Replacing Bryant with Lelie doesn't make a lot of sense. They must plan to sign/draft someone.
Agreed, which doesn't bode well for their passing game.Great place for Lelie to sign...should be the #1 headed into camp.
Considering Northcutt just signed for 3.4 mil a year & Bennett at 4.5 mil, I don't have a problem with this signing at all. Lelie is somewhat one dimensional, but he has the ability to stretch the field. This probably opens it up for the 49ers to go after a DL in round 1, grabbing a WR later in day 1 with their multiple picks. Hopefully Branch will drop to the 8th pick & the 49ers could package a pick to move up.He's not worth 2 million pesos, let alone 2 million bucks.
So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...
If he returns to his league leading YPC, it could be decent.Agreed, which doesn't bode well for their passing game.Great place for Lelie to sign...should be the #1 headed into camp.
Lelie at #1 is like Anna Nicole Smith being labled a star. Both are ridiculous, and both have always received more attention than they deserve.Great place for Lelie to sign...should be the #1 headed into camp.
I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...
Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...
I disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants to be right, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Agreed, which doesn't bode well for their passing game.Great place for Lelie to sign...should be the #1 headed into camp.
Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...
I disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.
Thats sadGreat place for Lelie to sign...should be the #1 headed into camp.
Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
I edited my post.. wasn't very nice.. but as to who they'll add, I dunno. But I don't have to know who that will be, to know it won't be Lelie.I disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
Ok, so you admit he sucks?Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
If I were the 49ers I would look for a younger WR that would fit in with my young offense...I don't see Horn in the mix but I've been wrong before.Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
I thought they were gonna look at Stallworth?Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
I don't think he sucks, I just don't think he has reached his potential. Anyone who leads the NFL in YPC has got potential.Ok, so you admit he sucks?Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
Stallworth would definitely get more balls than Lelie if he coudl stay healthy...he seems like a good fit for the USC offense as well. Will be interesting to see if the Niners pony up for two WRs...I doubt it.I thought they were gonna look at Stallworth?Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".I don't think he sucks, I just don't think he has reached his potential. Anyone who leads the NFL in YPC has got potential.Ok, so you admit he sucks?Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
say what you wanna say about lelie but he's alot better than what we have in houston at #2. and I would have been happy with what he signed for. I'll take his 3 catches and 2 drop at 19 yards a clip.I don't think he sucks, I just don't think he has reached his potential. Anyone who leads the NFL in YPC has got potential.Ok, so you admit he sucks?Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
Stallworth's still a possibility. SF had lots of dollars to burn when FA began, among the most cap room in the league. I know they have already spent a ton on defense and I don't have a feel right now for whether they can now afford Stallworth or not. He'd certainly be their #1 if they do get him.Stallworth would definitely get more balls than Lelie if he coudl stay healthy...he seems like a good fit for the USC offense as well. Will be interesting to see if the Niners pony up for two WRs...I doubt it.I thought they were gonna look at Stallworth?Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
They were also rumoured to be hot for Adalius Thomas - and he went elsewhere so they should have money to burn...Stallworth's still a possibility. SF had lots of dollars to burn when FA began, among the most cap room in the league. I know they have already spent a ton on defense and I don't have a feel right now for whether they can now afford Stallworth or not. He'd certainly be their #1 if they do get him.Stallworth would definitely get more balls than Lelie if he coudl stay healthy...he seems like a good fit for the USC offense as well. Will be interesting to see if the Niners pony up for two WRs...I doubt it.I thought they were gonna look at Stallworth?Could it be Joe Horn? If so I'd definitely expect them to draft someone in the early roundsI disagree with you both. It wasn't #1 money, and it won't be a #1 role. I know LHUCKS wants desperately to prove to the world that he's some sort of genius, but Lelie is just going to be what he's always been, a field stretching WR who doesn't catch nearly as many of the deep balls as he should and who isn't good for much else.Okay Einstein, who's the big free agent that SF plans to bring in?
He didn't lead the league in YPC last year. Which year are you talking about?His hands are horrible and so is his routing running. He's got speed, that about it. I think Battle & VDavis and F.Gore will have more catches and Battle & V.davis are likely to both have more yards. You can have your YPCI don't think he sucks, I just don't think he has reached his potential. Anyone who leads the NFL in YPC has got potential.Ok, so you admit he sucks?Lelie has no problem against #1 DBs...his problem lies in consistently catching the ball and not being a ##### when he goes over the middle.Even if he is a #1, that's all Lelie needs is to face #1 DBs each week instead of DB 3.Right, I don't see any other vets out there that would be a clear #1 over Lelie.I'm not saying it wont happen, but rarely do you see a team bring in not one, but two big name FA WRs...just doesn't happen very often.I think they will bring in another vet. As to who - I doubt it will be Stallworth although it might be intriguing to have both these guys streaking down the field at the same time...Who else is available - Moulds won't cut it, they won't be able to trade for Darrell Jackson. It would have to be someone with very good hands that is able to go across the middle and can get some penetration.So they are going to bring in another vet, or are you saying a rookie will be ahead of Lelie on the depth chart?which means LHUCKS and I do not agree either...As if he wasn't bad enough as it is.
including a 2 mil bonus?so what's that 1.15 per year?This doesn't do a darn thing to their plans for other WRs then.Free-agent wide receiver Ashley Lelie signed a two-year deal with the 49ers for $4.3 million, including a $2 million signing bonus.they still need more
Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
I didn't say that he did...he lead the leauge in '05.He didn't lead the league in YPC last year. Which year are you talking about?
Year six, ok, year six, lol. Nothing more needs to be said.Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
How many red zone catches? how about for his career? How do you explain that?Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
are you saying that A.Smith> VickWell, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
A) He came into the league as a projectB) Year 4 was a pretty good year and then year 5 he was Vicktimized.Good value play by the Niners, a place where the system seems to fit Lelie's strengths.Year six, ok, year six, lol. Nothing more needs to be said.Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
I'm saying '07 49er passing offense >> 06 ATL passing offenseare you saying that A.Smith> VickWell, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
He's not a physical WR...so what? I'm not saying he's a stud.How many red zone catches? how about for his career? How do you explain that?Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
bryant is on whole nother level.....almost pacman levelSo let me get this right: the 49ers dumped a head case WR (Antonio Bryant) and signed another head case in Ashlie Lelie? Weak.
...but you admit he sucks, right?He's not a physical WR...so what? I'm not saying he's a stud.How many red zone catches? how about for his career? How do you explain that?Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".
No....but you admit he sucks, right?He's not a physical WR...so what? I'm not saying he's a stud.How many red zone catches? how about for his career? How do you explain that?Well, his last full year with a QB not named Vick he led the league in YPC so one can argue he's entering his prime. This is only year six of his career.How many years does a guy get to be labled as having "Potential"? You would think he's way past the point of "Potential".![]()
In all fairness he did admit Lelie is a wimp...but you admit he sucks, right?![]()