Otis
Footballguy
lol'Chase Stuart said:I'm pretty sure I know the answer, but I'll ask: Otis, are you exercising, too?
lol'Chase Stuart said:I'm pretty sure I know the answer, but I'll ask: Otis, are you exercising, too?
Scale update?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right? It sends up signals that it isn't getting nutrition and puts the brakes on working off your last meal.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
a little?Who is suggesting that?Your shtick is getting a little stale.If you want to lose weight. Being healthy is a separate discussion. It's pretty hilarious that most of you are pushing a diet that contains 50% of the calories from alcohol as a "healthy" diet. I'm sure primal guy was walking around with a box of wine strapped to his back. He probably ate nothing but tree bark so that he could drink it all and not have issues with his figure, while being sure to get his daily requirement of selenium.'proninja said:Wait, I thought you were the eat whatever you like if the calories are low enough guy. Now he's consuming the wrong calories somehow?'DrJ said:I'm guessing the studies probably didn't include many people taking in half of their calories from it, though.'Chaka said:So long as his calories are reasonable for the day I think the health benefits of red wine outweigh any other concerns.I'm sure it's easy to stay under 1000 calories when things you eat mostly suck. Who is going to want to have sex with women if they were all a bunch of offdee 3's? I'd be careful with the wine dude, a 2nd glass is going to be like 30% of your calories and it sticks to sodium like nothing else.Hard to say. Been a while. That said, I'm good. Wife cracked some red wine tonight. Even had some baked whole wheat chips and salsa. Cruising through a delicious cut of salmon and some asparagus right now. May move onto wine glass #2. It's that good. And I was at about 400 calories on the day till I got home... SUCK IT CHUBBY NERDSSo Otis, how long has it been since you had a nice juicy cheeseburger?
Anyone else feel like you're getting the equivalent of a geography lesson from Sarah Palin when Oats talks about diet/nutrition?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
Get cracking big boy. I'd hate to owe you a buck for you not getting below 220 by Memorial Day.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
I think you have the bet backwards.Get cracking big boy. I'd hate to owe you a buck for you not getting below 220 by Memorial Day.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
that place has a pretty rockin' coconut donut -- if you're into that kind of thing.I'm not sure which thread to put this in, but Crumbs is selling a thin-mint girl scout cookie cupcake. Bought one on the way home. Will let you know how it is.
He doesn't want to scare away all of the action.Scale update?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
Nope, you do (sort of)....I win (both must happen)If - You lose 20 lbs by Memorial Day.And - You weigh 10+ pounds over your Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year. You win under these scenarios1. You don't lose 20 lbs by Mermorial Day2. You lose 20 lbs by Memorial but you are 10+ lbs over this Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year.Basically I'm on your train early and then severely fading you.I think you have the bet backwards.Get cracking big boy. I'd hate to owe you a buck for you not getting below 220 by Memorial Day.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
Looks like I've upset the diet nerds. This is what you want to become Otis?a little?Who is suggesting that?Your shtick is getting a little stale.If you want to lose weight. Being healthy is a separate discussion. It's pretty hilarious that most of you are pushing a diet that contains 50% of the calories from alcohol as a "healthy" diet. I'm sure primal guy was walking around with a box of wine strapped to his back. He probably ate nothing but tree bark so that he could drink it all and not have issues with his figure, while being sure to get his daily requirement of selenium.'proninja said:Wait, I thought you were the eat whatever you like if the calories are low enough guy. Now he's consuming the wrong calories somehow?'DrJ said:I'm guessing the studies probably didn't include many people taking in half of their calories from it, though.'Chaka said:So long as his calories are reasonable for the day I think the health benefits of red wine outweigh any other concerns.I'm sure it's easy to stay under 1000 calories when things you eat mostly suck. Who is going to want to have sex with women if they were all a bunch of offdee 3's? I'd be careful with the wine dude, a 2nd glass is going to be like 30% of your calories and it sticks to sodium like nothing else.Hard to say. Been a while. That said, I'm good. Wife cracked some red wine tonight. Even had some baked whole wheat chips and salsa. Cruising through a delicious cut of salmon and some asparagus right now. May move onto wine glass #2. It's that good. And I was at about 400 calories on the day till I got home... SUCK IT CHUBBY NERDSSo Otis, how long has it been since you had a nice juicy cheeseburger?
