What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bloom's QB tiers and David Dodds's projections (1 Viewer)

Ministry of Pain

Footballguy
I really liked Bloom’s QB tiers for a variety of reasons. Basically you could hand that to just about anyone off the street and they could probably navigate thru a draft with it no problem. Of course I don’t agree with all of it so I wanted to take a look at something I am sure many of you are looking at as well.

I have read David Dodd’s perfect draft and he encourages you to stay away from QBs too early in the draft, but when guys like Brees have been meeting expectations consistently the past few years I think it is not a stretch to want to draft 4,000+yds and 25+ TDs in the 2n or 3rd round…that’s serious points to rely on. Still, it does mean you could slip in other areas, however that is why you study so you get 4th round production form the WR3 you grab in the 8th or 9th round.

This isn’t about Dodds being right or wrong as there are no wrong answers but when you look at his projections it seems very clearly that there is a large band of QBs that are going to be available after the first 7-9 come off the board. But let’s look at the top QBs quickly and I will simply add my .02 to what most already know about these guys, then I want to jump to a much more grey area but one that could hold the keys to your draft and allow you to hammer away at RB/WR and even a top TE early.

I hate to break the news to some and this has more to do with redraft than Dynasty, but the people who are so wrapped up in Dynasty sometimes lose focus of players real production for the season at hand. I point to Terrell Owens the last 3 years who has not been worth a lot in terms of Dynasty because he is old and doesn’t bring much in trade value yet he has been a top10 WR including back to back 2nd place finishes in 2006 and 2007 and scored 38 TDs over that span. You see how skewed it becomes as everyone wants the youngest up and coming talent, right or wrong that is how it works. But it really messes folks up in redrafts with that type of thinking.

So I want to go thru the top8 or 9 QBs rather quickly and I use part of Bloom’s article as the basis for some of this, again I thought it was a great article, just a few too many tiers for me.

Tom Brady: Will take a couple weeks to get it together but he has a soft schedule and still no real threat in the running game to really steal away his chances. Taylor hasn’t rushed for double digit TDs since the year 2000…Brady has a trio of very talented WRs, no reason to expect less than 30 TDs out of him.

Drew Brees: My only concern is his WRs health. At some point he is going to run out of bodies to throw it to.

Peyton Manning: Not a guy I am itching to grab. New management sort of speak and I hear the food isn’t quite as good.

That was tier 1 sort of speak. The next 6 guys all have different things that are good and bad.

Aaron Rodgers: I am stunned everyone is ready to hitch the wagon to this guy. He had 1 healthy productive season and he is penciled in to finish top 5 again? Not a chance he takes a step back? Just a little? C’mon now, you gotta be brighter than that. The top 3 have years on their resumes, this guy did it once, relax a little with the Rodgers hype. I am on record that he won’t land top5 again this year.

Donovan McNabb: Last year he started 16 games…the last time he did that was 2003. They drafted a WR, and a 2nd/3rd tier RB for the RB2 role and people are gung ho ready to roll with McNabb. Again, I don’t see the reason to reach for him.

Phillip Rivers: Put me on record that he will not finish close to what he did a year ago. Too much talent at RB, and the Chargers have to get back to running the football. Look for at least 50 more carries and 50 less passes form San Diego in 2009. Where will that land Rivers? 4,000 yds and 34 TDs, you are chasing last years numbers.

Kurt Warner: No way he starts he all 16 games. Another one of those guys that has never been able to finish an entire season year in and year out, and now at the age of 37/38 we are ready to draft him in the 3rd or 4th round?

Tony Romo: Now I do like him despite TO leaving. They will run the ball but I think 25+TDs is well within the reach when you factor in Jason Witten, and talented WRs even if they are not consistent all the time and in some cases a bit unproven. Look for a good dose of Felix and MB III but also look for them to get a lot of catches as well. This is not going to be a power running team, the OL simply is not built for that.

Jay Cutler: I’m optimistic till the weather turns bitter in Chicago. I could see him having a great year and then disappear down the stretch. Not sold on the WRs either.

OK, those top 9 are interesting and I have a couple that I am looking at but the next 15 QBs on the board seem to have projections where if you add or subtract a couple TDs here and there you have a very interchangeable jigsaw puzzle. And using Dodd’s projections I could have slid Romo and Cutler in here but they have big name recognition at this point so why pretend they will be a bargain, they won’t.

Garrard, Big Ben, Schaub, Palmer, Ryan, Hass, Cassel, Eli, Edwards, Flacco, Campbell, Penny, Hill, Orton, and Delhomme. Just use this as one big tier and I will tell you what I think is a sound idea for those that wait until round 6 or later to start their QB hunt, in fact maybe even wait till 8 or 9 but you don’t want to end up with certain combos.

