Lee Evans is a glaring omission here, along with Vernon Davis.ETA, I was beaten to the punch!in no chronological order:LJLTSjaxBreesBulgerBensonMaroneythere's countless others but i think as a consensus, amidst all the expectations, these guys are really crushing their owners (me being one of them).
Agree on Maroney and LT, but ... SJax may be finished. Can't necessarily call one a "bust" due to injury, but, as far as your point is concerned, he can't turn it around from the pine.I'm not sure Maroney should be on that list. He's putting up good rushing numbers (a 4.7 avg), he's just not getting the TDs yet. This is the same offense in which Dillon ran for at least 12 TDs in 3 consecutive years. I think he'll get there eventually this season, along with LT and SJax. I'm not so sure about the other 3.
Colston hasn't been aweful, he's averaging 6 catches for 62 yds each week and has a TD.Everyone was actually pretty down on him coming into this season and I think he is performing right as expected....it just looks a little worse with all of the WR explosions in the first few weeks.Im adding Fitzgerald to the list. And maybe Colston. Fairly high draft WRs doing very little right now.
Maurice Jones-Drew is a much bigger bust than the majority of those listed so far.
Maurice Jones-Drew is a much bigger bust than the majority of those listed so far.First round pick in most leagues and he's been as bad as anyone else on that list.
Travis Henry hasn't really been all that terrific either. The Broncos don't seem to want to use him at the goaline for some reason and it's hurting his value.
mmm......let me seeBrees has 677 pass yards, 1 td & 7 intIm adding Fitzgerald to the list. And maybe Colston. Fairly high draft WRs doing very little right now.
Hines WardMark ClaytonMJDL. Evansin no chronological order:LJLTSjaxBreesBulgerBensonMaroney
I'm curious. What would the order look like had it been chronological?And Benson is far from a "bust" in the classic sense. I got him in the 5th round. I'm not unhappy so far.in no chronological order:LJLTSjaxBreesBulgerBensonMaroney
Gore even.
cause he's a warriorHow the hell does Hines Ward not get any flak?
Have you seen him block? Oh, and his smile.cause he's a warriorHow the hell does Hines Ward not get any flak?
Just wondering how your Bulger, Alexander, R. Johnson, Fitzgerald, Ward, Santana Moss team is doing?Nothing wrong with being conservative, but taking ONLY proven guys early is not gonna win you many leagues.MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
Steven Jackson one year wonder ??ARE YOU DRUNK ?MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
in no chronological order:
some staffer had him at 4th runner overall.I'm curious. What would the order look like had it been chronological?And Benson is far from a "bust" in the classic sense. I got him in the 5th round. I'm not unhappy so far.in no chronological order:LJLTSjaxBreesBulgerBensonMaroney
because he was like a mid 5th.... theres much bigger fish to fryand S Moss has 2 games where he went over 80 yd... not really a bust.How the hell does Hines Ward not get any flak?
I don't have a personal vendetta against Santana or anything, but even in a PPR league he's only put up 5, 14, and 11. If he were on my team I wouldn't be too happy with that.because he was like a mid 5th.... theres much bigger fish to fryand S Moss has 2 games where he went over 80 yd... not really a bust.How the hell does Hines Ward not get any flak?
I totally disagree-so taking risks early is the way to win? I've been in my league 17 years and I win-a bunchFYI-the bulk of my team looks like thisJust wondering how your Bulger, Alexander, R. Johnson, Fitzgerald, Ward, Santana Moss team is doing?Nothing wrong with being conservative, but taking ONLY proven guys early is not gonna win you many leagues.MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
And I (and many others) took him in the 5th round.This is why "bust" lists are largely subjective.some staffer had him at 4th runner overall.I'm curious. What would the order look like had it been chronological?And Benson is far from a "bust" in the classic sense. I got him in the 5th round. I'm not unhappy so far.in no chronological order:
LJ
LT
Sjax
Brees
Bulger
Benson
Maroney
Did I miss something during his 4 year career? Please send me PM me his stats if I did. So far, yes, he is a one year wonder. 2005 decent, 2006 excellent, 2007-non existent.Granted he has shown a good progression from year to year but still 1 year as an elite.Steven Jackson one year wonder ??
ARE YOU DRUNK ?
![]()
My point pretty much is that fantasy football is a game of luck no matter what. Last year Cadillac, Ronnie Brown, Edge, Rudi Johnson, Steven Jackson, Portis were all in the same mix of RB's. Jackson was mostly unproven, and he probably won a lot of leagues for people.I'm not saying taking risks early is a formula for success, but from my experience it seems that good picks in the later rounds and guys that outproduce ADP are what will win your league. A guy being proven or not, really seems to not come into play as far as helping your team win.I totally disagree-so taking risks early is the way to win? I've been in my league 17 years and I win-a bunchFYI-the bulk of my team looks like thisJust wondering how your Bulger, Alexander, R. Johnson, Fitzgerald, Ward, Santana Moss team is doing?Nothing wrong with being conservative, but taking ONLY proven guys early is not gonna win you many leagues.MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
P. Manning & Favre/ Edge, Green, Benson, Barber III/Harrison, R. Williams, Driver, Welker, D. Williams/Witten & Miller.
Looks good to me.
