Sure you could choose this one if you count the choke on the refs. The fat slob who would have probably caught the ball was eligable on the play and was clearly pass interfered.I chose Jackie SmithTrey Junkin's bobbled snap on GW FG, 2002 playoffs 49'ers vs Giants
I meant that had he made it, the game would have been sealed and the Vikings would have gone to the Super Bowl. Maybe the wording was a bit off..FYI, Gary Anderson's missed FG wasn't a "game-sealing miss" as you phrased it.The Vikes were UP by 7 when he picked an unfortunate time to miss his first kick of '98.
Norwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMO
Norwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMO
Copied from the other thread:Scott Norwood stats:Gonna have to go with Norwood. Stage of all stages and it directly effected the outcome.
Norwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMOCopied from the other thread:Scott Norwood stats:Gonna have to go with Norwood. Stage of all stages and it directly effected the outcome.
Pro-Football-Reference
DatabaseFootball
Some lowlights:
- Exceeded 80% FG accuracy in only one year out of seven
- Was below 70% accuracy in four of those years
- Missed 3% of PATs and 11% of FG attempts under 30 yards
- Did not kick a FG of 50+ yards until his final year in the league (career 2-for-10)
- Career 37-for-61 on 40-49 yard FGs.
- Career AAA rating of 67.0 is worse than every single starting kicker in the NFL, as of the beginning of 2006. (AAA rating defined here on page 11)
(Caveat: I haven't done any historical analysis of AAA ratings, so he may not have been the worst kicker in the NFL as of 1990)
I stand by my assertion that he should never been playing for a SB contender.
BTW, during that SB year, Norwood had not made a single kick from 47+ yards.
The games he choked away weren't big enough for the list. They were either 1st round or divisional round playoff games. If those performances/mistakes would have been in the NFC Championship or Super Bowl...then sure. But as it is, nobody really expected those teams to go very far so the poor performances are forgotten.Shouldn't Brett Favre be on this list?
Norwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMOCopied from the other thread:Scott Norwood stats:Gonna have to go with Norwood. Stage of all stages and it directly effected the outcome.
Pro-Football-Reference
DatabaseFootball
Some lowlights:
- Exceeded 80% FG accuracy in only one year out of seven
- Was below 70% accuracy in four of those years
- Missed 3% of PATs and 11% of FG attempts under 30 yards
- Did not kick a FG of 50+ yards until his final year in the league (career 2-for-10)
- Career 37-for-61 on 40-49 yard FGs.
- Career AAA rating of 67.0 is worse than every single starting kicker in the NFL, as of the beginning of 2006. (AAA rating defined here on page 11)
(Caveat: I haven't done any historical analysis of AAA ratings, so he may not have been the worst kicker in the NFL as of 1990)
I stand by my assertion that he should never been playing for a SB contender.
BTW, during that SB year, Norwood had not made a single kick from 47+ yards.How anyone voted Norwood, I'll never understand.
Good call. I vote Marino then.The games he choked away weren't big enough for the list. They were either 1st round or divisional round playoff games. If those performances/mistakes would have been in the NFC Championship or Super Bowl...then sure. But as it is, nobody really expected those teams to go very far so the poor performances are forgotten.Shouldn't Brett Favre be on this list?
nice work to use math to support your theory.no math needed though, this is a good KNorwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMOCopied from the other thread:Scott Norwood stats:Gonna have to go with Norwood. Stage of all stages and it directly effected the outcome.
Pro-Football-Reference
DatabaseFootball
Some lowlights:
- Exceeded 80% FG accuracy in only one year out of seven
- Was below 70% accuracy in four of those years
- Missed 3% of PATs and 11% of FG attempts under 30 yards
- Did not kick a FG of 50+ yards until his final year in the league (career 2-for-10)
- Career 37-for-61 on 40-49 yard FGs.
- Career AAA rating of 67.0 is worse than every single starting kicker in the NFL, as of the beginning of 2006. (AAA rating defined here on page 11)
(Caveat: I haven't done any historical analysis of AAA ratings, so he may not have been the worst kicker in the NFL as of 1990)
What does that even mean? We're not talking some all star team but the best two teams competing for a championship. He was part of one of them.I stand by my assertion that he should never been playing for a SB contender.
