I agree with everything, except even I must admit that Emmitt Smith, great O-line or not, MUST be in the top 10 at least. I mean come on, he does have the most career yards and other records. I'd put him at #5 on your list, and bump everyone down one. Terrell Davis was dominating for a few years, but I don't think he deserves a top 10 nod.Here is my top 10
1. Barry Sanders
2. Jim Brown
3. Walter Payton
4. Gale Sayers
5. Eric Dickerson
6. Earl Campbell
7. OJ Simpson
8. Tony Dorsett
9. Marcus Allen
10. Terrell Davis
And NO, Emmitt didn't make the cut because his O-line made him a better RB than he really ever was.![]()
After taking off Terrell Davis and put on Emmitt Smith, who would you take off for Tomlinson, the guy has only played 3 seasons?<seriously>LaDainian Tomlinson belongs somewhere on that list.</seriously>
M. Faulk was #11 on the list. Terrell Davis isn't even a part of the poll, I had to leave an option for "other".How do you rank T. Davis ahead of Marshal Faulk. The Greatest Show on Turf existed in great part because of one of the greatest three year runs by a running back. While others have filled in effectively, no one has been as much of a weapon in that offense. So far three different running backs have had great success taking over for Davis.
LT2 does not make the list. He has not played enough in my opinion. He is a helluva good RB but not top 10 YET.After taking off Terrell Davis and put on Emmitt Smith, who would you take off for Tomlinson, the guy has only played 3 seasons?<seriously>LaDainian Tomlinson belongs somewhere on that list.</seriously>
As an Eagles fan I don't particularly like Emmitt Smith, but to not have him in your top ten is a joke, honestly. And I'm so sick and tired of people using the "his o-line was too good" nonsense. Honestly, do you think some of the other backs on your list didn't have the best lines of their generation? Comparing Emmitt to his contemporaries in terms of O-line holds water, but if you're going to give him that much of a haircut you have to discount half your list too.Here is my top 101. Barry Sanders2. Jim Brown3. Walter Payton4. Gale Sayers5. Eric Dickerson6. Earl Campbell7. OJ Simpson8. Tony Dorsett9. Marcus Allen10. Terrell DavisAnd NO, Emmitt didn't make the cut because his O-line made him a better RB than he really ever was.![]()
Wow, I just now realized that Emmit was not on the list! That really is an oversight if I've ever seen one. I am not a fan of his one bit, but seriously come on.As an Eagles fan I don't particularly like Emmitt Smith, but to not have him in your top ten is a joke, honestly. And I'm so sick and tired of people using the "his o-line was too good" nonsense. Honestly, do you think some of the other backs on your list didn't have the best lines of their generation? Comparing Emmitt to his contemporaries in terms of O-line holds water, but if you're going to give him that much of a haircut you have to discount half your list too.FLAVVED
There is an "Other" option.Not Flawed.Definitely flawed without Emmitt![]()
I'm sorry but the all time leading rusher and 3 time superbowl champ should not be listed under "other" in this poll.There is an "Other" option.Not Flawed.Definitely flawed without Emmitt![]()
![]()
Wait till the Cowgirl fans get here and you'll find out who in bunches. I don't think he is, but others certainly will.Guess I should have put Emmitt on here cause people like his stats. He doesn't impress me as a top 10 of all time.It's not flawed though because I doubt anyone would have voted him as the best ever, I mean really who would have put him above Sanders, Payton or Jim Brown, ANYONE?
![]()
Marcus AllenI like Allen, but Tomlinson already has 37% of Allen's career rushing yards, 40% of his receptions, 29% of his receiving yards, 29% of his touchdowns, and has matched Allen with three 1000-yard seasons.And this is after only three years of action with what is likely the worst franchise over that time frame.After taking off Terrell Davis and put on Emmitt Smith, who would you take off for Tomlinson, the guy has only played 3 seasons?<seriously>LaDainian Tomlinson belongs somewhere on that list.</seriously>
Well, I happen to think that he might be one of the best RBs ever.Huh? How do you justify putting a guy on that list who only played 3 seasons thus far?![]()
The same could be said about Barry although not quite at the same level. Brown left after one of his most dominant seasons and Barry left just one year removed from is 2000+ season. Brown after 9 season, Barry after 10 and both with plenty of milage left in the tank. The records would look significantly different had both stuck around for at least 2 more years IMO. Both are the only 2 of the group to avg 5.0 a carry though which I think speaks for how great they really were.Jim Brown. This shouldn't even be up for debate. He only played 9 yrs and he left on top of his game. He was a man among boys then and he would be now also.
I agree with you up until the last part. He was a physical freak for his time and that's what made him so dominant. Throw him in with today's RBs and he MAY still be the best, but he would not be "a man among boys." As much as I dislike the man there is no player in history that could make Ray Lewis look like a boy.Jim Brown. This shouldn't even be up for debate. He only played 9 yrs and he left on top of his game. He was a man among boys then and he would be now also.
