What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Ben Carson presidential campaign headquarters*** (1 Viewer)

I heard something the other day on the radio about Dr. Carson's likeability rating was 'off the chart' and one pollster put it "almost no one dislikes him."

If he can keep that (likeability usually takes a hit the more people pay attention to you and find something that they disagree about) then he can take his second position in the polls on the early states and make a run for the nomination. The thing about Dr. Carson is that his likeability seems to be grounded in his story, his personality and that he is not a politician (genuine). Those are things that make it hard for people to knock his likeability down from.

Likeability is a huge factor in voting. People don't vote for people they do not like and are drawn to those that they do. It is a huge asset for him.

 
I heard something the other day on the radio about Dr. Carson's likeability rating was 'off the chart' and one pollster put it "almost no one dislikes him."

If he can keep that (likeability usually takes a hit the more people pay attention to you and find something that they disagree about) then he can take his second position in the polls on the early states and make a run for the nomination. The thing about Dr. Carson is that his likeability seems to be grounded in his story, his personality and that he is not a politician (genuine). Those are things that make it hard for people to knock his likeability down from.

Likeability is a huge factor in voting. People don't vote for people they do not like and are drawn to those that they do. It is a huge asset for him.
very well said. I think many people who disagree with him politically will still like and respect him. He also presents his ideas in a very reasonably... not aggressive but persuasive.

 
OK I just clicked through to the Rasmussen link and apparently they asked people with regard to each candidate whether he/she was "likely" or "very likely" etc. to be the nominee. Seems like a pretty dumb methodology.
This method provides an insight into how voters think other voters view the candidate... this is pretty interesting IMO
I don't have an issue with the line of questioning, I just think they should have asked people "which candidate do you think is most likely to win?" That way a person could only identify the one candidate they felt was most likely. The way they did it allowed poll respondents to say every candidate was likely to win the nomination. That makes no sense.

 
For the Carson supporters. Should he win the nomination,what is his best option for a running mate?

Go totally anti Washington and pick someone like Carly,another "outsider",or pick an experienced politician

to "balance" the ticket?

 
For the Carson supporters. Should he win the nomination,what is his best option for a running mate?

Go totally anti Washington and pick someone like Carly,another "outsider",or pick an experienced politician

to "balance" the ticket?
Smart money would say go with an experienced politician to balance the ticket.

 
For the Carson supporters. Should he win the nomination,what is his best option for a running mate?

Go totally anti Washington and pick someone like Carly,another "outsider",or pick an experienced politician

to "balance" the ticket?
someone that wins Ohio or Florida
 
I heard something the other day on the radio about Dr. Carson's likeability rating was 'off the chart' and one pollster put it "almost no one dislikes him."
Carson has a high likeability rating because people don't know enough about him yet.
In general that is the case but again- I think his likeability is centered in who he is and his story. Also, his profession and what he has accomplished are things that are attractive to people. He does not come off combative or rub people the wrong way even when you disagree with him. There is a lot to like about the guy.

 
Also- take Dr. Carson's likeability as opposed to Hillary who has a real problem with likeability- that would be a huge contrast in Dr. Carson's favor in a general (assuming Hillary holds Soviet Sanders off).

 
I heard something the other day on the radio about Dr. Carson's likeability rating was 'off the chart' and one pollster put it "almost no one dislikes him."
Carson has a high likeability rating because people don't know enough about him yet.
In general that is the case but again- I think his likeability is centered in who he is and his story. Also, his profession and what he has accomplished are things that are attractive to people. He does not come off combative or rub people the wrong way even when you disagree with him. There is a lot to like about the guy.
Those things may be true but they're far from enough to carry him to victory, even in the primaries. His backstory and his non-combative personality won't be able to save him from the damage done by some of his bizarre quotes (on homosexuality, slavery, Nazis, Armageddon, etc.). The more people hear those quotes, the less likely that he'll win (even in the primaries).

 
Chadstroma said:
Also- take Dr. Carson's likeability as opposed to Hillary who has a real problem with likeability- that would be a huge contrast in Dr. Carson's favor in a general (assuming Hillary holds Soviet Sanders off).
LOL at calling Carson, Dr. And Clinton 'Hillary' and Sanders Soviet. You're winning tons of talk radio points. Mega dittos.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?

 
Isn't it pretty much hush, hush that he's gonna be Donald's VP? Would garner Trump the Afromerican vote.
Probably not:

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/09/14/3701134/black-voters-study/

Study Explains Why Ben Carson Won't Help The Republican Party Win Black Voters

When it comes to voting, "party matters so much more than race."