So if Otis could find himself a taker that he can't lose 20 lbs by Memorial Day, he's playing with house money.Nope, you do (sort of)....I win (both must happen)If - You lose 20 lbs by Memorial Day.And - You weigh 10+ pounds over your Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year. You win under these scenarios1. You don't lose 20 lbs by Mermorial Day2. You lose 20 lbs by Memorial but you are 10+ lbs over this Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year.Basically I'm on your train early and then severely fading you.I think you have the bet backwards.Get cracking big boy. I'd hate to owe you a buck for you not getting below 220 by Memorial Day.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
So you're betting FOR me to succeed? Smarter than you look.Nope, you do (sort of)....I win (both must happen)If - You lose 20 lbs by Memorial Day.And - You weigh 10+ pounds over your Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year. You win under these scenarios1. You don't lose 20 lbs by Mermorial Day2. You lose 20 lbs by Memorial but you are 10+ lbs over this Memorial Day weight by Super Bowl Monday next year.Basically I'm on your train early and then severely fading you.I think you have the bet backwards.Get cracking big boy. I'd hate to owe you a buck for you not getting below 220 by Memorial Day.It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
No, some of your snide comments are actually kind of amusing, but the shtick you are wrapping around the actual diet advice you are trying to give is just pointless and unfunny.And your diet advice shtick is pretty weak too.Looks like I've upset the diet nerds. This is what you want to become Otis?
Thanks Maurile. They're far more likely to listen to you.He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
Thanks Maurile. They're far more likely to listen to you.He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?It's 7:08PM here. Today I ate a banana. And a multivitamin. And I had coffee. How are all you fatties -- drowning in your hot fudge sundaes?
Of course, that's what I thought about you when you joined the thread."A study published in the April 2007 edition of the "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition" examined the effect of one meal a day vs. three. The researchers found that the healthy participants who ate a single meal a day did lose fat mass, but they were hungry. Moreover, they had increased blood pressure and total cholesterol and a decreased cortisol concentration. Cortisol, a steroid hormone, causes your body to send more glucose into your bloodstream when you are under stress. Over the long term, a slow metabolism can sabotage your weight-loss efforts."http://www.livestrong.com/article/542042-is-eating-one-meal-a-day-healthy/And what happens most often isn't a controlled study and people tend to overeat that one meal, often dinner, going to sleep and slowing their metabolism even further.He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?
OK... so this fasting for a day thing is really easy! I had a moderate breakfast early yesterday. Had nothing to eat AT ALL the rest of the day. Drank at least 120 oz of water. Really never felt hungry. Even this morning when I woke up, I didn't feel as though I'd die without food. Had a banana and coffee for breakfast today and feel very sated. Not sure I feel any different/more rested/healthier this morning as a result... although I am proud of myself. I honestly didn't think I could do it.The only hard part was the temptation (which is my issue with food all the time). Wife made an awesome smelling pasta dish for dinner... really wanted some, but resisted. Son's hockey team parents were passing around Valentines goodies at his game last night. Sugar cookies looked particularly good, but I abstained. If I could go through fast days without having to deal with other people waving food under my nose, It'd be a piece of cake (no pun intended).I will probably try to fast one day a week going forward, if nothing else, to shed a few pounds. Hoping it will make me feel better in the process.Thanks for the info Chaka!'Keerock said:It's really not difficult. People have this crazy notion that going a day without food is some kind of grand task, I getlooks all the time when I tell people that I do 24 hour fasts almost every week. The typical response is something like "
do you have a newsletter?yesterday, I had two fried eggs served over a bed of sweet potato hash with peppers and other misc veggies mixed in, plus a glass of OJ and a couple cups of coffee. lunch was shredded chicken, avocado, onion, tomato, and salsa, served in a lettuce wrap - kind of a faux taco. I also had a slice of home-made apple pie made with no added sugar and a crust made from almond flour. dinner was flank steak, stuffed with jalapeno, garlic, I think basil, and I'm not sure what else, but it was delicious. Also, zucchini and squash sauteed in coconut oil. Maybe a couple of dates and figs to snack on throughout the day.All this was followed up by 2 1/2 hours of MMA kickboxing and jiu-jitsu, including a solid 20 minutes of some pretty intense circuit training.suck it fatties and fasties.
I am not sure how that study relates to anything we are talking about in here. Did you read the actual study design?It doesn't say what you think it says."A study published in the April 2007 edition of the "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition" examined the effect of one meal a day vs. three. The researchers found that the healthy participants who ate a single meal a day did lose fat mass, but they were hungry. Moreover, they had increased blood pressure and total cholesterol and a decreased cortisol concentration. Cortisol, a steroid hormone, causes your body to send more glucose into your bloodstream when you are under stress. Over the long term, a slow metabolism can sabotage your weight-loss efforts."http://www.livestron...-a-day-healthy/He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?
And what happens most often isn't a controlled study and people tend to overeat that one meal, often dinner, going to sleep and slowing their metabolism even further.
