What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best WR right now (1 Viewer)

Best WR right now

  • Smith - Carolina

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Holt - St. Louis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Owens - Dallas

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Johnson - Cincinnati

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Harrison - Indy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Moss - Oakland

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Put down the Berrian kool-aid man.But seriously, whi do you have Chad Johnson and Randy Moss in the poll??The best receiver is Tory Holt. Everyone knows it. Steve Smith is a close second. Then you can toss probably 15 guys around and get different opinions on who is 3-10 or so. (harrison, owens, CJ, housh, a johnson, r williams, harrison, wayne, jackson, walker, driver, moss, berrian, etc...)If anyone list anyone but Tory Holt as the best wr in football, they have some sort of mental deficiency that doesn't let them see beyond their own biases.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How can you even have this discussion without Anquan Boldin?
How can you even have a discussion beyond Tory Holt?? Serioiusly.Boldin is an excellent WR, he is no Tory Holt.I think it has gotten to the point where asking who the best WR is like asking who the best RB is. Holt and LT. He is that good.
 
How can you even have this discussion without Anquan Boldin?
How can you even have a discussion beyond Tory Holt?? Serioiusly.Boldin is an excellent WR, he is no Tory Holt.I think it has gotten to the point where asking who the best WR is like asking who the best RB is. Holt and LT. He is that good.
Wrong. Torry Holt has fantastic hands, speed, route running, and big play ability. Boldin has the same, aside from speed, and adds on top of that blocking ability, youth & is one of the hardest WRs to bring down in the league. I won't say Boldin is BETTER than Holt or vice versa -- but to completely dismiss him (or any other WR) from the argument is ridiculous.
 
How can you even have this discussion without Anquan Boldin?
How can you even have a discussion beyond Tory Holt?? Serioiusly.Boldin is an excellent WR, he is no Tory Holt.I think it has gotten to the point where asking who the best WR is like asking who the best RB is. Holt and LT. He is that good.
Wrong. Torry Holt has fantastic hands, speed, route running, and big play ability. Boldin has the same, aside from speed, and adds on top of that blocking ability, youth & is one of the hardest WRs to bring down in the league. I won't say Boldin is BETTER than Holt or vice versa -- but to completely dismiss him (or any other WR) from the argument is ridiculous.
Exactly.Also consider that Boldin leads the league in receptions, and has been a lock for 100+ catches since he entered the league (has anyone else done this? Even in his half-season he roped in over 50 catches).
 
Torry Holt and Steve Smith are undoubtedly the top two right now, IMO.

I am not sure I would put Owens and Moss in the top tier anymore. Both seem to have lost a step or two.

 
I also think Boldin should be in this conversation
Boldin is a fantastic wr, no doubt. But seriously, he is not as good as Tory Holt, sorry.Fantasy-wise, maybe you could make a case, mainly because his team has zero running game, and throws the ball a real lot. In real life, I doubt you would find any GM that would take him over Tory Holt (for this year only).
 
Boldin has more receptions, but almosta 2 yard difference in ypc, and has 4 less touchdowns.

It amazes me how people's memories work. If you came in here Sunday night, it would have been Holt and Smith, hands dows. Nobody would have mentioned boldin, not 1. Why? Because up until last night, there was actually talk in here of Boldin underperforming this year. What happens next??

Boldin has a fantastic game...now Holt and Smith are forgeotten (even though they had better games).

Now Boldin becomes the flavor of the day, and suddently he is the best wr in the game.

When in fact, he is the second best wr on his team. If it was Boldin who got hurt, and Fitz put up Boldin'w numbers from last night....would that make Fitz the best wr in football??

