This. And whatever is second isn't even close. They give the best statistical analysis of any fantasy resource out there.Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.
This. And whatever is second isn't even close. They give the best statistical analysis of any fantasy resource out there.Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.
Another confirmation here. Thread complete.vikingdave said:KCC said:This. And whatever is second isn't even close. They give the best statistical analysis of any fantasy resource out there.Garts said:Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.![]()
Couldn't agree more. Not to be a fanboy, but most other mags (including FBGs, sorry - I love the site) bore me to tears. I can't wait for FFI to come out every year and read it cover-to-cover.Garts said:Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.
Love the mag, and it makes it ever more useful since almost 2/3 of my main $$$ league uses it.Another confirmation here. Thread complete.vikingdave said:KCC said:This. And whatever is second isn't even close. They give the best statistical analysis of any fantasy resource out there.Garts said:Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.![]()
I always like this one too.I picked up Rotoworld's book, it's pretty good. Missing the game-by-game stats from last year that FFI has.I like Fantasy Football Pro Forecast the best.
It's out now and another vote for FFI.When does FFI come out, or is it?
It's pretty much the gold standard in my league, too. It's nice when the commissioner has to make a selection for an owner, everyone just goes 'to the book' and can see who that guy is going to get.Love the mag, and it makes it ever more useful since almost 2/3 of my main $$$ league uses it.Another confirmation here. Thread complete.This. And whatever is second isn't even close. They give the best statistical analysis of any fantasy resource out there.Fantasy Football Indexsimply the best IMO.![]()
There were much worse contradictions than that. I understand that different people are going to have different ranks. I didn't take notes or anything but something in regards to Tom Brady and the NE passing game terribly contradicts what they later say about Moss and the NE passing game IIRC. This and many others had me scratching my head as I read through wondering if the thing had ever bothered to be edited. Still, it seems everyone loves it so I guess I'm in the minority.Rack up another point for FFI. And there are contradictions in the magazine, as another FBGer pointed out, which I presume is due to several different people ranking the players for different parts of the magazine. So Dallas Clark is the #1 TE in one section, and Whitten tops elsewhere. (Nice to see some other Penn Staters in here)
I've been asked by FSP publications to write content for them for the past few years. It's nice publicity for FBGs, too - even if we have our own mag.I looked through the Index today since so many love it, and I just don't get why, Forecast is better in my opinion. Nice to see Matt Waldman's Crank article in it, not sure if he sells the article to other mags.
They aren't afraid to stick their head out and make bold predictions IMO....( LOL - Tatum Bell on their 2005 cover strikes out at me...but hey, they stuck their heads out...)They also offer analysis and back it with past proof, trends and references....I don't have any specefic examples off hand but I noticed it quite a bit in their team write-ups.I also like the positional write-ups....top 10 at each position.Rotowire is the best I've found by a mile!