What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Big dose of reality: Like it or not, fantasy football has taken over (1 Viewer)

Faust

MVP
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writ...tasy/index.html

Five years ago this summer, I wrote a piece that probably got more reader reaction than all 7,236 of the other stories combined that I've done since I started covering the NFL two decades ago. And that was just from family members.

Maybe you remember it. It featured my top 10 reasons for hating fantasy football, in the less-than-ground-breaking list format that has become a staple of internet journalism. I thought I hit on some valid, cogent points and my punch lines were fairly crisp, but that didn't stop about 91 percent of the fantasy football lovers from wishing me ill in rather colorful ways and suggesting I perform a number of anatomically improbable feats.

As always, thanks for the feedback folks, and keep those cards, letters and clicks coming.

As much as I realized at the time I was swimming against a powerful rip tide of public opinion and, yes, biting the hand that helps feed me in this NFL-obsessed land of ours, I was still amazed by the width and breadth of that column's reach. Besides being deluged with requests from radio stations far and wide to discuss my reasoning on air, I heard from a documentary-maker who was shooting a film about the impact of the fantasy game, an author who was writing a book on the subject, and even a college student or two who were doing a thesis or term paper on the topic.

It later occurred to me that talking/writing about fantasy football (I still refuse to capitalize the f's, as if it's a corporation or a sovereign country) is apparently only slightly less popular than playing the game itself. Everyone seems to have an opinion on fantasy football, and there's no mushy middle to inhabit. You're either with the fantasy players or against them, and the debate is almost entirely dominated by the true believers who worship the game. Think American Idol fans, but in a sports crowd.

I get it. I'm not in the norm on this one. I still have never played the game, don't care to, and I'm certainly not about to start now. Not to rehash my entire list, but my objections to the fantasy game still center on how it changes the way you watch a game (trivializing the bottom line result and blurring lines galore when it comes to team loyalties), glorifies the stats accumulator over the team player (say, how come nobody seems to covet LaDainian Tomlinson any more come draft day?), turns defenders into bit players compared to the league's point-scorers (you tell Jared Allen or Ray Lewis that they're really not important), and spawns an environment where literally everyone is an NFL football expert (and let's face it, if we're all experts, then none of us are, especially us internet typists).

Five years after my fantasy screed (one of the kinder, more subtle descriptions offered of that piece), the game built around an alternate state of reality hasn't exactly plateaued, has it? The housing bubble burst, the stock market tanked, and the economy almost slid into a capital-lettered second Great Depression, but fantasy football is bigger and thriving more than ever. That point was soundly driven home to me again Wednesday, when an e-mail from the NFL landed in my in-box, announcing the league was jumping with two feet deeper into the ever-expanding world of fantasy football.

We're told that for the first time, NFL.com has launched a new fantasy platform (and don't you know it's all about the platforms these days), featuring "the world's only NFL fantasy game with video and extensive in-game highlights.'' The press release goes on to say that player projections are tied to Madden NFL 11, which seems about right, since that seems to link a fantasy game that really doesn't exist in reality to a video game that really doesn't exist in reality. All by a league that may not play any real games itself next year if it doesn't get its labor situation figured out.

How perfect.

The new NFL.com fantasy game will provide "thousands of game highlights that make fantasy football come to life.'' I don't know what your experience has been, but whenever I'm anywhere near someone keeping track of their fantasy football team on Sundays, coaxing them into making the game come to life doesn't seem to be an issue. I've had to resist the urge a time or two to shake the life out of them, but I digress.

Fans who sign up with NFL.com are promised game highlights and video analysis throughout the season, customized to each fan's team and fantasy matchup, with highlights of all "significant fantasy scoring plays integrated into the platform, making Game Day on NFL.com the ultimate fantasy experience.'' The words "ultimate fantasy experience'' sounds like a come-on line for one of those 1-900 phone services to me, but I realize I might be easily excitable and in the minority on this one.

As if that's not enough evidence that fantasy football might be close to becoming the tail that wags the dog in the NFL, at least four teams this season -- the Patriots, Ravens, 49ers and Raiders -- reportedly plan to offer their fans in-stadium glimpses of the NFL RedZone channel on game days, which provides live, real-time look-ins and highlights to every other Sunday afternoon game (a fantasy player's crack cocaine). Clubs can decide how they want to use the content, but all are believed to be intent on featuring it both before and during their games.