 
How can you even have this discussion without Anquan Boldin?
How can you even have a discussion beyond Tory Holt?? Serioiusly.Boldin is an excellent WR, he is no Tory Holt.I think it has gotten to the point where asking who the best WR is like asking who the best RB is. Holt and LT. He is that good.
Wrong. Torry Holt has fantastic hands, speed, route running, and big play ability. Boldin has the same, aside from speed, and adds on top of that blocking ability, youth & is one of the hardest WRs to bring down in the league. I won't say Boldin is BETTER than Holt or vice versa -- but to completely dismiss him (or any other WR) from the argument is ridiculous.
Define "best".Holt is the best right now....and NFL-record 6 straight 1300-yard seasons and he is in his prime.Smith is electric, but hasn't done it consistently enough to be on par with Holt.Bolden and Roy are young and will be better for the long haul, but they don't have Holt's experience, savy, and proven clutch performances.
 
If we're talking real life football, Holt's close but I think it's got to be Steve Smith right now. He's picked up right where he left off after being injured and he is the franchise - at least on offense (Peppers is his peer on defense). He warps the whole game when he's in there to an extent unmatched by Holt. I think some people are having a little "incredible catch + 3 tds" hangover with Holt right now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just to reemphasize my point about Boldin.

There was a post Sunday, maybe Saturday asking to list the top 10 RB and top 10 WR.

I dont think anyone, not 1 had Boldin as number 1. That tells me that this one game last night is sticking in people's heads. i would imagine, by the same token, if he had 3 catches for 50 yards last night, nobody would be chiming in with "Boldin is the best wr in football".

One game does not make, or kill a wr.

 
21 posts before we get to Hines Ward?

No worse than #3 overall, arguably the best all-around.

 
21 posts before we get to Hines Ward?No worse than #3 overall, arguably the best all-around.
Hines Ward does not belong in the same category as Tory Holt and Steve Smith.Are you just a raging Steelers fan, or do you own Ward in your big money league? Because otherwise, there is no reason he should be mentioned in this thread.
 
Just to reemphasize my point about Boldin.There was a post Sunday, maybe Saturday asking to list the top 10 RB and top 10 WR.I dont think anyone, not 1 had Boldin as number 1. That tells me that this one game last night is sticking in people's heads. i would imagine, by the same token, if he had 3 catches for 50 yards last night, nobody would be chiming in with "Boldin is the best wr in football".One game does not make, or kill a wr.
I think your insulting people's intelligence. It's also arrogant and closeminded to dismiss other's opinions, because they differ from your own. I think Steve Smith is the best receiver playing in the NFL right now. He changes the whole dynamics of the game. Teams have to game plan on how to stop him. I watched the Ravens/Panthers game this past weekend, and it just amazes me how outstanding Smith is.
 
Okay I understand the eye rolling at Berrian, but what is it going to take for him to get a little respect.My gosh he was a step away from at least one maybe two long receptions last night. I can't bench him when he's got that much potential. If he ends the year as a top five back will he still be looked down upon?

 
21 posts before we get to Hines Ward?No worse than #3 overall, arguably the best all-around.
Hines Ward does not belong in the same category as Tory Holt and Steve Smith.Are you just a raging Steelers fan, or do you own Ward in your big money league? Because otherwise, there is no reason he should be mentioned in this thread.
I'm no Steelers fan, although I did trade for Ward this past off-season. He isn't near the FF WR the others are, but I appreciate his blocking ability and he (first 5 games this year notwithstanding) tends to make the difficult catches. He simply isn't flashy, which I respect.FWIW, I am a huge Lions fan and don't think Roy belongs in this discussion, yet. (and I happen to have him in the same league)
 