Is it a choke is the team still wins?Only because I remember saying before the play that the Steelers have it locked up if they just give the ball to the bus, I had to go with Bettis. I'm not sure if it was a fluke or pressure, but that fumble was HUGE. Or would have been had a certain QB not made a game saving tackle.
Yes. The outcome has no bearing on a fact that a player let pressure get to him and made a big mistake.Is it a choke is the team still wins?Only because I remember saying before the play that the Steelers have it locked up if they just give the ball to the bus, I had to go with Bettis. I'm not sure if it was a fluke or pressure, but that fumble was HUGE. Or would have been had a certain QB not made a game saving tackle.
Bri, you would have to agree that it is obvious that Norwood was not good at longer kicksnice work to use math to support your theory.no math needed though, this is a good KNorwood was an excellent K. He was a "lock". I was sure the Bills pulled out a squeeker there. That's the biggest one IMOCopied from the other thread:Scott Norwood stats:Gonna have to go with Norwood. Stage of all stages and it directly effected the outcome.
Pro-Football-Reference
DatabaseFootball
Some lowlights:
- Exceeded 80% FG accuracy in only one year out of seven
- Was below 70% accuracy in four of those years
- Missed 3% of PATs and 11% of FG attempts under 30 yards
- Did not kick a FG of 50+ yards until his final year in the league (career 2-for-10)
- Career 37-for-61 on 40-49 yard FGs.
- Career AAA rating of 67.0 is worse than every single starting kicker in the NFL, as of the beginning of 2006. (AAA rating defined here on page 11)
(Caveat: I haven't done any historical analysis of AAA ratings, so he may not have been the worst kicker in the NFL as of 1990)
1988 buf | 32 37 86.5 | 33 33 | 129 |
What does that even mean? We're not talking some all star team but the best two teams competing for a championship. He was part of one of them.I stand by my assertion that he should never been playing for a SB contender.
YES! If a teammate(s) bails you out that does not take away from a chokeIs it a choke is the team still wins?Only because I remember saying before the play that the Steelers have it locked up if they just give the ball to the bus, I had to go with Bettis. I'm not sure if it was a fluke or pressure, but that fumble was HUGE. Or would have been had a certain QB not made a game saving tackle.
I think this whole argument is perfectly stated.To me, the definition of choke involves allowing the pressure to get to you. I remember seeing a display of Michael Jordan, and there is a quote there from him that he missed a certain number of game winning shots. Just because you fail, doesn't mean you choked.So, there are only two options here for me in this poll, Scott Norwood and Mike Vanderjagt. After watching the replay of the Bills-Giants SB game on NFL network during the leadup to the SB, the kick that Norwood missed was on the edge of his range. Therefore, it doesn't seem like a choke to me.However, in Vanderjagt's case, the FG attempt was well within his range and he blew it BAD. Hence, I voted Vanderjagt. It seemed to me that the pressure got to him.
I am sticking with Neil O'Donnell. The Steelers had the Cowboys on the ropes and had all the momentum in the game. Those two picks to a wide open Brown (not a receiver in sight) absolutely killed the Steelers.It still pisses me off when I watch the replays of Super Bowl XXX.
Oh really?How about this kicker?1990 buf | 20 29 69.0 | 50 52 | 110 Or this one?1986 buf | 17 27 63.0 | 32 34 | 83 Or this one?1987 buf | 10 15 66.7 | 31 31 | 61no math needed though, this is a good K1988 buf | 32 37 86.5 | 33 33 | 129 |
With just enough time for a final drive, Levy tells Kelly he's gotta get them to the 30 yard line. Kelly got them there, to the 30 yard line.When watching a game, the kick is expected at that point IMO.That's not a 55 or 60 yarder, it's not that long.In fact it's the direction of the kick that was "off" it had plenty of distance.Bri, you would have to agree that it is obvious that Norwood was not good at longer kicks
When the Bills got the ball on their own 10 yard line with 2:16 left on the clock, Kelly felt that he could get the job done. He had done it so many times before. Coming from behind late in the game had become on of Kelly's trademarks. "We knew that we had one timeout left. We came out and I told the guys, ‘Hey, this is what champions are made of. Let's play like it - let's be one!'" "I had to run the ball a couple times and I didn't want to, but our goal was to get to the 30. We got there and it wasn't meant to be (winning).