That's the conclusion reached by David Niven, a University of Cincinnati professor of political science who released a study last week looking into whether black Republicans, like Ben Carson, can win black votes. The conclusion reached was a definitive no - black voters are more likely to vote for black candidates, unless the candidate is a Republican.

"There are some very successful African American Republicans, but those folks dont attract African American votes," Niven said in a University of Cincinnati press release, contradicting the GOPs strategy to recruit black and Hispanic candidates as a way to win over those electorates.

The study looked at voters in majority black precincts in Franklin County, Ohio and examined how they voted in the 2014 general election. Niven sent mailers to voters in support of black candidates - some of which identified the candidate's party and some that did not. After analyzing the election results and how the mailers affected voting, Niven concluded that race is significant to black voters, but its not their primary political influence.

"Simply knowing the candidate was African American did almost nothing for Republicans," Niven said. "If voters knew the candidates were Republican, they finished below the top of the ticket. If voters didnt know the candidates were Republican, they outperformed the top of the ticket."

The Republican Party's 2013 autopsy report, produced in response to Mitt Romney's defeat by President Barack Obama in 2012, said the party should make efforts to reverse its alienation of minorities. In order to appeal to the Hispanic community, the report recommended that the party "embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform" - something the primary candidates have wholeheartedly ignored. It also advised members of the party to "establish a presence in African American communities and at black organizations such as the NAACP."

"Too many African American voters have gotten in the habit of supporting Democrats without hearing anyone in their community making a case to the contrary," the report continued. It also said that the Republican National Committee should work to "develop best practices of Republicans who were successfully elected in districts with a high population of African American voters."

But according to Nevin's study, black voters contempt for the Republican Party may run deeper than strategists think. The Republican Party continues to support a number of policies that hurt black Americans, like restrictive voting measures including voter ID laws and other economic and social policies that alienate voters of color.

Ben Carson has made attempts to win over black voters, like visiting Baltimore after the Freddie Gray protests and Ferguson last week. Yet he continues to make comments that alienate the demographic, like calling the Black Lives Matter movement "silly."

But according to the study, his comments aren't all that significant. Nothing he says or does will be able to surpass his biggest liability - his party.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?
Yes or no... did Carson set the matter straight in a direct manner?

Or at all?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account ‏@realDonaldTrump 3 Sep 2014

No more massive injections. Tiny children are not horses—one vaccine at a time, over time.

Donald J. TrumpVerified account ‏@realDonaldTrump 3 Sep 2014

I am being proven right about massive vaccinations—the doctors lied. Save our children & their future.

Donald J. TrumpVerified account ‏@realDonaldTrump 4 Sep 2014

So many people who have children with autism have thanked me—amazing response. They know far better than fudged up reports!

 
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?
Yes or no... did Carson set the matter straight in a direct manner?

Or at all?
He did, and it's being wildly misrepresented by the media.

Wow. I'll find the exact quote during the debate.

eta* Holy ####, is this ever Orwellian. I saw him stand up to Trump and say vaccines didn't cause autism but that they shouldn't give so many out at once, and for that he's an anti-vaxxer.

Wow. Not trusting the media in this election cycle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CARSON: Well, let me put it this way, there has -- there have been numerous studies, and they have not demonstrated that there is any correlation between vaccinations and autism. This was something that was spread widely 15 or 20 years ago, and it has not been adequately, you know, revealed to the public what's actually going on. Vaccines are very important. Certain ones. The ones that would prevent death or crippling. There are others, there are a multitude of vaccines which probably don't fit in that category, and there should be some discretion in those cases. But, you know, a lot of this is -- is -- is pushed by big government.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Carson's never backed off the vaccine/autism thing, if I'm not mistaken. He came out during the last flare-up, and I think supported mandatory vaccines for life-threatening diseases. I think his "discretion" comment is directed at the movement by progressives to compel compulsory vaccinations for non-life threatening diseases or maladies.

Dude, this world is upside down in the media coverage of this.

 
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?
Yes or no... did Carson set the matter straight in a direct manner?

Or at all?
He did, and it's being wildly misrepresented by the media.

Wow. I'll find the exact quote during the debate.

eta* Holy ####, is this ever Orwellian. I saw him stand up to Trump and say vaccines didn't cause autism but that they shouldn't give so many out at once, and for that he's an anti-vaxxer.