OK then why not open the door for Green, Portis, Alexander, Holmes, or even Lewis. I'm sorry, but 3 years does not put you in the class of the guys on this list. LT has a very good shot at this in time, but don't you think that this is jumping the gun just a bit? Especially seeing that his rookie year wasn't even all that special: 1236 yds at 3.6 per carry with 10 tds.Well, I happen to think that he might be one of the best RBs ever.Huh? How do you justify putting a guy on that list who only played 3 seasons thus far?![]()
Then why is Terell Davis on your list? They have had one of the greatest schemes/lines. Emmitt Smith was a great running back. Not a good, decent or above average running back, but great. For those who don't think so, must have not seen him play.And for the original list, how the heck do you have Tony Dorsett on this list over Emmitt Smith. I love "The origianl TD," but he wasn't Emmitt Smith. Dallas in the early 90's did have a great line, but everyone uses that way too much, talk about overhyped. I'm getting to think that people don't think for themselves and they just repeat what they've heard, which is dangerous. It's hard to find the truth.BAcks like Jamal Lewis and Priest Holmes both have great lines. Just as good as those lines Dallas had. Those backs are great too.Now I'm not saying Emmitt Smith has had the greatest one year, or two years put together. I'm talking about looking at a career. I'm talking about longevity, leadership, Super Bowl Rings, Blocking, Running, speed, playing when injured. All the things rolled into one.When you do that, if he's not on your top 10 list because you're trying to be cute and leave him off, you're just showing your ignorance and lack of knowledge for the game.That's right, it's that much of a no brainer, it's not subjective to say the No.1 rusher of all time is in the top 10 running backs. If I said he's top 3, we could argue, 10 is big enough.So carry on, talk about the Terell DAvis's, Jerome Bettis, Erick Dickerson , Franco Harris's, all All Pro Backs, but everyone of them are looking up the leader No.22 baby! All the posts and negative comments can never and will never take that from him.Here is my top 101. Barry Sanders2. Jim Brown3. Walter Payton4. Gale Sayers5. Eric Dickerson6. Earl Campbell7. OJ Simpson8. Tony Dorsett9. Marcus Allen10. Terrell DavisAnd NO, Emmitt didn't make the cut because his O-line made him a better RB than he really ever was.![]()
What aThen why is Terell Davis on your list? They have had one of the greatest schemes/lines. Emmitt Smith was a great running back. Not a good, decent or above average running back, but great. For those who don't think so, must have not seen him play.And for the original list, how the heck do you have Tony Dorsett on this list over Emmitt Smith. I love "The origianl TD," but he wasn't Emmitt Smith. Dallas in the early 90's did have a great line, but everyone uses that way too much, talk about overhyped. I'm getting to think that people don't think for themselves and they just repeat what they've heard, which is a dangerous. It's hard to find the truth.BAcks like Jamal Lewis and Priest Holmes both have great lines. Just as good as those lines Dallas had. Those backs are great too.Now I'm not saying Emmitt Smith has had the greatest one year, or two years put together. I'm talking about looking at a career. I'm talking about longevity, leadership, Super Bowl Rings, Blocking, Running, speed, playing when injured. All the things rolled into one.When you do that, if he's not on your top 10 list because you're trying to be cute and leave him off, you're just showing your ignorance and lack of knowledge for the game.That's right, it's that much of a no brainer, it's not subjective to say the No.1 rusher of all time is in the top 10 running backs. If I said he's top 3, we could argue, 10 is big enough.So carry on, talk about the Terell DAvis's, Jerome Bettis, Erick Dickerson , Franco Harris's, all All Pro Backs, but everyone of them are looking up the leader No.22 baby! All the posts and negative comments can never and will never take that from him.Here is my top 101. Barry Sanders2. Jim Brown3. Walter Payton4. Gale Sayers5. Eric Dickerson6. Earl Campbell7. OJ Simpson8. Tony Dorsett9. Marcus Allen10. Terrell DavisAnd NO, Emmitt didn't make the cut because his O-line made him a better RB than he really ever was.![]()
LT played defense. However, he was the best linebacker I've ever seen too.And there is only 1 LT. IF you ever saw him play, you'd know why I say that.Look at Ray Lewis and multiply him by 1.5 and that equals Lawrence Taylor. Nobody on offense or defense could dominate a game like him.Not Joe Montanta, Barry Sanders, Jerry Rice, or Ray Lewis.I can understand leaving LT off for now, but on a pure talent level he's the best I've ever seen.
That is your opinion, so don't preach like it's gospel. While I will 100% agree that LT is the best linebacker I've ever seen play, others will argue that point with you. Saying LT was more dominant than Jerry Rice is just plain crap. Rice was the best football player ever at any position. :gang:LT played defense. However, he was the best linebacker I've ever seen too.And there is only 1 LT. IF you ever saw him play, you'd know why I say that.Look at Ray Lewis and multiply him by 1.5 and that equals Lawrence Taylor. Nobody on offense or defense could dominate a game like him.Not Joe Montanta, Barry Sanders, Jerry Rice, or Ray Lewis.I can understand leaving LT off for now, but on a pure talent level he's the best I've ever seen.
