclaim the chance to get in the boxscore. That is good for team morale, and good morale = more wins, better shot at the championship.Was 100% the right call.
:thumbup: Agreed 100%. Less about rubbing it in and more about giving a guy four shots at the end zone who may never get it again.Did it appear to anyone else that Phillips didn't shake Belichick's hand after the game?
 
Maybe if the Cowboy D had actually shown up today....
They didn't get much help from the offense. The Dallas offense failed to sustain long drives to rest the defense. The defense failed to stop the Patriots on 3rd down. They cyclically beat themselves today. Their kick return unit stunk as well, putting the offense in terrible starting position all day.
 
Koya said:
This has nothing to do with "classy" The goal is to win games on way to winning a championship. A few thoughts:While a FG gives them a near impossible to overcome three possession lead, a FG (one could argue) has a chance to get blocked, run back, then suddenly its a one possession game. If you don't punch it in, they STILL have to march down 99 yards with no (or one?) TO and then get an onside and then score.You get a chance to give a guy that works his ### off for not much acclaim the chance to get in the boxscore. That is good for team morale, and good morale = more wins, better shot at the championship.Was 100% the right call.
:confused: Agreed 100%. Less about rubbing it in and more about giving a guy four shots at the end zone who may never get it again.Did it appear to anyone else that Phillips didn't shake Belichick's hand after the game?
Yeah I saw that too. BB just kind of made a face and exited stage left. Wade Phillips sucks. He sucked in Buffalo as a coach and he still sucks today.
 
Besides, any team that employs Roy Williams deserves bush league stuff happening to them all game.
That statement probably extends to Detroit as well.
Not really.
Well, Matt Millen......bush league.....?
As far as I can recall Matt Millen played hard his entire career and was not a cheap shot artist.
Correct.However, let's look at his illustrious GM career. Bush league would be a compliment in that regard.
So how does that apply to Roy Williams WR of the Detroit Lions?
Same name... :confused:
Ok, just wanted to make sure you were spouting useless #### in the shark pool.
Yes, just a muscle shark trying to get to great white status...
 
As a Cowboy fan I hated to see it, but as a brady, welker and moss owner I wanted them to throw for a td with 19 secs left. :confused:

 
this isn't connecticut high school football. this is the nfl.

in this nfl, with it's borderline mediocrity, every spread is less than 7 points, i don't know why people have a problem with teams that can and will go out and dominate someone. i find it refreshing. if it means playing with chip on your shoulder, wanting to send a message, so be it.

(i'm not a pats fan)

 
mad sweeney said:
Bad_Mo said:
Colin Dowling said:
Bad_Mo said:
Waddle Fillups should learn to shut his fat piehole when it comes to dissin' NE.

How's that for your tainted SBs, you fat SOB who has ridden his fat daddy's coat tails?
Please translate to Inles. TIA.
OK, here it is....in INLES, as requested:Overweight Blowhard good to understand that not good to run fat mouth to Peter King about tainted anything. Fatboy only is where he is because of cowboy hat wearing fat daddy.
I love posts that point out typos while making their own glaring mistakes. Unless "good to understand" is some new phrase I've never heard.
Calling Colin colon is pretty juvenile stuff, but most everything this character has posted in this thread is. He is part of the increasingly annoying noise level in this once truely outstanding message board. On topic, why not take the FG there? Puts the game completely out of reach (yes, it was already) but anyone remember the Flutie drop kick? This is typical Belichick. News flash: He WANTED the TD. I'm surprise he didn't have Brady throw to go after Mannings' record, actually. That is his style. Maybe he is mellowing as his sweatshirts get more ragged looking, a bit frayed around the scissor cuts.
Truth be written, I actually meant to hit "i" not "o"....take a look at your keyboard.
 
