What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bonds just sucks... (1 Viewer)

tdoss

Footballguy
I'm so torn.

I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.

Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?

 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
I'm not sure he's 'performing' at any kind of respectable level anymore. He looked awful last week against the Braves. He was almost walking to balls in the outfield. It's amazing he's actually stolen a base this year. I guess like most of his age, he wakes up feeling a little better some days. It's a shame. In addition to the steroids, he's kind of embarrassing the game now with his pursuit of this record. If he had 700 and not 750, I wonder if he'd walk away at this point?
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
I'm not sure he's 'performing' at any kind of respectable level anymore. He looked awful last week against the Braves. He was almost walking to balls in the outfield. It's amazing he's actually stolen a base this year. I guess like most of his age, he wakes up feeling a little better some days. It's a shame. In addition to the steroids, he's kind of embarrassing the game now with his pursuit of this record. If he had 700 and not 750, I wonder if he'd walk away at this point?
:goodposting: Bonds leads the majors in OBP and OPS.
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
I'm not sure he's 'performing' at any kind of respectable level anymore. He looked awful last week against the Braves. He was almost walking to balls in the outfield. It's amazing he's actually stolen a base this year. I guess like most of his age, he wakes up feeling a little better some days. It's a shame. In addition to the steroids, he's kind of embarrassing the game now with his pursuit of this record. If he had 700 and not 750, I wonder if he'd walk away at this point?
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
I'm not sure he's 'performing' at any kind of respectable level anymore. He looked awful last week against the Braves. He was almost walking to balls in the outfield. It's amazing he's actually stolen a base this year. I guess like most of his age, he wakes up feeling a little better some days. It's a shame. In addition to the steroids, he's kind of embarrassing the game now with his pursuit of this record. If he had 700 and not 750, I wonder if he'd walk away at this point?
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
 
I'm so torn.I want to be able to sit down with my son and tell him that's he's witnessing history when Bond's hits that homer...but I just can't.Anyone else with son's feeling conflicted with this feat?
It's still history.
I agree, it is still history. I don't count myself as a Bonds fan, but I will attempt to watch when he goes to break the record. Steroids or not, he is still a great hitter and its is amazing that he is performing at this level(now) at his age. Each accomplishment in life as well as sports are not always done with people deserving of our admiration. But it is an admiration of the feat.
I'm not sure he's 'performing' at any kind of respectable level anymore. He looked awful last week against the Braves. He was almost walking to balls in the outfield. It's amazing he's actually stolen a base this year. I guess like most of his age, he wakes up feeling a little better some days. It's a shame. In addition to the steroids, he's kind of embarrassing the game now with his pursuit of this record. If he had 700 and not 750, I wonder if he'd walk away at this point?
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
He leads the NL with an OPS+ of 177. Same as A-Rod.
 
Who would you take first on your team for a pennant run from here on out?

I thought so.

 
First off...his OBP is due to te fact that some pitchers walk him out of spite. Others still don't want to risk having a ball hit 500 feet off of them. Let's not fool ourselves, people. Bonds still weighs 245 lbs. The growth hormone that he's been accused of taking is still not detectable by the current testing methods. Unlike Giambi and Pudge, who have shrunk considerably since testing began, Bonds is still huge. His skills may have eroded greatly, but when he does finally catch up with a fastball, it still goes a mile.

Let's not get too obssessed with OBP. At least not in Bonds' case. All you have to do is watch him play to realize that he is simply playing it out until he breaks the record. He is slow. He limps around. He may have a high fielding percentage, but he let's tons of base hits fall that others would have caught.

As I've mentioned on another board, I am rooting for him to hit his tiebreaking and record setting home runs on teh road. What a fitting end to this mockery it would be to watch him circle the bases to a chorus of boos.

 
First off...his OBP is due to te fact that some pitchers walk him out of spite. Others still don't want to risk having a ball hit 500 feet off of them. Let's not fool ourselves, people. Bonds still weighs 245 lbs. The growth hormone that he's been accused of taking is still not detectable by the current testing methods. Unlike Giambi and Pudge, who have shrunk considerably since testing began, Bonds is still huge. His skills may have eroded greatly, but when he does finally catch up with a fastball, it still goes a mile.