Just to reemphasize my point about Boldin.There was a post Sunday, maybe Saturday asking to list the top 10 RB and top 10 WR.I dont think anyone, not 1 had Boldin as number 1. That tells me that this one game last night is sticking in people's heads. i would imagine, by the same token, if he had 3 catches for 50 yards last night, nobody would be chiming in with "Boldin is the best wr in football".One game does not make, or kill a wr.
I think your insulting people's intelligence. It's also arrogant and closeminded to dismiss other's opinions, because they differ from your own. I think Steve Smith is the best receiver playing in the NFL right now. He changes the whole dynamics of the game. Teams have to game plan on how to stop him. I watched the Ravens/Panthers game this past weekend, and it just amazes me how outstanding Smith is.
Completely agree. If Holt doesn't make that spectacular catch yesterday, he has two touchdowns but less than a hundred yards, which is still excellent, but in a similar fashion I think that spectacular catch is also bumping him up. I'm not saying it's because of that catch that people regard him as the best, because, to be honest, he's definitely in the top 2 or 3, irrefutably, but to say it's a shut and closed case that he's the best with Smith out there simply isn't true. Talk about selective memories? Remember what Smith did last year? He was a one man wrecking crew that singlehandedly fueled that offense, and tore the Chicago defense to shreds in the post-season. Only when Seattle TRIPLE TEAMED him was he held in check. What he did to Baltimore yesterday was SICK. Holt feasts on Zona, SF and Seattle (which is a solid defense but their secondary leaves a lot to be desired).And count me in on the Boldin train. The guy is flat-out better than Fitzgerald and the definition of "beast". His talent puts him in the top five at the position without a doubt.
 
If the poll is to hold true to the title of "right now", CJ and Randy shouldn't even be on this list.

Its a 2 horse race between Holt and Smith. Arguments can be made either way I think and be valid. The other guys, well, thats just people picking their favorite guy or guys on their team or something.

 
Just to reemphasize my point about Boldin.There was a post Sunday, maybe Saturday asking to list the top 10 RB and top 10 WR.I dont think anyone, not 1 had Boldin as number 1. That tells me that this one game last night is sticking in people's heads. i would imagine, by the same token, if he had 3 catches for 50 yards last night, nobody would be chiming in with "Boldin is the best wr in football".One game does not make, or kill a wr.
I think your insulting people's intelligence. It's also arrogant and closeminded to dismiss other's opinions, because they differ from your own. I think Steve Smith is the best receiver playing in the NFL right now. He changes the whole dynamics of the game. Teams have to game plan on how to stop him. I watched the Ravens/Panthers game this past weekend, and it just amazes me how outstanding Smith is.
Completely agree. If Holt doesn't make that spectacular catch yesterday, he has two touchdowns but less than a hundred yards, which is still excellent, but in a similar fashion I think that spectacular catch is also bumping him up. I'm not saying it's because of that catch that people regard him as the best, because, to be honest, he's definitely in the top 2 or 3, irrefutably, but to say it's a shut and closed case that he's the best with Smith out there simply isn't true. Talk about selective memories? Remember what Smith did last year? He was a one man wrecking crew that singlehandedly fueled that offense, and tore the Chicago defense to shreds in the post-season. Only when Seattle TRIPLE TEAMED him was he held in check. What he did to Baltimore yesterday was SICK. Holt feasts on Zona, SF and Seattle (which is a solid defense but their secondary leaves a lot to be desired).And count me in on the Boldin train. The guy is flat-out better than Fitzgerald and the definition of "beast". His talent puts him in the top five at the position without a doubt.
I agree with your thoughts on Boldin...I see him somewhere in the top 10ish??And a case can be made for Smith and/or Holt I believe. I just dont see any other wrs coming close to the 2 of them right now. if Smith has another few games with no injury questions, then he very well could be the best wr.Tory Holt has put up numbers every week this year. He is amazaingly consistent. That is why i put him up at #1.
 
Tory Holt has put up numbers every week this year. He is amazaingly consistent. That is why i put him up at #1.
He has also put up the numbers every year for the last 7. Consistency is so rare for a WR, especially to that degree.
 
Here was my list of the Top Ten WR going forward that was posted in a thread yesterday

WR

1Holt

2Smith

3Roy

4A.Johnson

5Harrison

6Boldin

7CJ

8Santana Moss

9DJ

10Plax

I would not change that list today......Boldin is awsome and I am trying to trade for him but he is in the tier below Holt and Smith but he belongs on the list

 
I vote Steve Smith. I have Holt in my league but as far as real life is concerned, Smith is far and away the best wr in the league right now.