What I look for with this group is simple…1 QB who is consistent even if it is 6-10 points lower than I know Brady or Brees will likely be, and another guy that isn’t consistent but is capable of having some big games. Those guys are usually younger and sometimes a little unproven.

So within this group you have the old reliable like Palmer, Hass, Eli, Penny, and Delhomme. You can disagree but those guys have been in the league awhile and you know pretty much what you are going to get. Rather than split hairs about which is better than the other just make a tier of guys you think are decent vets. I might even put Big Ben in this group.

The other group is made up of guys that either have a lot less starting years or are somewhat unknown. Matt Ryan is interesting but we don’t really know what he will be like in year 2. Is there room for Ryan on MOP’s team? Sure but I don’t really want to pair him with Joe Flacco if I can help it. I would much rather have Ryan and maybe Jake Delhomme who is being sold pretty short this year.

Some combos that I think would be fine…Garrard/Palmer, Schaub/Delhomme, Cassel/Big Ben…we can run them all night but my point is take a guy with upside and a guy that you know will produce even if on a lesser level.

Let’s say the team you are facing has Tom Brady and you have Ryan and Hass. What is the point of starting Hasselbeck? Why not swing for the fences a bit and see if Ryan can have one of those breakout games if the match up can allow it? Hass will net you 200-220 yds and maybe 1 TD…you know you are in the hole 10 points before you blink. And you can run this scenario till the cows come home with different top QBs vs the guys in that 10-24 range.

So I do agree with Dodds that you can wait on QB but I think the right combo is crucial. A combo of 2 young unproven QBs in that group is going to be headaches the same way a Hass/Delhomme combo could leave you very short during the season when you need them most against a top3 or top5 proven QB.

I'd like to hear some combos you are looking to lock up and how you plan on getting them.

Cheers everyone

 
Tom Brady: Will take a couple weeks to get it together but he has a soft schedule and still no real threat in the running game to really steal away his chances. Taylor hasn’t rushed for double digit TDs since the year 2000…Brady has a trio of very talented WRs, no reason to expect less than 30 TDs out of him.
This seems to be a common theme among many posters, but . . .HOU has Slaton

PHI has Westbrook

SD has LT

TEN has Johnson

WAS has Portis

NE had more rushing yards than any of those teams last year. MIN has ADP . . . and the Pats weree within 50 yards of the Vikes in rushing yards.

Just because they don't I have one 1500 yard runner doesn't mean they can't run the ball.

 
Tom Brady: Will take a couple weeks to get it together but he has a soft schedule and still no real threat in the running game to really steal away his chances. Taylor hasn’t rushed for double digit TDs since the year 2000…Brady has a trio of very talented WRs, no reason to expect less than 30 TDs out of him.
This seems to be a common theme among many posters, but . . .HOU has Slaton

PHI has Westbrook

SD has LT

TEN has Johnson

WAS has Portis

NE had more rushing yards than any of those teams last year. MIN has ADP . . . and the Pats weree within 50 yards of the Vikes in rushing yards.

Just because they don't I have one 1500 yard runner doesn't mean they can't run the ball.
I never said they couldn't David, just don't see why a high flying offense with a good OL to protect Brady shouldn't produce about 2 TDs a game thru the air. Portis and Johnson don't have top tier talent at QB so I don't see why you listed them.

What are your thoughts on the QBs in the 10-24 crowd rather than focus on Tom Brady...as I wrote, it was just a little blurb about most of the guys that will require an early selection.

 
I'd have no issue reaching early for a Brees/Brady (if all td's are 6 points). That kind of elite performance on a consistent basis is HUGE. Especially when you consider qb's generally score more than other positions.

The rest of the qb's are all a similar gamble in my eyes so I'd wait to see whatever I could snag latest. Warner will likely be as good as Brady/Brees but aside from him I'd just as soon wait for Palmer/Schaub/McNabb/Rodgers/etc.

Imo people seriously underestimate the value of having an elite qb week in and week out. Last year I had Brees...I didn't plan on getting the guy but I was driving up his price in our auction as he was going much, much, lower than he should. It was my first year with an elite qb and it makes a HUGE difference.

 
I dont get why Palmer is being ranked so low consistantly. Is it because of the injury? His team? Both? Injury year aside, he's been very consistant. I think they improved the offense this year, and don't see Coles/Henry/Caldwell as any drop off from Housh when combined. Am I missing something or shouldnt he be ranked in the McNabb/Romo tier at least? Before last year he has generally played all 16, so I dont think hes prone to being hurt really.

