TheFanatic
Footballguy
just curious what everyone else thinks about the interview. Hope this isn't a honda. Did a search and found nothing...
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Anyone catch the David Justice Interview on Mike and Mike about Roids? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter TheFanatic
- Start date
pile of sith
Footballguy
didn't see this. but i heard some soundbytes/read some quotes from him yesterday. he seemed to have decent logical arguments. but guilty until proven innocent in this day and age.
TheFanatic
Footballguy
I heard it live and the more he talked the more he seemed guilty to me. He just repeated the same things over and over again and did a pretty good job of dodging some things like if he knew Radomsky which he used the exact same verbiage every time, "he is not familiar to me." Greeny tried to pin him down and asked him point blank if he knew Radomski and he just repeated the mantra.and his argument that he was never in the car with Radomsky and Glenallen Hill was that there was no reason for him getting a ride from someone else other than a member of his family that were in town for the WS. That's not a solid alibi to me...
skillz
Footballguy
He seemed real nervous while talking but I didn't think he was lying. I would be nervous too if my professional reputation was on the line due to an allegation against me. Of course, he could've been nervous because he was lying about Radomski's allegation.
Problem I have with believing Justice is that the timeframe he is being accused of steroid use corresponds with a time when he was on the downside of his career after leaving Atlanta. So, I could totally see him trying steroids to become a better player again. Also, everytime guys like McNamee or Canseco come out to accuse someone of steroid use, and a player (i.e. Clemens, Palmeiro) has denied the accusation, the player has later been shown to be lying. So I am still skeptical after hearing the interview.
Problem I have with believing Justice is that the timeframe he is being accused of steroid use corresponds with a time when he was on the downside of his career after leaving Atlanta. So, I could totally see him trying steroids to become a better player again. Also, everytime guys like McNamee or Canseco come out to accuse someone of steroid use, and a player (i.e. Clemens, Palmeiro) has denied the accusation, the player has later been shown to be lying. So I am still skeptical after hearing the interview.
Koya
Footballguy
The court of public opinion is not a court of law. Especially when (1) many/most of these guys ARE guilty and (2) those who weren't never spoke up, hence eliminating their using the excuse of innocent unless proven guilty. Those who were not a direct part of the problem impeded any solution, and hence were a part of the problem.
skillz
Footballguy
I am sure ball players have a lot of people hanging around them or people in their network so I am thinking he is trying to be safe by answering the question the way he did. I took his response as he didn't know Radomski personally but is probably nervous that he was previously driven somewhere or was in a place sometime where Radomski may have been among the group he was with. So, if a picture somehow surfaces at some point showing Justice and Radomski together somewhere, Justice can say that Radomski may have been with him, but he didn't know who he was, never spoke to him, and certainly never talked about getting steroids from him.
Similar threads