Let's not get too obssessed with OBP. At least not in Bonds' case. All you have to do is watch him play to realize that he is simply playing it out until he breaks the record. He is slow. He limps around. He may have a high fielding percentage, but he let's tons of base hits fall that others would have caught.

As I've mentioned on another board, I am rooting for him to hit his tiebreaking and record setting home runs on teh road. What a fitting end to this mockery it would be to watch him circle the bases to a chorus of boos.
Yea, it sucks to have a guy on your team that gets on base in half his at bats. There's almost no value in that. :thumbup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
Bonds EQA: .364Chipper Jones EQA (2nd NL): .346A-Rod EQA (1st AL): .334Magglio Ordonez EQA (2nd AL): .331Dismiss it all you want. I don't like Bonds either, but to say he's an embarrassment shows unbelievable ignorance.
He's not an embarassment, but if you factor in how much he does and doesn't play, Bonds is the 15th most valuable hitter in baseball (using VORP).
 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.

 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.
He's only displaying the flaws in misusing statistics. If you use a rate statistic where a counting statistic is more appropriate, things won't look right.
 
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
Bonds EQA: .364Chipper Jones EQA (2nd NL): .346A-Rod EQA (1st AL): .334Magglio Ordonez EQA (2nd AL): .331Dismiss it all you want. I don't like Bonds either, but to say he's an embarrassment shows unbelievable ignorance.
He's not an embarassment, but if you factor in how much he does and doesn't play, Bonds is the 15th most valuable hitter in baseball (using VORP).
Using VORP to account for playing time is fine, but when he's on the field, he's still absolutely dominant. Jesus, he plays 4 times a week, and *even including days off*, he's the fifteenth best hitter in baseball?Honestly, I think that's MORE impressive than the EQA.
 
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
Bonds EQA: .364Chipper Jones EQA (2nd NL): .346A-Rod EQA (1st AL): .334Magglio Ordonez EQA (2nd AL): .331Dismiss it all you want. I don't like Bonds either, but to say he's an embarrassment shows unbelievable ignorance.
He's not an embarassment, but if you factor in how much he does and doesn't play, Bonds is the 15th most valuable hitter in baseball (using VORP).
Using VORP to account for playing time is fine, but when he's on the field, he's still absolutely dominant. Jesus, he plays 4 times a week, and *even including days off*, he's the fifteenth best hitter in baseball?Honestly, I think that's MORE impressive than the EQA.
ok
 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.
He's only displaying the flaws in misusing statistics. If you use a rate statistic where a counting statistic is more appropriate, things won't look right.
I'd argue all day that VORP, showing him at #15, further proves my point.And yes, when he's on the field, he's one of, if not THE best players in baseball. You want traditional statistics? His OBP is .493. He gets on base HALF the times he's at the plate. If you can't understand how valuable that is...even taking away his power, then I'm pretty much done here.
 
Heh. Respectable level? Statistically, he's STILL the best player in baseball...even this year...even including defense.
Please.
Bonds EQA: .364Chipper Jones EQA (2nd NL): .346A-Rod EQA (1st AL): .334Magglio Ordonez EQA (2nd AL): .331Dismiss it all you want. I don't like Bonds either, but to say he's an embarrassment shows unbelievable ignorance.
He's not an embarassment, but if you factor in how much he does and doesn't play, Bonds is the 15th most valuable hitter in baseball (using VORP).
Using VORP to account for playing time is fine, but when he's on the field, he's still absolutely dominant. Jesus, he plays 4 times a week, and *even including days off*, he's the fifteenth best hitter in baseball?Honestly, I think that's MORE impressive than the EQA.
ok
You clearly disagree, so tell me why. :wall: I've been wrong before...we're all here for a distraction at work. Give me one.
 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.
He's only displaying the flaws in misusing statistics. If you use a rate statistic where a counting statistic is more appropriate, things won't look right.
I'd argue all day that VORP, showing him at #15, further proves my point.And yes, when he's on the field, he's one of, if not THE best players in baseball. You want traditional statistics? His OBP is .493. He gets on base HALF the times he's at the plate. If you can't understand how valuable that is...even taking away his power, then I'm pretty much done here.
Well, he's been a fairly unique case this year. He still gets alot of calls and people wont challenge him. I think that is partly because of the animosity, partly not wanting to be a part of history and partly because the Giants offense is god awful.
 