 
I dont get why Palmer is being ranked so low consistantly. Is it because of the injury? His team? Both? Injury year aside, he's been very consistant. I think they improved the offense this year, and don't see Coles/Henry/Caldwell as any drop off from Housh when combined. Am I missing something or shouldnt he be ranked in the McNabb/Romo tier at least? Before last year he has generally played all 16, so I dont think hes prone to being hurt really.
I can't get my hands on the stats here at work but prior to the injury wasn't he terribly inconsistent in '07?I remember the huge game against the Brownies but outside of the that I don't remember a whole lot of big games that year.
 
I use to wait to pick up a QB in the later rounds but not anymore. The 1st and 2nd place finishers in my league have all had top QB's on their teams. This will most likely be the yr. I reach out and grab a QB in the early rounds.

 
I'd have no issue reaching early for a Brees/Brady (if all td's are 6 points). That kind of elite performance on a consistent basis is HUGE. Especially when you consider qb's generally score more than other positions. The rest of the qb's are all a similar gamble in my eyes so I'd wait to see whatever I could snag latest. Warner will likely be as good as Brady/Brees but aside from him I'd just as soon wait for Palmer/Schaub/McNabb/Rodgers/etc.Imo people seriously underestimate the value of having an elite qb week in and week out. Last year I had Brees...I didn't plan on getting the guy but I was driving up his price in our auction as he was going much, much, lower than he should. It was my first year with an elite qb and it makes a HUGE difference.
AB, 100% in your corner on grabbing a stud early. If you get lucky with someone that cracks the top5 in that 10-25 band you look like a genious but it's a big big IF. It stinks beign down 10-12 points at QB every week when you get stuck in a division where you are facing other owners sometimes twice and they are all stacked at QB. You can make up for it in other ways but it's a hole that is sometimes hard to overcome. Nice post.
 
I use to wait to pick up a QB in the later rounds but not anymore. The 1st and 2nd place finishers in my league have all had top QB's on their teams. This will most likely be the yr. I reach out and grab a QB in the early rounds.
If you don't get Brady or Brees I would wait though.
 
I dont get why Palmer is being ranked so low consistantly. Is it because of the injury? His team? Both? Injury year aside, he's been very consistant. I think they improved the offense this year, and don't see Coles/Henry/Caldwell as any drop off from Housh when combined. Am I missing something or shouldnt he be ranked in the McNabb/Romo tier at least? Before last year he has generally played all 16, so I dont think hes prone to being hurt really.
I think its Cinci in general but I like the addition of Smith at LT to keep Palmer upright and I also love the signing of Coles who should satablize things. Chad, and Henry lined up wide, maybe Coles across the middle. They won't be super explosive but I liek Palmer to have ptotential top10 numbers if he can stay healthy.
 