![]()
I suppose you are correct by strict definition. But most "one-year wonders" refer to a guy who had one really good year due mainly to circumstances and opportunity (think Erric Pegram) rather than being talented. Jackson will be a top back for many years.Did I miss something during his 4 year career? Please send me PM me his stats if I did. So far, yes, he is a one year wonder. 2005 decent, 2006 excellent, 2007-non existent.Granted he has shown a good progression from year to year but still 1 year as an elite.Steven Jackson one year wonder ??
ARE YOU DRUNK ?
![]()
Showing your age there, buddy.I suppose you are correct by strict definition. But most "one-year wonders" refer to a guy who had one really good year due mainly to circumstances and opportunity (think Erric Pegram) rather than being talented. Jackson will be a top back for many years.Did I miss something during his 4 year career? Please send me PM me his stats if I did. So far, yes, he is a one year wonder. 2005 decent, 2006 excellent, 2007-non existent.Granted he has shown a good progression from year to year but still 1 year as an elite.Steven Jackson one year wonder ??
ARE YOU DRUNK ?
![]()
IIRC, this is the same guy who said Steve Smith shouldn't be #1WR because he'd also only done it for 1 year.... :(Steven Jackson one year wonder ??ARE YOU DRUNK ?MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
![]()
The very same guy. That was me and I'm standing by it-how did he look against real coverage vs Atlanta?Smith will not be the #1 WR this year either. Right now he's 3rd in my league and falling.IIRC, this is the same guy who said Steve Smith shouldn't be #1WR because he'd also only done it for 1 year.... :(Steven Jackson one year wonder ??ARE YOU DRUNK ?MJD, Coleston & S. Jackson don't even belong on this list since they were overvalued by almost everyone to begin with. (Jackson going as high as #2 in many drafts...are you friggin kidding me? They are all basically one year wonders-so far. Same can be said for Lee Evans and Gore. All have lots of potential but all of these players I mentioned have had ONE good year which is hardly enough to have them ranked them so high on draft day. Maybe I'm too conservative but when I draft my team I try to go with proven players for my higher draft picks and then take some flyers on raw talent and potential later on.
![]()
![]()
Showing your age there, buddy.I suppose you are correct by strict definition. But most "one-year wonders" refer to a guy who had one really good year due mainly to circumstances and opportunity (think Erric Pegram) rather than being talented. Jackson will be a top back for many years.Did I miss something during his 4 year career? Please send me PM me his stats if I did. So far, yes, he is a one year wonder. 2005 decent, 2006 excellent, 2007-non existent.Granted he has shown a good progression from year to year but still 1 year as an elite.Steven Jackson one year wonder ??
ARE YOU DRUNK ?
:(
With age comes wisdom.Young bull and old bull grazing on top of a hill. Young bull says "Look at all those cows down there!!! Let's run down the hill and screw one" Old bull says "Lets walk down and screw them all"Showing your age there, buddy.I suppose you are correct by strict definition. But most "one-year wonders" refer to a guy who had one really good year due mainly to circumstances and opportunity (think Erric Pegram) rather than being talented. Jackson will be a top back for many years.Did I miss something during his 4 year career? Please send me PM me his stats if I did. So far, yes, he is a one year wonder. 2005 decent, 2006 excellent, 2007-non existent.Granted he has shown a good progression from year to year but still 1 year as an elite.Steven Jackson one year wonder ??
ARE YOU DRUNK ?
:(I already admitted I've been at this hobby for 20 years. I'm finally getting it right. 3-0... high points every week.
(In case you were wondering)![]()
Hard to score TDs when you aren't trusted at the goal line or in short yardage. He won't score unless he takes one in from 8+ yards out. Maroney will hurt fantasy teams all year.I'm not sure Maroney should be on that list. He's putting up good rushing numbers (a 4.7 avg), he's just not getting the TDs yet. This is the same offense in which Dillon ran for at least 12 TDs in 3 consecutive years. I think he'll get there eventually this season, along with LT and SJax. I'm not so sure about the other 3.
i agree that LT falls in the buy low category but in no way would i be buying LJ - AT ALL. i have one word for anyone looking to trade for LJ - HERM. stay away. stay as far away as possible.I think labelling a guy a bust after 3 games with no SOS kind of analysis is an extremely flawed label. If a guy plays 3 awful defenses and puts up a decent stats it's going to be hidden by the small and advantageous schedules and vice versa for the player who's faced top defenses. To say player X was drafted #1 and he's putting up #15 numbers through 3 games so he's a bust is a completely incorrect way to view which players are busts. Many people may laugh but I think McGahee has been a mild bust so far and I've been looking to deal him before others figure it out.Being able to look at the numbers and try to understand why they are occurring is the difference between being a shark and guppie. People should be targetting a lot of these "busts" due to the fact that the majority of the players on the list had incredibly difficult schedules to start the season which will even out throughout the course of the season.