so the season I quoted wasn't a good one?4th highest scoring player in USFL in 1985 means he stinks?5 FGs in one game=bad kicker?I didn't say he was great, he was a good K thoughOh really?How about this kicker?1990 buf | 20 29 69.0 | 50 52 | 110 Or this one?1986 buf | 17 27 63.0 | 32 34 | 83 Or this one?1987 buf | 10 15 66.7 | 31 31 | 61no math needed though, this is a good K1988 buf | 32 37 86.5 | 33 33 | 129 |
Is it you or Grove that's a Bills fan? That kick ended Norwood's career. He never really came back from it. How would you explain that dramatic affect?Ghost Rider said:I would love to see a legitimate reason for why anyone is voting for Scott Norwood.
Rhino said:Wow… after all the hate for Peyton Manning that this board has thrown around over the years, I’m shocked that Jim Kelly gets a pass. Kelly had four straight seasons with a chance to win the Super Bowl and doesn’t deliver on any of them. His Super Bowl performances were terrible. In four Super Bowls he only threw a touchdown in one of them, the ’91 game against the Redskins. He also threw 4 interceptions in that game. Yet in the regular season he threw plenty of TD’s.Kelly should be running away with this.
Plus to put "The Miss" over the top U2 waited a bunch of years later and then wrote a video to go to the song about it...well in theory at least...ok it was in my head only but still...Is it you or Grove that's a Bills fan? That kick ended Norwood's career. He never really came back from it. How would you explain that dramatic affect?Ghost Rider said:I would love to see a legitimate reason for why anyone is voting for Scott Norwood.
I agree. That was worse than choking one on play. It was sustained choking.I am sticking with Neil O'Donnell. The Steelers had the Cowboys on the ropes and had all the momentum in the game. Those two picks to a wide open Brown (not a receiver in sight) absolutely killed the Steelers.
I picked him. Losing the Superbowl for 4 straight years is a talent in itself.Rhino said:Kelly should be running away with this.
I am not a Bills fan.So, that kick ended Norwood's career. He was never that great of a kicker, anyway. He had only hit 69% of his FG attempts that season. Him missing a 47-yarder, a tough kick for ANY kicker, is not choking. The way it is looking, Vanderjagt's miss last January might have ended his career, so that makes his miss more of a choke (though still not a high level choke, considering the distance), especially when you consider he is (or was coming into this last season, at least) the most accurate FG kicker ever. Granted, missing a game-typing FG is different than missing what would have been a Super Bowl-winning kick, but a 47-yard FG is tough to make, so missing it is hardly choking.Is it you or Grove that's a Bills fan? That kick ended Norwood's career. He never really came back from it. How would you explain that dramatic affect?Ghost Rider said:I would love to see a legitimate reason for why anyone is voting for Scott Norwood.
Damn, I didn't realize that Kelly lost those games all by himself, because allowing 139 points in 4 Super Bowls (almost 35 points a game) is always the QB's fault.I picked him. Losing the Superbowl for 4 straight years is a talent in itself.Rhino said:Kelly should be running away with this.
Got something caught in your eyes?Damn, I didn't realize that Kelly lost those games all by himself, because allowing 139 points in 4 Super Bowls (almost 35 points a game) is always the QB's fault.I picked him. Losing the Superbowl for 4 straight years is a talent in itself.Rhino said:Kelly should be running away with this.![]()
That's nice, but it has absolutely nothing to do with this thread, which is about choking.The AFC was in the midst of losing 13 straight Super Bowls. The Bills were woefully overmatched in all but one of them, the one against Giants. In that game, Kelly led the drive to set up a game-winning field goal and the kicker missed it.Throwing the word choke out when a team loses to a vastly superior team is stupid.Got something caught in your eyes?Damn, I didn't realize that Kelly lost those games all by himself, because allowing 139 points in 4 Super Bowls (almost 35 points a game) is always the QB's fault.I picked him. Losing the Superbowl for 4 straight years is a talent in itself.Rhino said:Kelly should be running away with this.![]()
That's an interesting stat. The Bills defense gave up 139 points during their Superbowl run. Jim Kelly is still the QB who lost 4 straight Superbowls. The Bills offense was stellar, but when they finally went to the big dance, forgetaboutit. That will never happen again for the next million years.