I dont get why Palmer is being ranked so low consistantly. Is it because of the injury? His team? Both? Injury year aside, he's been very consistant. I think they improved the offense this year, and don't see Coles/Henry/Caldwell as any drop off from Housh when combined. Am I missing something or shouldnt he be ranked in the McNabb/Romo tier at least? Before last year he has generally played all 16, so I dont think hes prone to being hurt really.
I can't get my hands on the stats here at work but prior to the injury wasn't he terribly inconsistent in '07?I remember the huge game against the Brownies but outside of the that I don't remember a whole lot of big games that year.
Uhh terribly is a strong word. If by terribly you mean playing 16 games, throwing for 4131 yards, 26 tds then probably not. If you mean his most inconsistant season to date because he did throw 20 INTs, then yes. The 86.7 QB rateing was also a bit low, for him I think. I think if you consider the team hes on, his career numbers make sense, aside from last years injury stats.Carson Palmer Year Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yds YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate2003 Cincinnati Bengals 0 0 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---2004 Cincinnati Bengals 13 13 432 263 60.9 2897 6.71 76 18 18 25/178 34 8 77.32005 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 509 345 67.8 3836 7.54 70 32 12 19/105 43 9 101.12006 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 520 324 62.3 4035 7.76 74 28 13 36/233 52 15 93.92007 Cincinnati Bengals 16 16 575 373 64.9 4131 7.18 70 26 20 17/119 51 8 86.72008 Cincinnati Bengals 4 4 129 75 58.1 731 5.67 36 3 4 11/67 7 0 69.0TOTAL 65 65 2165 1380 63.7 15630 7.22 76 107 67 108/702 187 40 88.9Also, compare those to Peyton Manning's stats for an equivelent amount of time.Peyton ManningYear Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yds YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate1998 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 575 326 56.7 3739 6.50 78 26 28 22/109 42 8 71.21999 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 533 331 62.1 4135 7.76 80 26 15 14/116 56 11 90.72000 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 571 357 62.5 4413 7.73 78 33 15 20/131 51 8 94.72001 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 547 343 62.7 4131 7.55 86 26 23 29/232 55 11 84.12002 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 591 392 66.3 4200 7.11 69 27 19 23/145 51 11 88.82003 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 566 379 67.0 4267 7.54 79 29 10 18/107 45 9 99.02004 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 497 336 67.6 4557 9.17 80 49 10 13/101 68 13 121.12005 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 453 305 67.3 3747 8.27 80 28 10 17/81 45 6 104.12006 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 557 362 65.0 4397 7.89 68 31 9 14/86 53 7 101.02007 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 515 337 65.4 4040 7.84 73 31 14 21/124 53 9 98.02008 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 555 371 66.8 4002 7.21 75 27 12 14/86 40 7 95.0TOTAL 176 176 5960 3839 64.4 45628 7.66 86 333 165 205/1318 559 100 94.7I think youll find that their careers arnt too different with respect to their consistancy allthough different amount of years played. I guess factoring in Palmers injury youd give Manning the edge... Based on first 4 years played though, really how far apart are they?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dont get why Palmer is being ranked so low consistantly. Is it because of the injury? His team? Both? Injury year aside, he's been very consistant. I think they improved the offense this year, and don't see Coles/Henry/Caldwell as any drop off from Housh when combined. Am I missing something or shouldnt he be ranked in the McNabb/Romo tier at least? Before last year he has generally played all 16, so I dont think hes prone to being hurt really.
It's because of the organization he plays for. OchoCinco mailed in last season and who knows how he'll handle things this year. Benson is their rb? Sure he had a decent second half last season against cream puff defenses but he had several seasons of mediocrity (at best) in Chicago. I'm not ready to say he "gets it". The line is still a question mark as well. Aside from the rookie tubby, what other additions did they get (I really don't know) along the o-line? Henry has allegedly turned things around but we see/hear this kind of talk from people all the time. To HAVE to count on it is a bit iffy in my book. The young wr's are unproven. The only wr I would count on is Coles, and who knows what he has left?People don't seem to realize what a horribly inept franchise this is, year in and year out. Bengals fans should send gift baskets to Detroit for taking them out of the lime light.Didn't some people think Palmer needed surgery last year? IIRC he didn't get it...so let's see how he recovers. This is really a terrible, terrible team. There are some organizations I'll give the benefit of a doubt (New England w/Brady comes to mind)...Cincinnati has proven they are NOT one of those teams. Err with caution.
 
C'mon folks, we got 450 views and little to no combos. Are we saying that we want to reach for the QB this year?
Well, to be honest, I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at with this thread.Are you looking for great qb combos outside the elite guys?
Sure AB, int he spirit of Dodd's perfect draft which was on the FBG PDF file last week, it encourages you to wait awhile and it really encourages folks to grab David Garrard and I am a little uncomfortabel with him, but perhaps the right combo of DG and someone else I could possibly live with. I just think the band from about 8-24 or thereabouts according to DD's projections, you need to make a wise combo in there. A lot of guys wait till round 7 or 8 and then go back to back and what I am saying is that you don't want to go unproven upside-unproven upside back to back. You also probably are waiving the white flag if you go steady with little upside-steady with little upside back to back like a Hass/Delhomme combo doesn't seem too smart to me. But maybe I'm totally off here, wouldn't be the first time.
 
Ah, I've gotcha now. I agree if you don't take one of the uber studs it's nice to have that steady pick if your gamble doesn't pay off. Some people take two gambles or others play it safe with boring options.

I'm taking off now but I'll comment on some combos that interest me later.

 
I'm looking at possibly waiting on a qb and like both garrard and schaub. Problem with schaub is that he won't be around too late in most drafts. I know fbguys was high on garrard last year and although he wasn't spectacular he was consistent. This year after upgrading the o-line and bringing in a veteran wr I think his outlook is a slight upgrade at least. I like palmer a lot this year too since he has value and was elite quite recently and 85 says he's actually putting in the effort this year.

I'm drafting where I won't have a shot at brady or brees (or manning most likely) so I've been thinking long and hard about this one. Last year I wanted cutler and I spazzed and grabbed palmer instead and i thought taking a "big name" qb early that i could plug in and forget about was the way to go.

This year I like the idea of stocking up on rbs and wrs and waiting until the eighth or so and going back to back with 2 of the qbs that MOP listed in that last tier. Unless I spaz again and take McNabb in the 4th.

