Statcruncher
Footballguy
It used to be the week before this game was like the last week of school before summer. This week it's like the last week of fall before school. I'm guessing 53 to 24 Packers. Hurry back Jay.
It used to be the week before this game was like the last week of school before summer. This week it's like the last week of fall before school. I'm guessing 53 to 24 Packers. Hurry back Jay and Lance.
Lol, the Bears don't have their starting QB and they're just "a bit" more banged up? And yes, GB has owned Chicago for too long, but other than an inordinate amout of picks GB hasn't really done anything special to him. Due to a combination of bad decisions, poor receiving options, terrible O-line, etc., Cutler has looked pretty meh against many teams.Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
Green Bay missing 2 of its top 3 WRs (if Jones is out again).Lol, the Bears don't have their starting QB and they're just "a bit" more banged up? And yes, GB has owned Chicago for too long, but other than an inordinate amout of picks GB hasn't really done anything special to him. Due to a combination of bad decisions, poor receiving options, terrible O-line, etc., Cutler has looked pretty meh against many teams.Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
Here are Cutler's regular season averages for 2009-20012 (against GB and against all opponents) and how he's doing in 2013 so far:
OPP Comp % Yds/Gm TD/INT/% QB Rat Yds/Att
GB 54% 205 8/16/.5% 61 6.5
AO 60% 220 82/63/1.3% 82 7.1
13 65% 237 12/7/1.7% 92 7.4
Highest in Chicago
Career high
The number that really sticks out is the ridiculous 16 interceptions in 7 games. That is complete ownage right there. It's unfortunate that Cutler is out this game because I honestly think the new system, improved receiving targets, and revamped O-line were setting Jay up for his best year.
Before the injury I really thought it would be a 50/50 toss-up on who would win this game. Unfortunately the December 29th game will be meaningless if the Bears can't stop the bleeding and Detroit and GB can't stop winning.
LOL....with no Finley, James Jones and Cobb? LOL again....Going to take a miracle to keep GB under 40 in this game.
Packers have had his # only because we had no OL and no weapons. Last year Marshall was the only weapon (Jeffrey was injured most of the year). Now we have an OL that actually blocks; 2 stud WRs and a very solid TE that can actually catch (Kellen Davis had more drops than any TE in the league as a starter).Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
Jeffrey was not injurred in at least one game vs. GB...other than his pride when he kept committing offensive pass interference.Packers have had his # only because we had no OL and no weapons. Last year Marshall was the only weapon (Jeffrey was injured most of the year). Now we have an OL that actually blocks; 2 stud WRs and a very solid TE that can actually catch (Kellen Davis had more drops than any TE in the league as a starter).Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
In week 17, we will find out when Cutler carves up the fudge-packers.
Jeffery played against GB last year. I remember him not even trying to hide his push offs several times.Packers have had his # only because we had no OL and no weapons. Last year Marshall was the only weapon (Jeffrey was injured most of the year). Now we have an OL that actually blocks; 2 stud WRs and a very solid TE that can actually catch (Kellen Davis had more drops than any TE in the league as a starter).Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
In week 17, we will find out when Cutler carves up the fudge-packers.
Lol Caleb Hanie. I could watch a replay of BJ Raji dancing in the end zone at Soldier all day long and never stop laughing.I get nervous when the bears bring in a backup. Caleb Hene made swiss cheese out of the cheese heads defense not long ago.
Woooo wooooo....who's OL is the same? Not talking about the Bears OL are you?Jeffery played against GB last year. I remember him not even trying to hide his push offs several times.Packers have had his # only because we had no OL and no weapons. Last year Marshall was the only weapon (Jeffrey was injured most of the year). Now we have an OL that actually blocks; 2 stud WRs and a very solid TE that can actually catch (Kellen Davis had more drops than any TE in the league as a starter).Both teams banged up...Bears a bit more than the Packers.
While missing Cutler sucks for the Bears...the Packers have had his number big time since he has been in Chicago.