Nice work.OK... so this fasting for a day thing is really easy! I had a moderate breakfast early yesterday. Had nothing to eat AT ALL the rest of the day. Drank at least 120 oz of water. Really never felt hungry. Even this morning when I woke up, I didn't feel as though I'd die without food. Had a banana and coffee for breakfast today and feel very sated. Not sure I feel any different/more rested/healthier this morning as a result... although I am proud of myself. I honestly didn't think I could do it.The only hard part was the temptation (which is my issue with food all the time). Wife made an awesome smelling pasta dish for dinner... really wanted some, but resisted. Son's hockey team parents were passing around Valentines goodies at his game last night. Sugar cookies looked particularly good, but I abstained. If I could go through fast days without having to deal with other people waving food under my nose, It'd be a piece of cake (no pun intended).I will probably try to fast one day a week going forward, if nothing else, to shed a few pounds. Hoping it will make me feel better in the process.Thanks for the info Chaka!
Correct. My mistake in saying fat storage. The slower metabolism makes it harder to lose weight. My point was more than skipping a couple meals, then eating a dinner (often too big to make up for the lack of nutrition/calories) can end up working against weight loss.I am not sure how that study relates to anything we are talking about in here. Did you read the actual study design?It doesn't say what you think it says."A study published in the April 2007 edition of the "American Journal of Clinical Nutrition" examined the effect of one meal a day vs. three. The researchers found that the healthy participants who ate a single meal a day did lose fat mass, but they were hungry. Moreover, they had increased blood pressure and total cholesterol and a decreased cortisol concentration. Cortisol, a steroid hormone, causes your body to send more glucose into your bloodstream when you are under stress. Over the long term, a slow metabolism can sabotage your weight-loss efforts."http://www.livestron...-a-day-healthy/He is slowing his metabolism, but he's not making it negative. He still has positive energy needs, and if he's eating too few calories to meet them, he'll make up the difference largely by burning body fat. Severe (and chronic) calorie-restriction results in a number of bad things, but fat-storage isn't one of them.You realize that, by not eating regularly, you're slowing your metabolism down and your body is storing more fat, right?
And what happens most often isn't a controlled study and people tend to overeat that one meal, often dinner, going to sleep and slowing their metabolism even further.
According to the study the 1 meal a day people saw a significant decrease in body fat and cortisol (which is a hormone that is released in response to stress so apparently the 1 meal/day people experienced less stress). They saw an increase in blood pressure (from 109/66 to 116/70 both absolutely within normal range) both total, LDL and HDL.
Total cholesterol went from 191.0 to 216.5 (both well within normal range), HDL went from 56.7 to 61.9 and LDL went from 113.3 to 136.2. All are well within normal range. And the primary indicator for heart disease risk from a standard lipid profile is not the LDL fraction but the ratio of Total Cholesterol to HDL (TC:HDL) the lower the better. In this case TC:HDL went from 3.37 to 3.50 which is not a significant change.
Finally nowhere in that study does it say that it increased fat storage which is what you said in your post.
Okay but the study you cited showed that is not the case.From one meal/day to three meals/day the study subjects body weight went from 65.9 to 67.7 kg, their fat mass went from 14.2 to 16.3 kg and their fat-free mass went from 50.9 to 49.4 kg.I am not saying these are huge numbers or an argument in favor of eating one meal/day for 8 weeks at a time (which is what they did in the study) but it certainly does nothing to convince me that having one meal a day is (or fasting for a day) is bad for you.I am pretty sure that you are off on this one Deepster.The slower metabolism makes it harder to lose weight. My point was more than skipping a couple meals, then eating a dinner (often too big to make up for the lack of nutrition/calories) can end up working against weight loss.
What am I missing about "Over the long term, a slow metabolism can sabotage your weight-loss efforts"?Okay but the study you cited showed that is not the case.From one meal/day to three meals/day the study subjects body weight went from 65.9 to 67.7 kg, their fat mass went from 14.2 to 16.3 kg and their fat-free mass went from 50.9 to 49.4 kg.I am not saying these are huge numbers or an argument in favor of eating one meal/day for 8 weeks at a time (which is what they did in the study) but it certainly does nothing to convince me that having one meal a day is (or fasting for a day) is bad for you.I am pretty sure that you are off on this one Deepster.The slower metabolism makes it harder to lose weight. My point was more than skipping a couple meals, then eating a dinner (often too big to make up for the lack of nutrition/calories) can end up working against weight loss.
Thanks Edison, I'm sure everyone was expecting me to lose 40lbs in 4 weeks.his diet updates seem to have been getting more desperate, so I expect the weight loss planed off a bit.
Not Chaka but I like to speak for him on occasion. Better yet, since Martin Berkham should do the speaking on this topic: Links to Fasted Training research. Those two links are barely a good start at that site, if you're really interested in fitness combined with fasting. Other online fitness gurus will argue with Martin, but I think Martin is usually correct.Edit for this article doing a better job than the others addressing your recovery question though still not directly.Chaka - how does this 1 day fast affect recovery from exercise? how does it affect you if you exercise that same day?