Well, he's been a fairly unique case this year. He still gets alot of calls and people wont challenge him.
Granted. I never argued that he was the most talented player in baseball this year, just that he's been the best contributor to his team (at least, that's what I mean by "best").Pitchers are absolutely moronic for not pitching to the guy--although he has an incredible ability to get on base, and take pitches he doesn't want to hit. That's a very, very important talent that few people have. But, I do agree that pitchers are extremely wrong in the way they pitch to him. He's not the Barry of the early part of the century.
 
Giants offense is god awful.
As for this, walking Bonds is still a horrid idea.I think it was James (or someone at BP) who ran a simulation with Ruth in his prime, and a bunch of replacement players. In one scenario, pitchers actually pitched to Ruth (used his normal stats), and in the other, the pitchers walked him in every at-bat.Obviously, you know the results...the team with the "walking Ruth" won FAR more games in a large, large sample-size simulation than the team who had Ruth hitting normally. The rate at which good hitters are "unintentionally, but intentionally walked" is unbearably too high.
 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.
He's only displaying the flaws in misusing statistics. If you use a rate statistic where a counting statistic is more appropriate, things won't look right.
I'd argue all day that VORP, showing him at #15, further proves my point.And yes, when he's on the field, he's one of, if not THE best players in baseball. You want traditional statistics? His OBP is .493. He gets on base HALF the times he's at the plate. If you can't understand how valuable that is...even taking away his power, then I'm pretty much done here.
If everyone on the team got on base 50% of the time, they'd have about 27 baserunners a game. That sounds pretty sweet.
 
Giants offense is god awful.
As for this, walking Bonds is still a horrid idea.I think it was James (or someone at BP) who ran a simulation with Ruth in his prime, and a bunch of replacement players. In one scenario, pitchers actually pitched to Ruth (used his normal stats), and in the other, the pitchers walked him in every at-bat.Obviously, you know the results...the team with the "walking Ruth" won FAR more games in a large, large sample-size simulation than the team who had Ruth hitting normally. The rate at which good hitters are "unintentionally, but intentionally walked" is unbearably too high.
Not saying its the right thing to do, just that its part of the reason his OBP is so high.
 
Giants offense is god awful.
As for this, walking Bonds is still a horrid idea.I think it was James (or someone at BP) who ran a simulation with Ruth in his prime, and a bunch of replacement players. In one scenario, pitchers actually pitched to Ruth (used his normal stats), and in the other, the pitchers walked him in every at-bat.Obviously, you know the results...the team with the "walking Ruth" won FAR more games in a large, large sample-size simulation than the team who had Ruth hitting normally. The rate at which good hitters are "unintentionally, but intentionally walked" is unbearably too high.
Not saying its the right thing to do, just that its part of the reason his OBP is so high.
And I don't disagree with you.This is a boring argument.
 
Bonds is obviously displaying flaws in some of the sabermetrics being used here. Yes, he's not playing horribly, but he's hardly the best player in baseball right now.
He's only displaying the flaws in misusing statistics. If you use a rate statistic where a counting statistic is more appropriate, things won't look right.
I'd argue all day that VORP, showing him at #15, further proves my point.And yes, when he's on the field, he's one of, if not THE best players in baseball. You want traditional statistics? His OBP is .493. He gets on base HALF the times he's at the plate. If you can't understand how valuable that is...even taking away his power, then I'm pretty much done here.
this is a great point. I think on base percentage is as underated of a stat as you can find. RBIs depend so much on people around youbatting average can be affected by where you are in the lineup and how good your team is alsostrikeouts arent as bad if you play on a team that doesnt get a lot of gujys on baseThe fact that he is walked so many times intentionally pretty much sums it all up.
 
OPS is probably the one stat closest to describing how good a player is in baseball. But it is not perfect because it includes OBP which is not a perfect stat. Pitchers pitch around Bonds a ton because he has nobody protecting him in the lineup. If you took out his intentional walks plus his unintentional intentional walks then youd get a better indicator of a players OBP. Dont get me wrong Bonds' would still be pretty high most likely but not to the ridiculous nature it is now.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top