 
I am looking at waiting on a QB in my 16 team local redraft league and rolling with the Schaub/Orlovsky combo and picking up a bye week filler when the time comes. I think Orlovsky is necessary in deep leagues to go with Schaub.

 
I been thinking about going:

Palmer/Garrard

Schaub/Hass

Ryan/Edwards

But the more I look at the above Quarterbacks, the more it makes me want to spend a high pick on a Brady/Brees/Manning. I think RB's in the second round of redrafts are very questionable, while the Brady/Brees/Manning are gold.

I think this is the year to spend one of the golden tickets on a elite QB, just my 2 cents.

 
In my 14 team league, I think Schaub, Garrard and Hassleback will be the ones most teams are targetting, so they'll probably go 2-3 rounds earlier than they should in my league.

If none of them fall to round 8-9 then I'll be looking to go with combos involving Edwards/Orton/Flacco.

I had Shawn Hill in there too but with the positive news about Alex Smith in OTA's is a concern. Whomever wins in San Fran I expect will be on a short leash and it wouldn't surprise me if the guy that wins the start in camp loses it 6 weeks in only to get it back 4-5 weeks later because the guys are too evenly matched.

 
In my 14 team league, I think Schaub, Garrard and Hassleback will be the ones most teams are targetting, so they'll probably go 2-3 rounds earlier than they should in my league. If none of them fall to round 8-9 then I'll be looking to go with combos involving Edwards/Orton/Flacco. I had Shawn Hill in there too but with the positive news about Alex Smith in OTA's is a concern. Whomever wins in San Fran I expect will be on a short leash and it wouldn't surprise me if the guy that wins the start in camp loses it 6 weeks in only to get it back 4-5 weeks later because the guys are too evenly matched.
JMO but I fully believe Smith will win the job in SF. A lot of homers seem to agree with me. It doesn't help that Hill is terrible in practices.
 
In my 14 team league, I think Schaub, Garrard and Hassleback will be the ones most teams are targetting, so they'll probably go 2-3 rounds earlier than they should in my league. If none of them fall to round 8-9 then I'll be looking to go with combos involving Edwards/Orton/Flacco. I had Shawn Hill in there too but with the positive news about Alex Smith in OTA's is a concern. Whomever wins in San Fran I expect will be on a short leash and it wouldn't surprise me if the guy that wins the start in camp loses it 6 weeks in only to get it back 4-5 weeks later because the guys are too evenly matched.
JMO but I fully believe Smith will win the job in SF. A lot of homers seem to agree with me. It doesn't help that Hill is terrible in practices.
I think Smith wins too, I'm just not confident that he'll be able to hang onto the start the full season.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well I don't believe in taking a QB early when I can wait and get one later.

I do not go into a draft thinking I am going to run a QBBC if I can help it though. With a little luck there is usualy one or 2 that slip through the cracks into the 5th round (thinking standard 12 team redraft) that is worth taking.

Who might be that guy this year?

Right now it is looking like Carson Palmer.

There are risks involved so that is why you ushualy want to double up on QBs if you wait. Not just for injury insurance but also to increase your odds of getting that QB in round 5 or later who still ends up finishing in the top 10.

So I am not looking for QBs who's schedules match up well (although if forced to that would be another place to look) but rather to get 2 QB after round 4 (these picks do not need to be back to back either but if the value is there they can be) that I believe have a good chance to finish top 10.

This always ends up being a game of chicken. With most owners all using the same strategy. Who blinks 1st and takes a QB? Will that start a run? Do you have the nerves of steel (and confidence in your QB lasting long enough) to be the last guy to take one?

This is always one of the more enjoyable parts of redraft for me.

So who else do people think has a good chance to finish top 10 outside of the currently ranked top 10 besides Carson Palmer? Is he the best choice? If he isn't who is?

 
In my 14 team league, I think Schaub, Garrard and Hassleback will be the ones most teams are targetting, so they'll probably go 2-3 rounds earlier than they should in my league. If none of them fall to round 8-9 then I'll be looking to go with combos involving Edwards/Orton/Flacco. I had Shawn Hill in there too but with the positive news about Alex Smith in OTA's is a concern. Whomever wins in San Fran I expect will be on a short leash and it wouldn't surprise me if the guy that wins the start in camp loses it 6 weeks in only to get it back 4-5 weeks later because the guys are too evenly matched.
JMO but I fully believe Smith will win the job in SF. A lot of homers seem to agree with me. It doesn't help that Hill is terrible in practices.
I think Smith wins too, I'm just not confident that he'll be able to hang onto the start the full season.
I don't know why you would want him even if he did last the whole season. Unless you're in an awfully deep league.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top