I'm a HUGE Cowboys fan (grew up just outside of Dallas), and while I think BB is a despicable person, I have no problem w/ any team continuing to play football, regardless of the time left in the game or the score. I absolutely despise coaches that take their foot off the gas in blowouts. IMO, it's not fair for the backups, who often only get to play in blowouts. Those guys don't bust their butts every week to take knee after knee. It's the defense's job to stop the offense, period! And trust me, my sofa took a beating w/ every 1st down NE picked up during the game. Sucks for Dallas, but they earned the beat down.....including that last TD!

 
yeah, it may have been a "shut your cake hole" to phillips...but i think it was more of a naval academy thing. eckel was rated pretty highly at FB coming out of navy, had to go into active duty instead of draft/NFL but served in newport (near pats training camp) in 2005 was cut in last round of cuts by the pats in 2005, picked up by miami, released, claimed again by NE this season...worked his way up from practice squad to backup FB behind heath evans, and is a team favorite, especially to the coaches who love his work ethic, and to belichick who of course loves the naval academy...so, sure, it was prob a big eff you to wade, but i think it was more belichick giving some limelight to one of his annapolis homies.

http://patriots.scout.com/2/677233.html

 
If they kick a field goal, we'd hear about how they should have kneeled. If they kneel with time left on the clock, we hear how they're rubbing it in. The only sportsmanline answer would have been to gently roll the ball backwards towards their own goal line.

 
If they kneel with time left on the clock, we hear how they're rubbing it in.
huh?
If they'd kneeled on first, second and third down, there would have been a half a minute or so left on the clock. Kneeling three times and just handing the ball back to the opponent is kind of showing them up, like, I know we're only up two scores, but come on, you have no chance. Normally, teams only kneel when kneeling three times will end the half/game. Of course, that wouldn't have been an issue if the Cowboys hadn't called their last time out.
 
Colin Dowling said:
PahtyTom said:
Colin Dowling said:
You make the mistake of thinking Belichik is a classy coach, which by the admission of everyone on earth, he isn't.

Of course it's bush league, but it doesn't matter. The Patriots are the cocks-of-the-walk right now. But to win the Super Bowl they will likely have to beat Jax or Ten at home, beat Indy (home or away), and then beat the Cowboys on a neutral field. If they win the SUper Bowl this year, it will be well-deserved through quite a gauntlet.

I just like how a cheater like Rodney Harrison derives so much satisfaction out of doing nothing more then getting run over a few times by Marion Barber. Good studd.
From: Round Rock Texas
I'm a Titans fan, frankly. I'm much more miffed at them losing today then the Cowboys. I think a few things about the NE/Dal game...1. New England was clearly the better team.

2. A late TD or a 1 point win, it looks the same in the standings.

3. Rodney Harrison is a cheater

4. The Cowboys were the 2nd best team on that field, but they shot themselves in the foot plenty w/ penalties.
Thanks for clearing that up.
 
If they kneel with time left on the clock, we hear how they're rubbing it in.
huh?
If they'd kneeled on first, second and third down, there would have been a half a minute or so left on the clock. Kneeling three times and just handing the ball back to the opponent is kind of showing them up, like, I know we're only up two scores, but come on, you have no chance. Normally, teams only kneel when kneeling three times will end the half/game. Of course, that wouldn't have been an issue if the Cowboys hadn't called their last time out.
ok, i didn't see the end.agreed that if kneeling 3 times doesn't run out the clock, that is rubbing it in.i don't have a problem with them just running up the gut.
 
If they kick a field goal, we'd hear about how they should have kneeled. If they kneel with time left on the clock, we hear how they're rubbing it in. The only sportsmanline answer would have been to gently roll the ball backwards towards their own goal line.
Yeah they would hear about it no matter what. To heck with it , they won.
 
What I thought was bush league in this game was Brady calling timeout @ 2:13 to go in the game and then passing on 2nd down within the 10 yard line...

They were able to pass on Dallas at will, but it seems kind of arrogant and unnecessary when the game was pretty much wrapped up considering they were able to run pretty effectively...

I could be wrong, though...I ended up losing by 1 point on that last Welker reception!

