Guess they feel he's not your average player.
Tribe has now signed Sizemore, Martinez, Hafner, Peralta and Sabathia to long term deals. Still working on Cliff Lee.
No I get it. They think he's great and, for a 23 year old, he had a hell of a year. I'm not arguing they should not have locked him up or that he won't have a great career. I'm arguing that it doesn't make sense to do it so soon when you still have 3 years before he's even eligible for arbitration.
well, possible breakdown:not positive on all the rules here but i gave it a shot:
sizemore has 1.056 yrs. of major league service which means he wouldn't become a free agent until (06=2,07=3,08=4,09=5,10=6) after the 2010 season. During those years, had Cleveland not made the new signing, what do we expect he would have gotten through arbitration through that period assuming he keeps putting up good #'s?
06=.327mil (league min)
-becomes super-two player so he's now arbitration-eligible
-the average raise for ML player through arbitration was 109% in 06. let's assume he'll be way above average and get 150% increase each year.
-let's assume he'll be at 3 mil in 07.
07=3 mil
08=4.5 mil (3*1.5)
09=6.75 mil (4.5*1.5)
10=10.125 mil (4.5*1.5) <--looks high but Soriano just made $10 mil in his final arbitration case and he lost
Total before free agency= 24.7mil
The new deal pays him 23.45mil through 2011 so even if those estimates are too high, you still think that Cleveland has got to be ahead on this one. And they have the option on 2012 which, if he pans out, I'm sure they will exercise.
So with this signing, Cleveland
a) locks him into a deal for an extra 1-2 yrs. (years when he's in his "supposed prime" mind you)
b) pays more in the short-term while they can afford it and more importantly, saves a lot of dough in the long-term, dough that they will be able to put toward other low-mid level free agents or re-signings (so basically, this team is going to be competitive for years to come)
c) is avoiding the hassle of arbitration and the strain that could put on the player-team relationship, which means that sizemore will be more likely to stay with the club for less money after the contract is done (though i'm guessing they will re-structure once or twice more in order to lock him into even years)
d) does take on a lot of risk in the deal. sizemore now has a guaranteed contract through 2011. if he doesn't pan out, they've shot themselves in the foot but i don't see much reason to think he won't. there are no minor league stats for him 01 but since then it appears as though he hasn't missed any time.
edit: but yeah you're basically right. it seems a year too soon. but then again, what if he goes 30-30 this year? then is it a year too soon? if his numbers increase a lot it could eventually cost them something like an extra $10 mil in the long-term, whereas if they sign him now and he goes 30-30, they're only paying an extra what, $3.5 mil? over what they should be.