Also, the NFL at its March owners meeting heard a pitch from former Chiefs general manager Carl Peterson, who along with current Dolphins owner Stephen Ross is marketing a hand-held video device called Game-Day Vision that would be available to fans in their seats at the stadium, allowing them to keep track of everything that unfolds around the league while they're at the game.

Sure, some of that effort is simply in line with the league's new and sensible push to make sure fans don't decide staying home and watching from the comfort of their couch beats the NFL's game-day in-stadium experience, but a big part of the lure of staying home is all about the needs and wishes of the fantasy player. Catering to that football fan is a big part of the overall goal of the NFL's new innovation.

You get the feeling we're headed for all access, all the time, with fantasy football furthering its grip as this sports-crazed nation's favorite pastime while watching its favorite game. In the NFL world, fantasy is the clear-cut king. Even if non-believers like me have our reasons for not liking it, it's not about to go away or decrease in popularity. From the looks of things, to think otherwise is pure fantasy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What bugs me about these people is that I don't see any of them willing to give back all the money that fantasy sports provides for them. The NFL and MLB especially would have a fraction of it's popularity if not for fantasy sports. That puts more money in everyone's pocket who's involved in sports. Give back a third or half your salary and then write this article and you'll have some credibility.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What bugs me about these people is that I don't see any of them willing to give back all the money that fantasy sports provides for them. The NFL and MLB especially would have a fraction of it's popularity if not for fantasy sports. That puts more money in everyone's pocket who's involved in sports. Give back a third or half your salary and then write this article and you'll have some credibility.
I don't know why he'd need to give back money in order to have some credibility. Even if Fantasy Football doubles the revenue of agencies that cover the NFL, that doesn't mean it doubles the revenue of each agent that covers the NFL. Getting rid of fantasy football wouldn't reduce every journalist's salary by 50%, it would reduce half of the journalists' salaries by 100% (i.e. everyone who writes about fantasy football would be fired) and would have a negligible impact on everyone else.Second off, he's an opinion columnist who wrote an opinion column. I'm not seeing where credibility comes into play.
 
Second off, he's an opinion columnist who wrote an opinion column. I'm not seeing where credibility comes into play.
:excited: It's what he gets paid to do. FF and gambling are the tails that wags the NFL dogs. IMO, it's easier to take potshots at the :popcorn: FF player than the degenerate gambler.
 
This is just a puff piece to enrage FF loyalists and drum up emotion/press. If you take a look at his top 10 list it is pretty week. I only think his points #1 and #7 have any validity...

 
What bugs me about these people is that I don't see any of them willing to give back all the money that fantasy sports provides for them. The NFL and MLB especially would have a fraction of it's popularity if not for fantasy sports. That puts more money in everyone's pocket who's involved in sports. Give back a third or half your salary and then write this article and you'll have some credibility.
I don't know why he'd need to give back money in order to have some credibility. Even if Fantasy Football doubles the revenue of agencies that cover the NFL, that doesn't mean it doubles the revenue of each agent that covers the NFL. Getting rid of fantasy football wouldn't reduce every journalist's salary by 50%, it would reduce half of the journalists' salaries by 100% (i.e. everyone who writes about fantasy football would be fired) and would have a negligible impact on everyone else.Second off, he's an opinion columnist who wrote an opinion column. I'm not seeing where credibility comes into play.
50% is probably an exaggeration, but the NFL is HUGE in no small part because of the fantasy football explosion. How many more games do you watch because of it? I'll sit through a Browns vs TB game if one of my players is in that game. No way I'll watch it otherwise. It trickles down to everyone involved in sports.Maybe credibility is the wrong word. Let's just say a lot fewer people would be interested in this guys opinion pieces if sports were not as huge as they are. And they're huge partially because of fantasy sports. I don't think a lot of journalists appreciate that.
 
I liked the part where he quotes Shattner asking if Trekkies ever kissed a girl. By the looks of the guy, i would bet he didnt until he was old enough to pay for it.

 
:confused: Poor Don still doesn't get it and probably never will. But as interest in his column wanes because he is a pretty poor writer with regards to things NFL (not much interesting info to offer IMO) he goes back to the one thing that spikes hits to his column, insulting FF players. Tacky.