 
I'm still scratching my head that, after the interception in Cowboy territory, then didn't just let the Pats score. This way they would have gotten the ball back with 3:20 left to score three touchdowns. Unlikely sure, but their chance of winning the way they played it out was zero.

 
What I thought was bush league in this game was Brady calling timeout @ 2:13 to go in the game and then passing on 2nd down within the 10 yard line...They were able to pass on Dallas at will, but it seems kind of arrogant and unnecessary when the game was pretty much wrapped up considering they were able to run pretty effectively...I could be wrong, though...I ended up losing by 1 point on that last Welker reception!
He called time out after letting the play clock run all the way down.
 
IMO, there was nothing wrong with the TD run in Week 6 against the Cowboys.

However, the 4th down pass attempt in Cleveland's redzone (Week 5) w/ about 1 minute left seemed a little arrogant.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My point being that most teams come out ready to run the ball to force the other team to burn timeouts...especially when they're up by 14...New England acted like they were down by 14 and really needed the passing play...

I have no problem with a rushing td late in the game...Dallas is out there to stop them...and they couldn't....but it still seemed arrogant to call the timeout and then pass...

 
My point being that most teams come out ready to run the ball to force the other team to burn timeouts...especially when they're up by 14...New England acted like they were down by 14 and really needed the passing play...I have no problem with a rushing td late in the game...Dallas is out there to stop them...and they couldn't....but it still seemed arrogant to call the timeout and then pass...
What was wrong with the timeout? Every team does this. THey couldn't run it down to the 2-minute warning so they let the playclock run down as far as they could and called TO. They weren't trying to stop the clock so they would have time to score.
 
that's the funniest thing. knuckleheads out there calling out one of our Academy guys as a 'bush-leaguer'. classic.

 
My point being that most teams come out ready to run the ball to force the other team to burn timeouts...especially when they're up by 14...New England acted like they were down by 14 and really needed the passing play...I have no problem with a rushing td late in the game...Dallas is out there to stop them...and they couldn't....but it still seemed arrogant to call the timeout and then pass...
What was wrong with the timeout? Every team does this. THey couldn't run it down to the 2-minute warning so they let the playclock run down as far as they could and called TO. They weren't trying to stop the clock so they would have time to score.
I guess when I'm up by 14 I have my rushing plays pretty much lined up and ready to go....I don't need to use my timeouts because at 2:13 I'm snapping the ball and rushing it...I just think it's kind of arrogant to be passing in this situation....the timeout to decide the which passing play you're going to call to further shove it down their throats is the iceing on the cake...Don't get me wrong...I play to win...I just would have ran in that situation...and not called a timeout...
 
the timeout to decide the which passing play you're going to call to further shove it down their throats is the iceing on the cake...
:wall:Do you really believe that's why they called a timeout?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe it's part of Bill's strategy to not only beat, but to humiliate opponents in case he has to play them again. Sure seems to have gotten into the heads of many of the posters in this thread.

 
My point being that most teams come out ready to run the ball to force the other team to burn timeouts...especially when they're up by 14...New England acted like they were down by 14 and really needed the passing play...I have no problem with a rushing td late in the game...Dallas is out there to stop them...and they couldn't....but it still seemed arrogant to call the timeout and then pass...
What was wrong with the timeout? Every team does this. THey couldn't run it down to the 2-minute warning so they let the playclock run down as far as they could and called TO. They weren't trying to stop the clock so they would have time to score.
I guess when I'm up by 14 I have my rushing plays pretty much lined up and ready to go....I don't need to use my timeouts because at 2:13 I'm snapping the ball and rushing it...I just think it's kind of arrogant to be passing in this situation....the timeout to decide the which passing play you're going to call to further shove it down their throats is the iceing on the cake...Don't get me wrong...I play to win...I just would have ran in that situation...and not called a timeout...
Against a team that scored twice in under 4 minutes last week to win the game, I call timeout to make sure I have the right play called so I can get a first down and run the clock out. What was Phillips thinking when he called TO after the first down play?
 