Wow. Not trusting the media in this election cycle.
If he shut it down without mincing words, I apologize and am happy to hear it.

 
If he shut it down without mincing words, I apologize and am happy to hear it.
I would say that. See the quote above. I'm not sure, other than not kowtowing to the exactitudes of the public health dogmatists, that he's done anything wrong here. And it's pretty clear that he's referring to the Lancet article when he's talking about misinformation from 15-20 years ago.

I'm stumped on the reaction to his comments about non-life threatening vaccines and schedules. It's pretty obvious he's making a political point about the impulse by exacting public health advocates to make those mandatory for public participation in schools, etc.

 
I missed the debate, did anyone ask Carson how his rejection of the fact that the earth is 4.5 billion years old will impact his ability to govern? For example, does he believe airplanes can fly?

 
How can you take someone seriously when they have an MD and say nothing when an opponent mentions vaccines causing an autism epidemic?
How can you take someone seriously when the misrepresent the exchange between Carson and trump regarding vaccines?
Yes or no... did Carson set the matter straight in a direct manner?

Or at all?
He did, and it's being wildly misrepresented by the media.

Wow. I'll find the exact quote during the debate.

eta* Holy ####, is this ever Orwellian. I saw him stand up to Trump and say vaccines didn't cause autism but that they shouldn't give so many out at once, and for that he's an anti-vaxxer.

Wow. Not trusting the media in this election cycle.
If he shut it down without mincing words, I apologize and am happy to hear it.
:lmao:

 
I missed the debate, did anyone ask Carson how his rejection of the fact that the earth is 4.5 billion years old will impact his ability to govern? For example, does he believe airplanes can fly?
I'm tired of hearing about this airplanes flying myth pushed by big government.

 
Carson said that the only exception he’d make would be if the Muslim running for office “publicly rejected all the tenants of Sharia and lived a life consistent with that.”



“Then I wouldn’t have any problem,” he said.
I bet if you framed the question this way and polled the public the vast majority would agree with Carson.
 
Carson said that the only exception he’d make would be if the Muslim running for office “publicly rejected all the tenants of Sharia and lived a life consistent with that.”



“Then I wouldn’t have any problem,” he said.
I bet if you framed the question this way and polled the public the vast majority would agree with Carson.
What Carson isn't saying is that he doesn't believe any true Muslim can live a life consistent with rejecting all the tenants of Sharia.
 
Carson said that the only exception he’d make would be if the Muslim running for office “publicly rejected all the tenants of Sharia and lived a life consistent with that.”



“Then I wouldn’t have any problem,” he said.
I bet if you framed the question this way and polled the public the vast majority would agree with Carson.
What Carson isn't saying is that he doesn't believe any true Muslim can live a life consistent with rejecting all the tenants of Sharia.So you a good friend of his?
 
Ben Carson: “If we can redefine marriage as between two men or two women […] we will continue to redefine it in any way that we wish, which is a slippery slope with a disastrous ending, as witnessed in the dramatic fall of the Roman Empire.”

:lmao: :lmao:

 
It's truly amazing that a former neurosurgeon can come off as an intellectual lightweight even amongst the current crowd of GOP candidates, which are setting an impressively low bar for intelligence.

 
FreeBaGeL said:
Ben Carson: If we can redefine marriage as between two men or two women [] we will continue to redefine it in any way that we wish, which is a slippery slope with a disastrous ending, as witnessed in the dramatic fall of the Roman Empire.

:lmao: :lmao:
Doesn't even crack the top 5 craziest things he's said.

 
He sat on the board of directors of numerous entities, including Kellogg Company, Costco Wholesale Corporation, the Academy of Achievement, and is an Emeritus Fellow of the Yale Corporation, the governing body of Yale University.
I just read this on his campaign page. Nice bit of experience here that is a bit odd to me that it is not brought up or spoken about more.

 
Carson said that the only exception he’d make would be if the Christian running for office “publicly rejected all the tenants of Biblical law and lived a life consistent with that.”



“Then I wouldn’t have any problem,” he said.
I bet if you framed the question this way and polled the public the vast majority would agree with Carson.
How about now?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any reports on what kind of staffing levels this guy has in Iowa/NH? Just curious.

-QG
That would be interesting. I am guessing he is ramping up but maybe the better question would be WHO is on staff there. Are they newbies or has he been able to get establishment locals to join him?

 
Heard someone say his speaking style is best described as late-stage Michael Jackson telling a particularly terrifying story

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top