 
Its a 2 horse race between Holt and Smith. Arguments can be made either way I think and be valid. The other guys, well, thats just people picking their favorite guy or guys on their team or something.
:goodposting: It's Holt and Smith way out in front of the rest.After those two you can start talking about Boldin, Andre Johnson, Harrison, Chad Johnson (despite the slow start), Owens, Roy, Ward, etc.
 
I vote Steve Smith. I have Holt in my league but as far as real life is concerned, Smith is far and away the best wr in the league right now.
Based on what?The facts (per game):

Holt 6 games: 6.17 receptions, 87.67 yds, 1.17 td's

Smith 4 games: 7.75 receptions, 112.5 yds, 0.5 td's

 
Holt is the fastest to reach 10,000 yards ever. He continues to produce year in and year out and is currently in his prime. The objection to this will be "yeah, but he did that in the Martz system>". Now he is doing it in a new system.

It's hard to argue against current production PLUS past production.

Steve Smith and all others on that list can only boast one or the other.

 
It is what it is said:
Terrell Owens. Even with a slow start, a possible overdose, a foreign offensive system, and virtually no preseason time with his new QB...Owens is still on pace for 70+ catches for close to 1,000 yards and 13 touchdowns. Owens still gains seperation easily from DB's, is a top 3 yac guy and a top 3 jump ball receiver from where I sit. This guy is still the best there is at the position in the NFL.
So a big year following by a dud, a big game followed by a dud, etc...is "better" than 6 straight 1300 yard seasons, 5 straight games with a TD, etc?
 
I vote Steve Smith. I have Holt in my league but as far as real life is concerned, Smith is far and away the best wr in the league right now.
Based on what?The facts (per game):

Holt 6 games: 6.17 receptions, 87.67 yds, 1.17 td's

Smith 4 games: 7.75 receptions, 112.5 yds, 0.5 td's
So Smith catches more passes for more yards?Panthers have gone 4-0 since Smith has returned. I feel he has a bigger impact on his team than Holt has on the Rams. They're both great wr's and you can't go wrong with either one.

 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
Terrell Owens. Even with a slow start, a possible overdose, a foreign offensive system, and virtually no preseason time with his new QB...Owens is still on pace for 70+ catches for close to 1,000 yards and 13 touchdowns. Owens still gains seperation easily from DB's, is a top 3 yac guy and a top 3 jump ball receiver from where I sit. This guy is still the best there is at the position in the NFL.
So a big year following by a dud, a big game followed by a dud, etc...is "better" than 6 straight 1300 yard seasons, 5 straight games with a TD, etc?
You are incorrect in applying the good year (game), bad year (game) label on Owens. Check the stats again.If you prefer to look at the last three years, Owens has 29 touchdowns in 36 games, while Holt has 31 touchdowns in 46 games. And this three year look ignores Holt's past inconsistancies in scoring touchdowns, in missing double digit touchdowns in all three previous years from 2000-2002. Where as Owens has proven to be able to score his touchdowns in any situation and with several different quarterbacks. Over the past six years, Owens has scored 72 touchdowns in 80 games, while Holt has just 48 touchdowns in 96 games.Holt has shown a steady decline over the past three season in touchdowns, receiving yards and YPC. While Owens has shown a steady increase in receiving yards, YPC and an increase in touchdowns from '03 to '04...while also maintaining that torrid touchdown pace of basically one touchdown per game from '04 to '05, that we have all come to expect from him. As Owens has shown the ability to do this touchdown a game average for 5 out of 6 years now, and under three different QBs.Holt may go for 100/1 a small percentage (6%) of the time more than Owens, but this doesn't make him a better Football player than Owens. The overall numbers don't lie...Owens| 2000 sfo | 14 | 97 1451 15.0 13 || 2001 sfo | 16 | 93 1412 15.2 16 || 2002 sfo | 14 | 100 1300 13.0 13 | 7 79 11.3 1 (Ru stats)! 2003 sfo | 15 | 80 1102 13.8 9 || 2004 phi | 14 | 77 1200 15.6 14 || 2005 phi | 7 | 47 763 16.2 6 |Holt| 2000 stl | 16 | 82 1635 19.9 6 || 2001 stl | 16 | 81 1363 16.8 7 || 2002 stl | 16 | 91 1302 14.3 4 || 2003 stl | 16 | 117 1696 14.5 12 || 2004 stl | 16 | 94 1372 14.6 10 || 2005 stl | 14 | 102 1331 13.0 9 |
I overstated a little, but my point was consistency. Goes back to my question of the definition of "best". Owens is bigger, faster, and stronger....but he's gotten injured, suspended, and cut. TO's floor is MUCH lower, and his ceiling is no longer higher.
 