I dislike the Patriots quite a bit, but it was not bush league. This is the NFL, not college football. Don't want the team to score...then stop them. Plus, Phillips was calling timeouts there, so the Patriots had no choice but to keep running the ball instead of kneeing to kill the clock.

 
Bad_Mo said:
Colin Dowling said:
Bad_Mo said:
Waddle Fillups should learn to shut his fat piehole when it comes to dissin' NE.How's that for your tainted SBs, you fat SOB who has ridden his fat daddy's coat tails?
Please translate to Inles. TIA.
OK, here it is....in INLES, as requested:Overweight Blowhard good to understand that not good to run fat mouth to Peter King about tainted anything. Fatboy only is where he is because of cowboy hat wearing fat daddy.
when ignorance and idiocy collide....
 
The way I saw it, running 4 plays up the gut for the TD wasn't classless or arrogant, it was the wise move and best choice. The Pats had to burn 2+ minutes off the clock from inside the DAL 10; if they take knees, they give DAL the ball back at their 10 needing two quick scores -- see DAL @ BUF last MNF. Kicking the FG on 4th and 1 is a more risky play (see DAL @ SEA last year) than a handoff to the RB. By playing it safe with a run, if NEP scores, it seals the game; if NEP fails, DAL gets the ball on their own 1 with little time left.

It was nice that BB gave the Navy guy the opportunity for the TD, but the reality is that NEP didn't have much of a choice except to keep pushing forward considering how much time was on the clock. As usual, BB made the smart choice.

 
The completely cluelessness in this thread defies my imagination. How can anyone blame the Pats here? Phillips called timeout. The Cowboys were still trying to win. Want the other team to take it easy on you? It's very simple. Don't call timeout. I'm not a Pats fan at all but you guys are just looking for a reason to whine about them. Get over it. This kind of thing happens in the NFL every day but nobody notices or says anything because it isn't BB.

 
The completely cluelessness in this thread defies my imagination. How can anyone blame the Pats here? Phillips called timeout. The Cowboys were still trying to win. Want the other team to take it easy on you? It's very simple. Don't call timeout. I'm not a Pats fan at all but you guys are just looking for a reason to whine about them. Get over it. This kind of thing happens in the NFL every day but nobody notices or says anything because it isn't BB.
:yawn:
 
I always wonder about this "running up the score" thing. If you're a player, do you care if you get beaten by 24 or 17? Really?

The goal of the offense is to score points to help win the game. I'm far from a Patriots fan, but if I'm Belicheck, I'm running my offense 'til the end of the game. No need to purposely fail just because you're better than the other team.

Lots of lightening up needs to happen in here. You lost. The extra TD doesn't matter. Just because Belicheck's a cheat doesn't mean this is a bad thing.

 
I didn't think it was bush league at all. Honestly I was more surprised by the Cowboys defense lack of tackeling on the play, they looked like a beaten team that didn't care.

 
I didn't read this whole post, but I see this as no different than letting Michael Turner go left end and taking it to the house in mop time.

The PATS game was never out of reach before the last Romo pick and then they just insured the clock was killed for the most part. Who cares if the 4th string RB got a TD. I was surprised they didn't pad Brady's stats. Not to mention that 4th string RB might be be getting ALOT of PT next week.

 
I need to preface this by saying I HATE the Cowboys but was actually cheering for them against the Pats because I hate the Pats that much more. I have a few points about this.

1) Yes it is tacky but if your defense can't stop a 4th string RB then they deserve to be scored on.

2) Why not give the scrub RB a shot at a TD as he'll get very few opportunities to do so.

3) Bellicheat is still being a #####y little girl about being caught cheating and is trying to make a point that they can score at will.

4) I could be wrong but they could not kneel or Dallas would have gotten the ball back.

5) If the Patriots were out there not to hurt the Cowboys feelings, they would have forfeited.