Not to hijack too much, but thanks for these. I'm a marathoner and have been thinking about nutrition as I keep looking for ways to improve. I'm curious about the endurance angle in the last link. Training on depleted glycogen stores makes some logical sense, but I've never really looked into it.Not Chaka but I like to speak for him on occasion. Better yet, since Martin Berkham should do the speaking on this topic: Links to Fasted Training research. Those two links are barely a good start at that site, if you're really interested in fitness combined with fasting. Other online fitness gurus will argue with Martin, but I think Martin is usually correct.Edit for this article doing a better job than the others addressing your recovery question though still not directly.Chaka - how does this 1 day fast affect recovery from exercise? how does it affect you if you exercise that same day?
The part where you are either moving the goal post or missing the point entirely.We have been talking about occasional fasting or caloric restriction and previously you seemed to be suggesting that doing would somehow slow down metabolism over the long term which is simply not true, it barely slows metabolism, if at all, over the limited time frames we have been talking about. And it certainly doesn't lead to extra fat storage, which you also suggested.Now if you want to change it to having a slow metabolism over a long period will make weight loss more difficult (which it seems like you are saying now) then I won't argue with you. In fact it's a very symptom of an very common condition called hypothyroidism.What am I missing about "Over the long term, a slow metabolism can sabotage your weight-loss efforts"?Okay but the study you cited showed that is not the case.From one meal/day to three meals/day the study subjects body weight went from 65.9 to 67.7 kg, their fat mass went from 14.2 to 16.3 kg and their fat-free mass went from 50.9 to 49.4 kg.I am not saying these are huge numbers or an argument in favor of eating one meal/day for 8 weeks at a time (which is what they did in the study) but it certainly does nothing to convince me that having one meal a day is (or fasting for a day) is bad for you.I am pretty sure that you are off on this one Deepster.The slower metabolism makes it harder to lose weight. My point was more than skipping a couple meals, then eating a dinner (often too big to make up for the lack of nutrition/calories) can end up working against weight loss.
Training, yes. Competing, no. You won't see personal bests while depleted, but you should create improvements allowing for new bests. I think a better explanation of that sentence settled the beef between Martin and Anthony Colpo. /hijackNot to hijack too much, but thanks for these. I'm a marathoner and have been thinking about nutrition as I keep looking for ways to improve. I'm curious about the endurance angle in the last link. Training on depleted glycogen stores makes some logical sense, but I've never really looked into it.Not Chaka but I like to speak for him on occasion. Better yet, since Martin Berkham should do the speaking on this topic: Links to Fasted Training research. Those two links are barely a good start at that site, if you're really interested in fitness combined with fasting. Other online fitness gurus will argue with Martin, but I think Martin is usually correct.Edit for this article doing a better job than the others addressing your recovery question though still not directly.Chaka - how does this 1 day fast affect recovery from exercise? how does it affect you if you exercise that same day?
also, very cranky.I'll submit this as exhibit BThanks Edison, I'm sure everyone was expecting me to lose 40lbs in 4 weeks.his diet updates seem to have been getting more desperate, so I expect the weight loss planed off a bit.
such a romanticWell, this thread inspired me to get a Vitamix for the wife for Valentine's Day. Sprung for the Professional Series 750. Wife freaked out at the expense, but I'm pretty psyched to give it a spin. Looking forward to using it for homemade salsa and soups.
She's going to sit on it later.such a romanticWell, this thread inspired me to get a Vitamix for the wife for Valentine's Day. Sprung for the Professional Series 750. Wife freaked out at the expense, but I'm pretty psyched to give it a spin. Looking forward to using it for homemade salsa and soups.
She's going to sit on it later.such a romanticWell, this thread inspired me to get a Vitamix for the wife for Valentine's Day. Sprung for the Professional Series 750. Wife freaked out at the expense, but I'm pretty psyched to give it a spin. Looking forward to using it for homemade salsa and soups.
Please write a song about that..."Hey, fattie...try drinking a salad once in a while."such a romanticWell, this thread inspired me to get a Vitamix for the wife for Valentine's Day. Sprung for the Professional Series 750. Wife freaked out at the expense, but I'm pretty psyched to give it a spin. Looking forward to using it for homemade salsa and soups.
You shouldve got your wife a new bowling ballWell, this thread inspired me to get a Vitamix for the wife for Valentine's Day. Sprung for the Professional Series 750. Wife freaked out at the expense, but I'm pretty psyched to give it a spin. Looking forward to using it for homemade salsa and soups.