1. Holt 2. Smith 3. RoyThey can not be covered right now. Impossible.
I think this is it right now....and i'd add:4. Boldin5. Chad JohnsonRoy is leading the league in yards...and that's with missing a game. He looks unstoppable out there, and Kitna has figured it out. He's going to continue to put up monster numbers. Boldin is a friggin Machine.
 
It is what it is said:
It is what it is said:
Terrell Owens. Even with a slow start, a possible overdose, a foreign offensive system, and virtually no preseason time with his new QB...Owens is still on pace for 70+ catches for close to 1,000 yards and 13 touchdowns. Owens still gains seperation easily from DB's, is a top 3 yac guy and a top 3 jump ball receiver from where I sit. This guy is still the best there is at the position in the NFL.
So a big year following by a dud, a big game followed by a dud, etc...is "better" than 6 straight 1300 yard seasons, 5 straight games with a TD, etc?
You are incorrect in applying the good year (game), bad year (game) label on Owens. Check the stats again.If you prefer to look at the last three years, Owens has 29 touchdowns in 36 games, while Holt has 31 touchdowns in 46 games. And this three year look ignores Holt's past inconsistancies in scoring touchdowns, in missing double digit touchdowns in all three previous years from 2000-2002. Where as Owens has proven to be able to score his touchdowns in any situation and with several different quarterbacks. Over the past six years, Owens has scored 72 touchdowns in 80 games, while Holt has just 48 touchdowns in 96 games.Holt has shown a steady decline over the past three season in touchdowns, receiving yards and YPC. While Owens has shown a steady increase in receiving yards, YPC and an increase in touchdowns from '03 to '04...while also maintaining that torrid touchdown pace of basically one touchdown per game from '04 to '05, that we have all come to expect from him. As Owens has shown the ability to do this touchdown a game average for 5 out of 6 years now, and under three different QBs.Holt may go for 100/1 a small percentage (6%) of the time more than Owens, but this doesn't make him a better Football player than Owens. The overall numbers don't lie...Owens| 2000 sfo | 14 | 97 1451 15.0 13 || 2001 sfo | 16 | 93 1412 15.2 16 || 2002 sfo | 14 | 100 1300 13.0 13 | 7 79 11.3 1 (Ru stats)! 2003 sfo | 15 | 80 1102 13.8 9 || 2004 phi | 14 | 77 1200 15.6 14 || 2005 phi | 7 | 47 763 16.2 6 |Holt| 2000 stl | 16 | 82 1635 19.9 6 || 2001 stl | 16 | 81 1363 16.8 7 || 2002 stl | 16 | 91 1302 14.3 4 || 2003 stl | 16 | 117 1696 14.5 12 || 2004 stl | 16 | 94 1372 14.6 10 || 2005 stl | 14 | 102 1331 13.0 9 |
Steady decline the last 3 years for Holt? I guess you ignore that Holt's receptions were up and yardage and TD were barely off his 2004 totals in spite of missing 2 games. I will concede the point that TO is much more of a red zone threat and Holt will not have as many double digit TD years as TO.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top