See, I can enjoy reading this because I can believe it. For a few years, Earl Campbell was absolutely tremendous.I can remember one play where Campbell had like a 10 yard start and Mel Blunt from the Steelers tried to tackle him and Campbell picked him up and carried him 8 yards straight back. It was very impressive.Now, even Campbell supporters couldn't say he was the best ever as he never won a ring and he just didn't play long enough. But in a short period of time that man was awesome and fun to watch.Except for a few highlights, I never watched Jim Brown play. That said, Earl Campbell impressed me the most
I grew up in NJ and saw Taylor play many times and I'm quite comfortable calling Tomlinson LT also. Both are talented players. And if given the choice of having to pick which player I'd rather have on my team I'd take Tomlinson every day of the week and twice on Sunday.LT played defense. However, he was the best linebacker I've ever seen too.And there is only 1 LT. IF you ever saw him play, you'd know why I say that.Look at Ray Lewis and multiply him by 1.5 and that equals Lawrence Taylor. Nobody on offense or defense could dominate a game like him.Not Joe Montanta, Barry Sanders, Jerry Rice, or Ray Lewis.I can understand leaving LT off for now, but on a pure talent level he's the best I've ever seen.
Another thing Ronnie Lott was just as dominant at his position as LT was. Get off the :soap:See, I can enjoy reading this because I can believe it. For a few years, Earl Campbell was absolutely tremendous.I can remember one play where Campbell had like a 10 yard start and Mel Blunt from the Steelers tried to tackle him and Campbell picked him up and carried him 8 yards straight back. It was very impressive.Now, even Campbell supporters couldn't say he was the best ever as he never won a ring and he just didn't play long enough. But in a short period of time that man was awesome and fun to watch.Except for a few highlights, I never watched Jim Brown play. That said, Earl Campbell impressed me the most
See, I can enjoy reading this because I can believe it. For a few years, Earl Campbell was absolutely tremendous.I can remember one play where Campbell had like a 10 yard start and Mel Blunt from the Steelers tried to tackle him and Campbell picked him up and carried him 8 yards straight back. It was very impressive.Now, even Campbell supporters couldn't say he was the best ever as he never won a ring and he just didn't play long enough. But in a short period of time that man was awesome and fun to watch.Except for a few highlights, I never watched Jim Brown play. That said, Earl Campbell impressed me the most
I was careful not label Earl the Greatest Ever, and I think you acknowledged that. In the back of my mind, what I really meant to say was that Earl Campbell is the running back I respect the most, for the sacrifices he made on his body.Now, even Campbell supporters couldn't say he was the best ever as he never won a ring and he just didn't play long enough.
Because Tomlinson is a better RB than those guys.OK then why not open the door for Green, Portis, Alexander, Holmes, or even Lewis.Well, I happen to think that he might be one of the best RBs ever.Huh? How do you justify putting a guy on that list who only played 3 seasons thus far?![]()
Do you remember how horrid that offensive line was (and still is) in 2001? Also, consider that in 2000 San Diego's leading rusher was Terrell Fletcher with 384 yards (with a 3.3 ypc). Their second leading rusher was Jermaine Fazande with 368 yards (with a 3.1 ypc).Besides, we aren't discussing "Best NFL Career". We talking about "Best RB Ever". Tomlinson deserves consideration. If you disagree, then please list his areas of deficiency.I'm sorry, but 3 years does not put you in the class of the guys on this list. LT has a very good shot at this in time, but don't you think that this is jumping the gun just a bit? Especially seeing that his rookie year wasn't even all that special: 1236 yds at 3.6 per carry with 10 tds.
I smell a CATFIGHT!!!Because Tomlinson is a better RB than those guys.OK then why not open the door for Green, Portis, Alexander, Holmes, or even Lewis.Well, I happen to think that he might be one of the best RBs ever.Huh? How do you justify putting a guy on that list who only played 3 seasons thus far?
Do you remember how horrid that offensive line was (and still is) in 2001? Also, consider that in 2000 San Diego's leading rusher was Terrell Fletcher with 384 yards (with a 3.3 ypc). Their second leading rusher was Jermaine Fazande with 368 yards (with a 3.1 ypc).Besides, we aren't discussing "Best NFL Career". We talking about "Best RB Ever". Tomlinson deserves consideration. If you disagree, then please list his areas of deficiency.I'm sorry, but 3 years does not put you in the class of the guys on this list. LT has a very good shot at this in time, but don't you think that this is jumping the gun just a bit? Especially seeing that his rookie year wasn't even all that special: 1236 yds at 3.6 per carry with 10 tds.