 
Anyone complaining about the TD at the end of this game should just cancel their leagues and stop watching football. If you can't watch football without getting your feelings hurt, you don't deserve to enjoy it.

 
The completely cluelessness in this thread defies my imagination. How can anyone blame the Pats here? Phillips called timeout. The Cowboys were still trying to win. Want the other team to take it easy on you? It's very simple. Don't call timeout. I'm not a Pats fan at all but you guys are just looking for a reason to whine about them. Get over it. This kind of thing happens in the NFL every day but nobody notices or says anything because it isn't BB.
Ding, Ding, Ding......we have a winner.Am I the only FF team that played Eckel tonight? I was hoping for more, but I'll take the 1 TD.

 
pinequick said:
gruecd said:
Anybody else think Eckel's TD w/19 seconds remaining was totally bush league? Already up by 14, doesn't a classy coach just tell his QB to take a knee there?Just re-affirms my opinion that Belicheck is an arrogant jerk with no class whatsoever. I hope this comes back to bite them in the backside.
Cowboys fan here.They ran it. Up the middle. With the 18-th string RB who never gets a chance. The defense couldn't stop them.I've got no problem with the call whatsoever.
:angry: It's not like they passed it in. It was a chance for Eckel to get his first TD, against a 1st string D. Nothing fancy. They took their gas off the pedal, clearly. they just didn't apply the brakes. I'd actually rather they kick the field goal, because it was my kicker, but I understand why it's MORE of a sportsman move to try and run it in. At least they have a chance to stop you frum running it up.
 
Jimmy James said:
I'll put it this way: it shows me that BB is in no way classy.I don't think it's outrageous, though. I don't think there is a requirement to show any mercy in pro sports. I think it's entirely optional and totally up to the person or persons in control of the team doing the blowing out. The class thing to do is not run up the score, but nobody says anybody has to do the classy thing. What is out of bounds is running up the score and then complaining about any other entities running up the score and/or stat padding. If Tony Dungy keeps Peyton Manning in and Peyton runs up stats, BB should keep his mouth shut.
Clearly they should punt on third down when they have the lead. I mean, that's only classy sportsmanship. If the Cowboys had manned up and stopped the last RB on the roster, this wouldn't be a point of discussion.
 
Colin Dowling said:
PahtyTom said:
Colin Dowling said:
You make the mistake of thinking Belichik is a classy coach, which by the admission of everyone on earth, he isn't.

Of course it's bush league, but it doesn't matter. The Patriots are the cocks-of-the-walk right now. But to win the Super Bowl they will likely have to beat Jax or Ten at home, beat Indy (home or away), and then beat the Cowboys on a neutral field. If they win the SUper Bowl this year, it will be well-deserved through quite a gauntlet.

I just like how a cheater like Rodney Harrison derives so much satisfaction out of doing nothing more then getting run over a few times by Marion Barber. Good studd.
From: Round Rock Texas
I'm a Titans fan, frankly. I'm much more miffed at them losing today then the Cowboys. I think a few things about the NE/Dal game...1. New England was clearly the better team.

2. A late TD or a 1 point win, it looks the same in the standings.

3. Rodney Harrison is a cheater

4. The Cowboys were the 2nd best team on that field, but they shot themselves in the foot plenty w/ penalties.
1. New England was clearly the better team.Clearly

2. A late TD or a 1 point win, it looks the same in the standings.

Actually, with Indy still undefeated, Pooint differential could easilly come into play down the road. So, in reality a team has an obligation to score as much, and hold theopponent to as little, as they can. Imagine in they lost the #1 seed by 6 points? Possible? Absolutely

3. Rodney Harrison is a cheater

So is Albert Haynesworth. So are many, many players names who haven't been exposed until they fail the second time, as Harrison did. He admitted to it, unlike say Shawn Merriman.

4. The Cowboys were the 2nd best team on that field, but they shot themselves in the foot plenty w/ penalties.

Many of the penalties were because they were out of position to a better player. You are often forced to commit penalties, because you're beat.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top