BTW here's a list of other things Don Banks "doesn't get" and hope the "fad" dies away

1- The automobile

2- The internet

3- Daggone cell phones

4- "sneakers"

5- Belts- what wrong with good ole suspenders

 
This is just a puff piece to enrage FF loyalists and drum up emotion/press. If you take a look at his top 10 list it is pretty week. I only think his points #1 and #7 have any validity...
Yes, they were quite weak. Especially the comparison to trekkies. Really? I fail to see how fantasy football could compromise anyone in that regard. It's not like we're playing world of warcraft 18 hours a day. Just watching football on Sundays.
Yet here we are in June on a FFB board? No mini camps. The draft is over and here we are... It's a valid point...
 
Link

5. The death of the NFL offseason. I realize this is a purely selfish one, but I happen to believe that in most things, less is more. I blame fantasy football for the NFL game's current status as a year-round, 24/7 national obsession. If there really is an NFL offseason any more, I don't know when it takes place. Maybe the two or three weeks before training camps open, but even then, there's still something going on that creates a headline or two in Paul Tagliabue's fiefdom.

Whatever happened to the quaint notion that you can't miss something if it never really goes away?
:lmao:
 
Link

5. The death of the NFL offseason. I realize this is a purely selfish one, but I happen to believe that in most things, less is more. I blame fantasy football for the NFL game's current status as a year-round, 24/7 national obsession. If there really is an NFL offseason any more, I don't know when it takes place. Maybe the two or three weeks before training camps open, but even then, there's still something going on that creates a headline or two in Paul Tagliabue's fiefdom.

Whatever happened to the quaint notion that you can't miss something if it never really goes away?
:bag:
:shrug:
 
This is just a puff piece to enrage FF loyalists and drum up emotion/press. If you take a look at his top 10 list it is pretty week. I only think his points #1 and #7 have any validity...
Yes, they were quite weak. Especially the comparison to trekkies. Really? I fail to see how fantasy football could compromise anyone in that regard. It's not like we're playing world of warcraft 18 hours a day. Just watching football on Sundays.
Fantasy football is a complete nerd activity, just like being a Trekkie is and just like playing World of Warcraft is. And :thumbup: if you're seriously going to claim that you don't spend anymore time and effort on your team(s) than "just watching football on Sundays."That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with playing fantasy football (I played myself for a number of years); it's harmless, a lot of people have fun doing it, and a lot of people make money doing it. But you're delusional and lying to yourself if you seriously think that fantasy football is any less nerdy than playing video games or attending Star Trek conventions.

Okay, maybe it's a little less nerdy than being a Trekkie. :thumbup:

 
Adebisi, you are exactly right. We spend a lot more time on our hobby than just Sundays. We definitely spend more time on this than the most die-hard trekkie I could imagine.

Good call. It is what is is, and I'm addicted. In order to understand an addiction, you have to acknowledge you have a problem, lol.

 
FF is fun and caters to all ages from 8 to 80. Banks should try it. He'd like it. I've never been a huge fan of Banks. SI has or as had many better football writers: King, Zimmerman, Silver, Trotter, Tucker, etc.

 
Not to rehash my entire list, but my objections to the fantasy game still center on how it changes the way you watch a game (trivializing the bottom line result and blurring lines galore when it comes to team loyalties)
How does it blur team loyalties? I root for the Packers, first, foremost, and always. Even with AP on my team last year. Never occurred to me to root for AP to crush the Pack.
glorifies the stats accumulator over the team player (say, how come nobody seems to covet LaDainian Tomlinson any more come draft day?)
Hey, Don Banks, did you notice that (except the Jets) nobody else in the NFL wanted LT either?!?!!?
turns defenders into bit players compared to the league's point-scorers (you tell Jared Allen or Ray Lewis that they're really not important)
Welcome to the world of IDP, Don "Genius" Banks. At least he could have used something like O-line to make a meaningful point.
and spawns an environment where literally everyone is an NFL football expert (and let's face it, if we're all experts, then none of us are, especially us internet typists).
So his real issue is that devalues the "expertise" of genius writers like Banks. What a clown.
 
This is just a puff piece to enrage FF loyalists and drum up emotion/press. If you take a look at his top 10 list it is pretty week. I only think his points #1 and #7 have any validity...
Yes, they were quite weak. Especially the comparison to trekkies. Really? I fail to see how fantasy football could compromise anyone in that regard. It's not like we're playing world of warcraft 18 hours a day. Just watching football on Sundays.
This is so not true, if that's true for you please let me in your league.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top