Just don't see the Packers losing this one at home.
In week 17, we will find out when Cutler carves up the fudge-packers.
Second, I believe your OL is the same as last year for the most part
And last, of course the bears will beat the packers week 17. Round 1 bye will be locked up. Enjoy beating on Seneca Wallace.
Link?LOL....with no Finley, James Jones and Cobb? LOL again....Going to take a miracle to keep GB under 40 in this game.
That fool retired. This game could get ugly quick.Where did you go, Gridiron Assassin?
I remember a Bears/Pack Monday night game a few years ago, maybe '08, where the Bears came back from a big deficit on a punt return and I think a pick 6 to win the game. You had a total meltdown. That was a thing of beauty man. The Bears weren't even very good that year.A few thoughts here......
Pack should win, but it's DUH Bearsssssssssssss, anything can happen.
Over/Under on the number of time flapgreen complains about the Bears Defense 32 1/2
Over/under on the number of times RBM whines about the Refs 17 1/2
Will BensonLeadsthe Way show up in the game thread? Yes 150-1 (If the Bears win even money)
Green Bay 31
Chicago 17
Not me, I don't meltdown.I remember a Bears/Pack Monday night game a few years ago, maybe '08, where the Bears came back from a big deficit on a punt return and I think a pick 6 to win the game. You had a total meltdown. That was a thing of beauty man. The Bears weren't even very good that year.A few thoughts here......
Pack should win, but it's DUH Bearsssssssssssss, anything can happen.
Over/Under on the number of time flapgreen complains about the Bears Defense 32 1/2
Over/under on the number of times RBM whines about the Refs 17 1/2
Will BensonLeadsthe Way show up in the game thread? Yes 150-1 (If the Bears win even money)
Green Bay 31
Chicago 17
Yeh, Pack/Vikings has been better lately. That game last year in week 17 was a classic...Is it really a rivalry if the same team wins 2x as much as the other? That's like calling UW-MIN a rivalry in college sports, but Wisconsin wins every year
32-16 is the record since 1990. It's just unfair. Almost makes you feel bad for Bears fans... Almost...
Good Lord, I hope it's that close...A few thoughts here......
Pack should win, but it's DUH Bearsssssssssssss, anything can happen.
Over/Under on the number of time flapgreen complains about the Bears Defense 32 1/2
Over/under on the number of times RBM whines about the Refs 17 1/2
Will BensonLeadsthe Way show up in the game thread? Yes 150-1 (If the Bears win even money)
Green Bay 31
Chicago 17
AwesomeI remember a Bears/Pack Monday night game a few years ago, maybe '08, where the Bears came back from a big deficit on a punt return and I think a pick 6 to win the game. You had a total meltdown. That was a thing of beauty man. The Bears weren't even very good that year.A few thoughts here......
Pack should win, but it's DUH Bearsssssssssssss, anything can happen.
Over/Under on the number of time flapgreen complains about the Bears Defense 32 1/2
Over/under on the number of times RBM whines about the Refs 17 1/2
Will BensonLeadsthe Way show up in the game thread? Yes 150-1 (If the Bears win even money)
Green Bay 31
Chicago 17
Stop by in Week 17 to find out how many games short of .500 the Bears end up.In week 17, we will find out
I will take the titles, recent ownage, super bowl trophies to winning the all time regular season series.Sweetness_34 said:And the Bears still own the fudge packers life time...Is it really a rivalry if the same team wins 2x as much as the other? That's like calling UW-MIN a rivalry in college sports, but Wisconsin wins every year
32-16 is the record since 1990. It's just unfair. Almost makes you feel bad for Bears fans... Almost...
Based on reading the bulk of the posts in here I'm convinced Chicago will win.
update?I'll be there and while I would have much rather we beat the Bears with Cutler playing, I'll still get my satisfaction... and money's worth.
MNF at Lambeau in November! Doesn't get much better IMO.
Agreed 10000%.Sweetness_34 makes me embarrassed to be a Bears fan.